Tedarikçi Firma Seçiminde Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi Ve 0-1 Hedef Programlama Yöntemlerinin Kullanılması

Öz

Organizasyonlar, faaliyetlerini sürdürebilmek için birçok tedarikçi firmayla çalışmak zorundadırlar. Tedarikçi firmaların bir grup adayın içinden seçilmesi zor bir karar problemidir. Bu çalışmada Analitik hiyerarşi prosesi ve 0-1 Hedef Programlama
tekniklerinin genel yapısı anlatılmış ve her iki yöntemin kullanılmasıyla tedarikçi seçimine yönelik bir uygulama yapılmıştır. Bu metotların bir arada kullanılmasının etkinliği de tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Analitik hiyerarşi prosesi, 0-1 hedef programlama, tedarikçi seçimi

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS AND USE OF 0-1 GOAL PROGRAMMING METHODS IN SELECTING SUPPLIER FIRM

Öz

Organizations have to work with a lot of supplier firms in order to continue their
activities. Selecting the supplier firms from a group of candidates is a difficult
decision making problem. In this study, Analytical hierarchy process and general
structure of 0-1 goal programming techniques are presented and an application to
select supplier is performed using the two methods. Using the two methods together
is also discussed in this study. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Analytical hierarchy process,0-1 goal programming,supplier selection

Kaynakça

1. Montgomery, D.C., Johnson, L.A., Forecasting and Time Series Analysis,
2. McGraw-Hill, USA, 1976.
3. Kutay, F., Zaman Serilerinde Tahmin Teknikleri ve Box-Jenkins Modelleri,
4. Ders Notları, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara, 1989.
5. Dizdar, E.N., Üretim Sistemlerinde Olası İş Kazaları İçin Bir Erken Uyarı
6. Modeli, Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 1998.
7. Vargas L.G., “An Overview of The AHP and Its Application”, European
8. Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 48, No: 1, pp. 2-8, 1990.

9. Zahedi, F., “A Utility Approach to The AHP”, Mathematical Modelling, Vol.
10. , No: 3-5, pp. 387-395, 1987.
11. Dickson, G.W., “An Analysis of Vendor Selection Systems and Decisions”,
12. Journal of Purchasing, Vol 2, pp. 5-17, 1966.
13. Arbel, A., Seidmann A., “An Application of The AHP to Bank Strategic
14. Planning: the Mergers and Acquisitions Process”, European Journal of
15. Operational Research, Vol 27, pp. 27-37, 1990.
16. Arbel, A., Seidmann A., “Capacity Planning, Benchmarking and Evaluation of
17. Small Computer Systems”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.
18. , pp. 347-358, 1985.
19. Arbel, A., Seidmann A., “Selecting a Microcomputer For Process Control and
20. Data Acquisition”, IIE Transactions, Vol. 16, No: 1, pp. 73-80, 1984.
21. Beck M.P., Lin B.W., “Selection of Automated Office Systems: a Case Study”,
22. OMEGA, Vol 9, No: 2, 169-176, 1981.
23. Tam M.C.Y., Tummala V.M.R., “An Application of The AHP in Vendor
24. Selection of a Telecommunications System”, OMEGA, Vol. 29, No: 2, pp 171-
25. , 2001.
26. Ghodsypour, S.H., Brien, C.O., “A Decision Support System for Supplier
27. Selection Using an Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Linear
28. Programming”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 56-57,
29. pp. 199-212, 1998.
30. Zviran, M.A., “Comprehensive Methodology for Computer Family Selection”,
31. Journal Systems Software, Vol 22, pp. 17-26, 1993.
32. Bard, J.F., “Evaluating Space Station Applications of Automation and
33. Robotics”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 33, No: 2,
34. -110, 1986.
35. Yurdakul, M., İç Y.T., “AHP ve Hedef Programlama Yöntemlerinin Sağlayıcı
36. Seçimi Probleminde Kullanılması”, XXII. Ulusal YA/EM Kongresi, Gazi
37. Üniversitesi, Ankara, 2001.
38. Narasimahn R., “An Analytical Approach to Supplier Selection” Journal of
39. Purchasing and Management, Vol. 19, No 4, 27-32, 1983.
40. Nydick R.L., Hill R.P., “Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Structure the
41. Supplier Selection Procedure”, Journal of Purchasing and Management, Vol.
42. , No: 2, pp. 31-36, 1992.
43. Partovi F.Y., Burton J., Banerjee A.. “Application of Analytic Hierarchy
44. Process in Operations Management”, International Journal of Operations
45. and Production Management, Vol. 10, No: 3, pp. 5-19, 1989.
46. Yurdakul, M., İç Y.T., “Üretim Firmalarının Kredibilitesinin Belirlenmesinde
47. Analitik Hiyerarşi Yönteminin Kullanılması”, Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri
48. Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 13, No: 4, pp. 1007-1023, 2000
49. Saaty T.L., The Analytic Hierarcy Process, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1980.
50. Jones D. F., Mirrazavi S. K., and Tamiz M., “Multi-Objective Meta-Heuristics:
51. An Overview of The Current State-of-The-Art”, European Journal of
52. Operational Research, Vol. 137, No: 1, pp. 1-9, 2002.
53. Aouni B., Kettani O., “Goal Programming Model: A Glorious History and A
54. Promising Future”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 133, No
55. , pp. 225-231, 2001.
56. Uría M. V. R., Caballero R., Ruiz F, and Romero C., ”Meta-Goal
57. Programming”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 136, No 2,
58. pp. 422-429, 2002.
59. Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Ferguson R., “Optimal Estimation of Executive
60. Compensation by Linear Programming”, Management Science Vol. 1, pp. 138-
61. , 1955.
62. Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Management Models and Industrial
63. Applications of Linear Programming, Wiley, New York, 1961.
64. Ignizio J. P., Goal Programming and Extensions, Lexington Mass: Heath,
65. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1976.
66. Lee S. M., Goal Programming for Decision Analysis, Auerbach, Philadelphia,
67. -
68. Romero C., Handbook of Critical Issues in Goal Programming, Pergamon
69. Press, Oxford, 1991.
70. Romero C., “A Survey of Generalised Goal Programming” European Journal
71. of Operational Research, Vol. 25, pp. 183-191, 1986.
72. Schniederjans M. J., The Life Cycle of Goal Programming Research as
73. Recorded in Journal Articles”, Operations Research, Vol. 43, pp. 551-557,
74. -
75. Tamiz M, Jones D F., El-Darzi, “A Review of Goal Programming and Its
76. Applications”, Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 58, pp. 39-53, 1993.
77. Tamiz M., Jones D., and Romero C., “Goal Programming For Decision Making:
78. An Overview of The Current State-of-The-Art”, European Journal of
79. Operational Research, Vol. 111, No: 3, pp. 569-581, 1998.
80. Badri, M.A., “Combining The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Goal
81. Programming for Global Facility Location-AllocationPproblem”, International
82. Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 62, pp. 237-248, 1999.
83. Schniederjans M.J., and Garvin T., “Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and
84. Multi-Objective Programming for The Selection of Cost Drivers in Activity-
85. Based Costing”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 100, No:
86. , pp. 72-80, 1997.
87. Expert Choice, Mclean, VA: Decision Support Software, 1986.