Orta Doğu’daki Çatışmaların Küresel Hatları

Yıl 2019, , 151 - 197, 15.04.2019

Andreas Leutzsch

https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.554057

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu makale, Orta Doğu’daki mevcut çatışmaların sadece devletler arası bir çatışma ya da bir Medeniyetler Çatışması olmadığını, küyerel göreli yoksunluğun bir iktidar boşluğuna ve durgun devletler arası çatışmalara yol açtığını savunmaktadır. Tezimi desteklemek için üç paradigmayı ve bunların Orta Doğu’daki krizi açıklama kapasitesini tartışacağım. Birincisi, Carl Schmitt’in Westphalia Yönetişimi’nden dış müdahalesizlik alanları olarak küresel hatlara (bir Yeryüzü Yasaları hattına) dönüşüdür. Bu ya ulus aşırı bir krize gerçek dışı uluslararası çözümler önermek ya da paradoksal şekilde, bölgedeki hegemonik çıkarları desteklemek için kullanılmaktadır. İkinci olarak, Samuel Huntington’ın klasik emperyalist anlayışın ötesinde, küresel mukayese edilebilirlik ufku sayesinde güçlendirilmiş küresel standartlar olarak bir Batı hegemonyası çağrısı için tartışmalı veri ve göndermelere dayalı Medeniyetler Çatışması paradigmasını irdeleyeceğim. Üçüncü olarak ise, Hans-Ulrich Wehler’in ulus devletlerde göreli yoksunluk, kimlik, katılım, bölüşüm, nüfuz ve meşruiyet krizlerine dayalı modernleşme krizinin nedenleri üzerine çizdiği çerçeveyi, Orta Doğu’daki çatımaları dünya toplumunda küyerel mukayese ve rekabetin bir sonucu olarak analiz etmek üzere genişleteceğim

Anahtar Kelimeler

Carl Schmitt, Samuel P. Huntington, Küresel Hatlar, Küyerel Göreli Yoksunluk, Medeniyetler Çatışması

Global Lines in Conflicts in the Middle East

Öz

My case is that current conflicts in the Middle East are not only conflicts between states or a Clash of Civilizations, but that glocal relative deprivation has caused a vacuum of power and conflicts between stationary states. To support my argument, I will discuss three paradigms and their ability for explaining the crisis in the Middle East: First, Carl Schmitt’s turn from Westphalian Governance to global lines (of a Nomos of Earth) as spheres of foreign non-interference, which is either used to propose unrealistic international solutions to a transnational crisis or, paradoxically, to back hegemonic interests in the region. Second, I will deconstruct Samuel Huntington’s paradigm of a Clash of Civilizations, which is based on dubious data and references to call for a Western hegemony that already exists beyond the classical imperialist understanding of it as global standards empowered with help of global horizons of comparability. Third, I will extend Hans-Ulrich Wehler’s sketch of reasons for modernization crisis in nation-states that is based on relative deprivation, identity-, participation-, distribution-, penetration-, and (culminating in a) legitimation-crisis, for analyzing conflicts in the Middle East as caused by glocal comparison and competition in world society. In summing, I intend to analyze the unrest in the Middle East as caused by glocal relative deprivation. This perspective enables us to deal with glocal political and social processes rather as represented than caused by global cultural or political conflicts between “civilizations” or states.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Carl Schmitt, Samuel P. Huntington, Global Lines, Glocal Relative Deprivation, Clash of Civilizations

Kaynakça

• ALBERT, Mathias, Bluhm, Gesa, Helmig, Jan, Leutzsch, Andreas, Walter, Jochen: “Introduction, The Communicative Construction of Transnational Political Spaces”, in: idem. (Ed.), Transnational Political Spaces: Agents-Structures-Encounters (Historische Politikforschung, Vol. 18) Campus, Frankfurt/New York 2009, 7-31.
• ANDERSON, Benedict R. O’G, Imagined Communities, Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, Verso, London, 1991.
• BRAUDEL, Fernand, Das Mittelmeer und die mediterrane Welt in der Epoche Philipps II., Suhrkamp, Frankfurt (M.) 1994.
• CASANOVA, José, Public Religions in the Modern World, Chicago UP, Chicago and London, 1994.
• CLAUSEWITZ, Carl von, Vom Kriege, Cormoran, München, 2000.
• DUGIN, Aleksandr, Osnovy geopolitiki, Geopoliticheskoe budushchee Rossii [The Foundations of Geopolitcs], Arktogeja, Moscow, 1997.
• ELIAS, Norbert, Über den Prozess der Zivilisation, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt (M.), 1978.
• FERGUSON, Niall, The Great Degeneration, How Institutions Decay and Economies Die, Penguin, London 2014.
• FUKUYAMA, Francis, The End of History and the Last Man, Free Press, New York, 2002.
• GERLACH, Julia, Der verpasste Frühling, Woran die Arabellion gescheitert ist, bpb, Bonn, 2016.
• GOERTZ, Stefan, Der neue Terrorismus: Neue Akteure, neue Strategien, neue Taktiken und neue Mittel, Springer, Wiesbaden, 2018.
• HERMANN, Rainer, Arabisches Beben, Die wahren Grunde der Krise im Nahen Osten, Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart, 2018.
• HIRSCHMANN, Kai, Wie Staaten schwach werden, Fragilität von Staaten als internationale Herausforderung, bpb, Bonn, 2016.
• HUNTINGTON, Samuel P., The Clash of Civilizations and the Remarking of World Order, Simon & Schuster, New York, 2003.
• KOJÈVE, Alexandre, Hegel, Eine Vergegenwärtigung seines Denkens, Kommentar zur Phänomenologie des Geistes, Stuttgart 1958.
• LÜDERS, Michael, Die den Sturm ernten, Wie der Westen Syrien ins Chaos stürzte, C.H. Beck, München, 2017.
• NEUMANN, Franz, Behemoth, The Structure and Practice of National Socialism, Oxford UP, Oxford/New York, 1944.
• NYE, Joseph, Soft Power, The Means to Success in World Politics, PublicAffairs, New York, 2004.
• SCHMITT, Carl, “Staat, Großraum”, Nomos, Arbeiten aus den Jahren 1916-1969, Ed. by Günter Maschke, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 1995.
• SCHMİTT, Carl, Der Begriff des Politischen, Text von 1932 mit einem Vorwort und drei Corollarien, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 6. Ed., 1997.
• SCHMITT, Carl, Der Nomos der Erde im Völkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europaeum, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 4. Ed., 1997.
• SCHMITT, Carl, Political Theology, Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, Translated and with an Introduction by George Schwab, With a new Foreword by Tracy B. Strong, Chicago UP, Chicago/London, 2005.
• SCHMITT, Carl, Theory of the Partisan, Telos-press, Candor, 2007.
• MÜNKLER, Herfried, Die neuen Kriege (Schriftenreihe, 387) bpb, Bonn, 2002.
• SCHMITT, Carl, The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes, Meaning and Failure of a Political Symbol, Translated by George Schwab and Erna Hilfstein and with an Introduction by George Schwab, With a new Foreword by Tracy B. Strong, Chicago UP, Chicago/London, 2008.
• SCHMITT, Carl, Land und Meer, Klett-Cotta, Berlin, 7. Ed, 2011 [1942].
• WALLERSTEIN, Immanuel, World Systems Analysis: An Introduction, Paradigm Press, Boulder, 2004.
• WEHLER, Hans-Ulrich, Umbruch und Kontinuität, Essays zum 20. Jahrhundert, C.H. Beck, München, 2000.
• WEHLER, Hans-Ulrich, Die Neue Umverteilung, Soziale Ungleichheit in Deutschland, C.H. Beck, München, 2013.
• WHITAKER, Brian, What’s really wrong with the Middle East, Saqi, London, 2009.
• ABELSHAUSER, Werner, David Gilgen, Andreas Leutzsch, “Kultur, Wirtschaft, Kulturen der Weltwirtschaft”, in: Idem (Eds.), Wirtschaftskulturen–Kulturen der Weltwirtschaft (Geschichte und Gesellschaft, Sepcial Issue, 24) Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, 2012, 9-27.
• AFP: Amerikas Botschafter in Israel posiert mit Fotomontage, retrieved from: FAZ, 23.05.2018.
• LEUTZSCH, Andreas, “Die Weltrevolution von 1989 -Global- oder Goofy-History?”, in: Christopher Kopper, Andreas Leutzsch, David Gilgen (Ed.), Deutschland als Modell?, Rheinischer Kapitalismus und Globalisierung seit dem 19. Jahrhundert, Festschrift Werner Abelshauser (Politik- und Gesellschaftsgeschichte, Vol. 88) Dietz, Bonn 2010, 383-419.
• LEUTZSCH, Andreas, „Wirtschaftsgeschichte einer Weltgesellschaft?“, EWE: Deliberation, Knowledge, Ethics, 25, Vol. 4, 2014, 574-577.
• LUHMANN, Niklas, “Die Weltgesellschaft”, in: Niklas Luhmann, Soziologische Aufklärung 2, Auf¬sätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft, Opladen 1975, 51-71.