Yıl 2016, Cilt 9 , Sayı 1, Sayfalar 0 - 0 2016-06-15

SOSYALİZASYON TAKTİKLERİNİN YENİ İŞGÖRENLER ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELLEMESİYLE İNCELENMESİ

Özlem YAŞAR UĞURLU [1] , Sibel AYAS [2] , İşıl ÖNAY [3]


Bu çalışma, sosyalleşme taktikleri geliştirmenin yeni işe başlayanların uyumuna katkı sağladığı ve dolayısıyla rol açıklığını ve güveni arttırıp stresi azaltarak performansı arttıracağı varsaymaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak anket kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışma Gaziantep Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi’nden mezun olan ve işe son bir yıl içinde başlayan 148 bireyden oluşmaktadır. Araştırma anketinden elde edilen sonuçlar yapısal eşitlik modellemesiyle test edilmiştir. Buna göre; örgütsel sosyalleşme taktikleri uygulandıkça, rol açıklığı ve örgütsel güven pozitif yönde etkilenmektedir. Aynı zamanda bireyler tarafından algılanan örgütsel güven düzeyi ile stres negatif yönde ilişkiliyken iş performansı ile pozitif yönde ilişkilidir. Bununla birlikte rol açıklığı düzeyi arttıkça bireylerin stres düzeyleri azalmaktadır. Ancak rol açıklığının ve stresin iş performansı üzerinde bir etkisi olmadığı görülmüştür.

  • Allen, N. J. & Meyer, J. P. (1990). Organizational socialization tactics: a longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers’ commitment and role orientation. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 847–858.
  • Anderson, J.C. & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), 411–423.
  • Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (2003). Amos 5.0 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
  • Arshadi, N., & Damiri, H. (2013). The relationship of job stress with turnover intention and job performance: Moderating role of OBSE. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 706-710.
  • Aryee S, Budhwar PS, & Chen ZX. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 23(1): 267–285.
  • Ashforth, B. E., Sluss, D. M., & Saks, A. M. (2006). Socialization tactics, proactivity, and learning: how process and content inxuence adjustment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta.
  • Ashforth, B. E., & Saks, A. M. (1996). Socialization tactics: longitudinal events on newcomers adjustment. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 149–178
  • Ashforth, B.E., Sluss, D.M., & Harrison, S.H. (2007). Socialization in organizational contexts. International review of industrial and organizational psychology, 22, 1.
  • Avey,J. B., Luthans, F., & Jensen, S. M. (2009). Psychological capital: A positive resource for combating employee stress and turnover. Human Resource Management, 48, 677-693
  • Bauer, T. N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D. M., & Tucker, J. S. (2007). Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: a meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 92 (3), 707.
  • Bauer, T. N., Morrison, E. W., & Callister, R. R. (1998). Organizational socialization: A review and directions for future research. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in Personnel And Human Resource Management, 16, 149-214.
  • Beehr, T. A., Walsh, J. T., & Taber, T. D. (1976). Relationships of stress to individually and organizationally valued states: Higher order needs as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61 (1), 41.
  • Berger, C. R. & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1: 99-112.
  • Blau, G. (1981). An empirical investigation of job stress, social support, service length, and job strain. Organizational behavior and human performance, 27 (2), 279-302.
  • Bliese, P. D. & Castro, C. A., (2010) Role clarity, work overload and organizational support : multilevel evidence of the importance of support, Work and Stress, 14 (1), 65-73.
  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17 (3), 303-316.
  • Braun S., Peus C., Weisweiler S. & Frey D. (2013). Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevel mediation model of trust. Leadership Quarterly, 24, 270-283.
  • Breaugh, J. A. (1980). A comparative investigation of three measures of role ambiguity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65 (5), 584.
  • Brett, J. M., Feldman, D. C., & Weingart, L. R. (1990). Feedback-seeking behavior of newhires and job changers. Journal of Management, 16: 737-749.
  • Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2007). Business Research Methods (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press
  • Cable, D. M., & Parsons, C. K. (2001). Socialization tactics and person‐organization fit. Personnel Psychology, 54 (1), 1-23.
  • Chattopadhyay, P. & George, E. (2001). Examining the effects of work externalization through the lens of social identity theory, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (4), 781-788.
  • Cohen, A.R., Stotland, E., & Wolfe, D.M. (1955). An experimental investigation of need for cognition. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 291-294.
  • Cohen, S. (1980). After effects of stress on human performance and social behavior: a review of research and theory. Psychological bulletin, 88 (1), 82.
  • Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the US In S. Spacapam & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social psychology of health: Claremont symposium on applied social psychology (31-67).
  • Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 909 –927.
  • Cooper, C. L. (1986). Job distress: Recent research and the emerging role of the clinical occupational psychologist. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society.
  • Costa, A. C., Roe, R. A., & Taillieu, T. (2001). Trust within teams: The relation with performance effectiveness. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 10 (3), 225- 244.
  • Cummings, L. L., & Bromiley, P. (1995). The Occupational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation. In R. Kramer, & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations (pp. 302-330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Dirks, K. T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of applied psychology, 84 (3), 445.
  • Donnelly Jr, J. H., & Ivancevich, J. M. (1975). Role clarity and the salesman.The Journal of Marketing, 71-74.
  • Dunham, J. (2001). Stress in the workplace: Past, present and future. Whurr, London.
  • Dutton, J. E. (2003). Breathing life into organizational studies. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12 (1):5–19.
  • Earley, P. C. (1986). Trust, perceived importance of praise and criticism, and work performance: An examination of feedback in the United States and England. Journal of management, 12 (4), 457-473.
  • Elangovan, A. R., & Shapiro, D. L. 1998. Betrayal of trust in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 547-566.
  • Fang, R., Duffy, M.K., & Shaw, J.D., (2011). The organizational socialization process: Review and development of a social capital model. Journal of Management, 37: 127-152.
  • Farber, H. S. (1994). The analysis of interfirm worker mobility. Journal of Labor Economics, 12: 554-593.
  • Feldman, D. C. (1976). A contingency theory of socialization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 433-452.
  • Friedlander, F. (1970). The primacy of trust as a facilitator of further group accomplishment. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 6 (4), 387-400.
  • Gambetta, D., (1988). Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, Oxford: Basil Blackwell
  • Gruman, J. A., Saks, A. M., & Zweig, D. I. (2006). Organizational socialization tactics and newcomer proactive behaviors: an integrative study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 90–104.
  • Gupta, N., & Beehr, T. A. (1979). Job stress and employee behaviors.Organizational behavior and human performance, 23 (3), 373-387.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6 (1), 1-55.
  • Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1985). A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 16-78.
  • Ivancevich, J. M., & Donnelly, J. H. (1974). A study of role clarity and need for clarity for three occupational groups. Academy of Management Journal, 17 (1), 28-36.
  • Ivancevich, J.M., Konopaske, R. & Matteson, M.T. (2005). Organizational behaviour and management. Toronto: McGraw-Hill, Irwin
  • Jamal, M. (1984). Job stress and job performance controversy: An empirical assessment. Organizational behavior and human performance, 33 (1), 1-21.
  • Jamal, M. (2007). Job stress and job performance controversy revisited: An empirical examination in two countries. International journal of stress management, 14 (2), 175.
  • Jex, S. M. (1998). Stress and job performance: Theory, research, and implications for managerial practice. Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Jones, G. R.(1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers' adjustments to organizations.Academy of Management journal, 29 (2): 262-279.
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
  • Kacmar, K.M. Bachrach, D.G. Harris, K.H. & Noble, D. (2012). Exploring the role of supervisor trust in the associations between multiple sources of relationship conflict and organisational citizenship behaviour, The Leadership Quarterly. 23, 43-54.
  • Kammeyer-Mueller, J.D., & Wanberg, C.R. (2003). Unwrapping the Organizational Entry Process: Disentangling Multiple Antecedents and their pathways to adjustments. Journal of Aplied Psychology,88 (5), 779.
  • Kegan, D. L., & Rubenstein, A. H. (1973). Trust, effectiveness, and organizational development: A field study in R & D. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 9(4), 498-513.
  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Annual review of psychology, 50, 569 –598. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews
  • Lance, C. E., Cornwell, J. M., & Mulaik, S. A. (1988). Limited information parameter estimates for latent or mixed manifest and latent variable models.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23 (2), 171-187.
  • Landsbergis, P.A. (2003). The changing organization of work and the safety and health of working people: A commentary. Journal of Occupationa andl Environmental Medicine, 45, 61 72.
  • Lapointe, É., Vandenberghe, C., & Boudrias, J. S. (2014). Organizational socialization tactics and newcomer adjustment: The mediating role of role clarity and affect‐based trust relationships. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87 (3), 599-624.
  • Lewicki, R.J. & Bunker, B.B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R.M. Kramer & T.R. Tyler, (Eds.). Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  • Louis, M.R. (1980) Surprise and sense making: what newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226-251.
  • Matteson, M. T., Ivancevich, J. M., & Smith, S. V. (1984). Relation of Type A behavior to performance and satisfaction among sales personnel. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 25 (2), 203-214.
  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 709-734.
  • McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 24 –59.
  • Mcknight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23, 473–490.
  • Mignerey, J. Rubin R, & Gordon W. (1995). Organizational entry: An Investigation of newcomer communication behavior and uncertainty. Communication Research, 22, 54-85
  • Morrison, E.W. (1993) Newcomer information seeking: exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 557-589.
  • Motowidlo, S. J., Packard, J. S., & Manning, M. R. (1986). Occupational stress: its causes and consequences for job performance. Journal of applied psychology, 71 (4), 618.
  • Muse, L. A., Harris, S. G., & Feild, H. S. (2003). Has the inverted-U theory of stress and job performance had a fair test?. Human Performance, 16 (4), 349-364.
  • Nyhan, R. C., & Marlowe, H. A. (1997). Development and psychometric properties of the organizational trust inventory. Evaluation Review, 21 (5), 614-635.
  • Oldham, G. R. (1975). The impact of supervisory characteristics on goal acceptance. Academy of Management Journal, 18 (3), 461-475.
  • Orpen, C., & Welch, M. (1989). Stress and work attitudes among Australian nurses: An empirical study. Psychological Studies.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1998), The Human Equation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 335-362.
  • Pratt, M. G., & Dirks, K. T. (2007). Rebuilding trust and restoring positive relationships: A commitment-based view of trust. In J. E. Dutton & B. R. Ragins (Eds.), Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation (pp. 17- 136). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Rich, G. A. (1997). The sales manager as a role model: Effects on trust, job satisfaction, and performance of salespeople. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 319-328.
  • Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15 (2), 150-163.
  • Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574-599.
  • Saks, A. M., Uggerslev, K. L., & Fassina, N. E. (2007). Socialization tactics and newcomer adjustment: A meta-analytic review and test of a model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70 (3), 413-446.
  • Schaubroeck, J. M., Peng, A. C., & Hannah, S. T. (2013). Developing trust with peers and leaders: Impacts on organizational identification and performance during entry. Academy of Management Journal, 56 (4), 1148-1168.
  • Schuler, R. S. (1975). Role perceptions, satisfaction, and performance: A partial reconciliation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60 (6), 683.
  • Shalley, C.E. & Zhou, J. (2009). Organisational creativity research: A historical overview. In J. Zhou, & C.E. Shalley, (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Shockley-Zalabak, P., Ellis, K., & Winograd, G. (2000). Organizational trust: What it means, why it matters. Organization Development Journal, 18 (4), 35–48.
  • Tan, H. & Lim, A., (2009). Trust in co-workers and trust in organizations, The Journal of Psychology, 143(1), 45-66.
  • Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
  • Wanberg, C. R., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of proactivity in the socialization process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 373-385.
  • Wanberg, C.. (2012). The Oxford handbook of organizational socialization. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Webber, S. S. (2008). Development of cognitive and affective trust in teams a longitudinal study. Small group research, 39 (6), 746-769.
  • Westman, M., & Eden, D. (1996). The inverted-U relationship between stress and performance: A field study. Work & Stress, 10 (2), 165-173.
  • Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of management, 17 (3), 601-617.
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yazar: Özlem YAŞAR UĞURLU

Yazar: Sibel AYAS

Yazar: İşıl ÖNAY

Tarihler

Yayımlanma Tarihi : 15 Haziran 2016

Bibtex @ { hititsosbil566085, journal = {Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi}, issn = {1308-5107}, eissn = {2536-4944}, address = {}, publisher = {Hitit Üniversitesi}, year = {2016}, volume = {9}, pages = {0 - 0}, doi = {10.17218/husbed.89897}, title = {SOSYALİZASYON TAKTİKLERİNİN YENİ İŞGÖRENLER ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELLEMESİYLE İNCELENMESİ}, key = {cite}, author = {Yaşar Uğurlu, Özlem and Ayas, Sibel and Önay, İşıl} }
APA Yaşar Uğurlu, Ö , Ayas, S , Önay, İ . (2016). SOSYALİZASYON TAKTİKLERİNİN YENİ İŞGÖRENLER ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELLEMESİYLE İNCELENMESİ . Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi , 9 (1) , 0-0 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/hititsosbil/issue/45202/566085
MLA Yaşar Uğurlu, Ö , Ayas, S , Önay, İ . "SOSYALİZASYON TAKTİKLERİNİN YENİ İŞGÖRENLER ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELLEMESİYLE İNCELENMESİ" . Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9 (2016 ): 0-0 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/hititsosbil/issue/45202/566085>
Chicago Yaşar Uğurlu, Ö , Ayas, S , Önay, İ . "SOSYALİZASYON TAKTİKLERİNİN YENİ İŞGÖRENLER ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELLEMESİYLE İNCELENMESİ". Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9 (2016 ): 0-0
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - SOSYALİZASYON TAKTİKLERİNİN YENİ İŞGÖRENLER ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELLEMESİYLE İNCELENMESİ AU - Özlem Yaşar Uğurlu , Sibel Ayas , İşıl Önay Y1 - 2016 PY - 2016 N1 - DO - T2 - Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 0 EP - 0 VL - 9 IS - 1 SN - 1308-5107-2536-4944 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2021 ER -
EndNote %0 Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi SOSYALİZASYON TAKTİKLERİNİN YENİ İŞGÖRENLER ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELLEMESİYLE İNCELENMESİ %A Özlem Yaşar Uğurlu , Sibel Ayas , İşıl Önay %T SOSYALİZASYON TAKTİKLERİNİN YENİ İŞGÖRENLER ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELLEMESİYLE İNCELENMESİ %D 2016 %J Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi %P 1308-5107-2536-4944 %V 9 %N 1 %R %U
ISNAD Yaşar Uğurlu, Özlem , Ayas, Sibel , Önay, İşıl . "SOSYALİZASYON TAKTİKLERİNİN YENİ İŞGÖRENLER ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELLEMESİYLE İNCELENMESİ". Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9 / 1 (Haziran 2016): 0-0 .
AMA Yaşar Uğurlu Ö , Ayas S , Önay İ . SOSYALİZASYON TAKTİKLERİNİN YENİ İŞGÖRENLER ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELLEMESİYLE İNCELENMESİ. hititsosbil. 2016; 9(1): 0-0.
Vancouver Yaşar Uğurlu Ö , Ayas S , Önay İ . SOSYALİZASYON TAKTİKLERİNİN YENİ İŞGÖRENLER ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELLEMESİYLE İNCELENMESİ. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2016; 9(1): 0-0.
IEEE Ö. Yaşar Uğurlu , S. Ayas ve İ. Önay , "SOSYALİZASYON TAKTİKLERİNİN YENİ İŞGÖRENLER ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELLEMESİYLE İNCELENMESİ", Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 9, sayı. 1, ss. 0-0, Haz. 2016, doi:10.17218/husbed.89897