ANALYSING THE ONTIC LAYERS OF THE DESIGN PRODUCTS

Öz

All being has something that shows itself even if one does not see it. Daily objects that exist may be seen as just the things that one uses. However, being for usage is only a form of data, not a form of being. Seeing that being will be possible only by communicating with possible things in the being in a way that complies with its ontic structure. This is because comprehension of ontic entirety makes it an obligation to propose a method that will analyze entirety and help us understand design products better. This paper attempts to propose a New Ontology-based method of ontological analysis to describe the polyphonic structure of the design product that shows togetherness and singularity in its plurality into three layers on a homogeneous real (physical) level and four levels on a heterogeneous irreal (spiritual) level.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• being,ontology,ontological analysis method,product design

Kaynakça

1. Barthes, R. (1981) Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, Hill and Wang, New York.
2. Berkeley, G. (1710) A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, Jeremy Pepyat, Dublin.
3. Creusen, M. E. H. and Schoormans, J. P. L. (2005) ‘The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 22, pp. 63-81
4. Croce, B. (2004) Aesthetic as Science of Expression and General Linguistic, Kessinger Publising, Montana.
5. Hartmann, N. (1949) Das Problem des Geistigen Seins, Walter de Gruyter & CO., Berlin.
6. Hartmann, N. (1965) Zur Grundlegung der Ontologie, Walter de Gruyter & CO., Berlin.
7. Heidegger, M. (1996) Being and Time, State University of New York Press, New York.
8. Ingarden, R. (1930) Das Literarische Kunstwerk, Niemeyer, Tübingen.

9. Kumar, M. and Garg, N. (2010) ‘Aesthetic principles and cognitive emotion appraisals: How much of the beauty lies in the eye of the beholder?’, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 20, pp. 485–494
10. Lovell, s. and Kemp, K. (2011) Dieter Rams: As Little Design as Possible, Phaidon Press, London.
11. Noble, C. H., and Kumar, M. (2010) ‘Exploring the appeal of product design: A grounded, value-based model of key design elements and relationships’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 27, pp. 640–657
12. Nussbaum, B. (2004) ‘The power of design’, Business week, Vol. 17 No.5, pp. 64
13. Rams, D. (1989). ‘Omit the unimportant’, in V. Margolin (Ed.), Design Discourse: History, Theory, Criticism, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 111-113
14. Roy, R. (1993) ‘Case studies of creativity in innovative product development’, Design Studies, Vol. 14, pp. 423–443
15. Schelling, F. W. J. (1989) The Philosophy of Art, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.