Evaluating Pre-Service Teachers' Oral Reading Records Prepared for the Grades 1-5 Considering the Prosodic Competences

Öz

The main purpose of this study was to assess the prosodic features of teacher candidates' recorded oral readings. In addition, the second purpose was to learn the pre-service teachers' perceptions about their classmates' oral readings and to learn their opinions about the prosody items included in the scale. 130 pre-service teachers participated in this study, and they made 185 recordings. Participants read the passages ranged from 75 to 1194 words-long. Female teacher candidates had higher arithmetic means in prosody scale, which meant that their oral readings had better prosodic features.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Recorded oral readings, Prosody, Pre-service teachers

Öğretmen Adaylarının 1-5. Sınıf Öğrencilerine Yönelik Hazırladıkları Sesli Okuma Kayıtlarının Prozodi Yeterlikleri Açısından Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Bu araştırmanın temel amacı öğretmen adaylarının sesli okuma kayıtlarının prozodik özellikler açısından değerlendirilmesidir. Buna ek olarak, öğretmen adaylarının, arkadaşlarının yaptıkları kayıtlar ve prozodi ölçeğindeki maddeler ile ilgili görüşlerinin alınması da amaçlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada 130 öğretmen adayı, 185 sesli okuma kaydı yapmıştır. Katılımcılar 75-1194 arasında değişen kelime sayılarındaki metinleri okumuşlardır. Kadın öğretmen adayları prozodi ölçeğinden daha yüksek aritmetik puanlar almışlar ve bu durum, yaptıkları sesli okuma kayıtlarının daha iyi prozodik özellikler taşıması ile açıklanmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sesli okuma kayıtları, Prozodi, Öğretmen adayları

Kaynakça

1. Brassell, D., & Rasinski, T. (2008). Comprehension that works: Taking students beyond ordinary understanding to deep comprehension. CA: Shell Education.
2. Deeney, T. A. (2010). One-minute fluency measures: Mixed messages in assessment and instruction. The Reading Teacher, 63, 440-450.
3. Dowhower, S. L. (1991). Speaking of prosody: Fluency’s unattended bedfellow. Theory Into Practice, 30(3), 165-175.
4. Hudson, R. F., Lane, H. B., & Pullen, P. C. (2005). Reading fluency assessment and instruction: What, why, and how? The Reading Teacher, 58, 702-714.
5. Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 230-251.
6. Mathson, D. V., Allington, R. L., & Solic, K. L. (2006). Hijacking fluency and instructionally informative assessments. In T. Rasinski, C. Blachowicz, & K. Lems, (Eds.), Fluency instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 106- 119). NY: The Guilford Press.
7. Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2008). A longitudinal study of the development of reading prosody as a dimension of oral reading fluency in early elementary school children. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 336-354.
8. Rasinski, T. V. ( 2003). The fluent reader: Oral reading strategies for building word recognition, fluency, and comprehension. NY: Scholastic.

9. Rasinski, T. (2004). Creating fluent readers. Educational Leadership, 61(6), 46-51.
10. Rasinski, T. (2011). The art and science of teaching reading fluency. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher, (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (3rd ed.) (pp. 238-246). NY: Taylor & Francis.
11. Rasinski, T., Homan, S., & Biggs, M. (2009). Teaching reading fluency to struggling readers: Method, materials, and evidence. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 25, 192-204.
12. Rasinski, T. V., Padak, N. D., & Fawcett, G. (2010). Teaching children who find reading difficult (4th ed.). NY: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Reutzel, D. R. (2006). “Hey, teacher, when you say Fluency, what do you mean? : Developing fluency in elementary classrooms. In T. Rasinski, C. Blachowicz, & K. Lems, (Eds.), Fluency instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 62- 85). NY: The Guilford Press.
14. Schrauben, J. E. (2010). Prosody’s contribution to fluency: An examination of the theory of automatic information processing. Reading Psychology, 31, 82-92.
15. Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing fluency in the context of effective literacy instruction. In T. Rasinski, C. Blachowicz, & K. Lems, (Eds.), Fluency instruction:
16. Research-based best practices (pp. 21-38). NY: The Guilford Press.
17. Tankersley, K. (2005). Literacy strategies for grades 4-12: Reinforcing the threads of reading. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.