Porselen laminate veneerler hakkındaki YouTube videolarının değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2021, , 19 - 27, 01.01.2021

Sezgi Cinel Şahin

https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.757397

Cited By: 2

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, estetik dental uygulamalardan biri olan porselen laminate veneer uygulamaları hakkındaki YouTube videolarının içeriğini değerlendirmektir.

Gereç ve Yöntem: ‘Porselen laminate veneer’ anahtar sözcükleri kullanılarak YouTube’da sistematik bir arama yapıldı. Videolar yükleyiciye göre sınıflandırılıp, bilgi içerikleri değerlendirildi. Video bilgileri-kalite indeksi aracılığıyla video kalitesi hesaplandı. Ayrıca videoların etkileşim ve görüntülenme oranları da analiz edildi. Elde edilen veriler, istatistiksel olarak incelendi ve anlamlılık p<0.01 ve p<0.05 düzeylerinde değerlendirildi.

Bulgular: Çalışma kapsamında taranan ilk 120 video içerisinden 70 video çalışmaya dahil edildi. Video yükleyicilerine göre dağılımlar değerlendirildiğinde, en fazla videonun TV kanalları (n=17, %25.3) tarafından yüklendiği görüldü. Video yükleyicileri değişmeksizin, tüm videoların bilgi içeriğinin yetersiz olduğu tespit edildi. Protetik diş tedavisi uzmanları tarafından yüklenen videoların daha fazla izlendiği ve etkileşim oranlarının istatistiksel olarak daha yüksek olduğu (p<0.05), ancak bu videoların bilgi içeriği açısından diğer yükleyicilere ait videolardan yetersiz olduğu tespit edildi.

Sonuç: Porselen laminate veneerler ile ilgili YouTube videolarının bilgi içerikleri yetersiz bulundu. En çok görüntülenen YouTube videoları, protetik diş tedavisi uzmanlarına ait olsa da bu videoların içeriklerinin bilgi akışı ve video kalitesi gibi parametreler açısından diğer yükleyicilere göre daha yetersiz olduğu tespit edildi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

dental laminat, dental porselen, diş kaplaması, internet, sosyal medya

Evaluation of YouTube videos on porcelain laminate veneers

Öz

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the content of YouTube videos about porcelain laminate veneer applications, which is one of the esthetic dental applications.

Materials and Method: A systematic search was made on YouTube using ‘porcelain laminate veneer’ keywords. The videos were classified according to the uploader and their information content was evaluated. Video quality was calculated by using the video information-quality index. The interaction and viewing rates of the videos were also analyzed. The data obtained were statistically analyzed and the significance was evaluated at p<0.01 and p<0.05.

Results: Among the first 120 videos scanned within the scope of the study, 70 videos were included in the study. When the distributions were evaluated according to the video uploaders, it was seen that most videos were uploaded by TV channels (n=17, 25.3%). Regardless of the video uploader, all videos were found to have insufficient information content. It was found that the videos uploaded by prosthetic dentists were watched more, and the interaction rates were significantly higher (p<0.05) than the others; but in terms of information content, these videos were less satisfactory than the videos of other uploaders.

Conclusion: The information content of YouTube videos on porcelain laminate veneers was found to be insufficient. Although the most viewed YouTube videos belonged to prosthodontists, the content of these videos was found to be inadequate in terms of parameters such as information flow and video quality.

Anahtar Kelimeler

dental laminate, dental porcelain, dental veneer, Internet, social media

Kaynakça

• Erkun HF, Bankoğlu Güngör M, Yılmaz H. Porselen laminate veneerler. Atatürk Univ Diş Hek Fak Derg 2016;16:170-183.
• Calamia JR. Etched porcelain facial veneers: A new treatment modality based on scientific and clinical evidence. NY J Dent 1983;53:255-9.
• Horn HR. A new lamination: Porcelain bonded to enamel. NY State Dent J 1983;49:401-3.
• Morita RK, Hayashida MF, Pupo YM, Berger G, Reggiani RD, Betiol EAG. Minimally invasive laminate veneers: Clinical aspects in treatment planning and cementation procedures. Case Rep Dent 2016;2016:1839793.
• Radz GM. Minimum thickness anterior porcelain restorations. Dental Clin N Am 2011;55:353-70.
• Nobrega AS, Silva Signoreli AF, Quinelli Mazzaro JV, Zavanelli RA, Zavanelli AC. Minimally invasive preparations: Contact lenses. J Adv Clin Res Insights 2015;2:176-9.
• Bayazıt EÖ, Karabıyık M. Chairside restorations of maxillary anterior teeth with CAD/CAM porcelain laminate veneers produced by digital workflow: A case report with a step to facilitate restoration design. Case Rep Dent 2019;2019:6731905.
• Morimoto S, Albanesi R, Sesma N, Agra C, Braga M. Main clinical outcomes of feldspathic porcelain and glass-ceramic laminate veneers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and complication rates. Int J Prosthodont 2016;29:38-49.
• Hong N, Yang H, Li J, Wu S, Li Y. Effect of preparation designs on the prognosis of porcelain laminate veneers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Dent 2017;42:197-213.
• Noll D, Mahon B, Shroff B, Carrico C, Lindauer SJ. Twitter analysis of the orthodontic patient experience with braces vs Invisalign. Angle Orthod 2017;87:377-83.
• AlGhamdi KM, Moussa NA. Internet use by the public to search for health-related information. Int J Med Inform 2012;81:363-73.
• Al-Silwadi FM, Gill DS, Petrie A, Cunningham SJ. Effect of social media in improving knowledge among patients having fixed appliance orthodontic treatment: A single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;148:231-7.
• Nagpal SJS, Karimianpour A, Mukhija D, Mohan D, Brateanu A. YouTube videos as a source of medical information during the Ebola hemorrhagic fever epidemic. Springerplus 2015;4:1-5.
• Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis-A wakeup call? J Rheumatol 2012;39:899-903.
• Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J 2015;21:173-94.
• Jorgensen G. Social media basics for orthodontists. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141:510-5.
• ElKarmi R, Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Scully C. YouTube as a source for parents’ education on early childhood caries. Int J Paediatr Dent 2017;27:437-43.
• Yavuz MC, Buyuk SK, Genc E. Does YouTubeTM offer high quality information? Evaluation of accelerated orthodontics videos. Ir J Med Sci 2020;189:505-9.
• Gaş S, Zincir Ö, Bozkurt AP. Are YouTube videos useful for patients ınterested in botulinum toxin for bruxism? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;77:1776-83.
• Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis 2016;22:202-8.
• Hegarty E, Campbell C, Grammatopoulos E, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. YouTubeTM as an information resource for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod 2017;44:90-6.
• Yilmaz H, Aydin M. YouTubeTM video content analysis on space maintainers. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2020;38:34-40.
• Menziletoglu D, Guler AY, Isik BK. Are YouTube videos related to dental implant useful for patient education? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; S2468-7855(20)30034-3.
• Abukaraky A, Hamdan AA, Ameera MN, Nasief M, Hassona Y. Quality of YouTube TM videos on dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2018;23:463-8.
• Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One 2013;8:82469.
• Sampson M, Cumber J, Li C, Pound CM, Fuller A, Harrison D. A systematic review of methods for studying consumer health YouTube videos, with implications for systematic reviews. PeerJ 2013;12:147-63.
• Albanesi RB, Pigozzo MN, Sesma N, Laganá DC, Morimoto S. Incisal coverage or not in ceramic laminate veneers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2016;52:1-7.
• Pons-Fuster E, Ruiz Roca J, Tvarijonaviciute A, López-Jornet P. YouTube information about diabetes and oral healthcare. Odontology 2020;108:84-90.
• Carneiro B, Dizon DS. Prostate cancer social media: In YouTube we trust? Eur Urol 2019;75:568-9.
• Leong AY, Sanghera R, Jhajj J, Desai N, Jammu BS, Makowsky MJ. Is YouTube useful as a source of health information for adults with type 2 diabetes? A South Asian perspective. Can J Diabetes 2018;42:395-403.
• Koller U, Waldstein W, Schatz KD, Windhager R. YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis. Int Orthop 2016;40:1995-2002.
• Kumar N, Pandey A, Venkatraman A, Garg N. Are video sharing Web sites a useful source of information on hypertension? J Am Soc Hypertens 2014;8:481-90.
• Knösel M, Jung K. Informational value and bias of videos related to orthodontics screened on a video-sharing Web site. Angle Orthod 2011;81:532-9.
• Ozdede M, Peker I. Analysis of dentistry YouTube videos related to COVID-19. Braz Dent J 2020;31:392-8.