INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES’ THREAT ASSESMENT ON TERRORISM-BASED THREATS: TRADITIONAL APPROACH

Öz

The most important task of intelligence agencies is the identification, analysis and assessment of the threat. The model of threat assesment described by Singer is a foundational concept within intelligence literature and practice. This model with dual-parameter (intention and capability) is the traditional approach used by intelligence agencies to asses both state-based threats and terrorism-based threats. Despite meaningful and important changes in the nature and charecteristics of the threats, this conventional method to assesing threats has undergone little modification. The main argument of this article is that the conventional model used by intelligence agencies is too simple to asses threats from terrorist organizations. This study analyses a traditional and main approach to intelligence analysis and highlights that both parameters are significant but weaknesses in assesing terrorist organizations’ threat. 9/11 terror attack was critically examined to show the analytical problem of the terrorism threat assesment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Intelligence,Intelligence Analysis,Threat,Threat Assessment,Terrorism

TERÖRİZM KAYNAKLI TEHDİTLERDE İSTİHBARAT KURUMLARININ TEHDİT DEĞERLENDİRMESİ: GELENEKSEL YAKLAŞIM

Öz

İstihbarat kurumlarının ana görevlerinden en önemlisi tehdidin tanımlanması, analiz edilmesi ve değerlendirilmesidir. Singer tarafından tanımlanan tehdit değerlendirmesi modeli istihbarat literatürü ve istihbarat uygulaması içerisinde temel konsepttir. İki parametreli (niyet ve kapasite) bu model, hem devlet temelli hem de terörizm temelli tehditleri değerlendirmek için istihbarat kurumları tarafından kullanılan geleneksel yaklaşımdır. Tehditlerin doğası ve karakteristiğinde anlamlı ve önemli değişiklikler olmasına rağmen, tehditleri değerlendirmek için kullanılan bu geleneksel yöntem çok az değişikliğe uğramıştır. Bu makalenin temel argümanı, istihbarat kurumları tarafından kullanılan bu geleneksel yöntemin terörist örgütlerden kaynaklı tehditleri değerlendirmede çok basit kaldığıdır. Bu çalışma, istihbarat analizindeki geleneksel ve ana yaklaşımı analiz etmekte olup iki parametrenin de önemli olduğuna, fakat terörist örgütlerin tehdit değerlendirmesinde yetersiz kaldığına vurgu yapmaktadır. Terörizm tehdidinin değerlendirmesindeki analitik problemi göstermek için 9/11 terör saldırısı eleştirel bir şekilde incelenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İstihbarat,İstihbarat Analizi,Tehdit,Tehdit Değerlendirmesi,Terörizm

Kaynakça

1. Aid, M. M., (2003). All Glory is Fleeting: Sigint and The Fight Against International Terrorism. Intelligence and National Security, Vol.18, No.4, 72-120.
2. Asal, V. H. vd. (2009). The Softest of Targets: A Study on Terrorist Target Selection. Journal of Applied Security Research, 4 (3), 258-278.
3. Aydınlı, E. and Rosenau, J. (ed.) (2005). Globilization, Security and the Nation-State: Paradigms in Transition. Albany: State University of New York Press.
4. Atran, S. (2003). The Genesis of Suicide Bombing. Science, Vol.299, 1534-1539.
5. Bell, C. (2003). A World Out Of Balance: American Ascendancy and International Politics in the 21st Centry. Longueville Books, Double Day.
6. Betts, R. (1998). Intelligence Warninig: Old Problems, New Agendas. Parameters. ss.26-35. http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/Articles/98 spring/betts.htm, (Erişim Tarihi: 17.11.2019).
7. Black, D. (2004). The Geometry of Terrorism. Sociological Theory. 22 (1), 14-25.
8. Birdişli, F. (2014), Teori ve Pratikte Uluslararası Güvenlik. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

9. Box, G.E.P, Robustness in the Strategyof the Scientific, Model Building. R.L. Launer and G.N. Wilkinson (ed.), Robustness in Stastics: Proceedings of a Workshop. New York: Academic Press. Buzan, B., Waever, O. ve Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework For Analysis, Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
10. Constable, P., (2001). In Bin Laden's Lair, Small Talk and a Warning. Washington Post. 08.07.2001, http://911blogger.com/news/2009-09-12/july-2001-bin-ladens-lair-small-talk-andwarning, (Erişim Tarihi:17.10.2019).
11. Copaland, T. E., (2006). Surprise, Intelligence, Failure and Mass Casualty Terrorism. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Unıversity of Oklohama.
12. Country Reports on Terrorism 2011. Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, 31 July 2012, http://www.state. gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2011/195548.htm, (Erişim Tarihi: 03.01.2019).
13. Davis, J., (2007). If Surprise Is Inevitable, What Role for Analysis. Sherman Kent Center for Intelligence Analysis Occasional Papers. 2 (1).
14. Dedeoğlu, B., (2014). Uluslararası Güvenlik ve Strateji. İstanbul: Yeniyüzyıl Yayınları.
15. Elias, D., (2001). Video Offers Strong Bin Laden-USS Cole Link. ABC News. 19.06.2001,http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=80896, (Erişim:07.04. 2015).
16. Fisk, R., (1996). Arab Rebel Leader Warns the British: 'Get out of the Gulf'. The Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/arab-rebel-leader-warns-the-british-get-out-of-thegulf-1328034.html, (Erişim Tarihi:09.11.2019).
17. Flynt, B., (2000). Threat Kingdom. Military Review. US Army Command And General Staff College, VOL. LXXX - July-August 2000, NO. 4, Professional Bulletin 100-99-5/6,12-21, file:///C:/Users/lenovo/Desktop/terör%20ve%20 istihbarat/threat%20ADA512069.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 02.01.2019).
18. Ganor, B., (2002). The Changing Threat of International Terrorism. The Sydney Papers. 14 (3), 43-51.
19. Gressangi, D., (2004). Audience and Message: Assessing Terrorist WMD Potential. Alan O’Day (ed.), Weapons of Mass Destruction and Terrorism. Ashgate: Aldershot.
20. Gurr, N., Cole, B., (2000). The New Face of Terrorism, Threats from Weapons of Mass Destruction. London: I.B. Tauris Publishers.
21. Heinrich, J., (2003). Bioterrorısm - Public Health Response to Anthrax Incidents of 2001. Washington, D.C., http://www.gao.gov/assets/250/240162.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 03.01.2019).
22. Hürriyet, (2017), http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ilk-ifade-reinayi-rakkaya-hem-de-o-gece-sordum-40338595, (Erişim Tarihi: 18.01.2019).
23. Jackson, B. vd. (2005). Apptitude For Destruction, Vol.1: Organizational Learning in Terrorist Groups and its Implications for Combatting Terrorism. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/ 2005/RAND_MG331.pdf, (Erişim tarihi: 02.01.2019).
24. Jenkins, Brian (2006). Unconquerable Nation: Knowing Our Enemy Strentghening Ourselves. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. http://www.rand.org/content/ dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2006/RAND_MG454.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 02.01.2019).
25. Khalsa, S., (2004). Forecasting Terrorism: Indicators and Proven Analytic Techniques. Maryland: Scarecrow Press Inch.
26. Kruglanski, A. W., ve Fishman, S. (2006). The Psychology of Terrorism: ‘Syndrome’ Versus ‘Tool’ Perspectives. Terrorism and Political Violence. 18 (2), 193-215.
27. Kurum, M. ve Avcı, E. (2019). Radikalizm ve Aşırıcılıktan Terörizme: Siyasal Şiddetin Araçsallaştırılması. Güvenlik Stratejileri. 14 (28), 37-90.
28. Layton, P., (2007). Redefining Warfare. Royal United Services Institute Journal. 152 (1), 34-41.
29. Laqueur, W., (2003). The Uses and Limits of Intelligence. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
30. Lyon, R., (2004). Six Challenges. Coral Bell vd. (ed.), Scoping Studies: New Thinking on security. Barton: Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
31. Krahmann, E., (2005). From State to Non-State Actors: The Emerge of Security Dovernance. Elke Krahmann (ed.), New Threats and New Actors in International Security. Palgrave Macmillian.
32. Köseli, M., (2003). The Appropriate Use Of Humint In Combating Terrorism. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). University of North Texas,
33. Mandel, R., (2009). On Estimating Post-Cold War Enemy Intentions. Intelligence and National Security. 24 (2), 194-215.
34. Meloy, J.R. vd. (2011). The Role Of Warnıng Behaviors In Threat Assesment: An Exploration And Suggested Typology. Behavioral Sciences and the Law Behav. Sci. Law. https://forensiseuropa.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/2011_ theroleofwarningbehaviorsinthreat.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 03.01.2019).
35. McConnell, M., (2007). Overhauling Intelligence. Foreign Affairs. 86 (4), 49-58. 2020 Terrosim Threat Assesment. New Jersey Office of Home Security and Preparedness, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54d79f88e4b0db3478a04405 /t/5e693c4b95285f1fb6c7e72e/1583955019945/ThreatAssessment-Booklet-2020.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 07.01.2020).
36. O’Brien, K. (2000). Intelligence Gathering on Asimetric Threats-Part 1. Jane’s Intelligence Review. 12 (10), 50-55.
37. Özcan, N. Ali (2003). Küreselleşme Bağlamında Terörizmle Mücadele. Birinci Uluslararası Sempozyum Bildirileri. Küreselleşme ve Uluslararası Güvenlik. Ankara: Genel Kurmay Basım Evi, 95-112.
38. PBS Frontline, (1998). Who Is Usame Bin Ladin. 1998, http://www.pbs.org/ wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/who/interview.html, (Erişim Tarihi:17.10.2019).
39. Pilch, R. (2004). The Bioterrorist Threat in United States. Russell Howard and Reid Sawyer (ed.). Terrorism and Counterterrorism: Unterstanding the New Security Enviroment. McGraw-Hill/Dushkin, Guilford.
40. Report Of The Joınt Inquıry Into The Terrorıst Attacks Of September 11, (2001), By The House Permanent Select Commıttee On Intellıgence And The Senate Select Committee On Intelligence, (December 2002), https://fas.org/irp/congress/2002_ rpt/911rept.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 10.10.2019).
41. Roberts, G. B. (2009). Hostis Humani Generis: The Threat of WMD Terrorism and How NATO is Facing the Ultimate Threat. Defence Against Terrorism Review. 2 (1), 1-13.
42. Ronczkowski, M., (2004). Terrorism and Organised Hate Crime: Intelligence Gathering, Analysis, and Investigations. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
43. Russell, R., (2010). Competiteve Analysis: Techniques For Better Guasing Enemy Political Intensions and Militay Capabilities. Loch Johnson (ed.), The Oxford handbook of national security intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Salama, S. and Hansell, L. (2005). Does Intent Equal Capability? Al-Qaeda and Weapons of Mass Destruction. The Nonproliferation Review. 12 (3), 615-653.
45. Sandıklı, A. ve Emeklier, B. (2012). Güvenlik Yaklaşımlarında Değişim ve Dönüşüm. (Ed.) Sandıklı, A., Teoriler Işığında Güvenlik, Savaş, Barış Ve Çatışma Çözümleri. İstanbul: Bilgesam Yayınları.
46. Segell, G., (2004). Intelligence Methodologies Applicable to Madrid Bombings. International of Intelligence and Counterintelligence. 18 (2), 221-238.
47. Seto, Y., (2001). The Sarin Gas Attack in Japan and the Related Forensic Investigation. Synthesis. https://www.opcw.org/news/article/the-sarin-gas-attack-in-japan-and-the-related-forensic-investigation/, (Erişim Tarihi: 03.01.2019).
48. Sinai, J. Forecasting Terrorist Groups’ Warfare: Conventional to CBRN. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F11427995_60#page-1, (Erişim Tarihi: 03.01.2019).
49. Singer, D. J. (1958). Threat-Perception and the Armament-Tension Dilemma. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2 (1), 90-104.
50. Steven, G. C. S. and Gunaratna, R. (2004). Counterterrorism-A Reference Handbook. Contemporary World Issues, Santa Barbara, ABC Clio.
51. Tenet, G. and Harlow, B., (2007). At the Center of the Storm: My Years at the CIA. New York: Harper Collins.
52. The 9/11 Commission Report, https://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911 Report.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 10.10.2019).
53. Treverton, G. (2009). Intelligence for an Age Terror. New York: Cambridge University Press.
54. Willis, H. vd. (2005). Estimating Terrorism Risk. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2005/RAND_MG388.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 02.01.2019).
55. Woo, G. (2009). Terrorism Threat Assessment and Management. Defence Against Terrorism Review.2(1),101-116, http://www.coedat.nato.int/publication/datr/ volume3/06-Terrorism_Threat_AssessmentandManagement.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 11.11.2019)
56. Yusufzai, R., (1999). Osama Bin Laden: Conversation with Terror. TIME. 11.01.1999, http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,989958,00. html, (Erişim Tarihi:17.10.2019).
57. Zegart, A.B v.d. (2007). Why Academics Don’t Study US Intelligence. Loch Johnson (ed.), Strategic Intelligence 1: Understanding The Hidden Side of Government. Westport: Praeger Security International. http:// scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1360&context=jss, (Erişim Tarihi: 03.01.2019).