Reliability of Portfolio : A Closer Look at Findings from Recent Publications
Öz
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Adamchik, C. (1996). The design and assessment of chemistry portfolios. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(6), 528-31. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National council on measurement in education. Standards for Educational and Psychological testing (1999). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
- Andrade, H. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18.
- Beck, R. J., Livne, N. L & Bear, S. (2005). Teachers’ self-assessment of the effects of formative and summative electronic portfolios on professional development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3), 221-244.
- Brennan, R. (2001). An essay on the history and future of reliability from the perspectives of replications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 295-317.
- Collins, A. (1992). Portfolio for science education: Issues in purpose, structure and authency, Science Education, 76(4), 451-463.
- Danielson, C & Abrutyn, L. (1997). An introduction to using portfolios in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Derham, C., Diperna, J., (2007). Digital Professional Portfolios of Preservice Teaching: An Initial Study of Score Reliability and Validity. JI. of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 363-381.
- Driessen, E. W., Overeem, K., Tartwijk, J., Van der Vleuten, C & Muijtjens, A. M. M., (2006). Validity of portfolio assessment: Which qualities determine ratings? Medical Education, 40, 862–866.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
-
Bölüm
-
Yazarlar
Özge Oskay Özyalçın
Bu kişi benim
Michael Schallıes
Bu kişi benim
İnci Morgil
Bu kişi benim
Yayımlanma Tarihi
1 Haziran 2008
Gönderilme Tarihi
23 Temmuz 2014
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2008 Cilt: 35 Sayı: 35