Examining the Relationships Between Perceived Social Support and Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Emotional Reactivity

Öz

The aim of this study is to investigate how emotional reactivity is affected by adaptive and maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation and perceived social support. Participants consisted of 400 university students, 262 of which were female (65.5%) and 138 (34.5%) were male. The data of the study were collected using the "Demographic Information Form", "Emotional Reactivity Scale", "Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support" and "Cognitive Emotion Regulation Scale". T-test, Pearson correlation analysis and multiple regression analyzes were used in the analysis of the data. The findings show that reactivity, a sub-dimension of emotional reactivity, is higher in males and there are significant relationships between the sub-dimensions of perceived social support, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional reactivity. It was found that family, positive refocusing, refocusing on plan, and positive reappraisal had a positive effect on predicting the sub-dimensions of emotional reactivity. Rumination and putting into perspective were found to have a negative effect. In conclusion, the research showed the positive effect of perceived family support and adaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies and the negative effect of maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies in explaining emotional reactivity. The results were discussed in the light of the relevant literature and suggestions were presented.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• perceived social support
• cognitive emotion regulation
• emotional reactivity

Algılanan Sosyal Destek ve Bilişsel Duygu Düzenleme ile Duygusal Tepkisellik Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı duygusal tepkiselliğin uyumlu ve uyumsuz bilişsel duygu düzenleme ve algılanan sosyal desteğin türlerinden nasıl etkilendiğini ortaya koymaktır. Katılımcılar 262’si kadın (%65.5), 138’i ise erkek (%34.5) 400 üniversite öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmaya ait veriler “Demografik Bilgi Formu”, “Duygusal Tepkisellik Ölçeği”, “Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği” ve “Bilişsel Duygu Düzenleme Ölçeği” kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde t-test, Pearson korelasyon analizi ve çoklu regresyon analizleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma bulguları, duygusal tepkiselliğin alt boyutu olan tepkiselliğin erkeklerde daha yüksek düzeyde olduğunu ve algılanan sosyal destek, bilişsel duygu düzenleme ve duygusal tepkisellik değişkenlerinin alt boyutları arasında anlamlı ilişkiler olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Duygusal tepkiselliğin alt boyutlarının yordanmasında aile, olumlu yeniden odaklanma, plana yeniden odaklanma ve olumlu yeniden gözden geçirmenin pozitif bir etkisi olduğu bulunmuştur. Düşünceye odaklanma ve bakış açısına yerleştirmenin ise duygusal tepkiselliğin açıklanmasında negatif bir etkisi olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak araştırma, duygusal tepkiselliğin açıklanmasında algılanan aile desteğinin ve uyumlu bilişsel duygu düzenlemenin pozitif; uyumsuz bilişsel duygu düzenlemenin ise negatif etkisini ortaya koymuştur. Sonuçlar ilgili alanyazın ışığı altında tartışılmış ve öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• algılanan sosyal destek
• bilişsel duygu düzenleme
• duygusal tepkisellik

Kaynakça

1. Agoha, B. C. E., Ogwa, F., Evbuoma, K., Igbokwe, D., & Idoko, J. (2015). Perceived social support, perceived stress as correlates of stress symptomatolog among university students. Covenant International Journal of Psychology (CIJP). Maiden Edition, 1(1), 27-34.
2. Aliche, J. C., Ifeagwazi, C. M., & Eze, J. E. (2019). Emotional reactivity and surgical anxiety. The protective nature of perceived social support. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 25(4), 434–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2019.1668030
3. Appleton, A. A., Buka, S. L., Loucks, E. B., Gilman, S. E., & Kubzansky, L. D. (2013). Divergent associations of adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies with inflammation. Health Psychology, 32(7), 748–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030068
4. Baltaş, Z. (2000). Sağlık Psikolojisi. Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul, 133-165.
5. Bonanno, G. A., Papa, A., Lalande, K., Westphal, M., & Coifman, K. (2004). The Importance of Being Flexible. Psychological Science, 15(7), 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00705.x
6. Bruhn, J. G., & Philips, B. U. (1984). Measuring social support: A synthesis of current approaches. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 7(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00845384
7. Bylsma, L. M., Taylor-Clift, A., & Rottenberg, J. (2011). Emotional reactivity to daily events in major and minor depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(1), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021662
8. Cai, W. P., Pan, Y., Zhang, S. M., Wei, C., Dong, W., & Deng, G. H. (2017). Relationship between cognitive emotion regulation, social support, resilience and acute stress responses in Chinese soldiers: Exploring multiple mediation model. Psychiatry Research, 256, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.018

9. Campbell-Sills, L., & Barlow, D. H. (2007). Incorporating emotion regulation into conceptualizations and treatments of anxiety and mood disorders. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 542e559). New York: Guilford Press.
10. Carthy, T., Horesh, N., Apter, A., Edge, M. D., & Gross, J. J. (2010). Emotional reactivity and cognitive regulation in anxious children. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(5), 384–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.12.013
11. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267
12. Cassel, J. (1976). The contribution of the social environment to American Journal of Epidemiology. 104. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112281
13. Cobb, S. (1976). Social Support as a Moderator of Life Stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38(5), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-197609000-00003
14. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
15. Cook, E. C., Blair, B. L., & Buehler, C. (2017). Individual Differences in Adolescents’ Emotional Reactivity across Relationship Contexts. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(2), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0673-9
16. Cunningham, M. R., & Barbee, A. P. (2000). Social support. In C. Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 273–285). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452220437.n20
17. Cutrona, C. E. (1996). Social support in couples: Marriage as a resource in times of stress. Sage Publications, Inc.
18. Davidson, R. J. (1998). Affective Style and Affective Disorders: Perspectives from Affective Neuroscience. Cognition & Emotion, 12(3), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999398379628
19. Diaz, T., & Bui, N. H. (2016). Subjective Well-Being in Mexican and Mexican American Women: The Role of Acculturation, Ethnic Identity, Gender Roles, and Perceived Social Support. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(2), 607–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9741-1
20. Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1995). Resources, personal strivings, and subjective well-being: A nomothetic and idiographic approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 926–935. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.926
21. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. (2002). Very Happy People. Psychological Science, 13(1), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00415
22. Durkheim, E. (1897). Suicide, a study in sociology (1951 Edition, J. A. Spaulding, & G. Simpson, Trans.). Routledge.
23. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Murphy, B., Maszk, P., Smith, M., & Karbon, M. (1995). The Role of Emotionality and Regulation in Children’s Social Functioning: A Longitudinal Study. Child Development, 66(5), 1360. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131652
24. Eker, D., Arkar, H. ve Yaldız, H. (2001). Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeğinin gözden geçirilmiş formunun faktör yapısı, geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 12(1), 17-25.
25. Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V. (2007). The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.141
26. Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(8), 1311–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00113-6
27. Garnefski, N., Teerds, J., Kraaij, V., Legerstee, J., & van den Kommer, T. (2004). Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: Differences between males and females. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(2), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00083-7
28. Gohm, C. L., & Clore, G. L. (2000). Individual Differences in Emotional Experience: Mapping Available Scales to Processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(6), 679–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200268004
29. Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional Assessment of Emotion Regulation and Dysregulation: Development, Factor Structure, and Initial Validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:joba.0000007455.08539.94
30. Gross, J. J. (1998). The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
31. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
32. Gross, J. J., Sheppes, G., & Urry, H. L. (2011). Cognition and emotion lecture at the 2010 SPSP emotion preconference. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 765-781.
33. Hilt, L. M., Aldao, A., & Fischer, K. (2014). Rumination and multi-modal emotional reactivity. Cognition and Emotion, 29(8), 1486–1495. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.989816
34. Jermann, Françoise; Van der Linden, Martial; d'Acremont, Mathieu; Zermatten, Ariane (2006). Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.2.126
35. Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Nobel Yayıncılık.
36. Kring, A. M., & Werner, K. H. (2004). Emotion regulation in psychopathology. In P. Philippot & R. S. Feldman (Eds.), The regulation of emotion (pp. 359385). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
37. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, apraisal, and coping. Springer.
38. Lee, A. H., & Woodruff-Borden, J. (2018). Roles of emotional reactivity, intolerance of uncertainty, and negative problem orientation on developing childhood worry. Personality and Individual Differences, 135, 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.048
39. Lepore, S. J., Evans, G. W., & Schneider, M. L. (1991). Dynamic role of social support in the link between chronic stress and psychological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 899–909. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.899
40. Macgeorge, E. L., Samter, W., & Gillihan, S. J. (2005). Academic Stress, Supportive Communication, and Health A version of this paper was presented at the 2005 International Communication Association convention in New York City. Communication Education, 54(4), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520500442236
41. Marroquín, B., Tennen, H., & Stanton, A. L. (2017). Coping, emotion regulation, and well-being: Intrapersonal and interpersonal processes. In M. D. Robinson & M. Eid (Eds.), The happy mind: Cognitive contributions to well-being (pp. 253–274). Springer International Publishing/Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58763-9_14
42. Matsuda, T., Tsuda, A., Kim, E., & Deng, K. (2014). Association between Perceived Social Support and Subjective Well-Being among Japanese, Chinese, and Korean College Students. Psychology, 05(06), 491–499. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.56059
43. Morris, A., Criss, M. M., Silk, J. S., & Houltberg, B. J. (2017). The impact of parenting on emotion regulation during childhood and adolescence. Child Development Perspectives, 11(4), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12238.
44. Nock, M. K., Wedig, M. M., Holmberg, E. B., & Hooley, J. M. (2008). The emotion reactivity scale: development, evaluation, and relation to self-injurious thoughts and behaviors. Behavior Therapy, 39(2), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2007.05.005
45. Norris, F. H., & Kaniasty, K. (1996). Received and perceived social support in times of stress: A test of the social support deterioration deterrence model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 498–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.498
46. Oktan, V. (2005). Yalnızlık ve algılanan sosyal destek düzeyinin ergenlerdeki öfkenin gelişimine etkisi. Marmara Üniversitesi, Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 21, 183–192.
47. Onat, O., & Otrar, M. (2010). Bilişsel Duygu Düzenleme Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. M.Ü. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi , (31), 123 – 143.
48. Pejičić, M., Ristić, M., & Anđelković, V. (2018). The mediating effect of cognitive emotion regulation strategies in the relationship between perceived social support and resilience in postwar youth. Journal of Community Psychology, 46(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21951
49. Rabinowitz, J. A., Osigwe, I., Drabick, D. A., & Reynolds, M. D. (2016). Negative emotional reactivity moderates the relations between family cohesion and internalizing and externalizing symptoms in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 53, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.09.007
50. Reti, T., de Terte, I., & Stephens, C. (2021). Perceived social support predicts psychological distress for ambulance personnel. Traumatology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/trm0000331
51. Rosen, P. J., Milich, R., & Harris, M. J. (2012). Dysregulated Negative Emotional Reactivity as a Predictor of Chronic Peer Victimization in Childhood. Aggressive Behavior, 38(5), 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21434
52. Rothbart, M. K., Sheese, B. E., Rueda, M. R., & Posner, M. I. (2011). Developing Mechanisms of Self-Regulation in Early Life. Emotion review : journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion, 3(2), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910387943
53. Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Gurung, R. A. R.(2000).Close personal relationships and health outcomes: A key to the role of social support.In B.R.Sarason & S.W.Duck (Eds.), Personal relationships: Implications for clinical and community psychology. John Wiley.
54. Seçer, İ., Halmatov, S., ve Gençdoğan, B. (2013). Duygusal Tepkisellik Ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Güvenirlik ve geçerlilik çalışması. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 3(1), 77-89.
55. Shapero, B. G., Abramson, L. Y., & Alloy, L. B. (2016). Emotional reactivity and internalizing symptoms: Moderating role of emotion regulation. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 40(30), 328-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-015-9722-4
56. Sobol, M., Woźny, M., & Czubak-Paluch, K. (2021b). Emotion regulation and social support as related to depressive symptoms: A study of healthy and hospitalized adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 174, 110665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110665
57. Spinrad, T. L., Eisenberg, N., Harris, E., Hanish, L., Fabes, R. A., &Kupanoff, K. (2004). The relation of children’s everyday nonsocial peer play behavior to their emotionality, regulation, and social functioning. Child Development, 40, 67-80.
58. Stokes, J. P. (1985). The relation of social network and individual difference variables to loneliness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 981–990. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.981
59. Suri, G., Sheppes, G., & Gross, J. J. (2013). Emotion regulation and cognition. In M. D. Robinson, E. Watkins, & E. Harmon-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 195–209). The Guilford Press
60. Swickert, R. J., Hittner, J. B., & Foster, A. (2010). Big five traits interact to predict perceived social support. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(6), 736–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.018
61. Thompson, R. A. (1994). Emotıon Regulatıon: A Theme In Search Of Defınıtıon. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2–3), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.1994.tb01276.x
62. Udayar, S., Urbanaviciute, I., & Rossier, J. (2019). Perceived Social Support and Big Five Personality Traits in Middle Adulthood: a 4-Year Cross-Lagged Path Analysis. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15(2), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9694-0
63. Urano, Y., & Ikeda, T. (2020). Perceived social support moderates the association betweenemotion regulation and psychological distress: a cross-sectional study among Japanese adults. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 26(10), 1195–1205. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1802051
64. Vangelisti, A. L. (2009). Challenges in conceptualizing social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509105520
65. Wu, C., Li, S., Cheng, F., Zhang, L., Du, Y., He, S., & Lang, H. (2020). Self-Identity and Career Success of Nurses in Infectious Disease Department: The Chain-Mediating Effects of Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Social Support. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.563558
66. Yurdakul, A. ,Üner, S. (2015). Sağlık yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin duygusal tepkisellik durumlarının değerlendirilmesi. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.5455/pmb.1-1422358166
67. Zhou, X., Wu, X., & Zhen, R. (2017). Understanding the relationship between social support and posttraumatic stress disorder/posttraumatic growth among adolescents after Ya’an earthquake: The role of emotion regulation. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 9(2), 214. https://doi.org/10.1037/ tra0000213