Çevrimiçi Matematik Öğrenmede Öz-Düzenlemeyi Etkileyen Bileşenler: Deprem Sürecinde Bir Öz-Düzenleme Perspektifi

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, çevrimiçi matematik öğrenme sürecinde öz-düzenlemeli öğrenmeyi etkileyen değişkenleri belirlemek ve bu değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. İlişkisel tarama modelinde tasarlanan bu çalışma, Türkiye'deki bir devlet üniversitesinde çevrimiçi ders alan toplam 233 matematik öğretmeni adayı üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Öğretmen adayları kişisel bilgi formu, öz-düzenlemeli çevrimiçi öğrenme ölçeği ve çevrimiçi öğrenme öz-yeterlik ölçeğini içeren veri toplama araçlarını çevrimiçi olarak doldurmuştur. Veriler rastgele orman ve sınıflama ve regresyon ağacı yöntemleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Rastgele orman yöntemiyle oluşturulan modelin doğru sınıflama performansı çok yüksek düzeyde bulunmuştur. Öğretmen adaylarının öz-düzenlemeli çevrimiçi öğrenmelerini yordamada etkili olan değişkenlerden önem derecesi en yüksek olanlar öz-yeterlik, öz-değerlendirme ve sınıf düzeyi değişkenleridir. Diğer önemli değişkenler ise ders tercihi, internet kullanma düzeyi ve internet kullanma sıklığıdır. Elde edilen sonuçlar doğrultusunda bu çalışmanın öğretmen adaylarının öz-düzenlemeli çevrimiçi öğrenmelerinin geliştirilmesi noktasında öngörüde bulunmaya, çevrimiçi öz-düzenlemeli öğrenme süreçlerine ve öz-yeterlik algılarının gelişmesine rehberlik etmeye önemli katkısının olacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öz-düzenleme
• Öz-Yeterlik
• Öz-Değerlendirme
• Rastgele Orman Yöntemi
• Sınıflandırma ve Regresyon Ağacı Yöntemi

Components Affecting Self-Regulation in Online Mathematics Learning: A Self-Regulation Perspective During the Earthquake

Öz

The aim of this research is to determine the variables that affect self-regulated learning in the online mathematics learning process and to examine the relationship between these variables. The study, designed in the relational screening model, was conducted on a total of 233 prospective mathematics teachers taking online courses at a state university in Turkey. Teacher candidates filled out data collection tools online, including a personal information form, self-regulated online learning scale and online learning self-efficacy scale. Data were analyzed using random forest and classification and regression tree methods. The correct classification performance of the model created by the random forest method was found to be very high. Among the variables that are effective in predicting teacher candidates' self-regulation online learning, the ones with the highest importance are self-efficacy, self-evaluation and grade level variables. Other important variables were determined as course preference, level of internet use and frequency of internet use. In line with the results obtained, it is thought that this study will make a significant contribution to making predictions about the development of online self-regulation learning of teacher candidates, guiding their self-regulated and development of self-efficacy in the online learning process.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Self-Regulation
• Self-Efficacy
• Self-Evaluation
• Random Forest Method
• Classification and Regression Tree Method.

Kaynakça

1. Aksu, G. (2018). PISA başarısını tahmin etmede kullanılan veri madenciliği yöntemlerinin incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
2. Albelbisi, N. A. & Yusop, F. D. (2019). Factors influencing learners’ self-regulated learning skills in a massive open online course (MOOC) environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 20(3), 1-16.
3. Alcı, B. & Altun, S. (2007). Lise öğrencilerinin matematik dersine yönelik öz-düzenleme ve bilişüstü becerileri, cinsiyete, sınıfa ve alanlara göre farklılaşmakta mıdır? Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16(1), 33–44.
4. Al-Hawamleh, M. S., Alazemi, A. F., Al-Jamal, D. A. H., Al Shdaifat, S., Rezaei Gashti, Z. & Namaziandost, E. (2022). Online learning and self-regulation strategies: Learning guides matter. Education Research International, 2022, 1–8. doi: 10.1155/2022/4175854
5. Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.,), The theory and practice of online learning (pp. 3-31), Edmonton, CA: Athabasca University Press.
6. Almwalad, S. M. (2023). Self-regulation and academic motivation as predictors of academic achievement of undergraduate students in an online learning environment (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Andrews University.
7. Arcoverde, A. R., Boruchovitch, E., Góes, N.M. & Acee, T. W. (2022). Self-regulated learning of Natural Sciences and Mathematics future teachers: Learning strategies, self-efficacy, and sociodemographic factors. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 35(1), 1-14. doi: 10.1186/s41155-021-00203-x
8. Arsal, Z. (2009). The impact of self-regulation instruction on mathematics achievements and attitudes of elementary school students. Education and Science, 34(152), 3-14.

9. Artino, A. R. & Jones, K. D. (2012). Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self regulated learning behaviours in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15(2012), 170-175. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.006
10. Baldan, B. (2017). Lisans öğrencilerinin öz düzenlemeli öğrenme becerisi düzeyleri ve yükseköğretim programlarının öz düzenlemeli öğrenme becerisini geliştirmedeki rolü (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
11. Baltacı, S., Bütüner, S. Ö. & Çalışkan, E. (2022). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının çevrimiçi öğrenmeye yönelik öz-yeterlik düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(Özel Sayı), 472-508. doi: 10.29299/kefad.1054516
12. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman,
13. Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O. & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring selfregulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005
14. Barnard-Brak, L., Lan, W. Y. & Paton, V. O. (2010). Profiles in self-regulated learning in the online learning environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1), 61–80.
15. Batool, T. (2020). Self-efficacy and self-regulation linkage with mathematics achievement in girls from secondary schools. Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 8(1), 92-103. doi:10.20547/jess0812008106
16. Biau, G. (2012). Analysis of a random forests model. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13(1), 1063-1095.
17. Bidjerano, T. & Dai, D. Y. (2007). The relationship between the big-five model of personality and selfregulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 69–81. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.02.001
18. Bouffard-Bouchard, T., Parent, S. & Larivee, S. (1991). Influence of self-efficacy on self-regulation andperformance among junior and senior high-school age students. International Journal of Behavioral Development,14, 153-164.
19. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self- regulation. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
20. Bylieva, D., Hong, J. C., Lobatyuk, V. & Nam, T. (2021). Self-regulation in e-learning environment. Education Sciences, 11, 785, 1-23. doi: 10.3390/educsci11120785
21. Ceyhan, G. (2023). Karar ağaçları. M. Kayri & H. Şevgin (Ed.), Eğitimde veri madenciliği ve bilgisayar uygulamaları içinde (ss. 105-142). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
22. Chatzistamatiou, M., Dermitzaki, I. & Bagiatis, V. (2014). Self-regulatory teaching in mathematics: Relations to teachers' motivation, affect and professional commitment. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29, 295-310. doi:10.1007/s10212-013-0199-9
23. Chen, P. P. (2003). Exploring the accuracy and predictability of the self-efficacy beliefs of seventh-grade mathematics students. Learning and Individual Differences 14(2003), 79-92. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2003.08.003
24. Cho, M. H., Cheon, J. & Lim, S. (2021). Preservice teachers’ motivation profiles, self-regulation, and affective outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 42(1), 37-54. doi:10.1080/01587919.2020.1869528
25. Cho, M. H., Demei, S. & Laffey, J. (2010). Relationships between self-regulation and social experiences in asynchronous online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 21(3), 297–316.
26. Cho, M. & Heron, M. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning: The role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students’ learning experiences in a self-paced online mathematics course. Distance Education, 36(1), 80–99. doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.1019963
27. Cho, M. H. & Shen, D. (2013). Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 290–301. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.835770
28. Çalık, B. (2014). Ortaokul öğrencilerinde matematik başarı duyguları, matematik özyeterliği ve özdüzenleyici öğrenme stratejilerinin ilişkisi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
29. Çelik-Ercoşkun, N. & Gündoğdu, K. (2020). Investigation of self-regulation and self-efficacy perceptions of prospective mathematics teachers. International Journal of Science and Education, 3(2), 101-118. doi:10.47477/ubed.781499
30. Darr, C. & Fisher, J. (2005). Self-regulated learning in mathematics classes. Set: Research Information for Teachers, 2: 44-49. doi:10.18296/set.0631
31. De Corte, E., Mason, L., Depaepe, F. & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Self-regulation of mathematical knowledge and skills. In B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk (Ed.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp.155-172). Routledge.
32. Domingos, P. (2012). A few useful things to know about machine learning. Communications of the ACM, 55(10), 78–87.
33. Domingos, P. (2000). A unified bias-variance decomposition and its applications, In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning, 231–238, Stanford, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
34. Fung, J. J. Y., Yuen, M. & Yuen, A. H. K. (2014). Self-regulation in learning mathematics online: Implications for supporting mathematically gifted students with or without learning difficulties. Gifted and Talented International, 29: 1-2, 113-123. doi: 10.1080/15332276.2014.11678434
35. Gafoor. A.K. & Kurukkan, A. (2016). Self-regulated learning: A motivational approach for learning mathematics. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR), 5(3), 60-65.
36. Goetz, T., Nett, U. E. & Hall, N. C. (2013). Self-regulated learning. In N. C. Hall and T. Goetz (Ed.), Emotion, motivation, and self-regulation: A handbook for teachers (pp. 123-166). Bradford: Emerald Group.
37. Gu, P. & Lee, Y. (2019). Promoting students’ motivation and use of SRL strategies in the web-based mathematics learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47(3), 391–410. doi:10.1177/0047239518808522
38. Hackett, G. & Betz, N. E. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-efficacy/mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 261-273.
39. Harding, S. M., English, N., Nibali, N., Griffin, P., Graham, L., Alom, B. & Zhang, Z. (2019). Self-regulated learning as a predictor of mathematics and reading performance: A picture of students in Grades 5 to 8. Australian Journal of Education, 63(1), 74-97. doi:10.1177/0004944119830153
40. Henry, P. (2001). E-learning technology, content and services. Education+ Training, 43(4/5), 249–255.
41. Hodges, C. B. (2008). Self-efficacy in the context of online learning environments: A review of the literature and directions for research. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(3/4), 7-25.
42. Hodges, C. B. & Kim, C. (2010). Email, self-regulation, self-efficacy and achievement in a college online mathematics course. Journal Educational Computing Research, 43(2) 207-223. doi:10.2190/EC.43.2.d
43. İlgar, S., Karakurt, Ç., Deringöl, Y. & Ütkür-Güllühan, N. (2021). Investigation of prospective teachers’ self-regulated learning skills in terms of different variables. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 6(2),155-168.
44. Jansen, R. S., Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Kester, L. & Kalz, M. (2017). Validation of the self-regulated online learning questionnaire. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(1), 6–27.
45. Julaihi, N. H., Zainuddin, P. F. A., Nor, R. C. M., Ahmad Bakri, S. R., Hamdan, A., Salleh, J. & Noriham, B. (2022). Self-efficacy in learning mathematics online. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 8(1), 139-156. doi: 10.33736/jcshd.4435.2022
46. Kabael, T. & Yayan, B. (2017). Effect of self-evaluation on pre-service mathematics teachers’ self-efficacy in language of Mathematics. AJESI- Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 7(1), 1-34 1
47. Karademir, Ç. A., Deveci, Ö. & Çaylı, B. (2018). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin öz-düzenlemeleri ve akademik öz-yeterliklerinin incelenmesi. E-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(3), 14-29. doi: 10.30900/kafkasegt.446793 Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler. Ankara: Nobel Yayın.
48. Kim, C., Park, S. W. & Cozart, J. (2014). Affective and motivational factors of learning in online mathematics courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 171–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01382.x
49. Labuhn, A. S., Zimmerman, B. J. & Hasselhorn, M. (2010). Enhancing students' self-regulation and mathematics performance: The influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 173-194. doi: 10.1007/s11409-010-9056-2
50. Leris, D., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., Hernandez, M. & Bueno, C. (2017). Validation of indicators for implementing an adaptive platform for MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 783–795. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.054
51. Los, B. A. (2014). The effects of self-regulation and self-efficacy on academic outcome (Doctorate thesis). University of Winnipeg, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
52. Lu, G. & Tian, M. (2023). The influences of online learning environments, self-efficacy, and interaction on learning achievement: The case of international students in China. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–22. doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2172045
53. May, D. K. (2009). Mathematics self-efficacy and anxiety questionnaire (Unpublished doctorate thesis). University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA. https://getd.libs.uga.edu/
54. Morris, S.A. (2014). A qualitative study of self-regulated learning in online learning environments (Master thesis). University of the Pacific Stockton, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
55. Negara, H.R.P., Nurlaelah, E., Wahyudin, Herman, T. & Tamur, M. (2021). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics performance in online learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(2021), 012050. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012050
56. Ng, A.Y. (1997). Preventing "overfitting" of cross-validation data. In D.H. Fisher (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning, Nashville, TN, USA, July 8–12, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
57. Oviatt, A. (2023). Teachers’ years of experience as a predictor of teacher self-efficacy toward self-regulated learning (Doctorate thesis). Grand Canyon University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
58. Özen, E. & Karaca N. (2021). Investigating learner motivation in online education in terms of self-efficacy and self-regulation. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(4), 745-758. doi: 10.31681/jetol.1016530
59. Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory Into Practice, 41:2, 116-125. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_8
60. Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(422), 1-28. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
61. Pangburn, A. C. (2020). Helping college mathematics students improve their mathematics self-efficacy and self-regulation using MyMathLab (Doctorate thesis), University of South Carolina, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
62. Peteros, E. D., Lucino, R.V.A, Yagong, J.H., Bacus, M.J.D., de Vera, J.V., Alcantara, G.A. & Fulgencio, M.D. (2022). Self-regulation, self-efficacy and students’ math performance in modular distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Innovation Scientific Research and Review, 4(3), 2522-2526
63. Santoso, H. B., Riyanti, R. D., Prastati, T., Susanty, A. & Yang, M. (2022). Learners’ online self-regulated learning skills in Indonesia Open University: Implications for policies and practice. Education Sciences, 12(7), 469. doi: 10.3390/educsci12070469
64. Sabonchi, M. H. Z. (2019). Lise öğrencilerinde problem çözme becerileriyle, öz yeterlik ve öz düzenleme arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
65. Schunk, D. H. (1996a). Self-evaluation and self-regulated learning. Paper presented at the Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York, New York, NY.
66. Schunk, D. H. (1996b). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children's cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359-382.
67. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
68. Shen, D., Cho, M-H., Tsai, C-L. & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 10-17. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001
69. Soner, M. (2021). Çevrimiçi eğitim kapsamında üniversite öğrencilerinin öz düzenleme becerileri ve okula bağlılıkları ile akademik başarıları arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Ufuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara
70. Sun, Z. & Xie, K. (2018). The role of self-regulated learning in students’ success in flipped undergraduate math courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 41–53.
71. Şentürk, A. (2006). Veri madenciliği kavram ve teknikler. Bursa: Ekin yayınevi
72. Uysal, S. & Gündoğdu, K. (2019). Bilgisayar ve öğretim teknolojileri eğitimi öğrencilerinin web pedagojik içerik bilgisi, program yaklaşımları ve öz düzenleme becerilerinin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 8(3), 1902-1928.
73. Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J. & Dierking, D. R. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich and M. Zeidner (Ed.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 728−749). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
74. Wesolowski, B. C. (2019). Predicting operational rater-type classifications using rasch measurement theory and random forests: A music performance assessment perspective. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56(3), 610–625
75. Widaman, K. F. (2006). Best practices in quantitative methods for developmentalists: III. Missing data: What to do with or without them. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 71(3), 42–64. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.2006.00404.x
76. Yavuzalp, N. & Bahçivan, E. (2020). The online learning self-efficacy scale: Its adaptation into Turkish and interpretation according to various variables. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE 21(1), 31-44.
77. Yavuzalp, N. & Özdemir, Y. (2020). Öz-düzenlemeli çevrimiçi öğrenme ölçeğini Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 10(3), 269–278. doi:10.2399/yod.19.512415
78. Yemenici, A. İ. & Karakaş-Yıldırım, Ö. (2023). A research on online self-regulated learning skills of pre-service Turkish teachers. Journal of Educational Technology ve Online Learning, 6(4), 1062-1077.
79. Zakariya, Y. F. (2022). Improving students’ mathematics self-efficacy: A systematic review of intervention studies. Frontiers in Psychology. 13: 986622. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986622
80. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation, a social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich and M. Zeidner (Ed.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
81. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2002), 64-70. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
82. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166 –183. doi:10.3102/0002831207312909
83. Zimmerman, B. J. & Campillo, M. (2003). Motivating self-regulated problem solvers. In J. E. Davidson and R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 233–262). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
84. Zimmerman, W. A. & Kulikowich, J. M. (2016). Online learning self-efficacy in students with and without online learning experience. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 180-191. doi: 10.1080/08923647.2016.1193801
85. Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk and B. J. Zimmerman (Ed.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1–30). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.