KEÇİ SÜTÜ KALİTESİNDE YENİ GELİŞMELERE BİR BAKIŞ

Öz

Günümüzde insan beslenmesinde son derece önemli yararlı etkileri tespit edilmiş olan keçi sütü ve ürünlerine talep hızlı bir biçimde artmakta, gerek keçilerin kolay bakım ve beslenmeleri gerekse sütünün üstün özelliklerinden dolayı keçi yetiştiriciliği önem kazanmaktadır. Günümüzde keçi sütünün sağlık üzerine olumlu etkilerinin anlaşılmasından dolayı son yıllarda keçi sütü ile ilgili araştırma sayısı artış göstermiştir. Keçi sütü ve keçi peynirinin kalitesini arttırmak için keçi diyetinde bulunan yemlerin tanımlanması, kalite kontrol için yeni sensörler geliştirilmesi, yeni ürünlerin geliştirilmesi gibi geliştirilen yeni yöntemlerle bu ürünlerin tüketimi giderek artmaktadır. Bu makalede keçi sütünün kalitesinin arttırılmasına yönelik yeni gelişmelerle alakalı son çalışmalara değinilecektir ve sonuçlanmış çalışmaların uygulanabilirliği tartışılacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Kaynakça

1. Açu, M., Özer, E., Yerlikaya, O., Kesenkaş, H., Kınık, Ö., 2012. Koyun ve keçi sütlerindeki somatik hücre
2. sayısının süt verimi ve bileşimine etkisi. Erişim: http://www.sutdunyasi.com/haber/577-koyun-ve-keci-sutulerindeki-
3. somatik-hucre-sayisini.html#sthash.Sw3b4WCO.dpuf
4. Adamopoulos KG, Goula AM, Petropakis HJ. 2001. Quality control during processing of feta cheese - NIR
5. application. J Food Compos Anal 14 (4): 431-440.
6. Akın, N., 1996. Peynir yapımında kullanılan süt pıhtılaştırıcı enzimler ve bunların bazı özellikleri.
7. Gıda 21 (6): 435-442.
8. Aruoma, O., Spencer, J.P., Rossi, R., Aeschbach, R., Kahn, A., Mahmood, N.,Munoz, A., Murcia, M.A.,

9. Butler, J., Halliwell, B., 1996. An evaluation ofthe antioxidant antiviral action of extracts of Rosemary and
10. provenc¸ alherbs. Food Chem. Toxicol. 34, 449–456.
11. Baudry, C., De Cremoux, R., Gaspard, C.E., 1999. Influence de la numérationcellulaire sur la production et
12. la composition du lait de chèvre (Influ-ence of somatic cell count on goat milk production and composition).
13. Journees Nationales GTV-INRA, Nantes, May 26–28. Vol. Antibiother-apie et antibioresistance, pp. 519–522
14. (in French).
15. Bertozzi, L., Panari, G., 1993. Cheeses with Appellation d’Origine Controlée(AOC). Factors that affect
16. quality. Int. Dairy J. 3, 297–312.
17. Boutoial, K., Rovira, S., García, V., Ferrandini, E., López, M.B., 2012. Influenceof feeding goats with thyme
18. and rosemary extracts on the physi-cochemical and sensory quality of cheese and pasteurized milk. In: Goats:
19. Habitat, Breeding Management. Nova Science Publisher, NewYork, USA, pp. 45–54.
20. Boutoial, K., Ferrandini, E., Rovira, S., García, V., López, M.B., 2013. Effect offeeding goats with Rosemary
21. (Rosmarinus officinalis spp.) by producton milk and cheese properties. Small Rumin. Res. 112, 147–153.
22. Buffa, M., Trujillo, A.J., Pavia, M., Guamis, B., 2001. Changes in textural,microstructural, and colour characteristics
23. during ripening of cheesesmade from raw, pasteurized or high-pressure-treated goats’ milk. Int.
24. Dairy J. 11, 927–934.
25. Caravaca, F., Carrizosa, J., Urrutia, B., Baena, F., Jordana, J., Amills, M.,Badaoui, B., Sánchez, A., Angiolillo,
26. A., Serradilla, J.M., 2009. Shortcommunication: effect of as1-casein (CSN1S1) and as1-casein (CSN3)
27. genotypes on milk composition in Murciano-Granadina goats. J. DairySci. 92, 2960–2964.
28. Castillo, M., Payne, F.A., Hicks, C.L., Lopez, M.B., 2000. Predicting cuttingand clotting time coagulating
29. goat’s milk using diffuse reflectance:effect of pH, temperature and enzyme concentration. Int. Dairy J. 10,551–562.
30. Castillo, M., Lucey, J.A., Wang, T., Payne, F.A., 2006. Effect of temperatureand inoculum concentration on
31. prediction of both gelation time andcutting time. Cottage cheese gels. Int. Dairy J. 16, 147–152.
32. Chiofalo, V., Liotta, L., Fiumanò, R., Riolo, E.B., Chiofalo, B., 2012. Influence ofdietary supplementation of
33. Rosmarinus officinalis L. on performancesof diary ewes organically managed. Small Rumin.
34. Res. 104, 122–128.
35. Cimander C, Carlsson M, Mandenius CF. 2002. Sen¬sor fusion for on-line monitoring of yoghurt fermentati
36. ¬on. J Biotechnol 99 (3): 237-248.
37. Comunian, R., Paba, A., Dupré, I., Daga, E.S., Scintu, M.F., 2010. Evaluationof a microbiological indicator
38. test for antibiotic detection in ewe andgoat milk. J. Dairy Sci. 93, 5644–5650.
39. Çelebi, Ş., Kaya, A., 2008. Konjuge linoleik asitin biyolojik özellikleri ve hayvansal ürünlerde miktarını
40. artırmaya yönelik bazı çalışmalar. Hayvansal Üretim 49(1): 62-68.
41. Dejmek, P., Walstra, P., 2004. The syneresis of rennet-coagulated curd. In:Fox, P.F. (Ed.), Cheese: Chemistry,
42. Physics and Microbiology. Vol. 1:General Aspects. , 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall, London, UK, pp. 71–101.
43. Delgado, F.J., González-Crespo, J., Cava, R., Ramírez, R., 2011. Changes in thevolatile profile of a raw goat
44. milk cheese treated by hydrostatic highpressure at different stages of maturation. Int. Dairy J. 21, 135–141.
45. De Feo, V., Quaranta, E., Fedele, V., Claps, S., Rubino, R., Pizza, C., 2006.Vegetal secondary metabolites in
46. goat milk in relation to plant intake.Ital. J. Food Sci. 18, 1–8.
47. Ertugay, M., Başlar, M., 2011. Gıdaların kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesinde yakın kızılötesi (nır) spektroskopisi.
48. GIDA 36 (1): 49-54.
49. Ecem AKAN, Özer KINIK / Gıda ve Yem Bilimi - Teknolojisi Dergisi / Journal of Food and Feed Science - Technology 15:42-45 (2015)
50. Evert-Arriagada, K., Hernández-Herrero, M.M., Juan, B., Guamis, B., Tru-jillo, A.J., 2012. Effect of high
51. pressure on fresh cheese shelf-life. J.Food Eng. 110, 248–253.
52. Fagan, C.C., Leedy, M., Castillo, M., Payne, F.A., O’Donnell, C.P., O’Callaghan,D.J., 2007. Development
53. of a light scatter sensor technology for on-linemonitoring of milk coagulation and whey separation. J. Food
54. Eng. 83,61–67.
55. Fagan, C.C., Castillo, M., O’Donnell, C.P., O’Collaghan, D.J., Payne, F.A., 2008.On-line prediction of cheese
56. making indices using backscatter of nearinfrared light. Int. Dairy J. 18, 120–128.
57. FAOSTAT, 2013. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,Available at: http://faostat.fao.
58. org (online, 18.9.2013).
59. García, V., Rovira, S., Teruel, R., Boutoial, K., Rodríguez, J., Roa, I., López,M.B., 2012. Effect of vegetable
60. coagulant, microbial coagulant and calfrennet on physicochemical, proteolysis, sensory and texture profilesof
61. fresh goats cheese. Dairy Sci. Technol. 92, 691–707.
62. García, V., Rovira, S., Boutoial, K., Ferrandini, E., López, M.B., 2013.Effect of starters and ripening time on
63. the physicochemical, nitro-gen fraction and texture profile of goat’s cheese coagulated witha vegetable coagulant
64. (Cynara cardunculus). J. Sci. Food Agric.,http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6292.
65. García-I˜niguez de Ciriano, M., García-Herreros, C., Larequi, E., Valen-cia, I., Ansorena, D., Astiasarán, I.,
66. Use of natural antioxidantfrom lyophilized water extracts of Borago officinalis in dry fermentedsausages
67. enriched in _-3 PUFA. Meat Sci. 83, 271–277.
68. González-Martín, I., González-Pérez, C., Hernández-Hierro, J., González-Cabrera, J.M., 2008. Use of NIRS
69. technology with a remote reflectancefibre-optic probe for predicting major components in cheese. Talanta75,
70. –355.
71. Haenlein, G. G. W., 2004. Goat milk in human nutrition. Small Ruminant Research 51, 155-163.
72. Hayaloglu, A.A., Karagul-Yuceer, Y., 2011. Utilization and characterizationof small ruminants’ milk and
73. milk products in Turkey: current statusand new perspectives. Small Rumin. Res. 101, 73–83.
74. Jandal, J.M., 1996. Comparative aspects of goat and sheep milk. SmallRumin. Res. 22, 177–185.
75. Jordán, M.J., Martínez, R.M., Martínez, C., Mo˜nino, I., Sotomayor, J.A., 2009.Polyphenolic extract and
76. essential oil quality of Thymus zygis ssp. gra-cilis shrubs cultivated under different watering levels. Ind. Crops
77. Prod.29, 145–153.
78. Jordán, M.J., Mo˜nino, M.I., Martnez, C., Lafuente, A., Sotomayor, J.A.,2010. Introduction of distillate rosemary
79. leaves into the diet of theMurciano-Granadina goat: transfer of polyphenolic compounds togoats’ milk
80. and the plasma of suckling goat kids. J. Agric. Food Chem.58, 8265–8270.
81. Juan, B., Trujillo, A.J., Guamis, V., Buffa, M., Ferragut, V., 2007. Rheological,textural and sensory characteristics
82. of high-pressure treated semi-hard ewe’s milk cheese. Int. Dairy J. 17, 248–254.
83. Kalantzopoulos, G., Dubeuf, J.P., Vallerand, F., Pirisi, A., Casalta, E., Lauret, A., Trujillo, T., 2004. Characteristics
84. of sheep and goat milks: quality and hygienic factors fort he shhep and goat dairy sectors. Bull. IDF
85. , 17-28.
86. Kınık, Ö., Kavas,G., Uysal, H. ve Kesenkaş, H. 2004. Yüksek Hidrostatik Basınç Tekniğinin Süt Endüstrisindeki
87. Uygulamaları, GIDA. 29 (1) : 95-102.
88. Laso, N., Brugué, E., Vidal, J., Ros, E., Arnaiz, J.A., Carné, X., Vidal, S., Mas,S., Deulofeu, R., Lafuente,
89. A., 2007. Effects of milk supplementationwith conjugated linoleic acid (isomers cis-9, trans-11 and trans-10,-
90. cis-12) on body composition and metabolic syndrome components.Br. J. Nutr. 98, 860–867.
91. Li, D., Bode, O., Drummond, H., Sinclair, A.J., 2003. Omega-3 (n-3) fattyacids. In: Gunstone, F.D. (Ed.),
92. Lipids for Functional Foods Nutraceuti-cals. The Oily Press, UK, pp. 225–262.
93. Lo Piero, A.R., Puglisi, I., Petrone, G., 2002. Characterization of “Lettucine”,a serine-like protease from
94. Lactuca sativa leaves, as a novel enzymefor milk clotting. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50, 2439–2443.
95. Loor, J.J., Herbein, J.H., Polan, C.E., 2002. Trans18:1 and 18:2 isomers inblood plasma and milk fat of
96. grazing cows fed a grain supplement con-taining solvent-extracted or mechanically extracted soybean meal.
97. J.Dairy Sci. 85, 1197–1207.
98. Manlongat N, Yang TJ, Hinckley LS, Bendel RB, Krider HM., 1998. Physiologic-chemoattractant-induced
99. migration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in milk. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol, 5: 375-381.
100. Ecem AKAN, Özer KINIK / Gıda ve Yem Bilimi - Teknolojisi Dergisi / Journal of Food and Feed Science - Technology 15:43-45 (2015) 43
101. Maraboli A, Cattaneo TMP, Giangiacomo R, 2002. Detection of vegetable proteins from soy, pea and wheat
102. isolates in milk powder by near infrared spectroscopy. J Near Infrared Spec 10 (1): 63–69.
103. Martínez, A.L., (Tesis Doctoral) 2011. Adición de aceites vegetales de difer-ente grado de insaturación a la
104. ración de cabras lecheras. Efectos sobrela utilización de la ración y la producción y composición de la leche.
105. Universidad de Córdoba (in Spanish).
106. Moniello G, Pinna W, Pani R, 1996. Improvement of Sheep Milk Quality in Extensive System of Mediterranean
107. Areas: Practical Approach in Field to Reduce the Somatic Cell Content of Bulk Milk. 47th Annual
108. Meeting of the European Assoc. For Animal Prod. Lillehammer, Norway.
109. Navratil M, Cimander C, Mandenius CF. 2004. On-line multisensor monitoring of yogurt and filmjölk fer¬-
110. mentations on production scale. J Agr Food Chem 52 (3): 415-420.
111. Milani, F.X., Wendorff, W.L., 2011. Goat and sheep milk products in theUnited States (USA). Small Rumin.
112. Res. 101, 134–139.
113. Milos, M., Makota, D., 2012. Investigation of antioxidant synergisms andantagonisms among thymol, carvacrol,
114. thymoquinone and p-cymenein a model system using the Briggs–Rauscher oscillating reaction. Food-
115. Chem. 131, 296–299.
116. Minervini, F., Bilancia, M.T., Siragusa, S., Gobbetti, M., Caponio, F., 2009.Fermented goats’ milk produced
117. with selected multiple starters as apotentially functional food. Food Microbiol. 26, 559–564.
118. Morand-Fehr, P., Fedele, V., Decandia, M., Le Frileux, Y., 2007. Influence offarming and feeding systems on
119. composition and quality of goat andsheep milk. Small Rumin. Res. 68, 20–34.
120. Nieto, G., Díaz, P., Ba˜non, S., Garrido, M.D., 2010. Dietary administration ofewe diets with a distillate
121. from rosemary leaves (Rosmarinus officinalisL.): influence on lamb meat quality. Meat Sci. 84, 23–29.
122. Nudda, A., Battacone, G., Decandia, M., Acciaro, M., Aghini-Lombardi, F.,Frigeri, M., Pulina, G., 2009.
123. The effect of dietary iodine supplemen-tation in dairy goats on milk production traits and milk iodine content.J.
124. Dairy Sci. 92, 5133–5138.
125. Önenç, S., Açıkgöz, Z., 2005. Aromatik Bitkilerin Hayvansal Ürünlerde Antioksidan Etkileri. Hayvansal
126. Üretim 46 (1): 50-55.
127. Pandya, A.J., Ghodke, K.M., 2007. Goat and sheep milk products other thancheeses and yoghurt. Small
128. Rumin. Res. 68, 193–206.
129. Parejo, I., Viladomat, F., Bastida, J., Rosas-Romero, A., Flerlage, N., Burillo,J., Codina, C., 2002. Comparison
130. between the radical scavengingactivity and antioxidant activity of six distilled and non distilledMediterranean
131. herbs and aromatic plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50,6882–6890.
132. Park, Y.W., Guo, M.R., 2006a. Goat milk products: processing technol-ogy, types and consumption trends.
133. In: Park, Y.W., Haenlein, G.F.W.(Eds.), Handbook of Milk of Non-bovine Mammals. Blackwell Publish-ers,
134. Ames, Iowa/Oxford, England, p. 59-106.
135. Park, Y.W., Guo, M.R., 2006b. Therapeutic and hypo-allergenic values ofgoat milk and implication of food
136. allergy. In: Park, Y.W., Haenlein,G.F.W. (Eds.), Handbook of Milk of Non-bovine Mammals. BlackwellPublishers,
137. Ames, Iowa/Oxford, England, p. 121-136.
138. Park, Y.W., Júarez, M., Ramos, M., Haenlein, G.F.W., 2007. Physico-chemical characteristics of goat and
139. sheep milk. Small Rumin. Res. 68,88–113.
140. Pizzillo, M., Cogliandro, E., Rubino, R., Fedele, V., 1996. Relationshipbetween somatic cells and milk
141. quality in different goat productionsystems. In: Rubino, R. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Somatic Cells andMilk
142. of Small Ruminants. Bella, Italy, September 25–27, 1994. EAAPPublication No 77, Wageningen Pers, pp.
143. –273.
144. Pulina, G., Nudda, A., Battacone, G., Cannas, A., 2006. Effects of nutrition onthe contents of fat, protein,
145. somatic cells, aromatic compounds, andundesirable substances in sheep milk. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.
146. ,255–291.
147. Queiroz-Macedo, I., Faro, C.J., Pires, E.M., 1996. Caseinolytic specificity ofCardosin, an aspartic protease
148. from the cardoon Cynara cardunculusL.: action on bovine _s- and _-casein and comparison with chymosin.J.
149. Agric. Food Chem. 44, 42–47.
150. Raff, M., Tholstrup, T., Toubro, S., Bruun, J.M., Lund, P., Straarup, E.M.,Christensen, R., Sandberg, M.B.,
151. Ecem AKAN, Özer KINIK / Gıda ve Yem Bilimi - Teknolojisi Dergisi / Journal of Food and Feed Science - Technology 15:44-45 (2015)
152. Mandrup, S., 2009. Conjugated linoleicacids reduce body fat in healthy postmenopausal women.
153. J. Nutr. 139,1347–1352.
154. Randolph H, Erwin RE, Richter RL., 1971. Influence of mastitis on properties of milk VII-distribution of
155. milk proteins. J Dairy Sci, 57: 15-18.
156. Raynal-Ljutovac, K., Gaborit, P., Lauret, A., 2005. The relationship betweenquality criteria of goat milk, its
157. technological properties and the qual-ity of the final products. Small Rumin. Res. 60, 167–177.
158. Raynal-Ljutovac, K., Pirisi, A., de Crémoux, R., Gonzalo, C., 2007. Somaticcells of goat and sheep milk:
159. analytical, sanitary, productive and tech-nological aspects. Small Rumin. Res. 68, 126–144.
160. Remeuf, F., Ricordeau, G., Brignon, G., Grosclaude, F., 2001. Influence dela teneur en caséine beta sur
161. les caractéristiques physicochimique etl’aptitude à la coagulation enzymatique du lait de chèvre (Influenceof
162. beta casein concentration on physicochemical characteristics andrennet coagulation of goat milk). Lait 81 (6),
163. –742 (in French).
164. Ribeiro, S.D.A., Ribeiro, A.C., 2010. Specialty products made from goat milk.Small Rumin.
165. Res. 89, 225–233.
166. Rodríguez-Alcalá, L.M., Harte, F., Fontecha, J., 2009. Fatty acid profile andCLA isomers content of cow,
167. ewe and goat milks processed by highpressure homogenization. Inn. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 10, 32–36.
168. Rodríguez-Otero, J.L., Hermida, M., Cepeda, A., 1997. Analysis of dairyproducts by near-infrared spectroscopy:
169. a review. J. Agric. Food Chem.45, 2815–2819.
170. Rovira, S., García, V., López, M.B., 2011. Application of a Large Field of Viewsensor during manufacture
171. of fresh goat cheese. Int. J. Dairy Technol.65, 51–56.
172. Rovira, S., García, V., Ferrandini, E., Carrión, J., Castillo, M., López, M.B.,2012. Usefulness of a Large
173. Field of View sensor for physicochemical,textural and yield predictions under industrial goat cheese (Murcia
174. alVino) manufacturing conditions. J. Dairy Sci. 95, 6320–6331.
175. Saldo, J., Fernández, A., Sendra, E., Butz, P., Tauscher, B., Guamis, B., 2003.High pressure treatment decelerates
176. the lipolysis in a caprine cheese.Food Res. Int. 36, 1061–1068.
177. Sánchez-Macías, D., Morales-delaNuez, A., Torres, A., Hernández-Castellano, L.E., Jiménez-Flores, R.,
178. Castro, N., Argüello, A., 2013. Effectsof addition of somatic cells to caprine milk on cheese quality.
179. Int. DairyJ. 29, 61–67.
180. Sanz Sampelayo, M.R., Chilliard, Y., Schmidely, P., Boza, J., 2007. Influenceof type of diet on the fat constituents
181. of goat and sheep milk. SmallRumin. Res. 68, 42–63.
182. Serafeimidou, A., Zlatanos, S., Laskaridis, K., Sagredos, A., 2012. Chem-ical characteristics, fatty acid composition
183. and conjugated linoleicacid (CLA) content of traditional Greek yogurts. Food Chem. 134,1839–1846.
184. Settani, L., Moschetti, G., 2010. Non-starter lactic acid bacteria used toimprove cheese quality and provide
185. health benefits. Food Microbiol.27, 691–697.
186. Shingfield, K.J., Ahvenjärvi, S., Toivonen, V., Vanhatalo, A., Huhtanen, P.,Griinari, J.M., 2008. Effect of
187. incremental levels of sunflower-seed oilin the diet on ruminal lipid metabolism in lactating cows.
188. Br. J. Nutr.99, 971–983.
189. Simopoulos, A.P., 2008. The importance of the omega-6/omega-3 fatty acidratio in cardiovascular disease
190. and other chronic diseases. Exp. Biol.Med. 233, 674–688.
191. Trujillo, A.J., Jordana, J., Guamis, B., Serradilla., J.M., Amills, M. 1998. El polimorfismo del gen de la caseina
192. κs1 caprina y su efecto sobre la producción, la composición y las propiedades tecnológicas de la leche y
193. sobre la fabricación y la maduración del queso. Food. Sci. Tech. Int. 4: 217-235.
194. Trujillo, A.J., Capellas, M., Buffa, M., Royo, C., Gervilla, R., Felipe, X., Sendra, E., Saldo, J., Ferragut, V.
195. and Guamis, B. 2000. Application of High Pressure Treatment for Cheese Production,
196. Food Research International. 33 : 311-316.
197. Trujillo, A. J., Capellas, M., Gervilla, R., Saldo, J. and Guamis, B. 2002. Application of High Hydrostatic
198. Pressure on Milk and Diary Products: a Review, Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies,
199. : 295-307.
200. Trujillo, A.J., Buffa, M., Casals, I., Fernández, P., Guamis, B., 2002. Proteolysisin goat cheese made from
201. raw, pasteurised or pressure-treated milk.Inn. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 3, 309–319.
202. Ecem AKAN, Özer KINIK / Gıda ve Yem Bilimi - Teknolojisi Dergisi / Journal of Food and Feed Science - Technology 15:45-45 (2015) 45
203. TUIK, 2011. http : // www.tuik.gov.tr Erişim Tarihi: 10.02.2014
204. Wang, S., Zhang, H.Y., Wang, L., Duan, Z.J., Kennedy, I., 2006. Analysisof sulphonamide residues in edible
205. animal products: a review. FoodAddit. Contam. 23, 362–384.
206. Walstra, P., Noomen, A., Geurts, T.J., 1993. Dutch-type varieties. In:Fox, P.F. (Ed.), Cheese: Chemistry,
207. Physics and Microbiology, Vol.2. Major Cheese Groups. , 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall, London,pp. 39–82.
208. Wettasinghe, M., Shahidi, F., Amarowickz, R., Abou-Zaid, M.M., 2001. Phe-nolic acids in defatted seeds of
209. borage (Borago officinalis L.). FoodChem. 75, 49–56.
210. Xu, J., Yin, W., Zhang, Y., Yi, J., Meng, M., Wang, Y., Xue, H., Zhang, T., Xi, R.,2012. Establishment of
211. magnetic beads-based enzyme immunoassayfor detection of chloramphenicol in milk.
212. Food Chem. 134, 2526–2531.
213. Yaralı, E., Atay, O., Gökdal, Ö., Çetiner, Ş., 2013. Keçi sütünün insan beslenmesi açısından önemi ve Türkiye’de
214. ve dünyada keçi sütü üretimi. Agrotime, 1, 100-108.
215. Zare, F., Boye, J.I., Orsat, V., Champagne, C., Simpson, B.K., 2011. Microbial,physical and sensory properties
216. of yogurt supplemented with lentilflour. Food Res. Int. 44 (8), 2482–2488.
217. Zervas, G., Tsiplakou, E., 2011. The effect of feeding systems on the char-acteristics of products from small
218. ruminants. Small Rumin. Res. 101,140–149.