BİR İŞLETMEDE TEDARİKÇİ DEĞERLENDİRME SÜRECİ İÇİN YENİ BİR MODEL TASARIMI VE UYGULAMASI

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 247 - 255, 01.03.2013

Metin Dağdeviren Nilay Dönmez Mustafa Kurt

Öz

Günümüzde doğru tedarikçilerle çalışmanın, işletmelerin hedeflerine ulaşmasındaki rolü gittikçe önem kazanmaktadır. Geçmişte alışılagelmiş yöntemlerle tedarikçi değerlendiren birçok işletme, bugün yeni değerlendirme yöntemleri arayışı içindedir. Bu çalışmada, bir işletme için yeni bir tedarikçi değerlendirme modeli geliştirilmiştir. Geliştirilen modelde Analitik Ağ Prosesi (AAP) yöntemi kullanılmıştır. AAP karar verme sürecini etkileyen faktörler arasındaki her türlü bağımlılık ve geri beslemeyi dikkate alan çok ölçütlü karar verme yöntemlerinden biridir. Önerilen tedarikçi değerlendirme modeli tedarikçi temsilcileri ile birlikte değerlendirilmiş ve belirli periyotlarla kullanılmasına karar verilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tedarikçi değerlendirme , çok kriterli analiz , analitik ağ prosesi.

DEVELOPING A NEW MODEL FOR SUPPLIER EVALUATION PROCESS FOR A COMPANY AND ITS APPLICATION

Öz

Today, the role of working with the right suppliers in achieving the goals of the companies is getting more important. Many companies, which used to evaluate their suppliers with traditional methods, are now seeking for new evaluation methods. In this study, a new supplier evaluation method is developed for a company. The Analytical Network Process (ANP) method is used in the proposed model. ANP is a multi criteria decision making method that takes into account the dependence and feedback among the factors affecting the decision
making process. The proposed supplier evaluation model is verified with the supplier representatives and it is determined to use this model periodically. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Supplier evaluation , Multi-criteria analysis , Analytical network process

Kaynakça

• Turban, A.J., Decision Support Systems and
• Intelligence Systems, Prentice Hall, New York,
• A.B.D., 1998.
• Çetinyokuş, T., Tedarikçi Performansının
• Değerlendirilmesi İçin Bir Karar Destek
• Sistemi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi,
• Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2003.
• Venkatraman, N., Ramanujam, V.,
• “Measurement of business performance in
• syrategy research: a comparison of approaches”,
• Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-
• , 1986.
• Germain, R., Droge, C., “Wholesale operations
• and vendor evaluation”, Journal of Business
• Research, 21(2), 119-129, 1990.
• Mentzer, J.T., Konrad, B.P., “An
• efficiency/effectiveness approach to logistics
• performance analysis”, Journal of Business
• Logistics, 12(1), 33-62, 1991.
• Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., Benton, C., “Vendor
• selection criteria and methods”, European
• Journal of Operational Research, 50(1), 2-18,
• -
• Limmerick, D., Cunnington, B., Managing the
• New Organization-A Blue Print for Network
• and Strategic Alliances, Business and
• Professional Publishing, Sydney, 1993.
• Chao, C., Scheuing, E.E., Ruch, W.A.,
• “Purchasing performance evaluation: an
• investigation of different perspectives”,
• International Journal of Purchasing and
• Materials Management, 29(3), 33-39, 1993.
• Mummalaneni, V., Dubas, K.M., Chao, C.,
• “Chinese purchasing managers preferences and
• trade-offs in supplier selection and performance
• evaluation”, Industrial Marketing
• Management, 25(1), 115-124, 1996.
• Krause, D.R., “Supplier development: current
• practices and outcomes”, International Journal
• of Purchasing and Materials Management,
• (2), 12-19, 1997.
• Roodhooft, F., Konings, J., “Vendor selection
• and evaluation an activity based costing
• approach”, European Journal of Operational
• Research, 96(2), 97-102, 1997.
• Humphreys, P., Mcvor, R., Chan, F., “Using
• case-based reasoning to evaluate supplier
• environmental management performance”,
• Expert Systems with Application, 25(2), 141-
• , 2003.
• Schmitz, J., Platts, K.W., “Supplier logistics
• performance measurement: Indications from a
• study in the automotive industry”, International
• Journal of Production Economics, 89(2), 231-
• , 2004.
• Hartley, J.L., Choi, T.Y., “Supplier development:
• customers as a catalyst of process change”,
• Business Horizons, 39(4), 37-44, 1996.
• Porter, A.M., “Supplier evaluation revisited”,
• Purchasing, 111(6), 58-68, 1991.
• Purdy, L., Astad, U., Safayeni, F., “Perceived
• effectiveness of the automotive supplier
• evaluation process”, International Journal of
• Operations and Production Management,
• (6), 91-103, 1994.
• Forker L.B., Ruch, W.A., Hershauer, J.C.,
• “Examining supplier improvement efforts from
• both sides”, The Journal of Supply Chain
• Management, 35(3), 40-50, 1999.
• Park, S., Hartley, J.L., Wilson, D., “Quality
• management practices and their relationship to
• buyer’s supplier ratings: a study in the Korean
• automotive industry”, Journal of Operations
• Management, 19(1), 695-712, 2001.
• Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process,
• McGraw-Hill, New York, A.B.D., 1980.
• Saaty, T.L., Decision Making with Dependence
• and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process,
• RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, A.B.D., 1996.
• Karsak, E.E., Sozer, S., Alptekin, S.E.,
• ”Production planning in quality function
• deployment using a combined analytical network
• process and goal programming approach”,
• Computers & Industrial Engineering, 44(1),
• -190, 2002.
• Chung, S.H., Lee, A.H.L., Pearn, W.L., “Analytic
• network process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator”,
• International Journal of Production
• Economics, In press, 2004.
• Meade, L.M., Sarkis, J., “Analyzing
• organizational project alternatives for agile
• manufacturing processes: an analytical network
• approach”, International Journal of Production
• Research, 37(2), 241-261, 1999.
• Meade, L.M., Sarkis, J., “Strategic analysis of
• logistics and supply chain management systems
• using the analytical network process”,
• Transportation Research Part E: Logistics
• and Transportation Review, 34(3), 201-215,
• -
• Lee, J.W., Kim, S.H., “An integrated approach
• for independent information system project
• selection”, International Journal of Project
• Management, 19(2), 111-118 2001.
• Lee, J.W., Kim, S.H., “Using analytic network
• process and goal programming for interdependent
• information system project selection”,
• Computers & Operations Research, 27(4),
• -382, 2001.
• Partovi, F.Y., Corredoira, R.A., “Quality function
• deployment for the good of soccer”, European
• Journal of Operational Research, 137(3), 642-
• , 2002.
• Meade, L.M., Presley, A., “R&D project
• selection using the analytic network process”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering
• Management, 49(1), 59-66, 2002.
• Bayazıt, O., “A new methodology in multiple
• criteria decision-making systems: analytical
• network process and an application”, Ankara
• Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi,
• (1), 15-34 2002.
• Sarkis, J., “A model for strategic supplier
• selection”, Journal of Supply Chain
• Management, 38(1), 18-28, 2002.
• Mikhailov, L., Singh, M.S., “Fuzzy analytic
• network process and its application to the
• development of decision support systems”, IEEE
• Transactions on Systems, Man, and
• Cybernetics-Part C: Applications and
• Reviews, 33(1), 33-41, 2003.
• Yurdakul, M., “Measuring long-term
• performance of a manufacturing firm using the
• analytical network process (ANP) approach”,
• International Journal of Production Research,
• (11), 2501-2529, 2003.
• Momoh, J.A., Zhu, J., “Optimal generationscheduling
• based on AHP/ANP”, IEEE
• Transactions on Systems, Man, and
• Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics, 33(3), 531-
• , 2003.
• Niemira, M.P., Saaty, T.L., “An analytical
• network process model for financial-crisis
• forecasting”, International Journal of
• Forecasting, Article in Press, 2004.