İş Yerindeki Maneviyat Engellerinin Proaktif Kariyer Davranış Üzerindeki Etkisinde Canlılığın Aracı Olumsuz Dedikodunun Durumsal Aracı Rolü: Sağlık Çalışanları Örneklemi

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 4, 1629 - 1642, 25.12.2024

Fevziye Bekar

https://doi.org/10.37989/gumussagbil.1507267

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı duygusal olaylar teorisi ve duygusal değişim modeli temelinde maneviyat engelleri, proaktif kariyer davranış, canlılık ve olumsuz dedikodu değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Araştırma sağlık çalışanları örneklemi üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Kolayda ve kartopu örneklem yöntemi ile 912 sağlık çalışanına ait verilerin analiz yapılmıştır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi için AMOS 23, açımlayıcı faktör analizi ve basit doğrusal regresyon analizleri için SPSS 22, aracılık etki (model 4) ve durumsal aracı etki (model 7) analizleri için PROCESS MACRO v3.4 kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda maneviyat engelleri ile proaktif kariyer davranışı arasında negatif ve anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu ilişkide canlılık değişkeni düşük oranda aracılık etmekte olduğu ve maneviyat engelinin olumsuz etkisini azalttığı tespit edilmiştir. Olumsuz dedikodunun ise bu değişkenler arasında durumsal aracılık rolü olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Canlılık, duygusal olaylar teorisi, iş yerinde maneviyat engelleri, Kariyer odaklı proaktif davranış, olumsuz dedikodu

Etik Beyan

Araştırma sürecine başlamadan önce Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulundan araştırma onayı 2020/06 - 95674917-108.99-E.14995 numaralı belge ile alınmıştır.

Destekleyen Kurum

Gümüşhane Üniversitesi

Teşekkür

Doktora tezi sürecimde değerli desteğini hiçbir zaman eksik etmeyen sayın tez danışmanım Prof. Dr. M.Ferhat ÖZBEK’e teşekkür ediyorum. Aynı zamanda bu zorlu süreçte maddi ve manevi olarak her daim yanımda olan sevgili aileme ve eşime çok teşekkür ederim.

The Situational Mediating Role of Negative Gossip as a Mediator of Vitality in the Effect of Bloks to Spirituality at Work on Proactive Career Behavior: A Sample of Healthcare Workers

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between bloks to spirituality, proactive career behavior, vitality, and negative gossip variables based on the theory of affective events and the affective shift model. The research was conducted on a sample of healthcare workers. Analysis was performed using data from 912 healthcare workers obtained through convenience and snowball sampling methods. AMOS 23 was used for confirmatory factor analysis, SPSS 22 for exploratory factor analysis and simple linear regression analysis, and PROCESS MACRO v3.4 for mediation effects (model 4) and situational mediation effects (model 7) analyses. The results of the study revealed a negative and significant relationship between blocks to spirituality and proactive career behavior. In this relationship, the vitality variable was found to partially mediate the negative impact of blocks to spirituality. It was concluded that negative gossip played a situational mediating role among these variables.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Vitality, affective events theory, bloks to spirituality, proactive career behavior, negative gossip

Kaynakça

• 1. Aktaş, K. (2015). “Genel anlamda kariyer ve kariyer sorunları. Sosyal Araştırmalar ve Davranış Bilimleri”, 1(1), 26-36.
• 2. Ang, M. C. (2012, September). An affective events theory perspective of emotional labor and intention to quit does emotional intelligence count?. In 2012 International Conference on Statistics in Science, Business and Engineering (ICSSBE) (1-6). IEEE.
• 3. Ashforth, B.E. and Pratt, M.G., 2010. Institutionalized spirituality: an Oxymoron? In: R.A. Giacalone and C.L. Jurkiewicz, eds. Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 44–58.
• 4. Ashmos, D. P., and Duchon, D. (2000). “Spirituality At Work: A Conceptualization And Measure”. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(2), 134-145.
• 5. Baş, T. (2008). “Anket: Anket Nasıl Hazırlanır?, Anket Nasıl Uygulanır?, Anket Nasıl Değerlendirilir?”. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• 6. Beersma, B., and Van Kleef, G. A. (2012). “Why People Gossip: An Empirical Analysis Of Social Motives, Antecedents, and Consequences”. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(11), 2640-2670.
• 7. Bennett, R. J., and Robinson, S. L. (2000). “Development Of A Measure Of Workplace Deviance”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349-360.
• 8. Biernacki, P., and Waldorf, D. (1981). “Snowball Sampling: Problems And Techniques Of Chain Referral Sampling”. Sociological Methods and Research, 10(2), 141-163.
• 9. Bledow, R., Schmitt, A., Frese, M., and Kühnel, J. (2011). “The Affective Shift Model Of Work Engagement”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1246-1257.
• 10. Brislin, R. W. (1986). “The Wording and Translation 0f Research İnstruments”. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field Methods İn Cross-Cultural Research (137–164). Sage Publications, Inc.
• 11. Chan, D. (2006). “Interactive Effects Of Situational Judgment Effectiveness and Proactive Personality on Work Perceptions And Work Outcomes”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 475-481.
• 12. Chandra, G., and Robinson, S. L. (2009). “They’re Talking About Me Again: The Impact of Being The Target of Gossip on Emotional Distress and Withdrawal”. Paper Presented At The Academy Of Management Conference. Chicago.
• 13. Claes, R., and Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A. (1998). Influences Of Early Career Experiences, Occupational Group, and National Culture on Proactive Career Behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52(3), 357-378.
• 14. Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 435–462.
• 15. Cullen‐Lester, K. L., Leroy, H., Gerbasi, A., and Nishii, L. (2016). “Energy's Role İn The Extraversion (Dis) Advantage: How Energy Ties And Task Conflict Help Clarify The Relationship Between Extraversion and Proactive Performance”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(7), 1003-1022.
• 16. De Vos, A., De Clippeleer, I., and Dewilde, T. (2009). “Proactive Career Behaviours and Career Success During The Early Career”. Journal of Occupational And Organizational Psychology, 82(4), 761-777.
• 17. Ertekin, A. B. (2021). “Kariyer Adanmışlığı İle Yaşam Doyumu Arasındaki İlişki: Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma”. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(3), 128-141.
• 18. Gerbasi, A., Porath, C. L., Parker, A., Spreitzer, G., and Cross, R. (2015). “Destructive De-Energizing Relationships: How Thriving Buffers Their Effect on Performance”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1423–1433
• 19. Ghasemy, M., Erfanian, M., ve Gaskin, J. E. (2020). “Affective events theory as a theoretical lens for improving the working environment of academics in developing economies”. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 13(1), 300-324.
• 20. Gürbüz, S. (2019a). AMOS İle Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• 21. Gürbüz, S. (2019b). Sosyal Bilimlerde Aracı, Düzenleyici Ve Durumsal Etki Analizleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• 22. Jiang, Z., Wang, Y., Li, W., Peng, K. Z., and Wu, C. H. (2023). “Career Proactivity: A Bibliometric Literature Review and A Future Research Agenda. Applied Psychology”, 72(1), 144-184.
• 23. Karakaş, F. (2010). Spirituality and performance in organizations: A literature review. Journal of business ethics, 94(1), 89-106.
• 24. Koçak, O. E. (2016). “How To Enable Thriving At Work Through Organizational Trust”. International Journal of Research in Business And Social Science (2147- 4478), 5(4), 40-52. Https://Doi.Org/10.20525/İjrbs.V5i4.580
• 25. Korkmaz, O., O. Kırdök, Alkal, A., ve Akça, M. (2020). “Kariyer Adanmışlık Ölçeği: Proaktif Kariyer Davranışlarının Ölçümünün Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması”. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 6(72). 4668- 4677. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.26449/Sssj.2570
• 26. Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., and Downs, D. L. (1995). “Self-Esteem As An İnterpersonal Monitor: The Sociometer Hypothesis”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 518-530.
• 27. Petchsawang, P., and Duchon, D. (2009). “Measuring Workplace Spirituality in An Asian Context”. Human Resource Development International, 12(4), 459-468. 28. Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C., and Garnett, F. G. (2012). “Thriving At Work: Toward its Measurement, Construct Validation, And Theoretical Refinement”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 250-275.
• 29. Prem, R., Ohly, S., Kubicek, B., and Korunka, C. (2017). “Thriving On Challenge Stressors? Exploring Time Pressure and Learning Demands As Antecedents of Thriving At Work”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(1), 108-123.
• 30. Robinson, S. L., and Bennett, R. J. (1995). A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: A Multidimensional Scaling Study”. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555-572.
• 31. Ryan, R. M., and Frederick, C. (1997). “On Energy, Personality, and Health: Subjective Vitality As A Dynamic Reflection of Well‐Being”. Journal of Personality, 65(3), 529-565.
• 32. Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., and Dries, N. (2019). “Antecedents And Outcomes Of Objective Versus Subjective Career Success: Competing Perspectives and Future Directions”. Journal of Management, 45(1), 35-69.
• 33. Türkiye Sağlık Bakanlığının (2020). Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2020. Erişim adresi: Https://Dosyasb.Saglik.Gov.Tr/Eklenti/43399/0/Siy2020-Tur-26052022pdf.Pdf (Erişim tarihi: 23.06.2024)
• 34. Watson, D. C. (2011). “Gossip and The Self”. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(7), 1818-1833.
• 35. Weiss, H. M., and Cropanzano, R. (1996). “Affective Events Theory”. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18(1), 1-74.
• 36. Wu, C. H., Parker, S. K., Wu, L. Z., and Lee, C. (2018). “When And Why People Engage İn Different Forms of Proactive Behavior: Interactive Effects of Self-Construals and Work Characteristics”. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 293-323.
• 37. Wu, X., Kwan, H. K., Wu, L. Z., and Ma, J. (2018). “The Effect Of Workplace Negative Gossip On Employee Proactive Behavior in China: The Moderating Role of Traditionality”. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(4), 801-815.
• 38. Weinberg, R. S. (2013). “Goal Setting in Sport nd Exercise: Research and Practical Applications”. Revista Da Educação Física/UEM, 24(2), 171-179.
• 39. Zhang, M. J., Law, K. S., and Lin, B. (2016). “You Think You Are Big Fish In A Small Pond? Perceived Overqualification, Goal Orientations, and Proactivity At Work”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(1), 61-84.