Geleneksel Yapım Tekniklerinin Sürdürülebilir Mimarlığın İtici Gücü Olarak Değerlendirilmesi: Türkiye İçin Kırsal Miras Temelli Bir Model

Öz

Bu çalışma, kerpiç, taş yığma, ahşap karkas sistemler ve avlu–saçak temelli pasif tasarım gibi geleneksel yapım tekniklerinin çağdaş sürdürülebilir mimarlık içerisindeki entegrasyon potansiyelini incelemektedir. Geleneksel yapılar yalnızca kültürel birer miras unsuru olarak değil, aynı zamanda iklimle uyum, malzeme verimliliği ve topluluk odaklı mekânsal organizasyon gibi temel sürdürülebilirlik ilkeleriyle örtüşen çevresel, mekânsal ve sosyo-kültürel performanslar sergileyen birikimli bilgi sistemleri olarak ele alınmaktadır. Çalışmanın kuramsal çerçevesi üç ilişkili boyut etrafında kurgulanmıştır: (i) düşük gömülü karbon özellikleriyle öne çıkan yerel malzemeler ve geleneksel yapım teknikleri, (ii) enerji verimliliği, karbon azaltımı ve kullanıcı konforu gibi çağdaş sürdürülebilir mimarlığın temel kriterleri ve (iii) yerel bilgi ile modern mühendislik ve tasarım sistemlerinin hibritleşmesini inceleyen entegrasyon boyutu. Yöntemsel olarak araştırma, nitel karşılaştırmalı durum çalışması yaklaşımını benimsemektedir. Uluslararası literatürde kırsal miras ve sürdürülebilir mimarlık üzerine yapılan çalışmaların incelenmesinin ardından, Türkiye’den iki temsilî kırsal yerleşim olan Cumalıkızık ve Safranbolu analiz edilmiştir. Geleneksel malzemeler, yapım teknikleri ve mekânsal kurgular, eşleştirme yöntemi aracılığıyla çağdaş sürdürülebilirlik kriterleri ile analitik olarak karşılaştırılmıştır. Ayrıca, çağdaş kerpiç sistemler ile CLT–geleneksel ahşap birleşim çözümleri gibi seçilmiş hibrit uygulamalar da değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular, toprak ve ahşap temelli sistemlerin malzeme kaynaklı çevresel etkileri azaltma potansiyeline sahip olduğunu; avlu ve derin saçaklar gibi pasif mekânsal stratejilerin ise iç mekân konforunu artırarak soğutma ihtiyacını azalttığını göstermektedir. Çalışma, önerdiği hibrit entegrasyon modeli ile düşük karbonlu ve bağlama duyarlı mimari üretim için aktarılabilir bir çerçeve sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kırsal miras
• Sürdürülebilir mimarlık
• Cumalıkızık
• Safranbolu
• Hibrit yapım sistemleri

From Rural Heritage to Sustainable Design: A Multi-Dimensional Hybrid Integration Model Based on Traditional Construction Techniques in Turkey

Öz

This study investigates the potential for integrating traditional rural construction techniques as active design inputs into contemporary sustainable architecture. Moving beyond conservation-oriented perspectives, the research conceptualizes rural heritage as a dynamic socio-ecological system and develops a structured analytical framework to evaluate its contribution to sustainability. The study focuses on two representative rural settlements in Turkey—Cumalıkızık and Safranbolu—and examines their architectural and spatial characteristics across four interrelated sustainability dimensions: material efficiency, climate responsiveness, social sustainability, and cultural continuity. Methodologically, the research employs a qualitative comparative case study approach supported by a criteria-based evaluation model and a matching matrix, enabling systematic cross-case analysis. The findings reveal that Cumalıkızık demonstrates strong ecological and spatial sustainability through passive climate strategies and low-impact material systems, while Safranbolu exhibits a more pronounced socio-cultural sustainability profile through integrated production systems, community networks, and cultural continuity mechanisms. Based on these findings, the study proposes a multi-layered hybrid integration model that translates traditional knowledge into contemporary design strategies. The model serves as an operational, transferable framework that simultaneously addresses environmental performance, spatial adaptability, and social sustainability. By linking vernacular knowledge with contemporary design processes, the study offers a design-oriented approach that repositions rural heritage as a strategic resource for low-carbon, context-sensitive architectural production.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Rural heritage
• Sustainable architecture
• Cumalıkızık
• Safranbolu
• Hybrid construction systems

Kaynakça

1. [1] Di Fazio, S., & Modica, G. (2018). Historic Rural Landscapes: Sustainable Planning Strategies and Action Criteria. The Italian Experience in the Global and European Context. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113834
2. [2] Bindi, L., Conti, M., & Belliggiano, A. (2022). Sense of Place, Biocultural Heritage, and Sustainable Knowledge and Practices in Three Italian Rural Regeneration Processes. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084858
3. [3] Oliver, P. (2006). Built to Meet Needs: Cultural Issues in Vernacular Architecture. Architectural Press.
4. [4] Scazzosi, L. (2018). Rural Landscape as Heritage: Reasons for and Implications of Principles Concerning Rural Landscapes as Heritage ICOMOS-IFLA 2017. Built Heritage. https://doi.org/10.1186/bf03545709
5. [5] Gullino, P., Beccaro, G., & Larcher, F. (2015). Assessing and Monitoring the Sustainability in Rural World Heritage Sites. Sustainability, 7, 14186–14210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71014186
6. [6] Li, S. (2023). Conservation and Revitalization of Rural Heritage: A Case Study of the Mountainous Traditional Village. Advances in Applied Sociology. https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2023.1312051
7. [7] Hong, Z., Cao, W., Chen, Y., Zhu, S., & Zheng, W. (2024). Identifying Rural Landscape Heritage Character Types and Areas: A Case Study of the Li River Basin in Guilin, China. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041626
8. [8] Du, X., & Shi, D. (2019). Rural Heritage: Value, Conservation and Revitalisation—From the Perspective of the Human-Land Relationship. Built Heritage. https://doi.org/10.1186/bf03545723

9. [9] Nocerino, I. (2023). Patrimonio rurale: percorsi concettuali nelle Carte e nelle Convenzioni (1972–2022). Restauro Archeologico. https://doi.org/10.36253/rar-14279
10. [10] Dragan, A., Ispas, R., & Crețan, R. (2024). Recent Urban-to-Rural Migration and Its Impact on the Heritage of Depopulated Rural Areas in Southern Transylvania. Heritage. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7080202
11. [11] Cerquetti, M., Ferrara, C., Romagnoli, A., & Vagnarelli, G. (2022). Enhancing Intangible Cultural Heritage for Sustainable Tourism Development in Rural Areas: The Case of the “Marche Food and Wine Memories” Project (Italy). Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416893
12. [12] Knapik, W., & Król, K. (2023). Inclusion of Vanishing Cultural Heritage in a Sustainable Rural Development Strategy–Prospects, Opportunities, Recommendations. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043656
13. [13] Shakya, M., & Vagnarelli, G. (2024). Creating value from intangible cultural heritage—the role of innovation for sustainable tourism and regional rural development. European Journal of Cultural Management and Policy. https://doi.org/10.3389/ejcmp.2024.12057
14. [14] Paulino, I., Burgos-Tartera, C., & Aulet, S. (2023). Participatory governance of intangible heritage to develop sustainable rural tourism: the timber-raftsmen of La Pobla de Segur, Spain. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 18, 710–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873x.2023.2235440
15. [15] Ede, B., Taş, M., & Taş, N. (2025). Sustainable Management of Rural Architectural Heritage Through Rural Tourism: Iznik (Turkey) Case Study. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083520
16. [16] Ekici, S., Özçakır, Ö., & Altınöz, A. (2022). Sustainability of historic rural settlements based on participatory conservation approach: Kemer Village in Turkey. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/jchmsd-05-2021-0087
17. [17] Zhang, X. (2022). Inheritance and Protection of Rural Intangible Cultural Heritage from the Perspective of Multiple Co-governance. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54691/fhss.v2i10.2486
18. [18] Kurtuluş, V., & Güçhan, N. (2025). Sustainable conservation through the interrelations between rural architecture and life: the case of Çomakdağ. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/jchmsd-04-2023-0035
19. [19] Santoro, A., Venturi, M., Bertani, R., & Agnoletti, M. (2020). A Review of the Role of Forests and Agroforestry Systems in the FAO Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Programme. Forests, 11, 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080860
20. [20] Su, M., Sun, Y., Min, Q., & Jiao, W. (2018). A Community Livelihood Approach to Agricultural Heritage System Conservation and Tourism Development: Xuanhua Grape Garden Urban Agricultural Heritage Site, Hebei Province of China. Sustainability, 10, 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020361
21. [21] Radzuan, A., Osman, N., Norazman, M., & Shaari, S. (2024). Community-driven approaches to safeguarding intangible cultural heritage of Malaysia. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Environment Management. https://doi.org/10.35631/jthem.937008
22. [22] Qin, J., & Zhen, H. (2022). Research on the protection and inheritance of intangible cultural heritage under the background of rural revitalisation. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 8, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2021.2.00250
23. [23] Cui, Y., Wang, Y., & Jiang, J. (2024). Sustainable Development of China’s Intangible Cultural Heritage in Rural Revitalization based on Experience Perspective. Problemy Ekorozwoju. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.5809
24. [24] Barrientos, F., Martin, J., De Luca, C., Tondelli, S., Gómez-García-Bermejo, J., & Casanova, E. (2021). Computational methods and rural cultural & natural heritage: A review. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 49, 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2021.03.009
25. [25] Goussous, J. (2022). Intangible Heritage and Sustainable Development Strategies. Problemy Ekorozwoju. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.22
26. [26] Rey-Pérez, J., & Domínguez-Ruíz, V. (2020). Multidisciplinarity, Citizen Participation and Geographic Information System, Cross-Cutting Strategies for Sustainable Development in Rural Heritage. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229628
27. [27] Perkins, H., Mackay, M., & Wilson, J. (2023). Community-led heritage conservation in processes of rural regeneration. Journal of Place Management and Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmd-10-2022-0097
28. [28] Agnoletti, M., Emanueli, F., Corrieri, F., Venturi, M., & Santoro, A. (2019). Monitoring Traditional Rural Landscapes: The Case of Italy. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216107
29. [29] Atik, M., Taşkan, G., & Balta, S. (2022). GIAHS Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems and the Mediterranean case Selge in the protection of rural-agricultural landscapes. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.999134
30. [30] Sun, Y., Jansen-Verbeke, M., Min, Q., & Cheng, S. (2011). Tourism Potential of Agricultural Heritage Systems. Tourism Geographies, 13, 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2010.516400
31. [31] Zhang, L., & Stewart, W. (2017). Sustainable Tourism Development of Landscape Heritage in a Rural Community: A Case Study of Azheke Village at China Hani Rice Terraces. Built Heritage, 1, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1186/bf03545656
32. [32] Atik, M. (2022). Kırsal Alanların Korunması ve Yönetiminde Peyzaj Perspektifi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 28(3), 321–334.
33. [33] Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
34. [34] OpenStreetMap. (n.d.). OpenStreetMap. https://www.openstreetmap.org/
35. [35] Perker, Z. S., Akıncıtürk, N. (2011). Geleneksel Cumalıkızık evlerinde ahşap konut sistemi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1).
36. [36] Bozkurt, S. G., Altınçekiç, H. (2013). Anadolu’da Geleneksel Konut ve Avluların Özellikleri ile Tarihsel Gelişiminin Safranbolu Evleri Örneğinde İrdelenmesi. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry, Istanbul University 2013, 63(1):69-91.
37. [37] Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.