21. Yüzyıl Okul Liderliği için Çok Boyutlu Metaforik Bir Bakış: Rubik Küpü Model

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 198 - 221, 24.12.2025

Murat Polat

Öz

Bu çalışma, 21. yüzyıl okul liderliğinin çok boyutlu, dinamik ve karmaşık yapısını Rubik Küpü Modeli aracılığıyla kavramsallaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Model, liderlikte pedagojik, etik, dijital, kriz yönetimi, kültürel duyarlılık ve stratejik planlama olmak üzere altı temel boyutu sistematik ve metaforik bir çerçevede bütünleştirmektedir. Eğitim liderliğinin hızla değişen koşullarına uyum sağlama gerekliliği, liderlerin çoklu roller arasında etkileşimli ve esnek bir biçimde hareket etmelerini zorunlu kılmaktadır. Rubik Küpü Modeli, liderlik süreçlerinin bütüncül doğasını anlamaya ve uygulamaya yönelik yeni bir perspektif sunmakta; liderlik eğitimi, politika yapımı ve uygulamalarında yol gösterici bir araç olma potansiyeli taşımaktadır. Çalışma, modelin farklı eğitim bağlamlarında ampirik olarak sınanmasını ve eğitim liderliği pratiğine entegrasyonunu önermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Okul liderliği , Rubik Küpü Modeli , çok boyutlu liderlik , metafor

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma, etik kurul izni gerektirmemektedir.

A Multidimensional Metaphorical Perspective for 21st Century School Leadership: The Rubik's Cube Model

Öz

The present study proposes a conceptual framework to elucidate the multidimensional, dynamic and complex nature of 21st-century school leadership, employing the Rubik's Cube Model as a conceptualizing device. The model systematically and metaphorically integrates six fundamental dimensions of leadership: pedagogical, ethical, digital, crisis management, cultural sensitivity, and strategic planning. The rapidly changing conditions of educational leadership necessitate that leaders operate flexibly and interactively across multiple roles. The Rubik's Cube Model provides a novel perspective on the understanding and application of the holistic nature of leadership processes, serving as a guiding tool for leadership education, policymaking, and practice. The study recommends empirical testing of the model in a variety of educational contexts and its integration into educational leadership practice.

Anahtar Kelimeler

School leadership , Rubik , multidimensional leadership , metaphor

Etik Beyan

This study does not require ethical committee approval.

Kaynakça

• Abay, S. T., Gomes, J. F., & Mengistu, A. B. (2023). A comparative analysis of values-based leadership theories: A review and future research agenda. The Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 16(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.22543/1948-0733.1457
• Ahmad, R. H., & Ghavifekr, S. (2017). School leadership for the 21st century: A conceptual overview. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management, 2(1), 48–61.
• Ahmad, S., Umirzakova, S., Mujtaba, G., Amin, M. S., & Whangbo, T. (2023). Education 5.0: Requirements, enabling technologies, and future directions [arXiv preprint]. arXiv:2307.15846. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.15846
• Akcil, U., Altinay, Z., Altinay, F., Dagli, G., & Altinay, M. (2018). The role of e-transformational leadership in intergenerational cooperation for school culture. Open and Equal Access for Learning in School Management, 29.
• Arnold, M., & Crawford, M. (2014). Metaphors of leadership and spatialized practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(3), 320–336.
• Azorín, C., & Fullan, M. (2022). Leading new, deeper forms of collaborative cultures: Questions and pathways. Journal of Educational Change, 23(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09438-2
• Bagga, S. K., Gera, S., & Haque, S. N. (2023). The mediating role of organizational culture: Transformational leadership and change management in virtual teams. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.07.003
• Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., Olsen, O. K., & Espevik, R. (2023). Daily transformational leadership: A source of inspiration for follower performance? European Management Journal, 41(5), 700–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.04.004
• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. SAGE Publications.
• Bell, L. (2002). Strategic planning and school management: Full of sound and fury, signifying nothing? Journal of Educational Administration, 40(5), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230210440276
• Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). Does school leadership matter for teachers’ classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1858119
• Bousquet, A., & Curtis, S. (2011). Beyond models and metaphors: Complexity theory, systems thinking and international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 24(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2011.558054
• Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2003). School leadership: Concepts and evidence. National College for School Leadership.
• By, R. T. (2021). Leadership: In pursuit of purpose. Journal of Change Management, 21(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1861698
• Cabrera, D., & Cabrera, L. (2023). What is systems thinking? In Learning, design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice, and policy (pp. 1495–1522). Springer International Publishing.
• Chatzipanagiotou, P., & Katsarou, E. (2023). Crisis management, school leadership in disruptive times and the recovery of schools in the post COVID-19 era: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 13(2), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020118
• Cheah, K., & Lim, A. (2022). Successful pedagogical leadership: Bibliometric analysis from the Web of Science database (2017–2021). International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 10(2), 140–167. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.8847
• Collinson, D. (2014). Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: New directions for critical leadership studies? Leadership, 10(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715013510807
• Copeland, M. K. (2014). The emerging significance of values based leadership: A literature review. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(2), 105.
• Day, C., Sammons, P., & Gorgen, K. (2020). Successful school leadership. Education Development Trust. https://www.educationdevelopmenttrust.com
• Day, D. V., Riggio, R. E., Tan, S. J., & Conger, J. A. (2021). Advancing the science of 21st-century leadership development: Theory, research, and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(5), 101557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101557
• Demirel, Y., & Özbezek, B. D. (2016). Örgütlerde zenginliğin kaynağı olarak farklılıkların yönetimi: Kavramsal bir inceleme. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1), 1–28.
• Deng, C., Gulseren, D., Isola, C., Grocutt, K., & Turner, N. (2023). Transformational leadership effectiveness: An evidence-based primer. Human Resource Development International, 26(5), 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2135938
• Eddy, P. L., & Boggs, G. R. (2023). Community college leadership: A multidimensional model for leading change. Routledge.
• Erçetin, Ş. Ş., & Düzer, A. (2008). Multidimensional perceptual leadership model “Muldimperlead”. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(1), 25–33.
• Fargas-Malet, M., & Bagley, C. (2022). Is small beautiful? A scoping review of 21st-century research on small rural schools in Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 21(5), 822–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211066711
• Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. Jossey-Bass.
• Gómez-Leal, R., Holzer, A. A., Bradley, C., Fernández-Berrocal, P., & Patti, J. (2022). The relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership in school leaders: A systematic review. Cambridge Journal of Education, 52(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1927987
• Goodchild, M. (2022). Relational systems thinking: The Dibaajimowin (story) of re-theorizing “systems thinking” and “complexity science”. Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 2(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.47061/jabsc.v2i1.2027
• Gougas, V., & Malinova, L. (2021). School leadership. Models and tools: A review. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.91009
• Guthrie, K. L., & Jenkins, D. M. (2018). The role of leadership educators: Transforming learning. IAP Publishing.
• Harris, A., Jones, M., & Ismail, N. (2022). Distributed leadership: Taking a retrospective and contemporary view of the evidence base. School Leadership & Management, 42(5), 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2109620
• Jackson, M. C. (2019). Critical systems thinking and the management of complexity. John Wiley & Sons.
• Kulkarni, M. A. P. (2025). Adaptability quotient as a strategic tool to enhance employability in the education sector in Mumbai. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11(10s), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.64252/caqffd39
• Maani, K. E., & Maharaj, V. (2004). Links between systems thinking and complex decision making. System Dynamics Review, 20(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.281
• Maker, C. J. (2021). From leading to guiding, facilitating, and inspiring: A needed shift for the 21st century. Education Sciences, 12(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010018
• Male, T., & Palaiologou, I. (2015). Pedagogical leadership in the 21st century: Evidence from the field. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213494889
• Mannheim, K. (1928). Das problem der generationen [The problem of generations]. In Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge.
• Marcellino, P. A. (2010). Metaphors and leadership: Understanding leadership processes through metaphor analysis. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13(2), 169–183.
• McCarthy, A. M., Maor, D., McConney, A., & Cavanaugh, C. (2023). Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100479
• McKay, L., Ekins, A., & Brown, M. (2019). Metaphors of educational leadership: A systematic review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(4), 517–539.
• Mincu, M. (2022). Why is school leadership key to transforming education? Structural and cultural assumptions for quality education in diverse contexts. Prospects, 52(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-022-09600-1
• Mukul, E., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023). Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of Education 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122664
• Okiri, P. O., & Hercz, M. (2025). The tenets of distributed pedagogical leadership in educational contexts—A systematic literature review on perception and practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231154444
• Pane, Y. K., Darwin, D., & Rahman, A. (2024). The relationship between situational leadership, digital transformation, and adversity quotient with the performance of vocational high school teachers. Journal La Sociale, 5(6), 1543–1552. https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v5i6.1420
• Parry, K. W. (2008). Viewing leadership through metaphor. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 393–403). Sage.
• Passey, D. (2014). Intergenerational learning practices—Digital leaders in schools. Education and Information Technologies, 19, 473–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9322-z
• Plekhanov, D., Franke, H., & Netland, T. H. (2023). Digital transformation: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 41(6), 821–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.09.007
• Polat, M. (2020). Türkiye’deki araştırmalar bağlamında kapsayıcı eğitim ve okul yönetimi. Research in Education and Social Sciences, 323–335.
• Polat, M. (2022). “Kapsayıcı eğitim” mümkün mü? Kapsayıcı eğitim dersini alan öğretmen adaylarının görüşlerinin vignette tekniği ile incelenmesi. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 965–986. https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.1066922
• Polat, M. (2024a). Dijitalleşme ve eğitimde yapay zekâ: Eğitim yönetimine yansımaları. Education Science and Sports, 6(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.70053/esas.1566395
• Polat, M. (2024b). Milli Eğitim Akademisi ve öğretmen yetiştirme sürecinin dönüşümü. İlke Yayınları.
• Polat, M. (2025). Okul liderliğinde Rubik Küpü modeli: 21. yüzyılda dönüşen roller ve yeni yönelimler [Conference panel presentation]. Uluslararası İstanbul Eğitimin Geleceği Kongresi İSTEG 2025, 28–30 Mayıs 2025, Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi.
• Polat, M., & Turhaner, K. (2024). The relationship between inclusive leadership and teachers' perceptions of organizational trust: A cross-sectional survey in Türkiye. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(1), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202424702
• Printy, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). Distributed leadership globally: The interactive nature of principal and teacher leadership in 32 countries. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(2), 290–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20926548
• Rahimi, R. A., & Oh, G. S. (2024). Rethinking the role of educators in the 21st century: Navigating globalization, technology, and pandemics. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-024-00117-w
• Ramírez-Herrero, V., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., & Medina-Merodio, J. A. (2024). Intergenerational leadership: A leadership style proposal for managing diversity and new technologies. Systems, 12(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12020050
• Rosch, D. M., & Anthony, M. D. (2012). Leadership pedagogy: Putting theory to practice. New Directions for Student Services, 2012(140), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20031
• Schleicher, A. (2012). Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century: Lessons from around the world. OECD Publishing.
• Spicer, A., & Alvesson, M. (2010). Metaphors we lead by: Understanding leadership in the real world. Routledge.
• Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.
• Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. (2000). Complexity and management: Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking? Psychology Press.
• Striepe, M., & Cunningham, C. (2022). Understanding educational leadership during times of crises: A scoping review. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2021-0057
• Tintoré, M., Cunha, R. S., Cabral, I., & Alves, J. J. M. (2022). A scoping review of problems and challenges faced by school leaders (2003–2019). Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(4), 536–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220942527
• Torres, L. L. (2022). School organizational culture and leadership: Theoretical trends and new analytical proposals. Education Sciences, 12(4), 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040254
• Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
• Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. In Managing digital transformation (pp. 13–66).
• Yücebalkan, B., Eryılmaz, B., Özlü, K., Keskin, Y. B., & Yücetürk, C. (2018). Digital leadership in the context of digitalization and digital transformations. Current Academic Studies in Social Science, 1, 489–505.
• Zeng, D. X., Li, M., Wang, J. J., Hou, Y. L., Lu, W. J., & Huang, Z. (2018). Overview of Rubik’s cube and reflections on its application in mechanism. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 31(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-018-0269-7
• Zheng, Y., Epitropaki, O., Graham, L., & Caveney, N. (2022). Ethical leadership and ethical voice: The mediating mechanisms of value internalization and integrity identity. Journal of Management, 48(4), 973–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211002611