FEN EĞİTİMİNDE PROBLEME DAYALI ÖĞRENME YAKLAŞIMININ PROBLEM ÇÖZME VE ÖZ-YETERLİK İNANÇ DÜZEYLERİNİN GELİŞİMİNE ETKİSİ

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• fen eğitimi, probleme dayalı öğrenme, problem çözme, öz-yeterlik inancı

Kaynakça

1. Açıkgöz. K. Ü. (2004). Aktif Öğrenme (6. Baskı). lzmir: Eğitim Dünyası Yayınları.
2. Bandura. A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
3. Barrows, H. (2002). Is it truly possible to have such a thing as dPBL? Distance Education, 23(1). 119-122.
4. Bentley. J.. Lowry. G. & Sandy, G. (1999. December). Initiatives in information systems matching learning to professional practice. In Eds.. J. Marsh. Implementing problem based learning: I'" Asia pacific conference on problem based learning (p. l 11-117). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University.
5. Cerezo. N. (2004). Problem-based learning in the middle school: A research case study of the perceptions of at-risk females. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 27(1), 20—42.
6. Chin, C. & Chia, L. (2004). Problem-based learning: Using students’ questions to drive knowledge construction. Science Education. 88(5), 707-727.
7. Cohen. L.. Manion. L. & Morrison. K. (2000). Research methods in education (5m Edition). London: Routledge/Falmer. Taylor&Francis Group.
8. Dahlgren. M. A. & Öberg. G. (2001). Questioning to learn and learning to question: Structure and function of problem-based learning scenarios in environmental science education. Higher Education. 41 . 263—282.

9. Hmelo-Silver. GB. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn'l. Educational Psychology Review, l6(3). 235-266.
10. Iglesias. J. L. (2001 ). Problem—based learning. in initial teacher education. Prospects. 32(3). 319-332.
11. Kaptan. F. & Korkmaz, H. (2001). İşbirliğine dayalı fen öğretiminin öğretmen adaylarının öz-yeterlik düzeylerine etkisi. IV. Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Kongresi 2000. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
12. Karaşar, N. (1999). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (9.Basım). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
13. Korkmaz, H. & Kaptan. F. (2001). Fen eğitiminde probleme dayalı öğrenme yaklaşımı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, 185-192.
14. Linn. R. L. & Gronlund. N. E. (2000). Measurement and assessment in teaching (8'h Edition). New Jersey. USA: Prentice Hall.
15. McDonald. J. T. (2002. January). Using problem based learning a in science methods course. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting ofthe Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Charlotte, USA.
16. McMillan. J. H. (2000). Educational research fundamentals for the consumer. USA: Longman
17. Mierson. S. & Parikh. A. A. (2000). Stories from the field. Change, 32(1). 20—27.
18. Miller. C. M. (2000). Student—researched problem—solving strategies. Mathematics Teacher, 93(2). 136-138.
19. Murray—Harvey, R.. Curtis, D. D.. Cattley. G. & Slee, P. T. (2005). Enhancing teacher education students’ generic skills through problem—based learning. Teaching Education. 16(3), 257-273.
20. Schmidt. H. G. (1983). Problem based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education, 17(1 ), 11-16.
21. Süleyman YAMAN, Necati YALÇIN / H. Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal ofEducatian), 29(2005), 229-236
22. Schriver, M. & Czemiak, CM. (1999). A comparison of middle and junior high science teachers' levels of efŞcacy and knowledge of developmentally appropriate curriculum and instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(1), 21 - 42.
23. Siegel, M. A. (2002, April). Models of teaching learning: A study of a case analyses by pre-service teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, USA.
24. Siege], M. A. & Lee, J. A. C. (2001, March). But electricity isn't static: Science discussion, identiŞcation of learning issues, and use of resources in a problem-based learning education course. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO. USA.
25. Sonmez, D. & Lee. H. (2003). Problem-based learning in science. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED482724).
26. Thomas, J. A., Pedersen, J. E. & Finson, K. (2001). Validating the draw-a-science-teacher—test checklist exploring mental models and teacher beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 295-310.
27. Yaman, S. (2003). Fen bilgisi eğitiminde probleme dayalı öğrenmenin öğrenme ürünlerine etkisi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. yayınlanmamış doktora tezi.
28. Yaman, S. & Yalçın, N. (2005). Fen bilgisi öğretiminde probleme dayalı öğrenme yaklaşınunın yaratıcı düşünme becerisine etkisi [Elektronik versiyonu]. Ilköğretim Online Dergisi, 4(1 ), 42-52.
29. Yiğit. N., Akdeniz. A. R. & Kurt, Ş. (2001, Eylül). Fizik eğitiminde çalışma yapraklarının geliştirilmesi... Makale, Yeni Bin Yılın Başında Türkiye’de Fen Bilimleri Sempozyumu’nda bildiri olarak sunulmuştur, Maltepe Universitesi Eğitim Fakültesi.