Taught Curriculum Effect on Teacher Education Programs at Faculties of Education in Turkey: Action 2006

Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1 1 Ocak 2012
Oğuz Cincioğlu
PDF İndir
EN TR

Taught Curriculum Effect on Teacher Education Programs at Faculties of Education in Turkey: Action 2006

Öz

Inevitable portion of teacher education programs is the continuous and gradual betterment proposals over the curricula. Any sort of propositions with an aim to improve the maintaining programs either recognizing the top-down, bottom-up or interactive and participative suggestions offered by participants -administrators, practitioners and expert academicians, or a combination of several, if not all- make sense especially if they are realized and find ways to get actualized in real life conditions. Action 2006, as an example of comparatively meaningful proposals of ‘taught curriculum’ which puts the teacher educators as intellectuals and educated brains to the center of curricular studies, has proved to be useful and found a place in teacher education programs for several reasons, which is the focus of this study. General reasoning and relative effects of Action 2006, even though it necessitates some more time to get overall results, shed light to the teacher education programs as an alternative to go beyond keeping abreast of the innovations and paradigm shifts. The study finalizes announcing both prompting concerns of teacher educators and mentioning several handicaps that this approach might bring to the curricular studies, which Action 2006 puts forward

Anahtar Kelimeler

Action 2006, Taught curriculum, Teacher educators, Curriculum development.

Kaynakça

  1. Apple, M. W., ve J. A. Beane (2007), Democratic Schools, Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH.
  2. Glatthorn, A., Boschee, F., & Whitehead, B. (2006), Chapter 1: The nature of curriculum. In Curriculum Leadership: Development and Implementation (pp.3-32). Thousand Oaks, CA:sage.
  3. Gordon, S. (2004), Curriculum Development. In Professional development for school improvement (pp.236-261). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  4. Hewitt, T. (2006), Chapter 11: Managing and implementing the curriculum. In Understanding and shaping the curriculum (pp. 287-314). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  5. Kavak, Y., Aydın, A., & Altun, S. A. (2007), Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Eğitim Fakülteleri (1982-2007): Öğretmenin Üniversitede Yetiştirilmesinin Değerlendirilmesi. Ankara: Yükseköğretim Kurulu Yayını, Temmuz 2007.
  6. Murphy, J. (2005), Connecting Teacher Leadership and School Improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  7. National Education Statistics:Formal Education 2010-2011, Ministry of National Education, Turkish Statistical Institute.
  8. Reevess, D. (2006), Chapter 17: Power Standards: How leaders add value to state and national standards. In The Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership. 2nd ed. (pp. 239-247). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  9. Richards, J. (2003), Chapter 2: From Syllabus Design to Curriculum Development.In Curriculum Development in Language Teaching 3rded. (pp.23-50). Cambridge University Press:Cambridge.
  10. Walker, D., & Soltis, J. (1986), Chapter 6: Aims Revisited. In Curriculum and Aims. (pp. 67-83). Teachers College Press:New York.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Cincioğlu, O. (2012). Taught Curriculum Effect on Teacher Education Programs at Faculties of Education in Turkey: Action 2006. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1), 116-130. https://izlik.org/JA96ZU53JL
AMA
1.Cincioğlu O. Taught Curriculum Effect on Teacher Education Programs at Faculties of Education in Turkey: Action 2006. SBAD. 2012;7(1):116-130. https://izlik.org/JA96ZU53JL
Chicago
Cincioğlu, Oğuz. 2012. “Taught Curriculum Effect on Teacher Education Programs at Faculties of Education in Turkey: Action 2006”. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi 7 (1): 116-30. https://izlik.org/JA96ZU53JL.
EndNote
Cincioğlu O (01 Ocak 2012) Taught Curriculum Effect on Teacher Education Programs at Faculties of Education in Turkey: Action 2006. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi 7 1 116–130.
IEEE
[1]O. Cincioğlu, “Taught Curriculum Effect on Teacher Education Programs at Faculties of Education in Turkey: Action 2006”, SBAD, c. 7, sy 1, ss. 116–130, Oca. 2012, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA96ZU53JL
ISNAD
Cincioğlu, Oğuz. “Taught Curriculum Effect on Teacher Education Programs at Faculties of Education in Turkey: Action 2006”. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi 7/1 (01 Ocak 2012): 116-130. https://izlik.org/JA96ZU53JL.
JAMA
1.Cincioğlu O. Taught Curriculum Effect on Teacher Education Programs at Faculties of Education in Turkey: Action 2006. SBAD. 2012;7:116–130.
MLA
Cincioğlu, Oğuz. “Taught Curriculum Effect on Teacher Education Programs at Faculties of Education in Turkey: Action 2006”. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 7, sy 1, Ocak 2012, ss. 116-30, https://izlik.org/JA96ZU53JL.
Vancouver
1.Oğuz Cincioğlu. Taught Curriculum Effect on Teacher Education Programs at Faculties of Education in Turkey: Action 2006. SBAD [Internet]. 01 Ocak 2012;7(1):116-30. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA96ZU53JL