BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Core Curriculum in Higher Education

Yıl 2017, Sayı: 1, 118 - 131, 01.04.2017

Nurdan Kalaycı Elif İlhan

Öz

It is inevitable that educational systems will be impacted by the rapid and ongoing changes observed in every part of the society. Considering all the increased and changing responsibilities due to these changes, higher education systems need to find new methods for qualified education. One of the most important aspects of qualified education is qualified curriculum design. The core curriculum is one of the most appropriate curriculum designs when the objectives of higher education systems are considered. This study which mainly aimed to explain the core curriculum and analyze its application in the higher education context is a narrative review article. The study is structured under three titles: core curriculum in higher education and its basic features, the relation between core curriculum in higher education and general education, and core curriculum applications in higher education

Anahtar Kelimeler

Higher education Curriculum design at higher education Core curriculum Types of core curriculum

Kaynakça

  • Alberty, H. (1938). The development of the core curricula in the schools of the eight-year study. In Rugg, H. (Ed.), Democracy and the curriculum. New York, NY: D. Appleton-Century.
  • Alberty, H. (1947). Reorganizing the high-school curriculum. New York: The Macmillan.
  • Alberty, H. B., & Alberty, E. J. (1962). Reorganizing the high-school curriculum (3rd ed.). New York: The Macmillan.
  • Altbach, P., G., & Salmi, J. (2011). The past, present, and future of the research university. In Altbach P. G. & Salmi J. (Eds.), The road to academic excellence the making of world-class research universities (pp.1-9). Washington: World Bank.
  • Altınok, V. (2008). Yükseköğretimde ilke ve yönelimler neler olmalı? Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19, 41-52.
  • Arimoto, A. (2001). Case study: Trends in higher education and academic reforms from 1994 onwards in Japan. Retrieved from http://chet.org.za/papers/case-study-trends-higher-education- and-academic-reforms-1994-onwards-japan.
  • Arnold, F. (2016). İşi ustasından öğrenin, başarının püf noktaları (Itır Arda, Çev.) İstanbul: NTV.
  • Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The bi-evolution of the university in the triple helix era. Science Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://cite- seerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.621.6900&r ep=rep1&type
  • Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: Industry-university-govern- ment innovation in action. New York: Routledge.
  • Etzkowitz, H., Gulbrandsen, M., & Levitt, J. (2000). Public venture capital: Government funding sources for technology entrepre- neurs. New York: Harcourt.
  • European Union. (2014). High level group on the modernisation of higher education: New modes of learning and teaching in higher education. Luxembourg: EU.
  • European Universities Association. (2004). Annual report 2003. Retrieved from http://www.eua.be/eua/jsp/en/upload/ EUA_annual_report_2003.1099928273680.pdf.
  • Fliegel, R., & Holland, J. (2013). Quantifying learning in critical thinking. Journal of General Education: A Curricular Commons of the Humanities and Sciences, 62(2–3), 160-203.
  • Futhey, T., Luce, R., & Smith, J.M. (2010). Drivers of change in higher education. Educause Review, 45(1), 12-13.
  • Gaff, J., G. (1991). New life for the college curriculum: Assessing achievements and furthering progress in the reform of general education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Glynn, S. M., Aultman, L. P., & Owens, A. M. (2005). Motivation to learn in general education programs. The Journal of General Education, 54, 150–170.
  • Goldstein, P.J. (2006). The future of higher education: A view from CHEMA. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/ pdf/ECP0602.pdf.
  • Günay, D. (2011). Türk yükseköğretiminin yeniden yapılandırılması bağlamında sorunlar, eğilimler, ilkeler ve öneriler. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 1(3), 113-121.
  • Gür, T., M. (2003). Araştırma ve eğitimde disiplinlerarasılık. In Babüroğlu O.N. (Ed.), (Çev. Dicleli Z.), Eğitimin geleceği: Üni- versitelerin ve eğitimin değişen paradigması. (pp. 185-195). İstanbul: Sabancı Üniversitesi.
  • Gürüz, K., Şuhubi, A. M., Şengör, C., Türker, K., & Yurtsever, E. (1994). Türkiye’de ve dünyada yükseköğretim, bilim ve teknolo- ji. İstanbul: Türk Sanayicileri ve İşadamları Derneği (TÜSİAD).
  • Harden, R.M., & Davis, M.H. (1995). AMEE medical education guide no. 5. The core curriculum with options or special study modules. Medical Teacher, 17(2), 125-148.
  • Hicks, O. (2007). Curriculum in higher education in Australia – Hel- lo? Enhancing higher education, theory and scholarship. Pro- ceedings of the 30th HERDSA Annual Conference. Retrieved from https://herdsa.org.au/system/files/p53.pdf.
  • Higher Education Academy. (2013). We think that’s the future: cur- riculum reform initiatives in higher education. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/Research/ curriculum_reform_initiatives.
  • Johnson, B. L. (1952). General education in action. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
  • Johnstone, D. B. (1998). The financing and management of higher education: A status report on worldwide reforms. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/html/extdr/educ/postbasc. htm.
  • Johnstone, D.B., & Marcucci, P.N. (2007). Worldwide trends in higher education finance: cost-sharing, the support of academic research. UNECSO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge. Paris: UNESCO.
  • yükseköğretim vizyonu. İstanbul: İstanbul Politikalar Merkezi.
  • McGregor, S., & Volckmann, R. (2010). Transdisciplinarity in higher education: The path of Arizona State University. Integral Leadership Review, 10(3), 1-25.
  • Menand, L. (2010). The marketplace of ideas: reform and resistance in the American university. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
  • Middlehurst, R., & Woodfield, S. (2006). Quality review in distance learning: policy and practice in five countries. Tertiary Education and Management, 12(1), 37-58.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd Ed.). CA: Thousand Oaks, Sage.
  • National Middle School Association. (2003). This we believe: successful schools for young adolescents. Westerville, OH: Author.
  • National Leadership Council for Liberal Education and America’s Promise. (2007). College learning for the new global century. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  • New Media Consortium. (2014). New horizon report 2014. Retrieved from https://www.nmc.org/pdf/2014-nmc-horizon- report-he-EN.pdf.
  • New Media Consortium. (2015). New horizon report 2015. Retrieved from http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2015-nmc-horizon- report-HE-EN.pdf.
  • Newton, R., R. (2000). Tensions and models in general education planning. The Journal of General Education, 49(3), 165-181.
  • O’Banion, T. (2016). A brief history of general education. Community College Journal of Research and Practice. 40(4), 327-334.
  • OECD. (2007). Four future scenarios for higher education. Paris: OECD.
  • OECD. (2009). Higher education to 2030: Globalisation. Paris: OECD.
  • Oliva, P. (2009). Developing the curriculum (7th ed.). USA: Pearson.
  • Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2004). Curriculum foundations, principles and issues (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Özdem, G., & Sarı, E. (2008). Yükseköğretimde yeni bakış açılarıyla birlikte yeni kurulan üniversitelerden beklenen işlevler (Giresun Üniversitesi örneği). Üniversite ve Toplum, Bilim, Eğitim ve Düşünce Dergisi, 8(1), 1-10.
  • Pautasso, M., & Bourne, P. (2013). Ten simple rules for writing a literature review. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715443/
  • Pinar, W. (2003). What is curriculum theory? New York: Routledge.
  • Posner, G. (1995). Analyzing the curriculum. USA: Library of Congress.
  • Pushor, D, & Murphy, S. ( 2010). Problem centered curriculum. In Kridel C. (Ed.), Enclopedia of currciulum studies (pp. 685-686). Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
  • Roth, M. (2014). Beyond the university: Why liberal education matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
  • Rudolph, F. (1977). Curriculum: A history of the American undergraduate course of study since 1636. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Rutgers University (2016). Core curriculum rubrics. Retrieved from http://sas.rutgers.edu/documents/core-requirements/636- crc-rubrics-for-core-goals/file.
  • courses/Scientific_Writing
  • Varış, F. (1977). Eğitimde program geliştirme. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi.
  • Vars, G. F. (1991). Integrated curriculum in historical perspective. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 14-15.
  • Vars, G. F. (2001). Can curriculum integration survive in an era of high-stakes testing? Middle School Journal, 33(3), 7-17.
  • Vidovich, L., O’Donoghue, T., & Tight, M. (2012). Transforming university curriculum policies in a global knowledge era: mapping a “global case study” research agenda. Educational Studies, 38(3), 283-295.
  • Waldo, J. T. (2014). Application of the test of scientific literacy skills in the assessment of a general education natural science program. Journal of General Education: A Curricular Commons of the Humanities and Sciences, 63(1), 1–14.
  • Waltzer, K. (2000). General education models: Pros & cons of general education strategies. Retrieved from https://www. york.cuny.edu/academic/academic-affairs/general-education- reform/Waltzer document.pdf.
  • Wells, C. (2016). Special issue: Realizing general education: Reconsidering conceptions and renewing practice. ASHE Higher Education Report, 42 (2), 1-85. Retrieved from http:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aehe.2016.42.issue-2/ issuetoc.
  • White, C., R. (1994). A model for comprehensive reform in general education: Portland State University. The Journal of General Education, 43(3), 168-237.
  • Williams, J. L., McCarley, N., & Kraft, J. (2013). History and systems of psychology: a course to unite a core curriculum. College Quarterly, 16(2), 1-13.
  • Wissema, J.G. (2009). Towards the third generation university. Managing the university in transition.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Wolf, P., Cristensen, J.H., Svinicki, M.D., & Rice, R.E. (2007). Yüksek öğretimde eğitim programı geliştirme: Öğretim üyeleri tarafından yürütülen süreçler ve uygulamalar. (Çev. Kalaycı, N. & İlhan, E.; Çev. Ed. Atay, M.T.). Ankara: Elhan.
  • Woodbury, S. (1998). Rhetoric, reality, and possibilities: Interdisciplinary teaching and secondary mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 303-311.
  • Wraga, W. G. (1996). A century of interdisciplinary curricula in American schools. Jefferson City, MO: Scholastic.
  • Wende, M. C. (2011). The emergence of liberal arts and sciences education in Europe: A comparative perspective. Higher Education Policy, 24(2), 233-253.
  • Xing, J., Ng, P.S., & Cheng, C.Y. (2013). General education and the development of global citizenship in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China. New York: Routledge.
  • Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.
  • Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK). (2007). Türkiye’nin yükseköğretim stratejisi. Retrieved from http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/ 10279/30217/yok_strateji_kitabi/27077070-cb13-4870-aba1- 6742db37696b
  • Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK). (2014). Büyüme, kalite, uluslararası- laşma: Türkiye yükseköğretimi için bir yol haritası. Retrieved from https://yolharitasi.yok.gov.tr/docs/YolHaritasi.pdf
  • Yüksel, İ. (2002). Yükseköğretimde eğitim-öğretim faaliyetleri ve örtük program. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 361-370.
  • B

Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program

Yıl 2017, Sayı: 1, 118 - 131, 01.04.2017

Nurdan Kalaycı Elif İlhan

Öz

Günümüzde toplumun her alanında gözlenen hızlı ve sürekli değişimlerin eğitim sistemlerine yansıması kaçınılmazdır. Yaşanan değişimlerle artan ve çeşitlenen sorumluluklara sahip olan yükseköğretim sistemlerinin, nitelikli eğitim sunma yöntemlerini bulması gerekmektedir. Nitelikli eğitimin en önemli değişkenlerinden biri, nitelikli eğitim programlarıdır. Yükseköğretim sistemlerinin amaçlarına uygun olan eğitim programı tasarımlarından biri çekirdek programdır. Çekirdek programın temel boyutlarıyla açıklanmasının ve yükseköğretim kademesindeki uygulamalarının incelenmesinin amaçlandığı bu çalışma, anlatıma dayalı derleme çalışmasıdır. Bu çalışma üç başlık altında yapılandırılmıştır: yükseköğretimde çekirdek program ve temel özellikleri, yükseköğretimde çekirdek program ve genel eğitim ilişkisi, yükseköğretimde çekirdek program uygulamaları

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yükseköğretim Yükseköğretimde eğitim programı tasarımları Çekirdek program Çekirdek program türleri

Kaynakça

  • Alberty, H. (1938). The development of the core curricula in the schools of the eight-year study. In Rugg, H. (Ed.), Democracy and the curriculum. New York, NY: D. Appleton-Century.
  • Alberty, H. (1947). Reorganizing the high-school curriculum. New York: The Macmillan.
  • Alberty, H. B., & Alberty, E. J. (1962). Reorganizing the high-school curriculum (3rd ed.). New York: The Macmillan.
  • Altbach, P., G., & Salmi, J. (2011). The past, present, and future of the research university. In Altbach P. G. & Salmi J. (Eds.), The road to academic excellence the making of world-class research universities (pp.1-9). Washington: World Bank.
  • Altınok, V. (2008). Yükseköğretimde ilke ve yönelimler neler olmalı? Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19, 41-52.
  • Arimoto, A. (2001). Case study: Trends in higher education and academic reforms from 1994 onwards in Japan. Retrieved from http://chet.org.za/papers/case-study-trends-higher-education- and-academic-reforms-1994-onwards-japan.
  • Arnold, F. (2016). İşi ustasından öğrenin, başarının püf noktaları (Itır Arda, Çev.) İstanbul: NTV.
  • Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The bi-evolution of the university in the triple helix era. Science Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://cite- seerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.621.6900&r ep=rep1&type
  • Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: Industry-university-govern- ment innovation in action. New York: Routledge.
  • Etzkowitz, H., Gulbrandsen, M., & Levitt, J. (2000). Public venture capital: Government funding sources for technology entrepre- neurs. New York: Harcourt.
  • European Union. (2014). High level group on the modernisation of higher education: New modes of learning and teaching in higher education. Luxembourg: EU.
  • European Universities Association. (2004). Annual report 2003. Retrieved from http://www.eua.be/eua/jsp/en/upload/ EUA_annual_report_2003.1099928273680.pdf.
  • Fliegel, R., & Holland, J. (2013). Quantifying learning in critical thinking. Journal of General Education: A Curricular Commons of the Humanities and Sciences, 62(2–3), 160-203.
  • Futhey, T., Luce, R., & Smith, J.M. (2010). Drivers of change in higher education. Educause Review, 45(1), 12-13.
  • Gaff, J., G. (1991). New life for the college curriculum: Assessing achievements and furthering progress in the reform of general education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Glynn, S. M., Aultman, L. P., & Owens, A. M. (2005). Motivation to learn in general education programs. The Journal of General Education, 54, 150–170.
  • Goldstein, P.J. (2006). The future of higher education: A view from CHEMA. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/ pdf/ECP0602.pdf.
  • Günay, D. (2011). Türk yükseköğretiminin yeniden yapılandırılması bağlamında sorunlar, eğilimler, ilkeler ve öneriler. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 1(3), 113-121.
  • Gür, T., M. (2003). Araştırma ve eğitimde disiplinlerarasılık. In Babüroğlu O.N. (Ed.), (Çev. Dicleli Z.), Eğitimin geleceği: Üni- versitelerin ve eğitimin değişen paradigması. (pp. 185-195). İstanbul: Sabancı Üniversitesi.
  • Gürüz, K., Şuhubi, A. M., Şengör, C., Türker, K., & Yurtsever, E. (1994). Türkiye’de ve dünyada yükseköğretim, bilim ve teknolo- ji. İstanbul: Türk Sanayicileri ve İşadamları Derneği (TÜSİAD).
  • Harden, R.M., & Davis, M.H. (1995). AMEE medical education guide no. 5. The core curriculum with options or special study modules. Medical Teacher, 17(2), 125-148.
  • Hicks, O. (2007). Curriculum in higher education in Australia – Hel- lo? Enhancing higher education, theory and scholarship. Pro- ceedings of the 30th HERDSA Annual Conference. Retrieved from https://herdsa.org.au/system/files/p53.pdf.
  • Higher Education Academy. (2013). We think that’s the future: cur- riculum reform initiatives in higher education. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/Research/ curriculum_reform_initiatives.
  • Johnson, B. L. (1952). General education in action. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
  • Johnstone, D. B. (1998). The financing and management of higher education: A status report on worldwide reforms. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/html/extdr/educ/postbasc. htm.
  • Johnstone, D.B., & Marcucci, P.N. (2007). Worldwide trends in higher education finance: cost-sharing, the support of academic research. UNECSO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge. Paris: UNESCO.
  • yükseköğretim vizyonu. İstanbul: İstanbul Politikalar Merkezi.
  • McGregor, S., & Volckmann, R. (2010). Transdisciplinarity in higher education: The path of Arizona State University. Integral Leadership Review, 10(3), 1-25.
  • Menand, L. (2010). The marketplace of ideas: reform and resistance in the American university. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
  • Middlehurst, R., & Woodfield, S. (2006). Quality review in distance learning: policy and practice in five countries. Tertiary Education and Management, 12(1), 37-58.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd Ed.). CA: Thousand Oaks, Sage.
  • National Middle School Association. (2003). This we believe: successful schools for young adolescents. Westerville, OH: Author.
  • National Leadership Council for Liberal Education and America’s Promise. (2007). College learning for the new global century. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  • New Media Consortium. (2014). New horizon report 2014. Retrieved from https://www.nmc.org/pdf/2014-nmc-horizon- report-he-EN.pdf.
  • New Media Consortium. (2015). New horizon report 2015. Retrieved from http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2015-nmc-horizon- report-HE-EN.pdf.
  • Newton, R., R. (2000). Tensions and models in general education planning. The Journal of General Education, 49(3), 165-181.
  • O’Banion, T. (2016). A brief history of general education. Community College Journal of Research and Practice. 40(4), 327-334.
  • OECD. (2007). Four future scenarios for higher education. Paris: OECD.
  • OECD. (2009). Higher education to 2030: Globalisation. Paris: OECD.
  • Oliva, P. (2009). Developing the curriculum (7th ed.). USA: Pearson.
  • Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2004). Curriculum foundations, principles and issues (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Özdem, G., & Sarı, E. (2008). Yükseköğretimde yeni bakış açılarıyla birlikte yeni kurulan üniversitelerden beklenen işlevler (Giresun Üniversitesi örneği). Üniversite ve Toplum, Bilim, Eğitim ve Düşünce Dergisi, 8(1), 1-10.
  • Pautasso, M., & Bourne, P. (2013). Ten simple rules for writing a literature review. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715443/
  • Pinar, W. (2003). What is curriculum theory? New York: Routledge.
  • Posner, G. (1995). Analyzing the curriculum. USA: Library of Congress.
  • Pushor, D, & Murphy, S. ( 2010). Problem centered curriculum. In Kridel C. (Ed.), Enclopedia of currciulum studies (pp. 685-686). Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
  • Roth, M. (2014). Beyond the university: Why liberal education matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
  • Rudolph, F. (1977). Curriculum: A history of the American undergraduate course of study since 1636. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Rutgers University (2016). Core curriculum rubrics. Retrieved from http://sas.rutgers.edu/documents/core-requirements/636- crc-rubrics-for-core-goals/file.
  • courses/Scientific_Writing
  • Varış, F. (1977). Eğitimde program geliştirme. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi.
  • Vars, G. F. (1991). Integrated curriculum in historical perspective. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 14-15.
  • Vars, G. F. (2001). Can curriculum integration survive in an era of high-stakes testing? Middle School Journal, 33(3), 7-17.
  • Vidovich, L., O’Donoghue, T., & Tight, M. (2012). Transforming university curriculum policies in a global knowledge era: mapping a “global case study” research agenda. Educational Studies, 38(3), 283-295.
  • Waldo, J. T. (2014). Application of the test of scientific literacy skills in the assessment of a general education natural science program. Journal of General Education: A Curricular Commons of the Humanities and Sciences, 63(1), 1–14.
  • Waltzer, K. (2000). General education models: Pros & cons of general education strategies. Retrieved from https://www. york.cuny.edu/academic/academic-affairs/general-education- reform/Waltzer document.pdf.
  • Wells, C. (2016). Special issue: Realizing general education: Reconsidering conceptions and renewing practice. ASHE Higher Education Report, 42 (2), 1-85. Retrieved from http:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aehe.2016.42.issue-2/ issuetoc.
  • White, C., R. (1994). A model for comprehensive reform in general education: Portland State University. The Journal of General Education, 43(3), 168-237.
  • Williams, J. L., McCarley, N., & Kraft, J. (2013). History and systems of psychology: a course to unite a core curriculum. College Quarterly, 16(2), 1-13.
  • Wissema, J.G. (2009). Towards the third generation university. Managing the university in transition.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Wolf, P., Cristensen, J.H., Svinicki, M.D., & Rice, R.E. (2007). Yüksek öğretimde eğitim programı geliştirme: Öğretim üyeleri tarafından yürütülen süreçler ve uygulamalar. (Çev. Kalaycı, N. & İlhan, E.; Çev. Ed. Atay, M.T.). Ankara: Elhan.
  • Woodbury, S. (1998). Rhetoric, reality, and possibilities: Interdisciplinary teaching and secondary mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 303-311.
  • Wraga, W. G. (1996). A century of interdisciplinary curricula in American schools. Jefferson City, MO: Scholastic.
  • Wende, M. C. (2011). The emergence of liberal arts and sciences education in Europe: A comparative perspective. Higher Education Policy, 24(2), 233-253.
  • Xing, J., Ng, P.S., & Cheng, C.Y. (2013). General education and the development of global citizenship in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China. New York: Routledge.
  • Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.
  • Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK). (2007). Türkiye’nin yükseköğretim stratejisi. Retrieved from http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/ 10279/30217/yok_strateji_kitabi/27077070-cb13-4870-aba1- 6742db37696b
  • Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK). (2014). Büyüme, kalite, uluslararası- laşma: Türkiye yükseköğretimi için bir yol haritası. Retrieved from https://yolharitasi.yok.gov.tr/docs/YolHaritasi.pdf
  • Yüksel, İ. (2002). Yükseköğretimde eğitim-öğretim faaliyetleri ve örtük program. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 361-370.
  • B
Toplam 71 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Nurdan Kalaycı Bu kişi benim

Elif İlhan Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Nisan 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Kalaycı, N., & İlhan, E. (2017). Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program. Yükseköğretim Ve Bilim Dergisi(1), 118-131.
AMA Kalaycı N, İlhan E. Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program. J Higher Edu Sci. Nisan 2017;(1):118-131.
Chicago Kalaycı, Nurdan, ve Elif İlhan. “Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program”. Yükseköğretim Ve Bilim Dergisi, sy. 1 (Nisan 2017): 118-31.
EndNote Kalaycı N, İlhan E (01 Nisan 2017) Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi 1 118–131.
IEEE N. Kalaycı ve E. İlhan, “Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program”, J Higher Edu Sci, sy. 1, ss. 118–131, Nisan 2017.
ISNAD Kalaycı, Nurdan - İlhan, Elif. “Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program”. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi 1 (Nisan 2017), 118-131.
JAMA Kalaycı N, İlhan E. Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program. J Higher Edu Sci. 2017;:118–131.
MLA Kalaycı, Nurdan ve Elif İlhan. “Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program”. Yükseköğretim Ve Bilim Dergisi, sy. 1, 2017, ss. 118-31.
Vancouver Kalaycı N, İlhan E. Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program. J Higher Edu Sci. 2017(1):118-31.