Zeytin karasuyunun membran filtrasyon yöntemleriyle arıtılması sürecinde oluşan filtre çamurunun biyogaza dönüşüm veriminin artırılması

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 41 Sayı: 1 , 401 - 412 , 31.03.2026

Hasan Ateş , Fadime Taner

https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1767926

https://izlik.org/JA72AM94JS

Öz

Bu çalışmada, üç fazlı sistemle üretilen zeytin karasuyunun taşınabilir membran arıtma sisteminde arıtılması sonucu oluşan karasu membran filtre çamuruna (KMFÇ) uygulanan asidik (H3PO4, HNO3), bazik (NaOH), geri soğutucu altında termal ve hibrit termokimyasal önişlemlerin biyogaz üretim verimine etkisi araştırılmıştır. Termal önişlemler, 100 °C’de 1, 2 ve 3 saat süreyle gerçekleştirilirken; kimyasal önişlemler, KMFÇ’deki toplam katı madde kütlesinin %10’u oranında asidik ve bazik kimyasallar eklenerek uygulanmıştır. Önişlem uygulanan numunelere anaerobik fermentasyon yapılmış ve en yüksek hacimsel biyogaz ile metan üretim veriminin yalnızca HNO3 ile uygulanan önişlemde elde edildiği belirlenmiştir. 30 günlük ölçümler sonucunda 217,46 mL biyogaz ve 173,85 mL metan üretilmiştir. Biyogaz ve metan üretim verimleri sırasıyla 1,023 mL g⁻¹ TKM⁻¹ gün⁻¹ ve 0,818 mL g⁻¹ TKM⁻¹ gün⁻¹ olarak hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, HNO3 önişleminin KMFÇ’den biyogaz üretimini artırmada etkili bir yöntem olduğunu ve ileriki çalışmalara rehberlik edebileceğini göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

zeytin karasuyu , membran filtrasyon , ters ozmoz , nanofiltrasyon , anaerobik fermentasyon

Teşekkür

Bu çalışma, Mersin Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Çevre Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı’nda, Prof. Dr. Fadime Taner danışmanlığında yürütülen yüksek lisans tezinden üretilmiştir. Çalışmanın yürütülmesindeki katkılarından dolayı Prof. Dr. Fadime Taner’e teşekkür ederim.

Kaynakça

• 1. Paraskeva P., Diamadopoulos E., Technologies for olive mill wastewater (OMW) treatment: A review, Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 81 (9), 1475–1485, 2006.
• 2. Oktav E., Ebru Ç.Ç., Şengül F., Treatment of olive oil mill wastewaters with chemical treatment methods, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Engineering Journal of Science and Engineering, 5 (3), 11–21, 2003.
• 3. Gök O., Mesutoğlu Ö.Ç., Olive pomace as a low-cost adsorbent for the removal heavy metals, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 32 (2), 507–516, 2017.
• 4. Çelikler C., Varol M., Investigation of agglomeration for the co-combustion of olive cake with high-sulfur lignites in a bubbling fluidized bed combustor, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 37 (2), 921–937, 2022.
• 5. Avcı B.B., Erkan G., The investigation of possible use of olive oil production wastes in polyamide (6.6) dyeing, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 39 (3), 1673–1692, 2024.
• 6. Ochando-Pulido J.M., Vuppala S., García-López A.I., Martínez-Férez A., A focus on anaerobic digestion and co-digestion strategies for energy recovery and digestate valorization from olive-oil mill solid and liquid by-products, Separation and Purification Technology, 333, 2024.
• 7. Boari G., Brunetti A., Passino R., Rozzi A., Anaerobic digestion of olive oil mill wastewaters, Agricultural Wastes, 10(3), 161–175, 1984.
• 8. Rozzi A., Malpei F., Treatment and disposal of olive mill effluents, International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 38 (3-4), 135–144, 1996.
• 9. Chaari L., Elloumi N., Mseddi S., Gargouri K., Bourouina B., Mechichi T., Kallel M., Effects of olive mill wastewater on soil nutrients availability, Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Research, 2 (1), 175–183, 2014.
• 10. Anh H.Q., Watanabe I., Tomioka K., Minh T.B., Takahashi S., Characterization of 209 polychlorinated biphenyls in street dust from northern Vietnam: Contamination status, potential sources, and risk assessment, Science of the Total Environment, 652, 345–355, 2019.
• 11. Rifi S. K., Aguelmous A., Fels L. E., Hafidi M., Souabi S., Effectiveness assessment of olive mill wastewater treatment by combined process: Natural flotation and anaerobic-aerobic biodegradation, Water and Environment Journal, 35, 986–997, 2021.
• 12. Abbassi B.E., Chemical treatment and enhancement of bioavailability of olive mill wastewater, Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 44 (3), 307–312, 2009.
• 13. Fiorentino A., Gentili A., Isidori M., Lavorgna M., Parrella A., Temussi F., Olive oil mill wastewater treatment using a chemical and biological approach, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52 (16), 5151–5154, 2004.
• 14. Xiao Y., Roberts D.J., A review of anaerobic treatment of saline wastewater, Environmental Technology, 31 (8-9), 1025–1043, 2010.
• 15. Mei W., Li L., Zhao Q., Li X., Wang Z., Gao Q., Wei L., Wang K., Jiang J., A critical review of effects, action mechanisms and mitigation strategies of salinity in anaerobic digestion, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 208, 2025.
• 16. Qian C., He S., Li X., Wu S., Wang D., Yang C., Effects of salinity on anaerobic digestion: Performance, microbial physiology, and community dynamics, Bioresource Technology, 431, 132619, 2025.
• 17. Güneş S.T., Akdemir E.O., Kinetic evaluation of organic matter removal in olive mill wastewater treatment using microfiltration membrane, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 39 (1), 287–298, 2023.
• 18. Elalami D., Latique S., Tayibi S., Oulkhir A., Drissi B.E., Barakat A., Oukarroum A., Taarji N., Lyamlouli K., Sequential co-processing of olive mill wastewater and organic residues by anaerobic co-digestion and pyrolysis for the generation of bioadsorbent and low-cost media for microalgae cultivation, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 186, 76–88, 2024.
• 19. Yadav K., Sircar A., Fundamentals and developments of compressed biogas in city gas distribution network in India: A review, Petroleum Research, 7 (3), 409–418, 2022.
• 20. Kheiredine B., Derbal K., Charbit K., Maryem A., Biogas production by an anaerobic co-digestion process from olive mill waste: Effect of ultrasonic pre-treatment, Desalination and Water Treatment, 246, 139–145, 2022.
• 21. Micoli L., Di Rauso Simeone G., Turco M., Toscano G., Rao M.A., Biochar enhances anaerobic digestion of olive mill wastewater, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 99, 85–90, 2023.
• 22. Sarıkaya F., Erdirençelebi D., Optimization of anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge with fruit and vegetable wastes (FVW): Methane production potential, process performance and stabilized sludge quality, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 37 (3), 1493–1508, 2022.
• 23. Bai X., Grassino M., Jensen P.D., Effect of alkaline pre-treatment on hydrolysis rate and methane production during anaerobic digestion of paunch solid waste, Waste Management, 171, 303–312, 2023.
• 24. Elalami D., Oukarroum A., Barakat A., Anaerobic digestion and agronomic applications of microalgae for its sustainable valorization, RSC Adv., 11, 26444, 2021.
• 25. Ateş H., Taner F., Enhancing biogas production efficiency through physical, chemical, thermal, and hybrid pre-treatment of olive mill wastewater, Bioresource Technology Reports, 31, 2025.
• 26. APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st Edition, APHA, AWWA, WEF, Washington D.C., 2005.
• 27. Singleton V.L., Rossi J.A., Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 16, 144–158, 1965.
• 28. Farahmand A., Ghorani B., Emadzadeh B., Sarabi-Jamab M., Emadzadeh M., Modiri A., Mendes A.C., Double protection of probiotics in alginate hydrogel through emulsification incorporated with freeze drying and coaxial wet-electrospraying: Survivability and targeted delivery, LWT, 204, 116459, 2024.
• 29. Alibardi L., Cossu R., Effects of carbohydrate, protein and lipid content of organic waste on hydrogen production and fermentation products, Waste Management, 47, 69–77, 2016.
• 30. Abdel-Hadi, A simple apparatus for biogas quality determination, Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 25 (3), 1055–1066, 2008.
• 31. Turnell Suruagy V.M., Ross A.B., Babatunde A., Influence of microwave temperature and power on the biomethanation of food waste under mesophilic anaerobic conditions, Journal of Environmental Management, 341, 117900, 2023.
• 32. Wang H.Y., Qian H., Yao W.R., Melanoidins produced by the Maillard reaction: Structure and biological activity, Food Chemistry, 128 (3), 573–584, 2011.
• 33. Saha B., Khwairakpam M., Kalamdhad A.S., Thermal pre-treatment – A prerequisite for the reduction of hydrolysis stage during anaerobic digestion of Ageratum conyzoides, Materials Science for Energy Technologies, 4, 34–45, 2021.
• 34. Ahn J.H., Shin S.G., Hwang S., Effect of microwave irradiation on the disintegration and acidogenesis of municipal secondary sludge, Chemical Engineering Journal, 153 (1-3), 145–150, 2009.
• 35. Boubaker F., Cheikh Ridha B., Anaerobic co-digestion of olive mill wastewater with olive mill solid waste in a tubular digester at mesophilic temperature, Bioresource Technology, 98 (4), 769–774, 2007.
• 36. Dareioti M.A., Dokianakis S.N., Stamatelatou K., Zafiri C., Kornaros M., Exploitation of olive mill wastewater and liquid cow manure for biogas production, Waste Management, 30 (10), 1841–1848, 2010.
• 37. Hendriks A.T.W.M., Zeeman G., Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass, Bioresource Technology, 100 (1), 10–18, 2009.
• 38. Amin F.R., Khalid H., Zhang H., u Rahman S., Zhang R., Liu G., Chen C., Pretreatment methods of lignocellulosic biomass for anaerobic digestion, AMB Express, 7 (72), 2017.
• 39. Wang S., Hou X., Su H., Exploration of the relationship between biogas production and microbial community under high salinity conditions, Scientific Reports, 7, 1–10, 2017.
• 40. Mustafa H.M., Abdulrahman B., Dahiru S.M., Production of bio-ethanol from sulfuric acid pretreated rice husk using co-culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Science World Journal, 14 (1), 107–110, 2019
• 41. Tiwari S., Yadav J., Gaur R., Singh R., Verma T., Yadav J.S., Pandey P.K., Rath S.K., Pandey S.K., Rath S.K., Multistep Structural and Chemical Evaluation of Sugarcane Baggase, Pretreated With Alkali for Enhancing the Enzymatic Saccharification by Cellulase and Xylanase of the Pseudomonas sp. CVB-10 (MK443365) and Bacillus paramycoides T4 (MN370035) Mix-Culture S, Front. Energy Res., 9, 1–13, 2022.
• 42. Li Y., Jin Y., Effects of thermal pretreatment on acidification phase during two-phase batch anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste, Renewable Energy, 77 (C), 550–557, 2015.
• 43. Cubero-Cardoso J., Llamas M., Trujillo-Reyes Á., Fernández-Prior Á., Rodríguez-Gutiérrez G., Assessing the potential of olive mill solid waste as feedstock for methane and volatile fatty acids production via anaerobic bioprocesses, New Biotechnology, 84, 77–84, 2024.
• 44. Messineo A., Maniscalco M.P., Volpe R., Biomethane recovery from olive mill residues through anaerobic digestion: A review of the state of the art technology, Science of the Total Environment, 703, 135508, 2020.
• 45. Azbar N., Keskin T., Çatalkaya E.C., Improvement in anaerobic degradation of olive mill effluent (OME) by chemical pretreatment using batch systems, Biochemical Engineering Journal, 38 (3), 379–383, 2008.
• 46. Kim I., Lee B., Park J.Y., Choi S.A., Han J.I., Effect of nitric acid on pretreatment and fermentation for enhancing ethanol production of rice straw, Carbohydrate Polymers, 99, 563–567, 2014.
• 47. Zhang R., Liu F., Liu H., Fast acidogenic fermentation of corn stover through a two-step method: Nitric acid hydrolysis combined with the fermentation of hydrolysate, Bioresources, 8 (3), 4193–4207, 2013.
• 48. Obileke K.C., Makaka G., Tangwe S., Mukumba P., Improvement of biogas yields in an anaerobic digestion process via optimization technique, Environmental Development and Sustainability, 27, 15025–15051, 2025.
• 49. Nugraha W.D., Syafrudin, Keumala C.F., Matin H.H.A., Budiyono, The effect of acid pre-treatment using acetic acid and nitric acid in the production of biogas from rice husk during solid state anaerobic digestion (SS-AD), E3S Web of Conferences, 31, 01006, 2018.
• 50. Siciliano A., Stillitano M.A., De Rosa S., Biogas production from wet olive mill wastes pretreated with hydrogen peroxide in alkaline conditions, Renewable Energy, 85, 903–916, 2016.
• 51. Rincón B., Borja R., Martín M.A., Martín A., Kinetic study of the methanogenic step of a two-stage anaerobic digestion process treating olive mill solid residue, Chemical Engineering Journal, 160 (1), 215–219, 2010.
• 52. Tufaner F., Investigation of Anaerobic Treatability and Biogas Production Potential of Olive Mill Wastewater, BEU Journal of Science, 9 (4), 1766–1778, 2020.
• 53. Hamdi M., Anaerobic digestion of olive mill wastewater, Process Biochemistry, 31 (2), 105–110, 1995.
• 54. Dermeche S., Nadour M., Larroche C., Moulti-Mati F., Michaud P., Olive mill wastes: Biochemical characterizations and valorization strategies, Process Biochemistry, 48 (10), 1532–1552, 2013.
• 55. Genethliou C., Kornaros M., Dailianis S., Biodegradation of olive mill wastewater phenolic compounds in a thermophilic anaerobic upflow packed bed reactor and assessment of their toxicity in digester effluents, Journal of Environmental Management, 255, 109882, 2020.
• 56. Martinez-Garcia G., Johnson A.C., Bachmann R.T., Williams C.J., Burgoyne A., Edyvean R.G.J., Anaerobic treatment of olive mill wastewater and piggery effluents fermented with Candida tropicalis, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 164 (2-3), 1398–1405, 2009.
• 57. Jamrah A., Al-Zghoul T.M., Darwish M.M., A comprehensive review of combined processes for olive mill wastewater treatments, Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 8, 100493, 2023.