Mimarlıkta teknik çizim eğitimini yeniden düşünmek: Melez bir öğretim modeline doğru analog ve bilgisayar tabanlı çizim

Öz

Uluslararası yükseköğretim ortamında, birçok üniversite dijital dönüşüme uyum sağlamak için eğitim programlarını dönüştürmüştür. Son zamanlarda, sürekli değişen teknolojilerin gelişmesi ve afetler, pandemi ortamları gibi ortaya çıkan ortamlarla birlikte, geleneksel mimarlık eğitimi de dijital öğretim yöntemlerini benimsemiştir. Mimarlık eğitiminin dijitalleşmesini planlamak için, bu makale, mimari temsil yöntemlerinden biri olan teknik çizimin yeni başlayan öğrencilere nasıl öğretilebileceğini sorgulamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bilgisayar tabanlı ve analog çizim yöntemlerinin bir kombinasyonu olan önerilen model, yeni başlayan öğrencilere dijital çağda çizim yoluyla düşünme yeteneği kazandırarak eğitimlerine katkıda bulunacaktır. Her iki çizim yönteminin etkisi, bir anket yardımıyla iki öğrenci grubunda nicel araştırma yapılarak incelenmiştir. Anket, üç ana kategoride (ders içeriği, araçlar ve çalışma ortamı) çizim aracının avantajlarını ve dezavantajlarını değerlendirmek için kapalı uçlu sorular içermektedir. Bu araştırma projesi, bir üniversitede halihazırda uygulanan teknik çizim dersinin öğrenme yöntemlerini incelemekte ve bilgisayar tabanlı ve analog çizim yöntemlerinin dersin öğrenme çıktıları üzerindeki uygunluğunu değerlendirmektedir. Bu araştırma projesi, ders içeriği, öğrenme araçları ve çalışma ortamını dikkate alarak analog ve bilgisayar tabanlı çizim yöntemlerinin avantajlarını sunmakta ve hibrit müfredat için bir bilgi tabanı oluşturmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Covid-19
• Mimari Temsil
• Analog Çizim
• Dijital Çizim
• Öğretim Modeli

Reconsidering Technical Drawing Education in Architecture: Analog and Computer-Based Drawing Toward a Hybrid Teaching Model

Öz

In the environment of international higher education, many universities have transformed their educational programs for adapting to the digital turn. Recently, conventional architectural education has also adopted digital teaching methods, with the development of ever-changing technologies and the emergent environments such as disasters, pandemic environments and more. For planning the digitalization of architectural education, the article intends to query how technical drawing, as one of the methods of architectural representation, could be taught to novice students. The proposed model, a combination of computer-based and analog drawing methods, will contribute to the training of novice students by giving them the ability to think by drawing in the digital age. The impact of both drawing methods was investigated by conducting quantitative research in two student groups with the help of a questionnaire. The questionnaire includes close-ended questions to evaluate the advantages and drawbacks of the drawing tool over three main categories: course content, tools, and work environment. This research project examines the learning methods of technical drawing course learning methods that are currently applied in a university and evaluates the convenience of computer-based and analog drawing methods on the learning outcomes of the course. This research project presents the merits of analog and computer-based drawing methods considering the course contents, learning tools and work environment, and constitutes a knowledge base for the hybrid curriculum.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Covid-19
• Architectural Representation
• Analog Drawing
• Digital Drawing
• Teaching Model

Destekleyen Kurum

This work was supported by the Çankaya University Scientific Research Project Department under Grant [number MF. 20.003].

Etik Beyan

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards. Ethics committee approval information is added.

Teşekkür

Authors would like to acknowledge Çankaya University Scientific Research Project Department for the financial support and cooperation during the project.

Kaynakça

1. Aguilar Zavaleta, J.P. (2026). Pre and post-digital contrasts in architectural representation: from analogue drawing to software rendering and generation using artificial intelligence. Doi: 10.20944/preprints202607.0252.v1
2. Basa, İ., Şenyapılı, B. (2005). The (in)secure position of the design jury towards computer generated presentations, Design Studies, Vol 26, No. 3.
3. Boynton, P.M. and Greenhalgh, T. (2004). “Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire”, BMJ, Vol. 328 No. 7451, pp. 1312-1315. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1312.
4. Brandon, L. and McLain-Kark, J. (2001). “Effects of hand–drawing and CAD techniques on design development: A comparison of design merit ratings”, Journal of Interior Design, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 26-34. Doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1668.2001.tb00475.x.
5. Caldwell, G. A. & S. Woodward, (2012). “First year design “Visualisation II”: The hybridisation of analogue and digital tools”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 51, 989-994.
6. Carpo, M. (2011). The Alphabet and the Algorithm, MIT Press.
7. Carpo, M. (2013). “The art of drawing”, Architectural Design, Vol. 83 No. 5, pp. 128–133.
8. Ceylan, S., Şahin, P., Seçmen, S., Somer, M. E., & Süher, H. K. (2024). The contribution of digital tools to architectural design studio: A case study. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 15(6), 102795. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102795

9. Frascari, M. (2011). Eleven Exercises in the Art of Architectural Drawing, Routledge, New York, USA.
10. Goldschmidt, G. (2017). “Manual sketching: Why is it still relevant?”, in Ammon, S. and Capdevila-Werning, R. (Eds.), The Active Image: Architecture and Engineering in the Age of Modelling, Springer.
11. Graves, M. (2012). “Architecture and the lost art of drawing”, The New York Times, 2 September, p. 5.
12. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T. and Bond, A. (2020). “The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning”, Educase Review, available at: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning (accessed 15 February 2021).
13. IBM Corp. (2021). “IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0.”, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY.
14. Ibrahim, R., & Pour Rahimian, F. (2010). “Comparison of CAD and Manual Sketching Tools for Teaching Architectural Design”, Automation in Construction, 19(8), 978-987.
15. Krathwohl, David R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview, Theory Into Practice, 41:4, 212-218, DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
16. Wang, H. and Pan, C. (2013). “Teaching reform of Engineering Graphics ___ on the relationship between hand drawing and computer drawing”, Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Information, Business and Education Technology, Atlantis Press. doi:10.2991/icibet.2013.125.
17. Yıldızoğlu, N. (2024). Sketching versus digital design tools in architectural design. Journal of Computational Design, 5(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.53710/jcode.1504947