Research Article

The Relationship Between Teachers' Sustainable Education Dispositions and Their Perceptions of National Social Responsibility

Volume: 13 Number: 2 July 30, 2025
TR EN

The Relationship Between Teachers' Sustainable Education Dispositions and Their Perceptions of National Social Responsibility

Abstract

The concept of sustainability, which was first introduced in 1987, has gained significant traction in the field of education. In recent years, the relationship between sustainability and education has been a focal point of research, with the prevailing view being that sustainability will become more operational through education. In this context, the relationship between teachers' levels of sustainable education tendency and their perceptions of national social responsibility has gained significance. The present study was conceptualized with the assumption that sustainable education tendency, which is inherently associated with the concept of social responsibility, is also related to national social responsibility perceptions. The present study aims to elucidate the relationship between teachers' sustainable education disposition levels and their perceptions of social responsibility. The study population consists of teachers working in the provinces of Ankara, Kayseri, and Sivas. The final sample size comprised 605 teachers. The study employed the relational survey model, a quantitative research method, to collect data. The collection of research data was facilitated by the Sustainable Education Tendencies Scale and the Global Social Responsibility Scale. The subsequent analysis employed a series of statistical tests, including the Mann-Whitney U test, the Kruskal-Wallis H test, and formal evaluation tests, to ascertain the existence of a significant relationship between teachers' sustainability tendencies and their perceptions of social responsibility, contingent upon specific variables.

Keywords

Sustainability , Sustainable Education , Social Responsibility , Teacher Perceptions

References

  1. Ahmed, I., Hamzah, A. B., & Abdullah, M. N. L. Y. B. (2020). Effect of social and emotional learning approach on students’ social-emotional competence. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 663-676. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13441a
  2. Akkaş, F. D. (2023). Öğretmenlerin ilkokullarda sürdürülebilir eğitim liderliğine ilişkin algıları ile eğitim felsefesi inançları arasındaki ilişkiler [The relationship between teachers' perceptions of sustainable educational leadership in primary schools and their philosophy of education beliefs] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.
  3. Alptekin, Z. M. (2020). Dijitalleşme ve dijital sosyal sorumluluk iletişimi [Digitalisation and digital social responsibility communication]. MEDİAJ, 3(2), 136-155. https://doi.org/10.33464/mediaj.829079
  4. Ankara İl Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğü (2024, Ekim 15). İstatistikler [Statistics]. https://ankara.meb.gov.tr.
  5. Aytar, O. (2019). BİST sürdürülebilirlik endeksinde yer alan şirketlerin kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk faaliyetleri üzerine bir içerik analizi [A content analysis on corporate social responsibility activities of companies in the BIST sustainability index]. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(18), 320-340. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.583811
  6. Bakır, H., Erden, M. H., Turay, İ., & Urtekin, M. S. (2022). Sınıf öğretmenlerinde küresel sosyal sorumluluk algısının istatistiksel değerlendirilmesi [Statistical evaluation of global social responsibility perception in classroom teachers]. Bilim-Teknoloji-Yenilik Ekosistemi Dergisi, 3(2), 140-149.
  7. Başer, E. H. (2015). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarinin küresel sosyal sorumluluk düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açisindan incelenmesi [Examining the global social responsibility levels of pre-service social studies teachers in terms of various variables] [Unpublished master thesis]. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi.
  8. Başer, E. H., & Kilinç, E. (2015). Küresel sosyal sorumluluk ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Global social responsibility scale: validity and reliability study]. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(3), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.57328
  9. Blowers, A. (2003). Environmental planning for sustainable development. In A. Blowers & B. Evans (Ed.), Town Planning into the 21 st Century (pp. 33-54). Routledge.
  10. Brand, K. W. (2002). Politik der nachhaltigkeit: voraussetzungen. Edition Sigma.
APA
Yiğit, Y., Topcu, İ., Cingöz, O., & Yiğittekin, M. (2025). The Relationship Between Teachers’ Sustainable Education Dispositions and Their Perceptions of National Social Responsibility. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, 13(2), 929-963. https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1620360