İŞ DEĞERLENDİRME SÜRECİNDE ANALİTİK HİYERARŞİ PROSESİ VE UYGULAMASI

Öz

Ücret yönetimi kısa dönemde işletme verimliliğini, uzun dönemde işletme faaliyetlerinin devamını etkileyen önemli bir konudur. Bu ücretin hem personel hem de organizasyon açısından taşıdığı önemden kaynaklanmaktadır. Çalışanlar arasında dengeli bir ücret yapısı kurulmaz ise organizasyonda sürekli çatışma yaşanır. Dengeli bir ücret yapısının kurulması ise iş değerlendirme ile mümkündür. Bu çalışmada Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) ile bir iş değerlendirme sistemi tasarlanmış ve geliştirilen sistem bir elektrik işletmesindeki farklı işlerin değerlendirilmesinde kullanılmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İş değerlendirme, AHP.

Kaynakça

1. Özgen, H., Öztürk, A., Yalçın, A., İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Adana, Nobel Kitabevi, 2002.
2. Kaynak, T., ve ark., İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Yayınları, No :276, 1998.
3. Lytle, C.W., Job Evaluations Methods, New York, The Ronald Press Company, 1964.
4. Livy, B., Job Evaluation Critical Review, London, George Lenwin Ltd., 1975.
5. Kurt, M., İş Analizi ve Değerlendirme Ders Notları, Gazi Üniversitesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü, 1993.
6. Oktay, A.G., “Ana Çizgileriyle İş Değerlen-dirme Çalışmaları”, Verimlilik Dergisi, 92(2), 65-85, 1992.
7. Gemalmaz, O., Analitik İş Değerlendirme Puan Yöntemi, Ankara, MPM Yayınları, No: 318, 1995.
8. Saaty, T., “The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, McGraw-Hill International Book Company, USA,1980.

9. Schniederjans, M. J., and Wilson, R.L., “Using the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for information system project selection”, Information & Management, 20(5), 333-342, 1991.
10. Suresh, N.C., and Kaparthi, S., “Flexible automation investments: A synthesis of two multi-objective modeling approaches”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 22(3), 257-272, 1992.
11. Ehie, I.C., and Benjamin, C.O., “An integrated multiobjective planning model: A case study of the Zambian copper mining industry”, European Journal of Operational Research, 68(2), 160-172, 1993.
12. Myint, S., and Tabucanon, M.T., “A multiple-criteria approach to machine selection for flexible manufacturing systems”, International Journal of Production Economics, 33(1-3), 121-131, 1994.
13. Ramanathan, R., and Ganesh, L. S., “Energy alternatives for lighting in households: an evaluation using an integrated goal programming-AHP model”, Energy, 20(1), 63-72, 1995.
14. Ramanathan, R. and Ganesh, L. S.,”Energy resource allocation incorporating qualitative and quantitative criteria: An integrated model using goal programming and AHP”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 29(3), 197-218, 1995.
15. Schniederjans, M.J., and Garvin, T., “Using the analytic hierarchy process and multi-objective programming for the selection of cost drivers in activity-based costing”, European Journal of Operational Research, 100(1), 72-80, 1997.
16. Badri, M. A., “Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location-allocation problem”, International Journal of Production Economics, 62(3), 237-248, 1999.
17. Badri, M. A., “A combined AHP–GP model for quality control systems”, International Journal of Production Economics, 72(1), 27-40, 2001.
18. Bowen, W.M., “Subjective judgements and data envelopment analysis in site selection”, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 14(2), 133-144, 1990.
19. Shang, J., and Sueyoshi, T., “A unified framework for the selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System”, European Journal of Operational Research, 85(2), 297-315, 1995.
20. Sinuany-Stern, Z., Mehrez, A., and Hadad, Y., “An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units”, International Transactions in Operational Research, 7(2), 109-124, 2000.
21. Yang, T., and Kuo, C., “A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem”, European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1), 128-136, 2003.
22. Mon, D., Cheng, C., and Lin, J., “Evaluating weapon system using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on entropy weight”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 62(2), 127-134, 1994.
23. Chang, D., “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP”, European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649-655, 1996.
24. Weck, M., Klocke, F., Schell, H., and Rüenauver, E., “Evaluating alternative production cycles using the extended fuzzy AHP method”, European Journal of Operational Research, 100(2), 351-366, 1997.
25. Zhu, K., Jing, Y., and Chang, D., “A discussion on Extent Analysis Method and applications of fuzzy AHP”, European Journal of Operational Research, 116(2), 450-456, 1999.
26. Kuo, R. J., Chi, S. C., and Kao, S. S., “A decision support system for locating convenience store through fuzzy AHP”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 37(1-2), 323-326, 1999.
27. Leung, L. C., and Cao, D., “On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP”, European Journal of Operational Research, 124(1), 102-113, 2000.
28. Yu, C.S., “A GP-AHP method for solving group decision-making fuzzy AHP problems”, Computers & Operations Research, 29(14), 1969-2001, 2002.
29. Bozdağ, C.E., Kahraman, C., and Ruan, D., “Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems”, Computers in Industry, 51(1), 13-29, 2003.
30. Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., and Doğan, I., “Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection”, Information Sciences, 157, 135-153, 2003.
31. Saaty, T.,”The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Processes”, MCDM XV-th International Conference, Ankara, Turkey, 2000.
32. Tam, M.C.Y., Tummala, V.M.R., ”An Application of The AHP in Vendor Selection of a Telecommunications System” The International Journal of Management Science, 29(2), 171-182, 2001.
33. Saaty, T., “The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decision Making”, Kobe, Japan, 1999.
34. Saaty, T.,”Fundamentals Of Decision Making and Priority Theory”, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, USA, 2000.
35. MESS, Metal Sanayii İş Gruplandırma Sistemi, İstanbul, 1996.
36. Liberatore, M.J., Nydick, R.L., Sanchez, P.M., “The evaluation of research papers”, Interfaces, 22(2), 92-100, 1992.