21. Yüzyıl Okul Liderliği için Çok Boyutlu Metaforik Bir Bakış: Rubik Küpü Model

Murat Polat

TR EN

21. Yüzyıl Okul Liderliği için Çok Boyutlu Metaforik Bir Bakış: Rubik Küpü Model

Öz

Bu çalışma, 21. yüzyıl okul liderliğinin çok boyutlu, dinamik ve karmaşık yapısını Rubik Küpü Modeli aracılığıyla kavramsallaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Model, liderlikte pedagojik, etik, dijital, kriz yönetimi, kültürel duyarlılık ve stratejik planlama olmak üzere altı temel boyutu sistematik ve metaforik bir çerçevede bütünleştirmektedir. Eğitim liderliğinin hızla değişen koşullarına uyum sağlama gerekliliği, liderlerin çoklu roller arasında etkileşimli ve esnek bir biçimde hareket etmelerini zorunlu kılmaktadır. Rubik Küpü Modeli, liderlik süreçlerinin bütüncül doğasını anlamaya ve uygulamaya yönelik yeni bir perspektif sunmakta; liderlik eğitimi, politika yapımı ve uygulamalarında yol gösterici bir araç olma potansiyeli taşımaktadır. Çalışma, modelin farklı eğitim bağlamlarında ampirik olarak sınanmasını ve eğitim liderliği pratiğine entegrasyonunu önermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Okul liderliği, Rubik Küpü Modeli, çok boyutlu liderlik, metafor

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma, etik kurul izni gerektirmemektedir.

Kaynakça

Abay, S. T., Gomes, J. F., & Mengistu, A. B. (2023). A comparative analysis of values-based leadership theories: A review and future research agenda. The Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 16(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.22543/1948-0733.1457
Ahmad, R. H., & Ghavifekr, S. (2017). School leadership for the 21st century: A conceptual overview. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management, 2(1), 48–61.
Ahmad, S., Umirzakova, S., Mujtaba, G., Amin, M. S., & Whangbo, T. (2023). Education 5.0: Requirements, enabling technologies, and future directions [arXiv preprint]. arXiv:2307.15846. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.15846
Akcil, U., Altinay, Z., Altinay, F., Dagli, G., & Altinay, M. (2018). The role of e-transformational leadership in intergenerational cooperation for school culture. Open and Equal Access for Learning in School Management, 29.
Arnold, M., & Crawford, M. (2014). Metaphors of leadership and spatialized practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(3), 320–336.
Azorín, C., & Fullan, M. (2022). Leading new, deeper forms of collaborative cultures: Questions and pathways. Journal of Educational Change, 23(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09438-2
Bagga, S. K., Gera, S., & Haque, S. N. (2023). The mediating role of organizational culture: Transformational leadership and change management in virtual teams. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.07.003
Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., Olsen, O. K., & Espevik, R. (2023). Daily transformational leadership: A source of inspiration for follower performance? European Management Journal, 41(5), 700–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.04.004
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. SAGE Publications.
Bell, L. (2002). Strategic planning and school management: Full of sound and fury, signifying nothing? Journal of Educational Administration, 40(5), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230210440276

Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). Does school leadership matter for teachers’ classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1858119
Bousquet, A., & Curtis, S. (2011). Beyond models and metaphors: Complexity theory, systems thinking and international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 24(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2011.558054
Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2003). School leadership: Concepts and evidence. National College for School Leadership.
By, R. T. (2021). Leadership: In pursuit of purpose. Journal of Change Management, 21(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1861698
Cabrera, D., & Cabrera, L. (2023). What is systems thinking? In Learning, design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice, and policy (pp. 1495–1522). Springer International Publishing.
Chatzipanagiotou, P., & Katsarou, E. (2023). Crisis management, school leadership in disruptive times and the recovery of schools in the post COVID-19 era: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 13(2), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020118
Cheah, K., & Lim, A. (2022). Successful pedagogical leadership: Bibliometric analysis from the Web of Science database (2017–2021). International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 10(2), 140–167. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.8847
Collinson, D. (2014). Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: New directions for critical leadership studies? Leadership, 10(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715013510807
Copeland, M. K. (2014). The emerging significance of values based leadership: A literature review. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(2), 105.
Day, C., Sammons, P., & Gorgen, K. (2020). Successful school leadership. Education Development Trust. https://www.educationdevelopmenttrust.com
Day, D. V., Riggio, R. E., Tan, S. J., & Conger, J. A. (2021). Advancing the science of 21st-century leadership development: Theory, research, and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(5), 101557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101557
Demirel, Y., & Özbezek, B. D. (2016). Örgütlerde zenginliğin kaynağı olarak farklılıkların yönetimi: Kavramsal bir inceleme. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1), 1–28.
Deng, C., Gulseren, D., Isola, C., Grocutt, K., & Turner, N. (2023). Transformational leadership effectiveness: An evidence-based primer. Human Resource Development International, 26(5), 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2135938
Eddy, P. L., & Boggs, G. R. (2023). Community college leadership: A multidimensional model for leading change. Routledge.
Erçetin, Ş. Ş., & Düzer, A. (2008). Multidimensional perceptual leadership model “Muldimperlead”. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(1), 25–33.
Fargas-Malet, M., & Bagley, C. (2022). Is small beautiful? A scoping review of 21st-century research on small rural schools in Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 21(5), 822–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211066711
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. Jossey-Bass.
Gómez-Leal, R., Holzer, A. A., Bradley, C., Fernández-Berrocal, P., & Patti, J. (2022). The relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership in school leaders: A systematic review. Cambridge Journal of Education, 52(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1927987
Goodchild, M. (2022). Relational systems thinking: The Dibaajimowin (story) of re-theorizing “systems thinking” and “complexity science”. Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 2(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.47061/jabsc.v2i1.2027
Gougas, V., & Malinova, L. (2021). School leadership. Models and tools: A review. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.91009
Guthrie, K. L., & Jenkins, D. M. (2018). The role of leadership educators: Transforming learning. IAP Publishing.
Harris, A., Jones, M., & Ismail, N. (2022). Distributed leadership: Taking a retrospective and contemporary view of the evidence base. School Leadership & Management, 42(5), 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2109620
Jackson, M. C. (2019). Critical systems thinking and the management of complexity. John Wiley & Sons.
Kulkarni, M. A. P. (2025). Adaptability quotient as a strategic tool to enhance employability in the education sector in Mumbai. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11(10s), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.64252/caqffd39
Maani, K. E., & Maharaj, V. (2004). Links between systems thinking and complex decision making. System Dynamics Review, 20(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.281
Maker, C. J. (2021). From leading to guiding, facilitating, and inspiring: A needed shift for the 21st century. Education Sciences, 12(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010018
Male, T., & Palaiologou, I. (2015). Pedagogical leadership in the 21st century: Evidence from the field. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213494889
Mannheim, K. (1928). Das problem der generationen [The problem of generations]. In Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge.
Marcellino, P. A. (2010). Metaphors and leadership: Understanding leadership processes through metaphor analysis. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13(2), 169–183.
McCarthy, A. M., Maor, D., McConney, A., & Cavanaugh, C. (2023). Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100479
McKay, L., Ekins, A., & Brown, M. (2019). Metaphors of educational leadership: A systematic review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(4), 517–539.
Mincu, M. (2022). Why is school leadership key to transforming education? Structural and cultural assumptions for quality education in diverse contexts. Prospects, 52(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-022-09600-1
Mukul, E., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023). Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of Education 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122664
Okiri, P. O., & Hercz, M. (2025). The tenets of distributed pedagogical leadership in educational contexts—A systematic literature review on perception and practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231154444
Pane, Y. K., Darwin, D., & Rahman, A. (2024). The relationship between situational leadership, digital transformation, and adversity quotient with the performance of vocational high school teachers. Journal La Sociale, 5(6), 1543–1552. https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v5i6.1420
Parry, K. W. (2008). Viewing leadership through metaphor. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 393–403). Sage.
Passey, D. (2014). Intergenerational learning practices—Digital leaders in schools. Education and Information Technologies, 19, 473–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9322-z
Plekhanov, D., Franke, H., & Netland, T. H. (2023). Digital transformation: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 41(6), 821–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.09.007
Polat, M. (2020). Türkiye’deki araştırmalar bağlamında kapsayıcı eğitim ve okul yönetimi. Research in Education and Social Sciences, 323–335.
Polat, M. (2022). “Kapsayıcı eğitim” mümkün mü? Kapsayıcı eğitim dersini alan öğretmen adaylarının görüşlerinin vignette tekniği ile incelenmesi. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 965–986. https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.1066922
Polat, M. (2024a). Dijitalleşme ve eğitimde yapay zekâ: Eğitim yönetimine yansımaları. Education Science and Sports, 6(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.70053/esas.1566395
Polat, M. (2024b). Milli Eğitim Akademisi ve öğretmen yetiştirme sürecinin dönüşümü. İlke Yayınları.
Polat, M. (2025). Okul liderliğinde Rubik Küpü modeli: 21. yüzyılda dönüşen roller ve yeni yönelimler [Conference panel presentation]. Uluslararası İstanbul Eğitimin Geleceği Kongresi İSTEG 2025, 28–30 Mayıs 2025, Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi.
Polat, M., & Turhaner, K. (2024). The relationship between inclusive leadership and teachers' perceptions of organizational trust: A cross-sectional survey in Türkiye. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(1), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202424702
Printy, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). Distributed leadership globally: The interactive nature of principal and teacher leadership in 32 countries. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(2), 290–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20926548
Rahimi, R. A., & Oh, G. S. (2024). Rethinking the role of educators in the 21st century: Navigating globalization, technology, and pandemics. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-024-00117-w
Ramírez-Herrero, V., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., & Medina-Merodio, J. A. (2024). Intergenerational leadership: A leadership style proposal for managing diversity and new technologies. Systems, 12(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12020050
Rosch, D. M., & Anthony, M. D. (2012). Leadership pedagogy: Putting theory to practice. New Directions for Student Services, 2012(140), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20031
Schleicher, A. (2012). Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century: Lessons from around the world. OECD Publishing.
Spicer, A., & Alvesson, M. (2010). Metaphors we lead by: Understanding leadership in the real world. Routledge.
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.
Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. (2000). Complexity and management: Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking? Psychology Press.
Striepe, M., & Cunningham, C. (2022). Understanding educational leadership during times of crises: A scoping review. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2021-0057
Tintoré, M., Cunha, R. S., Cabral, I., & Alves, J. J. M. (2022). A scoping review of problems and challenges faced by school leaders (2003–2019). Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(4), 536–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220942527
Torres, L. L. (2022). School organizational culture and leadership: Theoretical trends and new analytical proposals. Education Sciences, 12(4), 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040254
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. In Managing digital transformation (pp. 13–66).
Yücebalkan, B., Eryılmaz, B., Özlü, K., Keskin, Y. B., & Yücetürk, C. (2018). Digital leadership in the context of digitalization and digital transformations. Current Academic Studies in Social Science, 1, 489–505.
Zeng, D. X., Li, M., Wang, J. J., Hou, Y. L., Lu, W. J., & Huang, Z. (2018). Overview of Rubik’s cube and reflections on its application in mechanism. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 31(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-018-0269-7
Zheng, Y., Epitropaki, O., Graham, L., & Caveney, N. (2022). Ethical leadership and ethical voice: The mediating mechanisms of value internalization and integrity identity. Journal of Management, 48(4), 973–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211002611

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Eğitimde Liderlik

Bölüm

Derleme

Yazarlar

Murat Polat ^*
0000-0002-2921-7831
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

24 Aralık 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

18 Temmuz 2025

Kabul Tarihi

12 Eylül 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA69XF44KX

APA

Polat, M. (2025). 21. Yüzyıl Okul Liderliği için Çok Boyutlu Metaforik Bir Bakış: Rubik Küpü Model. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 198-221. https://izlik.org/JA69XF44KX

AMA

1.Polat M. 21. Yüzyıl Okul Liderliği için Çok Boyutlu Metaforik Bir Bakış: Rubik Küpü Model. GAUN-JES. 2025;9(2):198-221. https://izlik.org/JA69XF44KX

Chicago

Polat, Murat. 2025. “21. Yüzyıl Okul Liderliği için Çok Boyutlu Metaforik Bir Bakış: Rubik Küpü Model”. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 9 (2): 198-221. https://izlik.org/JA69XF44KX.

EndNote

Polat M (01 Aralık 2025) 21. Yüzyıl Okul Liderliği için Çok Boyutlu Metaforik Bir Bakış: Rubik Küpü Model. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 9 2 198–221.

IEEE

[1]M. Polat, “21. Yüzyıl Okul Liderliği için Çok Boyutlu Metaforik Bir Bakış: Rubik Küpü Model”, GAUN-JES, c. 9, sy 2, ss. 198–221, Ara. 2025, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA69XF44KX

ISNAD

Polat, Murat. “21. Yüzyıl Okul Liderliği için Çok Boyutlu Metaforik Bir Bakış: Rubik Küpü Model”. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 9/2 (01 Aralık 2025): 198-221. https://izlik.org/JA69XF44KX.

JAMA

1.Polat M. 21. Yüzyıl Okul Liderliği için Çok Boyutlu Metaforik Bir Bakış: Rubik Küpü Model. GAUN-JES. 2025;9:198–221.

MLA

Polat, Murat. “21. Yüzyıl Okul Liderliği için Çok Boyutlu Metaforik Bir Bakış: Rubik Küpü Model”. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 9, sy 2, Aralık 2025, ss. 198-21, https://izlik.org/JA69XF44KX.

Vancouver

1.Murat Polat. 21. Yüzyıl Okul Liderliği için Çok Boyutlu Metaforik Bir Bakış: Rubik Küpü Model. GAUN-JES [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2025;9(2):198-221. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA69XF44KX

Bu eser, Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ile lisanslanmıştır.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

21. Yüzyıl Okul Liderliği için Çok Boyutlu Metaforik Bir Bakış: Rubik Küpü Model

21. Yüzyıl Okul Liderliği için Çok Boyutlu Metaforik Bir Bakış: Rubik Küpü Model

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

A Multidimensional Metaphorical Perspective for 21st Century School Leadership: The Rubik's Cube Model

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Etik Beyan

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

IZ

Kaynak Göster