Eğitimin Merkezinde Ama Dışında: Öğrenci Sesinin Eğitim Politikalarında Görünmezliği Üzerine Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz

Ayhan Aksakallı

doi:10.17152/gefad.1730442

TR EN

Eğitimin Merkezinde Ama Dışında: Öğrenci Sesinin Eğitim Politikalarında Görünmezliği Üzerine Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz

Öz

Bu araştırma, eğitim politikalarında sıkça dile getirilen “öğrenci merkezlilik” söyleminin, öğrencilerin gün-lük okul deneyimlerinde nasıl karşılık bulduğunu anlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Nitel araştırma deseni çerçe-vesinde, fenomenolojik yaklaşımla yapılandırılan çalışmada, Türkiye’nin bir ilinde yer alan üç farklı lise tü-ründen (Anadolu, fen ve meslek lisesi) toplam 15 on ikinci sınıf öğrencisiyle yarı yapılandırılmış derinleme-sine görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler tematik analiz yöntemiyle çözümlenmiş ve dört ana tema belirlenmiştir: “Sözümüzü Bize Bırakın”, “Bizimle İlgili Ama Bizsiz”, “Bize Değil, Bizim Üzerimize” ve “Sadece Başarılıysan Varsın”. Bulgular, öğrencilerin eğitim politikalarına yönelik süreçlerden sistemli biçimde dışlandığını; katılım, temsil ve değer atama mekanizmalarının büyük ölçüde sembolik düzeyde kal-dığını göstermektedir. Araştırmanın bulguları, öğrenci sesinin bastırılmasının yalnızca pedagojik düzeyde değil; aynı zamanda politik ve ideolojik yapılarla ilişkili olabileceğine işaret etmektedir. Elde edilen sonuç-lar, öğrencilerin edilgen alıcılar değil, karar süreçlerinin etkin ve meşru özneleri olarak kabul edilmesi ge-rektiğini vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dışlanma, Eğitim politikaları, Katılım, Öğrenci sesi, Temsiliyet

At the Center of Education, Yet on the Outside: A Phenomenological Analysis of the Invisibility of Student Voice in Education Policy

Öz

This study aims to explore how the frequently emphasized discourse of “student-centeredness” in education policies is reflected in students’ actual school experiences. Designed within the framework of a qualitative research approach and structured through a phenomenological perspective, the study involved semi-structured in-depth interviews with 15 twelfth-grade students from three different types of high schools (Anatolian, science, and vocational) in a province of Turkey. The data were analyzed using thematic analy-sis, resulting in four main themes: “Let Us Speak for Ourselves,” “About Us but Without Us,” “Not for Us, But Over Us,” and “You Only Matter If You Succeed.” The findings indicate that students are syste-matically excluded from educational policy processes and that mechanisms of participation, representation, and value assignment remain largely symbolic. The study reveals that the silencing of student voices is not merely a pedagogical issue but also a political and ideological one. The results highlight the need for a par-ticipatory and inclusive restructuring of the education system and argue that students should be recognized not as passive recipients but as legitimate and active subjects in decision-making processes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Disengagement, Education policy, Participation, Representation, Student voice

Kaynakça

Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In L. Althusser (Ed.), Lenin and Philo-sophy and Other Essays (pp. 127–186). Monthly Review Press. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm
Apple, M. W. (2012). Education and power (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Education-and-Power/Apple/p/book/9780415913102?srsltid=AfmBOoryX93YXPGpLqdqo4wVKCGBy9vehjcupr9bd4ta5wsST08MhZ-f&utm_source
Arnot, M., & Reay, D. (2007). A sociology of pedagogic voice: Power, inequality and pupil consultation. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300701458814
Au, W. (2018). A Marxist education: Learning to change the world. Haymarket Books. https://www.haymarketbooks.org/books/1153-a-marxist-education
Biesta, G. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Paradigm Publishers. https://www.routledge.com/Beyond-Learning-Democratic-Education-for-a-Human-Future/Biesta/p/book/9781594512346?utm
Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Good-Education-in-an-Age-of-Measurement-Ethics-Politics-Democracy/Biesta/p/book/9781594517914?utm
Biesta, G. (2022). World-centred education: A view for the present. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003098331
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psycho-logy, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence and power: “Student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design/book266033?utm

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan. https://nsee.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/KnowledgeCenter/BuildingExpEduc/BooksReports/10.%20democracy%20and%20education%20by%20dewey.pdf
Fielding, M. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017949213447
Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192042000195236
Fielding, M. (2012). Student voice and the possibility of radical democratic education: Re-narrating for-gotten histories, developing alternative futures. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(4), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2010.539531
Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, (3), 107–120. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii3/articles/nancy-fraser-rethinking-recognition?utm
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Herder and Herder. (Original work published in Portuguese in 1968). https://files.libcom.org/files/Paulo%20Freire%2C%20Myra%20Bergman%20Ramos%2C%20Donaldo%20Macedo%20-%20Pedagogy%20of%20the%20Oppressed%2C%2030th%20Anniversary%20Edition%20%282000%2C%20Bloomsbury%20Academic%29.pdf?utm
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder. https://files.libcom.org/files/Paulo%20Freire%2C%20Myra%20Bergman%20Ramos%2C%20Donaldo%20Macedo%20-%20Pedagogy%20of%20the%20Oppressed%2C%2030th%20Anniversary%20Edition%20%282000%2C%20Bloomsbury%20Academic%29.pdf?utm
Freire, P. (2005). Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare teach (Expanded ed.). Westview Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429496974
Gillborn, D., & Youdell, D. (2000). Rationing Education: Policy, Practice, Reform and Equity. Open Uni-versity Press. https://research.birmingham.ac.uk/en/publications/rationing-education-policy-practice-reform-and-equity?utm
Giroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. Bloomsbury. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/on-critical-pedagogy-9781350144989/?utm
Hart, R. (1992). Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship (Innocenti Essays No. 4). UNICEF International Child Development Centre. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24139916_Children%27s_Participation_From_Tokenism_To_Citizenship
Holdsworth, R. (2000). Schools that create real roles of value for young people. Prospects, 30(3), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02754086
Holquist, S. E., Wang, H., & Smith, T. (2023). What is student voice, anyway? The intersection of student voice practices and shared leadership. UCLA Transform Schools. https://transformschools.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Copy-of-holquist-et-al-2023-what-is-student-voice-anyway-the-intersection-of-student-voice-practices-and-shared-leadership.pdf
Hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Teaching-to-Transgress-Education-as-the-Practice-of-Freedom/hooks/p/book/9780415908085?utm
Kirk, D. (2025). Student voice, agency, and engagement in education: Emerging practices and challenges. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 45(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00721-4
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Lundy, L. (2007). “Voice” is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass. https://www.amazon.com/Qualitative-Research-Guide-Design-Implementation/dp/111900361X?utm
Mitra, D. (2018). Student voice in school reform: Building youth–adult partnerships that strengthen scho-ols and empower youth. SUNY Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.18254352
Mitra, D. L. (2009). Collaborating with students: Building youth–adult partnerships in schools. American Journal of Education, 115(3), 407–436. https://doi.org/10.1086/597493
Mitra, D., & Serriere, S. C. (2022). Student voice in school reform: Building youth-adult partnerships that strengthen schools and empower youth. SUNY Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/Student_Voice_in_School_Reform.html?id=kwh-sE2OFpUC
OECD. (2020). Education policy outlook: Turkey. https://www.oecd.org/education/policy-outlook/country-profile-Turkey-2020.pdf
Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. University of Minnesota Press. https://www.upress.umn.edu/9780816628452/disagreement/
Reay, D. (2017). Miseducation: Inequality, education and the working classes. Policy Press. https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/miseducation?utm
Robinson, C., & Taylor, C. (2007). Theorizing student voice: Values and perspectives. Improving Schools, 10(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480207073702
Rudd, T., Colligan, F., & Naik, R. (2006). Learner voice. Futurelab. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32231461_Futurelab_Learner_voice_handbook
Shier, H. (2001). Pathways to participation: Openings, opportunities and obligations. Children & Society, 15(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.617
Smyth, J., & Wrigley, T. (2020). Living on the edge: Rethinking poverty, class and schooling. Peter Lang. https://www.peterlang.com/document/1055780
Victoria Student Representative Council. (2025). Victorian students say their voice is the key to fixing strained education system in new report. Herald Sun. https://www.heraldsun.com.au/victoria-education/victorian-students-say-their-voice-is-the-key-to-fixing-strained-education-system-in-new-report/news-story/bc0c3cbb039e64ac9d6f59f0d7acdca7

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Eğitimin Psikolojik Temelleri , Eğitim Politikası

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ayhan Aksakallı ^*
0000-0001-6281-5828
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Ağustos 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

30 Haziran 2025

Kabul Tarihi

19 Ağustos 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 45 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1730442

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA99CN78FM

APA

Aksakallı, A. (2025). Eğitimin Merkezinde Ama Dışında: Öğrenci Sesinin Eğitim Politikalarında Görünmezliği Üzerine Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 45(2), 623-648. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1730442

AMA

1.Aksakallı A. Eğitimin Merkezinde Ama Dışında: Öğrenci Sesinin Eğitim Politikalarında Görünmezliği Üzerine Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz. GEFAD. 2025;45(2):623-648. doi:10.17152/gefad.1730442

Chicago

Aksakallı, Ayhan. 2025. “Eğitimin Merkezinde Ama Dışında: Öğrenci Sesinin Eğitim Politikalarında Görünmezliği Üzerine Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz”. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 45 (2): 623-48. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1730442.

EndNote

Aksakallı A (01 Ağustos 2025) Eğitimin Merkezinde Ama Dışında: Öğrenci Sesinin Eğitim Politikalarında Görünmezliği Üzerine Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 45 2 623–648.

IEEE

[1]A. Aksakallı, “Eğitimin Merkezinde Ama Dışında: Öğrenci Sesinin Eğitim Politikalarında Görünmezliği Üzerine Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz”, GEFAD, c. 45, sy 2, ss. 623–648, Ağu. 2025, doi: 10.17152/gefad.1730442.

ISNAD

Aksakallı, Ayhan. “Eğitimin Merkezinde Ama Dışında: Öğrenci Sesinin Eğitim Politikalarında Görünmezliği Üzerine Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz”. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 45/2 (01 Ağustos 2025): 623-648. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1730442.

JAMA

1.Aksakallı A. Eğitimin Merkezinde Ama Dışında: Öğrenci Sesinin Eğitim Politikalarında Görünmezliği Üzerine Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz. GEFAD. 2025;45:623–648.

MLA

Aksakallı, Ayhan. “Eğitimin Merkezinde Ama Dışında: Öğrenci Sesinin Eğitim Politikalarında Görünmezliği Üzerine Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz”. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 45, sy 2, Ağustos 2025, ss. 623-48, doi:10.17152/gefad.1730442.

Vancouver

1.Ayhan Aksakallı. Eğitimin Merkezinde Ama Dışında: Öğrenci Sesinin Eğitim Politikalarında Görünmezliği Üzerine Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz. GEFAD. 01 Ağustos 2025;45(2):623-48. doi:10.17152/gefad.1730442

Eğitimin Merkezinde Ama Dışında: Öğrenci Sesinin Eğitim Politikalarında Görünmezliği Üzerine Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

At the Center of Education, Yet on the Outside: A Phenomenological Analysis of the Invisibility of Student Voice in Education Policy

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster