Mandibula processus coronoideus morfometrik parametrelerinin taraflar arası incelenmesi

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 3, 317 - 323, 01.08.2022

Gonca Ay Keselik , Mehmet Ali Malas

https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.979039

Cited By: 1

Öz

Amaç: Çalışmamızda kuru kemiklerde mandibula processus coronoideus’u ile diğer mandibula morfometrik parametreleri arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi ve bu verilerin taraflar arası karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Anatomi laboratuvarında kemik koleksiyonuna ait 22 adet mandibula, dijital fotoğraf makinesi kullanılarak üç ayrı açıdan fotoğraflanmıştır. Dijital görüntüler üzerinde Image J yazılımı kullanılarak ölçümler yapılmıştır. Processus coronoideus morfometrik parametreleri, ramus mandibula ve corpus mandibulaya ait morfometrik parametreler belirlenmiş, processus coronoideus kanca, üçgen, yuvarlak ve kare olarak 4 ayrı şekilde tiplendirilmiştir. Parametreler taraflar arasında karşılaştırılmış ve korelasyon analizi yapılmıştır.

Bulgular: Tüm parametrelerde taraflar arasında anlamlı farklılık bulunmamıştır. Processus coronoideus tiplerinin yüzde dağılımında da taraflar arasında fark bulunmamaktadır. Her iki taraftada processus coronoideus alanı ile processus coronoideus yüksekliği arasında çok iyi derecede korelasyon bulunmaktadır (p=0.000). Sağ taraftaki processus coronoideus parametrelerinin korelasyon değerleri, sol tarafa göre daha yüksek bulunmuştur.

Sonuç: Taraflar arası processus coronoideus morfometrik parametreri çocukluk, adolesan ve erişkin olmak üzere farklı gelişim dönemlerinde yapılacak yeni çalışmalarda incelenmelidir. Ayrıca çiğneme tarafı tercihinin processus coronoideus üzerine olan etkilerinin ve taraf/cinsiyet farklılıklarının değerlendirilmesi için sağlıklı bireylerde yapılacak yeni çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

mandibula, processus coronoideus, morfometri, çiğneme tarafı tercihi

Investigation of morphometric parameters of mandibula processus coronoideus between sides

Öz

Aim: In our study, the relationship between mandible coronoid process and other mandible morphometric parameters in dry bones and it is aimed to compare these data between the sides.

Materials and Methods: In the anatomy laboratory, 22 mandible from the bone collection were photographed in three different ways, from right-left lateral and posterior, using a digital camera. Measurements were performed on digital images using Image J software. Morphometric parameters of coronoid process and morphometric parameters of mandible ramus and body were determined. Coronoid process types were hooked, triangular, round and square. The parameters were compared between the two sides and correlation analysis was performed.

Results: There was no significant difference between the right and left sides in all parameters. There was no difference between the parties in the percent distribution of processus coronoideus types. There was a high correlation between processus coronoideus area and processus coronoideus height on both sides (p <0.001). Correlation values of the processus coronoideus parameters on the right side were higher than the left side.

Conclusion: For the differences in the morphometric parameter values between the coronoid process between the sides, further studies should be conducted in the developmental process up to childhood, adolescence and adulthood. Furthermore, further studies are needed to evaluate the effects of chewing side preference on processus coronoideus and to assess the differences in side/gender.

Anahtar Kelimeler

mandible, coronoid process, morphometry, chewing side preference

Kaynakça

• Referans1 Arıncı K, Elhan A. Anatomi 1. Cilt. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi, 1995; 48-50.
• Referans2 Spyropoulos MN. The morphogenetic relationship of the temporal muscle to the coronoid process in human embryos and fetuses. Am. J. of Anat. 1977; 150: 395-409.
• Referans3 Reynolds P, Robinson PD. Infratemporal and pterygopalatine fossae and temporomandibular joint In: Adler JT, ed. Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 40 ed. Spain: Elsevier, 2010; 530-46.
• Referans4 Avis V. The relation of the temporal muscle to the form of the coronoid process. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1959; 17: 99-104.
• Referans5 Yamaoka M, Okafuji N, Furusawa K, et al. Alteration of the angle of the coronoid process in prognathism. J Oral Rehabil. 2001; 28: 479-84.
• Referans6 Washburn SL. The relation of the temporal muscle to the form of the skull. Anat Rec. 1947; 99: 239-48.
• Referans7 Torisu T, Yamada K, Fukui T, et al. A cross-sectional study on the relationship between craniofacial morphology and the coronoid process. Eur. J. Orthod. 2009; 31: 613-9.
• Referans8 Merida‐Velasco J, Sanchez‐Montesinos I, Espin‐Ferra J et al. Developmental differences in the ossification process of the human corpus and ramus mandibulae. Anat Rec. 1993; 235: 319-24.
• Referans9 Bakirci S, Ari I, Kafa IM. Morphometric characteristics and typology of the coronoid process of the mandible. Acta Medica Medterr. 2013; 29: 683-6.
• Referans10 Amorim M, Borini C, De Castro Lopes S et al. Relationship between the angle of the coronoid process of the mandible and the electromyographic activity of the temporal muscle in skeletal Class I and III individuals. J. Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37: 596-603.
• Referans11 Marques H, Richter F, Heck L et al. Biomechanical potential of the temporal muscle in brachyfacial and dolichofacial subjects: a study on dry mandibles. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2016; 19: 162-8.
• Referans12 Aragão JA, Souto MLS, São Mateus CR et al. Edentulousness in relation to remodeling of the gonial angles and incisures in dentate and edentate mandibles: morphometric study using the Image J software. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014; 36: 889-94.
• Referans13 Leonardi R, Muraglie S, Bennici O et al. Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular functional units in adult patients with unilateral posterior crossbite: A cone beam study with the use of mirroring and surface-to-surface matching techniques. Angle Orthod. 2019; 89: 590-6.
• Referans14 Cardinal L, Martins I, Gribel BF et al. Is there an asymmetry of the condylar and coronoid processes of the mandible in individuals with unilateral crossbite? Angle Orthod. 2018; 89: 464-9.
• Referans15 Asaumi J, Kawai N, Honda Y et al. Comparison of three-dimensional computed tomography with rapid prototype models in the management of coronoid hyperplasia. Dentomaxillofac Rad. 2001; 30: 330-5.
• Referans16 Galiè M, Consorti G, Tieghi R et al. Early surgical treatment in unilateral coronoid hyperplasia and facial asymmetry. J Craniofac Surg. 2010; 21: 129-33.
• Referans17 Murakami K, Yokoe Y, Yasuda S et al. Prolonged mandibular hypomobility patient with a “square mandible” configuration with coronoid process and angle hyperplasia. Cranio. 2000; 18: 113-9.
• Referans18 Kasat P, Bhuiyan P. A study on coronoid process of the dry adult human mandibles. J Anat Soc India. 2016; 65: 9-14.
• Referans19 Malas MA, Üngör B, Tağıl SM et al. Determination of dimensions and angles of mandible in the fetal period. Surg Radiol Anat. 2006; 28: 364-71.
• Referans20 Rasband WS. ImageJ Software 2012 Available at: https://image j.nih.gov/ij/. Erişim tarihi 18 Ocak 2021. (Accessed January 18, 2021.)
• Referans21 Jiang H, Liu H, Liu G et al. The effects of chewing‐side preference on human brain activity during tooth clenching: an fMRI study. J. Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37: 877-83.
• Referans22 Diernberger S, Bernhardt O, Schwahn C et al. Self‐reported chewing side preference and its associations with occlusal, temporomandibular and prosthodontic factors: results from the population‐based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP‐0). J. Oral Rehabil. 2008; 35: 613-20.
• Referans23 Serel Arslan S, İnal Ö, Demir N et al. Chewing side preference is associated with hemispheric laterality in healthy adults. Somatosens Mot Res. 2017; 34: 92-5.
• Referans24 Pihlaja K, Vuollo V, Sidlauskas M et al. Relations of laterality and chewing sidedness in twins. Eur J Orthod. 2018; 41: 244-9.
• Referans25 Lee S-M, Oh S, Yu SJ et al. Association between brain lateralization and mixing ability of chewing side. J. Dent. Sci. 2017; 12: 133-8.
• Referans26 Christensen L, Radue J. Lateral preference in mastication: a feasibility study. J. Oral Rehabil. 1985; 12: 421-7.
• Referans27 Çorumlu U, Kopuz C, Demir MT et al. Bilateral elongated mandibular coronoid process in an Anatolian skull. J. Cell. Physiol. 2016; 49:217-20.
• Referans28 Chauhan P, Dixit SG. Bilateral elongated coronoid processes of mandible. Int. J. Anat. Var. 2011; 4: 25-7.
• Referans29 Kasai K, Richards L, Kanazawa E et al. Relationship between attachment of the superficial masseter muscle and craniofacial morphology in dentate and edentulous humans. J. Dent. Res. 1994; 73: 1142-9.
• Referans30 Quadri A, Khan H, Ahmed T. Variations in Shape of Mandibular Coronoid Process in 200 South Indian Subjects. Int. J. Sci. 2016; 4: 159-60.
• Referans31 Sharieff J. Observation on morphological features of human mandibles in 200 South Indian subjects. Anatomica Karnataka. 2011; 5: 44-9.
• Referans32 Isaac B, Holla S. Variations in the shape of the coronoid process in the adult human mandible. J Anat Soc India. 2001; 50: 137-9.
• Referans33 Ishwarkumar S, Pillay P, De Gama B et al. Osteometric and Radiological Study of the Mandibular Notch. Int J Morphol. 2019; 37: 491-7.
• Referans34 Upadhyay RB, Upadhyay J, Agrawal P et al. Analysis of gonial angle in relation to age, gender, and dentition status by radiological and anthropometric methods. JJ Forensic Dent Sci. 2012; 4: 29.
• Referans35 Larrazabal-Moron C, Sanchis-Gimeno JA. Gonial angle growth patterns according to age and gender. Ann Anat. 2018; 215: 93-6.
• Referans36 Osato S, Kuroyama I, Nakajima S et al. Differences in 5 anatomic parameters of mandibular body morphology by gonial angle size in dentulous Japanese subjects. Ann Anat. 2012; 194: 446-51.