Süt Sığırcılığı İşletmelerinde Ayak Banyosu Uygulamaları

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 62 Sayı: 1, 67 - 76, 30.06.2021

Celal İzci

https://doi.org/10.29185/hayuretim.774433

Öz

Ayak banyoları, süt sığırlarında başta digital dermatitis olmak üzere enfeksiyöz ayak hastalıklarının kontrol ve önlenmesindeki etkinliği bilinen ve dünyada yaygın olarak kullanılan uygulamalardır. Ayak banyosu tasarımı ve uygulama protokollerinde ülkeler, bölgeler ve çiftlikler arasında geniş bir çeşitlilik olduğu görülmektedir. Ayrıca ayak banyolarında çok sayıda farklı kimyasal kullanılmaktadır. Ülkemizdeki süt sığırcılığı işletmelerinde ayak banyosu kullanımına ilişkin kapsamlı bir veri kaynağı bulunmamaktadır. Doğru uygulanmayan ayak banyosunun topallık riskinin arttığı bilinmektedir. Ancak konuya ilişkin mevcut bilimsel veri eksikliği ve hemen hemen tüm saha uygulamalarının ampirik bulgulara dayanması ayak banyosu uygulamasında standartlaştırmaya ihtiyaç olduğunu göstermektedir. Sığırlarda ayak banyosu maliyetli bir uygulamadır. Bu durum ayak banyosu uygulamalarında tedbirli olmayı ve kontrol ve gözetim altında kullanımını gerekli kılmaktadır. Ayrıca ayak banyolarında kullanılan kimyasalların insan sağlığı ve çevre üzerindeki etkileri nedeniyle dikkatli olunması gerekmektedir. Bu bağlamda çiftliklerde ayak banyosu uygulamasında dünyadaki mevcut bilimsel bilgi ve saha deneyimleri dikkate alınmalıdır. Bu derlemenin amacı, süt sığırcılığı işletmelerinde ayak banyosu kullanımı ile ilgili dünyadaki güncel literatür bilgiyi özetlemek ve deneyimlere dayanarak sahadaki uygulayıcılara yol göstermektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ayak banyosu, süt sığırı, enfeksiyöz ayak hastalığı, topallık

Destekleyen Kurum

Selçuk Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi

Use of Footbaths in Dairy Cattle Farms

Öz

Kaynakça

• Akköse M, İzci C. 2017a. Süt ineklerinde yatma süresinin topallıklara etkisi ve yatma süresini etkileyen faktörler. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 57(1):44-51.
• Akköse M, İzci C. 2017b. İnek Konforunun Topallıklar Üzerine Etkisi ve Konforun Değerlendirilmesi. Hayvansal Üretim 58(1):33-45.
• Ariza JM, Relun A, Bareille N, Oberle K, Guatteo R. 2017. Effectiveness of collective treatments in the prevention and treatment of bovine digital dermatitis lesions: a systematic review. Journal of Dairy Science 100(9):7401–7418.
• Ariza JM, Bareille N, Oberle K, Guatteo R. 2019. Current recommendations for footbath solutions renewal rates in dairy cattle:the need for adaptation? Animal 13(6):1319-25.
• BCFI (Belgısch Centrum Voor Farmacotherapeutısche Informatıe). 2019. Gecommentarıeerd Geneesmıddelen-Repertorıum. www.bcfi.be of www.cbip.be. (www.bcfi.be of www.cbip.be.) (13 July 2020).
• Becker J, Steiner A, Kohler S, Koller-Bahler A,Wuthrich M, Reist M. 2014. Lameness and foot lesions in Swiss dairy cows: I. Prevalence. Schweizer Archiv Fur Tierheilkunde 156(2):71–78.
• Bell NJ, Bell MJ, Knowles TG, Whay HR, Main DJ, Webster AJF. 2009. The development, implementation and testing of a lameness control programme based on HACCP principles and designed for heifers on dairy farms. The Veterinary Journal 180(2):178–188.
• Bicalho RC, Machado VS, Caixeta LS. 2009. Lameness in dairy cattle: A debilitating disease or a disease of debilitated cattle? A cross-sectional study of lameness prevalence and thickness of the digital cushion. Journal of Dairy Science 92(7):3175–3184.
• Bjurstrom A. 2016. Footbath Management. Walking Strong, UW-Extension Dairy Team: A Factsheet Series on Dairy Hoof Health. https://fyi.extension.wisc.edu/dairy/files/2016/11/IDeal-Footbath-Miller-Hennes-2.pdf (https://fyi.extension.wisc.edu/dairy/files/2016/11/IDeal-Footbath-Miller-Hennes-2.pdf ) (06 May 2020).
• Blowey R. 2005. Factors associated with lameness in dairy cattle. In Practice 27(3):154-162.
• Bruijnis MRN, Hogeveen H, Stassen EN. 2013. Measures to improve dairy cow foot health: consequences for farmer income and dairy cow welfare. Animal 7(1):167–175.
• Burgi K. 2010. Managing a Footbath Successfully. Dairyland Hoof Care Institute Inc January, 1–3. Burgi 2017. The Fundamentals For Good Hoof Health. https://www.wiagribusiness.org/fourstatedairy/2017/16_burgi.pdf. (https://www.wiagribusiness.org/fourstatedairy/2017/16_burgi.pdf.) (20 February 2018)
• Cha E, Hertl JA, Bar D Gröhn YT. 2010. The cost of different types of lameness in dairy cows calculated by dynamic programming. Preventive veterinary medicine 97(1):1-8.
• Collins JJ, Lineker GA. 2004. A review and meta-analysis of formaldehyde exposure and leukemia. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 40(2):81–91.
• Cook NB. 2006. Footbath alternatives. http://www.vetmed.wisc.edu/dms/fapm/fapmtools/6lame/ Footbath-Alternatives.pdf. (http://www.vetmed.wisc.edu/dms/fapm/fapmtools/6lame/ Footbath-Alternatives.pdf.) (29 January 2020)
• Cook NB, Rieman J, Burgi K. 2011. Behavioral observations on hoofbath design. In: Proceedings of 16th Symposium and 8th Conference Lameness in Ruminants: Lameness – A Global Perspective. 28 February – 3 March, Rotorua, New Zealand, p.22.
• Cook NB, Rieman J, Gomez A, Burgi K. 2012. Observations on the design and use of footbaths for the control of infectious hoof disease in dairy cattle. The Veterinary Journal 193(3):669–673.
• Cook NB, Hess JP, Foy MR, Bennett TB, Brotzman RL. 2016. Management characteristics, lameness and body injuries of dairy cattle housed in high performance dairy herds in Wisconsin. Journal of Dairy Science 99(7):5879–5891.
• Cook NB 2017. A Review of the Design and Management of Footbaths for Dairy Cattle. Veterınary Clınıcs Of North Amerıca-Food Anımal Practıce 33(2):195-225.
• Cramer G, Lissemore KD, Guard CL, Leslie KE, Kelton DF. 2008. Herd- and cow-level prevalence of foot lesions in Ontario dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 91(10):3888–3895.
• Cramer G, Lissemore KD, Guard CL, Leslie KE, Kelton DF. 2009. Herd-level risk factors for seven different foot lesions in Ontario Holstein cattle housed in tie stalls or free stalls. Journal of Dairy Science 92(4):1404–1411.
• Doane M, Sarenbo S. 2014. Exposure of farm laborers and dairy cattle to formaldehyde from footbath use at a dairy farm in New York State. Scıence Of The Total Envıronment 487C(1):65–71.
• Edwards J. 2019. Top 4 Foot Bath Management Mistakes – Solved. https://hoards.com/blog-25243-top-4-foot-bath-management-mistakes---solved.html (https://hoards.com/blog-25243-top-4-foot-bath-management-mistakes---solved.html ) (12 April 2020).
• Epperson B, Midla L. 2007. Copper sulfate for footbaths- issues and alternatives. Tri-State Dairy Nutrition Conference. 24-25 April, Ohio, USA, p.51-54
• Fjeldaas T, Knappe-Poindecker ME, Boe KE, Larssen RB. 2014. Water footbath, automatic flushing, and disinfection to improve the health of bovine feet. Journal of Dairy Science 97(5):2835–2846.
• Flemming C, Trevors J. 1989. Copper toxicity and chemistry in the environment: a reviev. Water Air and Soil Pollution 44(1):143-158.
• Gard R. 2018. The latest on lameness. Veterinary practice, Large animal, A summary of discussions at the Cattle Lameness Academy Seminar held on 28 March. https://veterinary-practice.com/article/the-latest-on-lameness-1 (https://veterinary-practice.com/article/the-latest-on-lameness-1 ) (11 April 2020).
• Gestis 2020. GESTIS substance database. http://gestis-en.itrust.de/nxt/gateway.dll/gestis_en/000000.xml?f=templates$fn=default.htm$vid=gestiseng:sdbeng$3.0. (http://gestis-en.itrust.de/nxt/gateway.dll/gestis_en/000000.xml?f=templates$fn=default.htm$vid=gestiseng:sdbeng$3.0.) (13 July 2020).
• Green LE, Hedges VJ, Schukken YH, Blowey RW, Packing¬ton AJ. 2002. The impact of clinical lameness on the milk yield of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85(9):2250–2256.
• Green LE, Huxley JN, Banks C, Green MJ. 2014. Temporal associations between low body condition, lameness and milk yield in a UK dairy herd. Preventive veterinary medicine 113(1):63–71.
• Härdi-Landerer MC, Stoffel A, Dürr S, Steiner A. 2019. Footbath as treatment of footrot in sheep. Current situation on Swiss sheep farms. Schweizer Archiv Fur Tierheilkunde 161(6):377–386.
• Hartshorn RE, Thomas EC, Anklam K, Lopez-Benavides MG, Buchalova M, Hemling TC, Döpfer D. 2013. Short communication: minimum bactericidal concentration of disinfectants evaluated for bovine digital dermatitis-associated Treponema phagedenis-like spirochetes. Journal of Dairy Science 96(5):3034–3038.
• Hernandez J, Shearer JK, Webb DW. 2002. Effect of lameness on milk yield in dairy cows. Journal Of The Amerıcan Veterınary Medıcal Assocıatıon 220(5):640-644.
• Hoff B, Boermans HJ, Baird JD. 1998. Retrospective study of toxic metal analyses requested at a veterinary diagnostic toxicology laboratory in Ontario (1990-1995). Canadian The Veterinary Journal 39(1):39–43.
• Holzhauer M, Döpfer D, De Boer J, Van Schaik G. 2008. Effects of different intervention strategies on the incidence of papillomatous digital dermatitis in dairy cows. Veterinary Record 162(2):41–46.
• Holzhauer M, Bartels CJ, Bergsten C, Van Riet MMJ, Franken K, Lam TJGM. 2012. The effect of an acidified, chelated copper sulphate solution on digital dermatitis in dairy cows. The Veterinary Journal 193(3):659–663.
• Hoschet I. 2015. Animal behaviour in relation to footbath designs and footbath management in modern dairy herds in Flanders. Ghent Unıversıty Faculty Of Veterınary Medıcıne. Research report as part of the master’s dissertation.
• Huxley JN. 2013. Impact of lameness and claw lesions in cows on health and production. Livestock Science 156(1-3):64–70.
• International Lameness Committee 2008 Dairy claw lesion identification. In: Sciences, S.U.o.A. (Ed.), 15th International Symposium and 7th Conference on Lameness in Ruminants, 9-13 June 2008, Kuopio, Finland.
• Ippolito JA, Barbarick KA. 2008. Fate of biosolids trace metals in a dryland wheat agroecosystem. Journal of Environmental Quality 37(6):2135–2144.
• İzci C. 1994. Sığırlarda Topallığa Neden Olan İnterdigital Deri Hastalıkları ve Taban Lezyonları. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 34(3-4):84-108.
• İzci C, Erol M, Gökşahin E. 2011. A study about determining the changes in the structural characteristics of the digital cushion in heifer and multipar dairy cows: A preliminary report. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 17(1):159-162.
• İzci C, Akköse M, Gerçekcioğlu M. 2016. Süt sığırcılığı işletmelerinde yapılan topallık skorlaması sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi. 15’inci Ulusal Veteriner Cerrahi Kongresi ve 1’th International Turkey Veterinary Surgery Congress,11-14 Mayıs, Erzurum.
• İzci C. 2018. Sığırlarda Ayak Hastalıkları ve Topallık Kontrolü. SÜ Basımevi, Konya.
• Jacobs C, Beninger C, Hazlewood GS, Orsel K, Barkema HW. 2019. Effect of footbath protocols for prevention and treatment of digital dermatitis in dairy cattle: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 164 (2019):56–71.
• Laven RA, Proven MJ. 2000. Use of an antibiotic footbath in the treatment of bovine digital dermatitis. Veterinary Record 147(18):503–506.
• Laven RA, Hunt H. 2002. Evaluation of copper sulfate, formalin and peracetic acid in footbaths for the treatment of digital dermatitis in cattle. Veterinary Record 151(5):144–146.
• Laven R, Logue DN. 2004. Treatment strategies for digital dermatitis for the UK. The Veterinary Journal 171(1):79–88.
• Laven RA and Logue DN. 2006. Treatment strategies for digital dermatitis for the UK. The Veterinary Journal 171(1):79–88.
• Logue DN, Gibert T, Parkin T, Thomson TS, Taylor DJ. 2012. A field evaluation of a footbathing solution for the control of digital dermatitis in cattle. The Veterinary Journal 193(3):664–668.
• Manning AD, Mahendran SA, Hurst BS, Blackmore TL, Bell NJ. 2017. Effect of a prewash on footbath contamination: a randomized control trial (Short Communication). Veterinary Record 180(5):121.
• Murray RD, Downham DY, Clarkson MJ, Faull WB, Hughes JW, Manson FJ, Merritt JB, Russell WB, Sutherst JE, Ward WR. 1996. Epidemiology of lameness in dairy cattle: Description and analysis of foot lesions. Veterinary Record 138(24):586–591.
• Offer JE, Kelly M, Jack M, Mason C, Barrett C, Logue DN, Howat D. 2006. Footbath design and use. Milk Development Council Study 03/T2 07-2 April 2004–April 2006, SAC Report, Edinburgh, UK, p.1–113.
• Olson R. 2017. Footbaths: Solution to a Problem or a Problematic Solution? Western Dairy Management Conference, 28 February – 2 March 2017, Reno, NV.
• Osorio JS, Batistel F, Garrett EF, Elhanafy MM, Tariq MR, Socha MT, Loor JJ. 2016. Corium molecular biomarkers reveal a beneficial effect on hoof transcrip¬tomics in peripartal dairy cows supplemented with zinc, manganese, and copper from amino acid complexes and cobalt from cobalt glucoheptonate. Journal of Dairy Science 99(12):9974–9982.
• Peterse DJ. 1985. Laminitis and interdigital dermatitis and heel horn erosion. Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice 1(1):83–89.
• Phillips C. 2002. The Welfare of Dairy Cows. Cattle Behavior and Welfare. 2nd ed. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford U.K., Hoboken, NJ.
• Potterton SL, Bell NJ, Whay HR, Berry EA, Atkinson OCD, Dean RS, Main DCJ, Huxley JN. 2012. A descriptive review of the peer and non-peer reviewed literature on the treatment and prevention of foot lameness in cattle published between 2000 and 2011. The Veterinary Journal 193(3):612–616.
• Raven ET. 1989. Cattle footcare and claw trimming. Farming Press, Ipswich, UK.
• Relun A, Lehebel A, Bareille N, Guatteo R. 2012. Effectiveness of different regimens of a collective topical treatment using a solution of copper and zinc chelates in the cure of digital dermatitis in dairy farms under field conditions. Journal of Dairy Science 95(7):3722–3735.
• Relun A, Guatteo R, Auzanneau MM, Bareille N. 2013. Farmers’ practices, motivators and barriers for adoption of treatments of digital dermatitis in dairy farms. Animal 7(9):1542–1550.
• Shaw G. 2017. Latest Lameness Research: A Summary. International Animal Health Journal 4(4):36-39. http://animalhealthmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Latest-Lameness-research.pdf) (10.10.2018).
• Smith AC, Wood CL, McQuerry KJ, Bewlwy JM. 2014. Effect of a tea tree oil and organic acid footbath solution on digital dermatitis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 97(4):2498–2501.
• Solano L, Barkema HW, Pajor EA, Mason S, Orsel K. 2013. Decreasing lameness and increasing cow comfort on Alberta dairy farms. WCDS Advances in Dairy Technology, Red Deer, AB, Canada. 25, 297-306.
• Solano L, Barkema HW, Pajor EA, Mason S, LeBlanc SJ, Zaffino Heyerhoff JC, Nash CGR, Haley DB, Vasseur E, Pellerin D, Rushen J, De Passille AM, Orsel K. 2015. Prevalence of lameness and associated risk factors in Canadian Holstein-Friesian cows housed in freestall barns. Journal of Dairy Science 98(10):6978–6991.
• Solano L, Barkema HW, Mason S, Pajor EA, LeBlanc SJ, Orsel K. 2016. Prevalence and distribution of foot lesions in dairy cattle in Alberta, Canada. Journal of Dairy Science 99(8):6828–6841.
• Solano L, Barkema HW, Pickel C, Orsel K. 2017. Effectiveness of a standardized footbath protocol for prevention of digital dermatitis. Journal of Dairy Science 100(2):1295–307.
• Somers JGCJ, Frankena K, Noordhuizen-Stassen EN, Metz JHM. 2003. Prevalence of claw disorders in Dutch dairy cows exposed to several floor systems. Journal of Dairy Science 86(6):2082–2093.
• Somers JGCJ, Frankena K, Noordhuizen-Stassen EN, Metz JHM. 2005a. Risk factors for interdigital dermatitis and heel erosion in dairy cows kept in cubicle houses in The Netherlands. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 71(1-2):23–34.
• Somers JGCJ, Schouten WGP, Frankena K, Noordhuizen-Stassen EN, Metz JHM, 2005b. Development of claw traits and claw lesions in dairy cows kept on different floor systems. Journal of Dairy Science 88(1):110–120.
• Speijers MHM, Baird LG, Finney GA, McBride J, Kilpatrick DJ, Logue DN, O’Connell NE. 2010. Effectiveness of different footbath solutions in the treatment of digital dermatitis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93(12):5782–5791.
• Tarlton JF, Holah DE, Evans KM, Jones S, Pearson GR, Webster AJF. 2002. Biomechanical and histopathological changes in the support structures of bovine hooves around the time of first calving. The Veterinary Journal 163(2):196–204. Teixeira AGV, Machado VS, Caixeta LS, Pereira RV, Bicalho RC. 2010. Efficacy of formalin, copper sulfate, and a commercial footbath product in the control of digital dermatitis. Journal of Dairy Science 93(8):3628–3634.
• Trent AM, Redic-Kill KA. 1997. Clinicalpharmacology. Editors: Greenough PR, Weaver AD. Lameness in cattle. London: WB Saunders, p.57–70.
• Van Amstel SR, Shearer JK. 2006. Manual for treatment and control of lameness in cattle. 1st edition. Oxford (United Kingdom): Blackwell Publishing, USA.
• Van Amstel S and Shearer J. 2013. Manual of Foot Care in Cattle. 2nd ed. Hoard’s Dairyman, Fort Atkinson, WI.
• Von Keyserlingk M, Barrientos A, Ito K, Galo E, Weary DM. 2012. Benchmarking cow comfort on North American freestall dairies: Lameness, leg injuries, lying time, facility design, and management for high-producing Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(12):7399–7408.
• Yaylak E, Konca Y, Koyubenbe N. 2016. İzmir İli Ödemiş İlçesindeki Damızlık Sığır Yetiştiricileri Birliği Üyesi İşletmelerde Sağlık Koruma Uygulamaları ve Sağlık Sorunları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Hayvansal Üretim, 57(1):28-40.