ÖRGÜTSEL YABANCILAŞMA VE İÇ GİRİŞİMCİLİK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE PSİKOLOJİK RAHATLIK ALGISININ DÜZENLEYİCİ ROLÜ

Öz

Bu çalışmada örgütlerde son yıllarda farklı nedenlerden dolayı yaşanan örgütsel yabancılaşma duygusunun örgütlerin sürdürülebilir rekabet avantajı (SRA) sürecindeki belirleyenlerinden iç girişimcilik davranışı üzerine olan etkisi sorgulanmıştır. Ayrıca bu etkide psikolojik rahatlık algısının düzenleyici rolü sorgulanmıştır. İç girişimcilik davranışı çalışanların örgüt içinde verim ve etkinliği arttırmak için gösterdikleri yenilik ve yaratıcılık güdümlü davranışları ifade etmektedir. Örgütsel yabancılaşma örgütte çalışanların güçsüzlük, çaresizlik,  umutsuzluk, anlamsızlık duygularını ifade etmek için kullanılan olumsuz bir duygudur. Psikolojik rahatlık algısı çalışanların örgütte hissetmiş oldukları kişilerarası saygı ve hoşgörü seviyesidir. Sinop il ve ilçelerinde bulunan KOBİ’lerde çalışan 159 katılımcıya uygulanan anket sonuçlarına göre psikolojik rahatlık algısının düzenleyici rolü gözlenmiştir. Normlara uymama kuramı ve kolektivist grup içinde bireysel davranışlarla psikolojik rahatlık algısının örgütsel yabancılaşma ve iç girişimcilik arasındaki ilişkideki düzenleyici etkisi açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Psikolojik rahatlık,örgütsel yabancılaşma,iç girişimcilik

MODERATION ROLE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY ON THE RELATION BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL ALIENATION AND INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Abstract

In this research the effect of organizational alienation which arises from different predictors,  on intrapreneurship, considered as one of the main predictors of sustainable competitive advantage (SCA) is questioned. Also moderating role of psychological safety on this relationship was quesioned. Intrapreneurial behaviors defines innovation and creativeness guided behaviors which  aimed to increase effectiveness and productivity in organization.  Work alienation is a negative emotion which is  used to express the mood of powerlessness, hopelessness, desperateness, meaninglessness of employees in an organization. Psychological safety perception indicates the level of interpersonal respect and tolerance in an organization. Moderation effect of psychological safety was observed according to the results of surveys which were gathered from employees in SME’s of Sinop and its districts. With the help of nonconformity theory and individualistic behaviors within collectivist group the moderating role of psychological safety on the relationship between organizational alienation and intrapreneurship is tried to be explained.

Keywords

• Psychological safety,organizational alienation,intrapreneurship

Kaynakça

1. ABBAS, A.Abdulhassan., ABBAS, Adel ve KHALI, H. Huraij., (2017), “The Effect of Hostile Work Environment on Organizational Alienation: The Mediation Role of the Relaionship between the Leader and Followers”, Asian Social Science 13(2), ss.140-158
2. ALPKAN, Lutfihak, BULUT, Cagrı, GUNDAY, Gurhan, ULUSOY, Gunduz ve KILIÇ, Kemal (2010),“Organizational support for intrapreneurship and its interaction with human capital to enhance innovative performance”,Management Decision, 48(5),ss.732-755, https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011043902
3. ANTONCIC Bostjan ve HISRICH, Robert. D. (2003), “Clarifying the intrapreneurship concept”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(1), ss.7-24
4. APARICIO, Mario Ek. (2017), “Driving and Inhibiting Factors for Intrapreneurship”, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Norveç Bilim ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi, 2017
5. BARON, Robert. (2007), “Behavioral and Cognitive Factors in Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation.”, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1), ss.27–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej
6. BENNER, Mary ve TUSHMAN, Michael. (2002), “ Process Management and Technological Innovaiton: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries. Working Paper, The Wharten School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
7. BOLTON, John Eveleigh. (1971), “Small Firms: Report of the Committee of Inquiry on Small Firms”, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office
8. CEYLAN, Adnan ve SULU, Seyfettin. (2011), “Organizational in justice and work alienatıon”, Ekonomika a Management, (2),ss.65-78

9. CHRISTENSEN, Karina Skovvvan. (2005), “Enabling intrapreneurship: the case of a knowledge-intensive industrial company”, European Journal of Innovation Management,8(3),ss.305–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060510610171
10. COOLEY, Charles Horton. (1902), “Human Nature and the Social Order”, NY: Scribne
11. DUHIGG, Charles. (2016), “What Google Learned from its Quest to build perfect teams”, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/ magazine/ what-google-learned-from-its-quest-to-build-the-perfect-team.html
12. EDMONDSON Amy. (1999), “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams, Administrative Science Quarterly”, 44(2), ss. 350-384.
13. EDMONDSON, Amy. (2004), “Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: a group-level lens. In Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches”, Kramer RM, Cook KS (eds). New York; Russell Sage Foundation.
14. EFRATY, David, SIRGY, Joseph, ve CLAIBORNE B. ( 1991), “The effects of personal alienation”, Journalof Business and Psychology, 5 (1), ss. 52-78.
15. FETTAHLIOĞLU, Tamara (2006), “Örgütlerde yabancılaşmanın yönetimi: Kahramanmaraş özel işletme ve kamu kuruluşlarında karşılaştırmalı bir araştırma”, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Kahramanmaraş.
16. GARTNER, William B. (1985), “A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomena of New Venture Creation”, Academy of Management Review, 10, ss. 696-706
17. HASTUTI, Widwa, ABU TALIB, Noraini, WONG, Kuan, Yev, ve MARDANI, Abbas (2016), “The Role of Intrapreneurship for Sustainable Innovation Through Process Innovation in SME’s.”, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2016, 6(3) ss. 83-91.
18. HAYEK, Friedrich, (1948), “Economics and Knowledge, reprinted in Individualism and Economic Order”, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
19. HAYES, Andrew. (2013), “An Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach”, Guilford Press, New York, NY.
20. HIRSCHMAN, Albert, (1970), “Exit, voice and loyalty. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States”, Cambridge.
21. HORNSBY, Jeffrey, KURATKO, Donald. F., ve ZAHRA, Shaker. A. (2002), “Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: Assessing a measurement scale”, Journal of Business Venturing, 17(3), ss. 253—273.
22. HUBER, George. (1998), “Synergies Between Organizational Learning and Creativity & Innovation”, Creativity and Innovation Management, 4, ss. 21-49.
23. KATSIKIS, Ioannis ve KYRGIDOU, Lida (2009), “Entrepreneurship in teleology: the variety of the forms”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 15(2), ss. 209-231.
24. KONGAR, Emre (1979), “Toplumsal Değişim Kuramları ve Türkiye Gerçeği [Social change theories and the reality of Turkey]” Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi.
25. Lockheed Martin. (2016). Skunk Works. Erişim Tarihi, 20 Haziran, 2017, from http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us /aeronautics/ skunkworks.html.
26. LOVE James ve ROPER, Stephen (2009), “Organizing innovation: Complementarities between cross-functional teams”, Technovation, 29(3), ss. 192–203.
27. MASOMI, Eghdami, DERAKHSAN Mohsen, ASHORE, Saeid ve GHANIMAT Peyman (2013). The Relationship between Organizational Climate Dimensions and Corporate Entrepreneurship. Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 2(11), ss. 107-113.
28. NAKTİYOK, Atılhan (2004), “İç Girişimcilik”, Beta Basın Yayın Dağıtım A.Ş., İstanbul.
29. PELİT, Elbeyi., İSTANBULLU Dinçer, F. ve KILIÇ, İbrahim. (2015), “The Effect of Nepotism on Organizational Silence, Alienation and Commitment: A Study on Hotel Employees in Turkey”, Journal of Management Research, 7(4), ss. 82-110.
30. PINCHOT, Gifford. ve PINCHOT, Elizabeth (1978), “Intra-corporate entrepreneurship”, Tarrytown School for Entrepreneurs.
31. PINCHOT, Gifford (1985). Intrapreneuring: Why You Don’t Have to Leave the Corporation to Become an Entrepreneur. Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship, 1985 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1496196.
32. READ, Stuart. (2011), “The bird-in-hand principle: Start with what you have”, Effectual Entrepreneurship, 2011.
33. SCHUMPETER, Joseph (1961). The Theory of Economic Development: An enquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, New York: New York University Press.
34. SİRİN, Hatice, ve SİRİN, Erkan (2013). Research on the organizational commitment of the instructors in terms of job satisfaction, and organizational alienation: school of physical education and sports sample. International Journal of Academic Research, 5(3), ss. 176-183.
35. TASSIOPOULOS, Dimitri (2008), “New tourism ventures: an entrepreneurial and managerial approach” Juta & Co Ltd, Cape Town, South Africa.
36. TUSHMAN, L. L., ve O’REILLY, C. A. A. (1999). Building ambidextrous organizations. Forming your own “skunk works”. Health Forum Journal, 42(2), ss. 20–3, 64. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10538896.
37. YENER, Serdar, (2015). Psikolojik Rahatlık Ölçeğinin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması, Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2015, (13).
38. YENER, Serdar. (2016). İşgören Sesliliğinin Örgütlerde İşbirliğine etkisinde Psikolojik Rahatlık Algısının Aracı Değişken Rolü. 1. Avrasya Pozitif Psikoloji Kongresi, 28-30 Nisan 2016, Üsküdar Üniversitesi.
39. YENER, Serdar. ve SAKA,Can. (2017). Örgütsel Öğrenme Bağlamında Psikolojik Rahatlık. Sinop Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi,1(1), ss. 45-66
40. YORULMAZ, Yılmaz, ALTINKURT, Yahya ve YILMAZ, Kürşad. (2015), “The relationship between teachers’ occupational professionalism and organizational alienation” Educational Process: International Journal, 4(1-2), ss. 31-44. http://10.12973/edupij.2015.412.3