CONFLICT MANAGEMENT OR CONFLICT RESOLUTION?: THE ORETICALLY APPROACH TO THE PEACE NEGOTIATION PROCESS

Yıl 2018, , 203 - 236, 13.11.2018

Fulya Köksoy

https://doi.org/10.28956/gbd.482050

Öz

Conflicts, which are the natural part of daily life
and are defined as  the struggle that
they have experienced because of the unalterable interests of the parties, seem
to have turned into internal armed conflicts that have increased especially in
the post-Cold War era.
The internal
armed conflicts that have been occurred in different geographies of the world
during the present century make way for the conflict negotiation process that
is one of the stages of conflict resolution and the conflict resolution which
is the sub-phase of conflict management which covers the whole of conflict and
peace research phases.

The main focus of this study is the theoretical
approach to peace negotiation processes by revealing the conflict management
and conflict resolution concepts. The main purpose of
creating a study in this direction is to create the conceptual and theoretical
framework of peace negotiation processes that represent a sensitive phase. On
the other hand, it is analyzed the conceptualization of peace negotiation
processes that express the interaction of the parties in order to end the
conflict under which “top title” in the frame of the peace researches
literature. In this context, it is handled that whether these concepts should
be used as a top title or a separate process in the axis of the peace process
in the conflict resolution and peace researches literatüre.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Conflict Resolution, Conflict Management, Peace Process Concepts, Conflict and Peace Research, Peace Negotiation Process

ÇATIŞMA YÖNETİMİ Mİ YOKSA ÇATIŞMA ÇÖZÜMÜ MÜ?: BARIŞ MÜZAKERE SÜRECİNE TEORİK OLARAK YAKLAŞMAK

Öz

Günlük hayatın doğal bir parçası olan ve tarafların
uyumlaştırılamayan çıkarları nedeniyle yaşadıkları mücadele olarak tanımlanan
çatışmaların, özellikle Soğuk Savaş sonrası dönemde artış gösteren iç silahlı
çatışmalara dönüştüğü görülmektedir. İçinde bulunduğumuz yüzyılda da Dünya’nın
farklı coğrafyalarında yaşanan iç silahlı çatışmalar ise çatışma ve barış
araştırmaları evrelerinin tümünü kapsayan çatışma yönetiminin bir alt evresi
olan çatışma çözümüne ve çatışma çözümünün aşamalarından biri olan barış müzakere
süreçlerine alan açmaktadır.

Bu
çalışmanın temel odak noktasına çatışma yönetimi ve çatışma çözümü kavramları
konularak barış müzakere süreçlerine teorik olarak yaklaşılmaktadır. Bu yönde
bir çalışma oluşturulmasının temel amacı ise hassas bir aşamayı temsil eden
barış müzakere süreçlerinin kavramsal ve teorik çerçevesini oluşturmaktır. Öte
yandan, iç silahlı çatışmalar özelinde çatışmayı sona erdirme amacıyla
tarafların etkileşimini ifade eden barış müzakere süreçlerinin, barış
araştırmaları literatürü çerçevesinde hangi üst başlık altında
kavramsallaştırıldığı analiz edilmektedir. Bu bağlamda çatışma analizi ve barış
araştırmaları literatüründe çatışma çözümü ve yönetimi kavramlarının bir üst
başlık olarak mı kullanılması gerektiği yoksa barış süreci ekseninde ayrı bir
süreci mi ifade ettiği hususu ele alınmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çatışma Çözümü, Çatışma Yönetimi, Barış Süreci Kavramları, Çatışma ve Barış Araştırmaları, Barış Müzakere Süreci

Kaynakça

• Agricola, G. (2009). Defining Conflict Resolution Education: A Literature Review. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Hollanda: Utrecht University.
• Aktan, H. (2015). Jonathan Powell’la Süreç Üzerine, http://bianet.org/kurdi/biamag/163715-jonathan-powell-la-surec-uzerine, (01.12.2017).
• Akyeşilmen, N. (2013). Çatışma Yönetimi Kavramsal ve Kuramsal Bir Analiz. (Ed.,Nezir Akyeşilmen). Barışı Konuşmak: Teori ve Pratikte Çatışma Yönetimi, Ankara: ODTÜ Yayıncılık, ss. 18-44.
• Andrews, R. ve Tjosvold, D. (1983). Conflict Management under Different Levels of Conflict Intensity. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, C.4, ss.223-228.
• Angstrom, J. (2001). Towards a Typology of Internal Armed Conflict: Synthesising a Decade of Conceptual Turmoil. Civil Wars, C.4, S.3, ss.93-116.
• Arslan, K.H. ve Çapan, F. (2013). Çatışma Çözümüne Temel Yaklaşımlar. (Ed.,Nezir Akyeşilmen). Barışı Konuşmak: Teori ve Pratikte Çatışma Yönetimi, Ankara: ODTÜ Yayıncılık, ss. 45-60.
• Axt, Heiz-Jürgen ve diğer. (2006). Conflict: A Literatüre Review. https://tr.scribd.com/document/47839338/Conflict-Review, (02.08.2017).
• Babbitt, E, ve Hampson, F.O. (2011). Conflict Resolution as a Field of Inquiry: Practice Informing Theory. International Studies Review, C.13, ss.46-57.
• Bar-Tal, D. (2000). From Intractable Conflict Through Conflict Resoltion to Reconciliation: Psycholgical Analyses. Political Pyschology, 21(2), ss.351-365.
• Bercovitch, J. ve diğer.(2009). Introduction: The Nature of Conflict and Conflict Resolution. Jacob Bercovitch, Victor Kremneyuk ve I. William Zartman (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Conflict Resolution, CA: Sage Publishers, ss.1-14.
• Burton, J.W. (1993). Conflict Resolution as a Political System. http://scar.gmu.edu/wp_1_burton.pdf, (20.10.2017).
• Clement, S. (1997) Conflict Prevention in the Balkans: Case Studies of Kosovo and the FYR of Macedonia. France: Institute for Security Stıdies of WEU.
• Davidson, J. ve Wood, C. (2004). A Conflict Resolution Model. Theory into Practice, 43(1), ss.6-13.
• DPI. (2015). Sürecin Tekrar Rayına Oturtulması. http://docplayer. biz.tr/11556180-Istanbul-bilgi-universitesi-catisma-cozumu-uygulama-ve-arastirma-merkezi-ile-demokratik-gelisim-enstitusu-nun-ortak-ev-sahipliginde-yuvarlak-masa.html, (08.06.2018).
• Fenn, P. ve Gameson, R. (1992). Construction Conflict Management and Resolution, London: Chapmann and Hall.
• Fetherson, A.B. (2000). Peacekeeping, Conflict Resolution and Peacebuilding: A Reconsideration of Theoretical Frameworks. International Peacekeeping, 7(1), ss.190-218.
• Fisas, V. (2012). Barış Süreci El Kitabı. http://escolapau.uab. cat/img/programas/procesos/turk_baski.pdf, (14.12.2017).
• Fisher, S. ve diğer. (2000). Working With Conflict: Skill and Strategies for Action, London: Zed Books Ltd.
• Galtung, J. (2007). Peace by Peaceful Conflict Transformation-The Transcend Approach. Charles Webel ve
• Johan Galtung (Ed.), Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies, London and NewYork: Routledge, ss.14-32.
• Galtung, J. (2010). Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution: The Need for Transdisciplinarity. Transcultural Psychiatry, 47(1), ss.20-32.
• Goldwich, D. (2010). Win-Win Negotiations, Singapore: Marshall Cavendis Business.
• Gurr, T. R. (2003). Terrorism in Democracies: When It Occurs, Why It Fails. Charles Keglet (Ed.), The New Global Terrorism, New Jersey:Pearson, ss.202-215.
• Güngör, U. (2010) From Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution. Stratejik Araştırmalar, 8(15), ss.37-74.
• Hamad, A. (2005). The Reconceptualisation of Conflict Management. Peace, Conflict and Development: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, ss.1-31.
• Hampson, F.O., Crocker, C.A. ve Aall, P.R. (2007) Negotiation and International Conflict. Charles Webel ve Johan Galtung (Ed.), Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies, London-NewYork: Routledge, ss.35-50.
• Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2005) Logical Argument Mapping: A Method for Overcoming Cognitive Problems of Conflict Management. The International Journal of Conflict of Management, 16 (4), ss.304-334.
• Javaid, U. ve Sahrai, N. (2016). Conflict Management between Pakistan and India: Challenges and Failures. A Research Journal of South Asian Studies, 31(1), ss.245-256.
• Kelman, H.C. (2004). Reconciliation as Identitiy Change: A Social-Psychological Perspective. Yaacov Bar- Simon Tov (Ed.), From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation, NewYork: Oxford University Press, ss. 111-124.
• Kelman, H.C. (2010) Conflict Resolution and Reconciliation: A Social Psychological Perspective on Ending Violent Conflict Between Identity Groups. Landscape of Violence, 1(1), ss.1-9.
• Korobkin, R. (2009). Negotiation: Theory and Strategy, NewYork: Aspen Publishers.
• Kremenyuk, V.A. (2002). Conflict Management in the 21st Century: New Challenges, Adequate Responses. The Process of International Negotiation Process, ss.1-3.
• Kydd, A.H. ve Walter, B.F. (2002). Sabotaging the Peace: The Politics of Extremist Violence. International Organization, 56(2), ss.263-296.
• Lederach, J.P. (2003). Conflict Transformation. http://www. beyondintractability.org/essay/transformation, (15.03.2018).
• Licklider, R. (2008). Ethical Advice: Conflict Management vs. Human Rights in Ending Civil Wars. Journal of Human Rights, 7, ss.376-387.
• Lund, M. (1997) Preventing and Mitigating Violent Conflicts: A Revised Guide for Practitioners, Washington: Creative Associates International.
• Lyons, C. (2007). I Win You Win: The Essential Guide to Principled Negotiation, Great Britain: A & C Black Publishers.
• Mayer, B. (2000). The Dynamics of Conflict Resolution, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Miller, C.E. (2005) A Glossary of Terms and Concepts in Peace and Conflict Studies, Addis Ababa:University for Peace.
• Munduate, L., Ganaza, J., Peiro, J. ve Euwema, M. (1999) Patterns of Styles in Conflict Management and Effectiveness. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 10 (1), ss.5-24.
• Nieuwmeijer, L. ve Cloete, F. (2001) Conflict Management: Theory, Analysis and Practice. http://www.ibrarian.net/navon/paper/22 _August_2001.pdf?paperid=973820, (24.04.2018).
• Olajide, O. (2011). Towards the Resolution of Conflict Research and Sustainable Development in the Developing Countries: The Role of Libraries and Information Centers. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 3(9), ss.195-198.
• Özerdem, A. (2013) Barış İnşası Kuram ve Uygulaması. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Page, M.T. (2002). The Birth of a Discipline? Peace and Conflict Research in the New Millennium. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 25, ss.57-65.
• Posthuma, R.A. (2005). The Need for More Influential International Conflict Management Research. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 16(3), ss.212-217.
• Powell, J. (2011). The Lessons of Northern Ireland: Security is not Enough: Ten Lessons for Conflict Resolution from Northern Ireland. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/43488/1/The%20lessons%20of%20Northern%20Ireland_security%20is%20not%20enough(lsero).pdf, (17.05.2018).
• Powell, J. (2015). Teröristlerle Konuşmak: Silahlı Çatışmalar Nasıl Sona Erdirilir?. (Çev. Nuray Önoğlu). İstanbul: Aykırı Yayıncılık.
• Ramsbotham, O. vd. (2011). Contemporaray Conflict Resolution: The Prevention, Management and Transformation of Deadly Conflicts, UK: Polity Press.
• Reimann, C. (2004). Assessing the State-of-the-Art in Conflict Transformation Reflections from a Theoretical Perspective. http://edoc.vifapol.de/opus/volltexte/2011/2568/pdf/reimann_handbook.pdf, (07.04.2018).
• Robbins, S.P. (1978). Conflict Management and Conflict Resolution Are Not Synonymous Terms. California Management Review, 21(2), ss.67-75.
• Sahadevan, P. (2006). Negotiating Peace in Ethnic Wars. International Studies, 43(3), ss.239-266.
• Sahadevan P. (2010). Negotiating the Grand Swap in Kandahar. William I. Zartman ve Guy Oliver Faure (Ed.), Negotiating with Terrorists: Strategy, Tactics and Politics, London and NewYork: Routledge, ss. 163-196.
• Sandole, D.J.D. (1998). A Comprehensive Mapping of Conflict and Conflict Resolution: A Three Pilar Approach. http://www.gmu.edu/programs /icar/pcs/sandole.htm, (15.05.2018).
• Sanson, A. ve Bretherton, D. (2001). Conflict Resolution: Theoretical and Practical Issues. D.J. Christie, R. V. Wagner ve A. D. Winter (Ed.), Peace, Conflict and Violence: Peace Psychology for the 21st Century, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, ss.193-209.
• Sanson, A. ve Bretherton, D. (2001). Conflict Resolution: Theoretical and Practical Issues. D.J. Christie, R. V. Wagner ve A. D. Winter (Ed.), Peace, Conflict and Violence: Peace Psychology for the 21st Century, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, ss.193-209.
• Siver, S. (2005). A Process Oriented View of Conflict Resolution. http://stanfordsiver.net/wp-content/themes/twentyten/pdf/Conflict Resolution.pdf, (17.03.2018).
• Tanner, F. (2000). Conflict Prevention and Conflict Resolution: Limits of Multilateralism. https://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents /article/other/57jqq2.htm, (22.03.2018).
• Uçan, M.Y. (2008). Müzakere Yönetimi ve Bir Model Denemesi. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Isparta: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Wall, J.A. (1985) Negotiation: Theory and Practice, London: Pearson Scott Foreman.
• Wallensteen, P. (2002). Understanding Conflict Resolution: War, Peace and the Global System, London: Sage Publications.
• Wallensteen, P. (2005). Northeast Asia: Challenges of Conflict Prevention and Conflict Prevention Research. Niklas Swanström (Ed.), Conflict Prevention and Conflict Management in Northeast Asia, Sweeden: Uppsala University Silkroad Studies Publication, ss.39-49.
• Wright, Q. (1942). A Study of War, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Zartman, W.I. (1995). Dynamics and Constraints in Negotiations in Internal Conflicts. I. William Zartman (Ed.), Elusive Peace: Negotiating an End to Civil Wars, Washington DC: Brookings Institution, ss.3-29.
• Zartman, W.I. (2001). The Timing of Peace Initiatives: Hurting Stalemates and Ripe Moments. The Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 1(1), ss.8-18.
• Zartman, W.I. ve Rubin, J.Z. (2002). The Study of Power and the Practice of Negotiation. I. William Zartman ve Jeffrey Z. Rubin (Ed.), Power and Negotiation, USA: The University of Michigan Press, ss.3-29.
• Zartman, W.I. ve Alfredson, T. (2010). Negotiating With Terrorists and The Tactical Question. Rafael Reuveny ve William R. Thompson (Ed.), Coping With Terrorism, Sunny Press, ss.247-283.