A Qualitative Investigation of Perceived Stress in Covid-19 Pandemic

Yıl 2024, , 216 - 230, 27.03.2024

Begüm Serim Yıldız , S. Burcu Üçok , Çiğdem Topcu , Claudia Chiarolanza , Ashley K. Randall

https://doi.org/10.37989/gumussagbil.1320067

Cited By: 1

Öz

After China announced the first case of coronavirus in 2019, several countries started to report cases of coronavirus, and the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a pandemic in 2020. Precautions including curfews, working from home, and remote learning changed the daily routines of individuals and how they form and maintain relationships. All these changes resulted in negativities such as experiencing stress over people. The current study’s goal was to examine the stress factors of people during the pandemic with a qualitative research design.
A total of 103 participants (80 women) aged between 21 and 71 were asked three open-ended questions to evaluate their own, their romantic partners’, and other people’s stress experiences. Data were analyzed via framework analysis and a total of nine themes for all three categories (individual, partner, and the others) emerged; education, work/finances, health, social relationships, hygiene, changes in daily life, negative emotions, positive experiences, and no stress. The findings of the current research were consistent with the results of previous research studies. Considering that crisis situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic are frequently encountered both in the world and in Turkey, defining the sources of stress perceived by individuals for themselves, their partners and other individuals is important in the preparation of effective preventive and intervention programs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

qualitative analysis, framework analysis, stress, COVID-19, pandemic

Covid-19 Pandemisinde Algılanan Stres Üzerine Nitel Bir Çalışma

Öz

2019 yılında Çin'de ilk koronavirüs vakasının görülmesinin ardından farklı ülkelerden vaka bildirimleri gelmiş ve bunun üzerine 2020 yılında Dünya Sağlık Örgütü pandemi ilan etmiştir. Bu süreçte sokağa çıkma yasağı, online çalışma, uzaktan eğitim gibi önlemler alınmış ve bu önlemlere ilişkin, kişilerin günlük yaşam alışkanlıkları ve birbirleriyle etkileşim kurma ve sürdürme şekilleri değişmiştir. Yaşanan değişikliklerin kişiler üzerinde stres gibi olumsuz sonuçlar doğurduğu alanyazın bulguları arasındadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı pandemi sürecinde yaşanan değişikliklere bağlı stres faktörlerini incelemektir.
Nitel araştırma deseni kullanılarak katılımcılara kendilerinin, birlikte yaşadıkları partnerlerinin ve toplumun yaşadığı stres deneyimlerine ilişkin sorular sorulmuştur. Çalışmanın örneklemi, yaşları 21 ile 71 arasında değişen 80’i kadın olmak üzere 103 kişiden oluşmuştur. Çevrimiçi bir form kullanılarak katılımcılara üç açık uçlu soru ile COVID-19 pandemisinde kendileri için, partnerleri için ve diğer insanlar için ne gibi stres kaynakları olduğunu düşündükleri sorulmuştur. Çerçeve analizi yöntemi ile incelenen veride kişinin kendisi, partneri ve diğer insanlar için ortaklaşan toplam dokuz ana tema ortaya çıkmıştır. Bunlar eğitim, iş/ekonomik, sağlık, sosyal ilişkiler, hijyen, günlük yaşamdaki değişiklikler, olumsuz duygular, olumlu deneyimler ve stresin olmamasıdır. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçların literatür ile uyumlu olduğu saptanmıştır. Pandeminin hem ülkemizde hem de dünyada ciddi bir kriz oluşturduğu aşikardır. Bu bağlamda bireylerin algıladıkları stres kaynaklarının tanımlanmasının koruyucu ve önleyici müdahalelerin planlanmasında yol gösterici olacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

nitel araştırma deseni, çerçeve analizi, stres, COVID-19, pandemi

Kaynakça

• 1. Feinstein, R. E., Kotara, S., Jones, B., Shanor, D. ve Nemeroff, C. B. (2020). “A health care workers mental health crisis line in the age of COVID‐19”. Depression and Anxiety, 37(8), https://doi.org/822-826.10.1002/da.23073
• 2. Parker, C. L., Barnett, D. J., Everly, G. S. ve Jr. Links, J. M. (2006). “Establishing evidence-informed core intervention competencies in psychological first aid for public health personnel”. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 8(2), 83–92.
• 3. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). “The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design”. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• 4. Belser, C. T. ve Prescod, D. J. (2021). “Conceptualizing COVID‐19‐related career concerns Using bioecological systems: Implications for career practice”. The Career Development Quarterly, 69(4), 355-370. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12279
• 5. Dünya Sağlık Örgütü (2020). “Coronavirus (COVID-19) data”. Erişim adresi: https://www.who.int/data#reports (Erişim tarihi: 14.09.2022)
• 6. Randall, A. K., Totenhagen, C., Chiarolanza, C., Basili, E., Aryeetey, R., Bar-Kalifa, E., Boiger, M., Boon, S. D., Brassard, A., Donato, S., Carnelley, K., Fitriana, M., Gaines, S. O., Kanth, B., Karademas, E., Karantzas, G., Martos, T., Natividadde, J. C., Rusu, P., Landolt, S. A., Lafontaine, M., Milek, A., Peloquin, K., Relvas, A. P., Rumondor, P. C. B., Shujja, S., Üçok, B., Verhofstadt, L., Joo, S., Burke, T., Yoo, G., Botella, L., Saul, L. A., Quinones, A., Ugarte ve C., Dash, A. (2020). “COVID-19: Effects of a global stressor on couples”. Erişim adresi: https://osf.io/9hsdg/ (Erişim tarihi: 26.10.2022)
• 7. Genc, E., Su, Y. ve Turhan, Z. (2021). “The mediating role of dyadic coping on the effects of COVID-19 and relationship satisfaction among Turkish couples”. American Journal of Family Therapy, 51(4), 421-439.
• 8. de Lima, C. V. C., Cândido, E. L., da Silva, J. A., Albuquerque, L. V., Soares, L. de M., do Nascimento, M. M., de Oliveira, S.A. ve Rolim Neto, M. L.(2020). “Effects of quarantine on mental health of populations affected by COVID-19”. Journal of Affective Disorders, 275, 253–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.063
• 9. Spinelli, M., Lionetti, F., Setti, A. ve Fasolo, M. (2021). “Parenting stress during the COVID‐19 outbreak: Socioeconomic and environmental risk factors and implications for children emotion regulation”. Family Process, 60(2), 639-653. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12601
• 10. Roychowdhury, D. (2020). “2019 novel coronavirus disease, crisis, and isolation”. Frontiers in Psychology. 11, 1958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01958
• 11. Deng, S., Wang, W., Xie, P., Chao, Y. ve Zhu, J. (2020). “Perceived severity of COVID-19 and post-pandemic consumption willingness: The roles of boredom and sensation-seeking”. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567784
• 12. Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N. ve Rubin, G.J. (2020). “The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence”. Lancet, 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
• 13. Price, R. H., Choi, J. N. ve Vinokur, A. D. (2002). “Links in the chain of adversity following job loss: How financial strain and loss of personal control lead to depression, impaired functioning, and poor health”. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(4), 302. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8998.7.4.302
• 14. Kang, L., Ma, S., Chen, M., Yang, J., Wang, Y., Li, R., Yao, L., Bai, H., Cai, Z., Xiang Yang, B., Hu, S., Zhang, K., Wang, G., Ma, C. ve Liu, Z. (2020). “Impact on mental health and perceptions of psychological care among medical and nursing staff in Wuhan during the 2019 novel coronavirus disease outbreak: A cross-sectional study”. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 87, 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.03.028
• 15. Sethi, B. A., Sethi, A., Ali, S. ve Aamir, H. S. (2020). “Impact of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on health professionals”. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(COVID19-S4), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2779
• 16. Oducado, R. M. ve Estoque, H. (2021). “Online learning in nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stress, satisfaction, and academic performance”. Journal of Nursing Practice, 4(2), 143-153.
• 17. Rimé, B. (2009). “Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review”. Emotion Review, 1(1), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073908097189
• 18. Durkheim, E. (1912) “The elementary forms of religious life”. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
• 19. Garcia, D. ve Rimé, B. (2019). “Collective emotions and social resilience in the digital traces after a terrorist attack”. Psychological Science, 30(4), 617-628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619831964
• 20. Pellert, M., Schweighofer, S. ve Garcia, D. (2020). “The individual dynamics of affective expression on social media”. EPJ Data Science, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0219-3
• 21. Lau, J. T. F., Lau, M., Kim, J. H. ve Tsui, H. Y. (2006). “Impacts of media coverage on the community stress level in Hong Kong after the tsunami on 26 December 2004”. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 675–682. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.041897
• 22. Riehm, K. E., Holingue, C., Kalb, L. G., Bennett, D., Kapteyn, A., Jiang, Q., veldhuis, C.B., Johnson, R. M., Fallin, M. D., Kreuter, F., Stuart, E. A. ve Thrul, J. (2020). “Associations between media exposure and mental distress among US adults at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic”. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 59(5), 630-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.06.008
• 23. Wa-Mbaleka, S. ve Costa, A. P. (2020). “Qualitative research in the time of a disaster like COVID-19”. Revista Lusófona de Educação, 48, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle48.01
• 24. Smith, J. ve Firth, J. (2011). “Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach”. Nurse researcher, 18(2).
• 25. Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S. ve Redwood, S. (2013). “Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research”. BMC medical research methodology, 13(1), 1-8.
• 26. Robertshaw, D. ve Cross, A. (2019). “Experiences of integrated care for dementia from family and carer perspectives: A framework analysis of massive open online course discussion board posts”. Dementia, 18(4), 1492–1506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301217719991
• 27. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). “Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research”. Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405.
• 28. Ritchie, J. ve Lewis, J. (2003). “Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students & Researchers”. London: Sage Publications.
• 29. Guba, E. G. ve Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). “Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry”. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30(4), 233-252.
• 30. Hawley, S. R., Thrivikraman, J. K., Noveck, N., St.Romain, T., Ludy, M., Barnhart, L., Swee Chee, W. S., Cho, M. J., Chong, M. H. Z., Du, Chen, Fenton, J. I., Hsiao, P. Y., Hsiao, R., Keaver, L., Lee, HeeSoon, Shen, W., Lai, C, Tseng, K., Tseng, W. ve Tucker, R. (2021). “Concerns of college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: Thematic perspectives from the United States, Asia, and Europe”. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 4(1), 1-10.
• 31. Karpman, M., Zuckerman, S., Gonzalez, D. ve Kenney, G. M. (2020). “The COVID-19 pandemic is straining families’ abilities to afford basic needs”. Erişim adresi: Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/COVID-19-pandemicstraining-families-abilities-afford-basic-needs. (Erişim tarihi: 28.10.2022)
• 32. Aslan, H. ve Pekince, H. (2021). “Nursing students' views on the COVID‐19 pandemic and their perceived stress levels”. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 57(2), 695-701. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12597
• 33. Wang, H., Liu, Y., Hu, K., Zhang, M., Du, M., Huang, H. ve Yue, X. (2020).” Healthcare workers’ stress when caring for COVID-19 patients: An altruistic perspective”. Nursing Ethics, 27(7), 1490-1500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020934146
• 34. Gouveia, R., Ramos, V. ve Wall, K (2021). “Household diversity and the impacts of COVID-19 on families in Portugal”. Frontiers in Sociology, 6, 736714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.736714
• 35. Singh, J. ve Singh, J. (2020). “COVID-19 and its impact on society”. Electronic Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 168-172.
• 36. Marsden, K. M., Robertson, I. K. ve Porter, J. (2022). “Stressors, manifestations and course of COVID-19 related distress among public sector nurses and midwives during the COVID-19 pandemic first year in Tasmania, Australia”. Plos One, 17(8), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271824
• 37. Voltmer, E., Köslich-Strumann, S., Walther, A., Kasem, M., Obst, K ve Kötter, T. (2021). “The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on stress, mental health and coping behavior in German University students: A longitudinal study before and after the onset of the pandemic”. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1385. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11295-6
• 38. Lithander, F. E., Neumann, S., Tenison, E., Lloyd, K., Welsh, T. C., Rodrigues, J. C. L., Higgins, J.P.T., Scourfield, L., Christensen, H., Haunton, V. J. ve Henderson, E.J. (2020). “COVID-19 in older people: A rapid clinical review”. Age and Ageing, 49(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa093
• 39. Datu, J. A. D., Valdez, J. P. M., McInerney, D. M. ve Cayubit,R. F. (2022). “The effects of gratitude and kindness on life satisfaction, positive emotions,negative emotions, and COVID-19 anxiety: An online pilot experimental study”. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being,14(2), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12306