Hititlerin Suriye Krallıkları İle Yaptıkları Vassal Antlaşmalar

Öz

Yazılı tarih öncesinde de muhtemelen insanlar birçok konuda uzlaşı sağlama yolunu tercih etmişlerdir. Ancak tarihi çağlar başladıktan sonra, uzlaşma ve antlaşmalar yazılı metinlere aktarılmıştır. Dolayısıyla tarih öncesi dönemlerde konu hakkında çok fazla bilgi sahibi olamasak da tarihi dönemlerden kalan metinler bize uzlaşı sağlanan konular, antlaşmanın tarafları ve koşulları hakkında bilgi sağlamaktadır. Antlaşmalar ve antlaşma metinleri dendiğinde Eski Çağ tarihinde ilk akla gelen Hitit Devleti olmaktadır. Devletlerarası siyasetini ağırlıklı olarak bu çerçevede yürüten Hitit Devleti çağdaşı olan büyük devletlerle olan ilişkilerini genellikle vassal devletlerle yapılan bağlayıcı antlaşmalar üstünden yürütülmüştür. Vassal antlaşmaları içerisinde de, günümüz Suriye’sinin topraklarında konumlanmış, dönemin nispeten küçük devletleri ile yapılan antlaşmalar geniş yer tutmaktadır. Suriye o dönemde, sahip olduğu yer altı ve yer üstü zenginlikleri ve stratejik konumu nedeniyle Mısır, Mitanni ve Hitit gibi büyük devletlerin hâkimiyet altına almak istedikleri bir konumda olmuştur. Bu nedenle mücadele alanı haline gelen Suriye’deki devletler de bu mücadeleden paylarına düşeni almışlar, varlıklarını devam ettirebilmek adına büyük devletler arasında denge politikası yürütmüşlerdir. Bu makale, bahse konu devletlerle Hitit Devleti arasında düzenlenen vassal antlaşmaları geleneksel tipoloji ve içerik bakımından inceleyerek, dönemin uluslararası politikalarının belirlenmesindeki etkilerini ortaya koymak amacıyla hazırlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hitit
• Halep
• Ugarit
• Amurru

Vassal Treaties Of The Hittites With The Syrian Kingdoms

Öz

Before the written history, people probably preferred to make compromises on many issues. However, after the beginning of the historical ages, compromises and treaties were transformed into written texts. Therefore, although we cannot have much information on the subject in prehistoric periods, the texts from historical periods provide us with information about the subjects, parties and conditions of the treaty. When it comes to treaties and treaty texts, the Hittite State comes to mind first in the history of the Ancient Age. The Hittite State, which carried out its interstate politics mainly within this framework, generally conducted its relations with the contemporary great states through binding treaties with vassal states. Among the vassal treaties, the treaties made with the relatively small states of the period, located in the territory of present-day Syria, occupy a large place. At that time, Syria was in a position that the great states such as Egypt, Mitanni and Hittite wanted to dominate due to its underground and aboveground riches and strategic location. For this reason, the states in Syria, which became an area of struggle, also took their share of this struggle and carried out a policy of balance between the great states in order to maintain their existence. This article analyses the vassal treaties between these states and the Hittite Empire in terms of traditional typology and content, and examines their impact on the determination of the international policies of the period.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hittite
• Aleppo
• Ugarit
• Amurru
• Nuḫḫašše

Kaynakça

1. Altman, Amnon. The Historical Prologue of the Hittite Vassal Treaties, An Inquiry into the Concepts of Hittite Interstate Law. Ramat-Gan: Bar Ilan University Press, 2004.
2. Altman, Amnon. Tracing the Earliest Recorded Concepts of International Law. Editör Randall Lesaffer, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012.
3. Beckman, Gary. Hittite Diplomatic Text. Editör Harry A. Hoffner, Scholar Press, 1996.
4. Bryce, Trevor R.. The Kingdom Of The Hittites. Oxford University Press, 2005.
5. Buck, Mary E.. The Amorite Dynasty of Ugarit. Editör Michael D. Coogan, Brill, 2020.
6. Burns, Ross. ALEPPO A History. Roudledge, 2017.
7. Ciastres, Pierre. Archeology Of Violence. Çeviren Jeanine Herman, Semiotext(e), 2010.
8. Collins, Billie Jean. The Hittites And Their World. Editör Andrew G. Vaughn, Society of Biblical Literature, 2007.

9. Devecchi, Elena. “Suppiluliuma’s Syrian Campaigns in Light Of The Documents From Ugarit.” New Results And New Questions On The Reign Of Suppiluliuma I, Editör Stefano de Martino - Jared L. Miller, 81-97. LoGisma, 2013.
10. Devecchi, Elena. “Treaties and Edicts in the Hittite World.” Organization, Representation, and Symbols of Power in the Ancient Near East, Editör Gernot Wilhelm, 637-645. Penn State University Press, 2012.
11. Devecchi, Elena ve Milller, Jared L. “Hittite-Egyptian Synchronisms and their Consequences for Ancient Near Eastern Chronology.” Egypt and the Near East-the Crossroads, Editör Jana Mynářová, 139-176. Charles University in Prague, 2010.
12. Lebrun, Renè, “Les traites hittites.” Traites et serments dans le proche-orient ancient, Supplement au Chier Evangile 81. Editör Jacques Briend, Renè Lebrun, and Emile Puech, 15-59. Paris: Impression Dumas, 1992.
13. May, Larry. “Ancient Peace Treaties and International Law.” International Law and Peace Settlements, Editör Marc Weller, Mark Retter, Andrea Varga, 31-45. Cambridge University Press, 2021.
14. Nougayrol, Jean. Textes accadiens des archives sud (Archives internationales). Editör C.F.A. Schaeffer, Paris: Imprimerie Nationale / Klincksieck, 1956.
15. Pritchard, James B. Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament. Princeton Unıversity Press, 1969. Sayce, Archibald Henry. The Hittities. The Religious Tract Society, 1980.
16. Sulyok, Gabor. “Treaties, Origin.” Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Editör Wolfrum Rüdiger, 1-12. Oxford University Press, 2015.
17. Weidner, Ernst F. Politische Dokumente aus Kleinasien, Die Staatsvertrage in akkadischer Sprache aus dem Archiv von Boghazköi. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs’sche Buchhandlung, 1923.
18. Wright, William. The Empire of the Hittites. James Nisbet & Company, 1886.
19. Zaccagnini, C. “The Forms of Alliance and Subjugation in the Near East of the Late Bronze Age.” I trattati nel mondo antico. Forma ideologia funzione, Editör L. Canfora, M. Liverani & C. Zaccagnini, 37–79. Roma: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 1990.
20. Altman, Amnon. “Rethinking the Hittite System of Subordinate Countries from the Legal Point of View.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 123, no. 4 (2003): 741-756.
21. Beckman, Gary. “The Hittite Language and its Decipherment.” Bulletin of the Canadian Society for Mesopotamian Studies 31, (1996): 23-30.
22. Bryce, Trevor R. “Tette and the Rebellions in Nuhassi.” Anatolian Studies 38, (1988): 21-28.
23. Devecchi, Elena. “Aziru, Servant of Three Masters?” Akademie Verlag 39, no. 1 (2012): 38-48.
24. Devecchi, Elena. “Details that Make the Difference: the Akkadian Manuscripts of the “Šattiwaza Treaties.” Die Welt des Orients Bd. 48, no. 1 (2018): 72-95.
25. Dietrich, M., Loretz, O., “Der Vertrag zwischen Suppiluliuma und Niqmadu Eine philologische und kulturhistorische Studie.” Die Welt des Orients 3, (1968): 206-245.
26. Charpin, Dominique. “Chroniques Bibliographiques 18. Les Débuts Des Relatıons Diplomatiques Au Proche-Orient Ancien.” Dans Revue d’assyriologie et d’archéologie orientale 110, (2016): 127-186.
27. Gilan, Amir. “In Search Of A Distant Past: Forms Of Historical Consciousness In Hittite Anatolia.” Anatolia 44, (2018): 1-23.
28. Halayqa, Issam K. H. “The Demise of Ugarit in the Light of its Connections with Ḫatti.” Ugarit-Forschungen 42, (2010): 297-326.
29. Laroche, Emmanuel. “Fragments hittites du traite mitannien de Suppiluliuma Ierer.” Ugaritica 6, no. 3 (1969): 69-73.
30. Luckenbill, D. D. “Hittite Treaties and Letters.” AJSL 37, (1921): 61-211.
31. Matessi, Alvise. “The Making of Hittite Imperial Landscapes: Territoriality and Balance of Power in South-Central Anatolia during the Late Bronze Age.” Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History 3, no. 2 (2016): 117-162.
32. Miller, Jared L. “The Contribution of the Hittite Documentation to the Historical Geography of the Middle Orontes Region.” Syria Supplément IV, (2016): 107-118.
33. Yaron, R. A. “Royal Divorce at Ugarit.” Orientalia Nova Series 32, no. 1 (1963): 21-31.