Yapay Zeka Okuryazarlığı ve Kariyer Kararlılığı Arasındaki İlişkide Yapay Zeka Kaygısının Aracılık Rolü

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, kariyer kararlılığının yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı üzerindeki etkisinde yapay zekâ kaygısının aracı bir rolünün olup olmadığını incelemektir. İlişkisel ve yordayıcı modelin kullanıldığı bu kesitsel araştırma, kullanılan ölçekler ve geliştirilen model bakımından literatürde muhtemelen ilk çalışma olması açısından dikkat çekicidir. Araştırma, dijital kuşağa mensup 512 üniversite öğrencisi ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler; Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı Ölçeği, Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlığı Ölçeği ve Kariyer Kararlılığı Ölçeği kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde SPSS ve Jamovi yazılımları kullanılmıştır. Katılımcılar, Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlığı Ölçeği ve Kariyer Kararlılığı Ölçeği’nden yüksek, Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı Ölçeği’nden ise orta düzeyde ortalama puanlar elde etmiştir. Korelasyon analizi sonuçları, Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlığı Ölçeği ile Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı Ölçeği puanları arasında negatif ve anlamlı; Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlığı Ölçeği ile Kariyer Kararlılığı Ölçeği puanları arasında pozitif ve anlamlı; Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı Ölçeği ile Kariyer Kararlılığı Ölçeği puanları arasında ise negatif ve anlamlı ilişkiler olduğunu göstermiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, kariyer kararlılığının yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı üzerinde doğrudan ve anlamlı bir etkisi bulunmakta olup, yapay zekâ kaygısının bu ilişkide kısmi aracılık rolü vardır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dijital kuşak
• Yapay zeka kaygısı
• Yapay zeka okuryazarlığı
• Kariyer kararlılığı
• Aracılık Rolü

Proje Numarası

---

The Mediating Role of AI Anxiety in the Relationship Between AI Literacy and Career Decidedness

Öz

The main purpose in conducting this study is to investigate whether artificial intelligence anxiety has a mediating role in the effect of career decidedness on artificial intelligence literacy. This cross-sectional study, in which the correlational and predictive model was used, is noteworthy because it is probably the first study in the literature in terms of the scales used in it and the model developed. The study was conducted with 512 university students of the digital generation. Data were collected using the Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale, Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale, and Career Decidedness Scale. SPSS and Jamovi software programs were used in the analysis of the data. The participating students obtained high mean scores from the Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale, and Career Decidedness Scale, and a moderate mean score from the Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale. The results of the correlation analysis revealed that there was a negative and significant relationship between the scores obtained from the Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale and Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale, a positive and significant relationship between the scores obtained from the Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale and Career Decidedness Scale and a negative and significant relationship between the scores obtained from the Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale and Career Decidedness Scale. According to the results of the study, career decidedness had a direct and significant effect on artificial intelligence literacy, and artificial intelligence anxiety did have a partial mediating role in this relationship.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Digital generation
• artificial intelligence anxiety
• artificial intelligence literacy
• career decidedness
• mediating role

Destekleyen Kurum

---

Proje Numarası

---

Etik Beyan

Before the study was conducted, ethical approval was obtained from the Social and Human Sciences Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee of Uşak University (Decision date: December 13, 2024, Decision number: E.249762). The study was carried out in accordance with the ethical standards established in the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and the ethical standards of the National Research Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants after they were informed about the study and told that they had the right to withdraw from the study at any time without giving any reason and that the data about them would be used only for scientific purposes and would not be disclosed to third parties.

Teşekkür

The authors are grateful to all the university students who volunteered to participate in this study.

Kaynakça

1. Akçakanat, T., & Uzunbacak, H. H. (2019). Kariyer kararlılığı ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(9), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.576572 Akkaya, B., Özkan, A., & Özkan, H. (2021). Yapay zekâ kaygı (YZK) ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Alanya Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 5(2), 1125-1146. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.833668
2. Almaiah, M. A., Alfaisal, R., Salloum, S. A., Hajjej, F., Thabit, S., El-Qirem, F. A., ... & Al-Maroof, R. S. (2022). Examining the impact of artificial intelligence and social and computer anxiety in e-learning settings: Students’ perceptions at the university level. Electronics, 11(22), 3662. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11223662
3. Asio, J. M. R., & Suero, A. N. (2024). Artificial intelligence anxiety, self-efficacy, and self-competence among students: Implications to higher education institutions. Education Policy and Development, 2(2), 82-93. https://doi.org/10.31098/epd.v2i2.2541 Banaz, E., & Demirel, O. (2024). Türkçe öğretmen adaylarının yapay zekâ okuryazarlıklarının farklı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (60), 1516-1529. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1461048
4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
5. Bingham, A. J., Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., & Hamilton, L. S. (2018). Ahead of the curve: Implementation challenges in personalized learning school models. Educational Policy, 32(3), 454-489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904816637688
6. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587 Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342
7. Çelebi, C., Demir, U., & Karakuş, F. (2023). Yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı konulu çalışmaların sistematik derleme yöntemiyle incelenmesi. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Ereğli Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 535-560. https://doi.org/10.51119/ereegf.2023.67
8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
10. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Row & Peterson.
11. Fortunati, L., Taipale, S., & de Luca, F. (2019). Digital generations, but not as we know them. Convergence, 25(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517692309
12. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
13. Hirschi, A. (2013). Career decision making, stability, and actualization of career intentions: The case of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(4), 555-571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072712475287
14. Hornberger, M., Bewersdorff, A., & Nerdel, C. (2023). What do university students know about artificial intelligence? Development and validation of an AI literacy test. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100165
15. Huang, J., Saleh, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). A review on artificial intelligence in education. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3), 206-217. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0077
16. Kaya, F., Aydın, F., Schepman, A., Rodway, P., Yetişensoy, O., & Demir Kaya, M. (2024). The roles of personality traits, ai anxiety, and demographic factors in attitudes toward artificial intelligence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(2), 497-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2151730
17. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
18. Köse, E. (2025). Research on the effect of artificial intelligence anxiety in accounting profession candidates on career decidedness. Fiscaoeconomia, 9(1), 568-582. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1556196
19. Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Haverkamp, N., & Raupach, T. (2023). Development of the scale for the assessment of non-experts’ AI literacy–An exploratory factor analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12, 100338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100338
20. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
21. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
22. Li, H., Ngo, H. Y., & Cheung, F. (2019). Linking protean career orientation and career decidedness: The mediating role of career decision self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115, 103322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103322
23. Lounsbury, J. W., Tatum, H. E., Chambers, W., Owens, K., & Gibson, L. W. (1999). An investigation of career decidedness in relation to big five personality constructs and life satisfaction. College Student Journal, 33(4), 646-652.
24. McKinsey Global Institute. (2017). Jobs lost, jobs gained: workforce transitions in a time of automation. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/jobs-lost-jobs-gained-what-the-future-of-work-will-mean-for-jobs-skills-and-wages
25. Meydan, H. & Şeşen, H. (2015). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi amos uygulamaları. Detay Publishing.
26. Migdadi, M. D. K., Oweidat, I. A., Alosta, M. R., Al-Mugheed, K., Saeed Alabdullah, A. A., & Farghaly Abdelaliem, S. M. (2024). The association of artificial intelligence ethical awareness, attitudes, anxiety, and intention-to-use artificial intelligence technology among nursing students. Digital Health, 10, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241301958
27. Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., & Kato, K. (2006). Psychology in human–robot communication: An attempt through investigation of negative attitudes and anxiety toward robots. In: RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (IEEE Catalog No. 04TH8759). IEEE, pp 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374726 Polatgil, M., & Güler, A. (2023). Yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Sosyal Bilimlerde Nicel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(2), 99-114. Savickas, M. L. (2002). Career construction: A developmental theory of vocational behavior. In D. Brown (Ed.), Career choice and development (4th ed., pp. 149-205). Jossey-Bass.
28. Saylam, A. İ., & Sapancı, A. (2025). The mediating role of anxiety in the relationship between humor coping and secondary traumatic stress. Cyprus Turkish Journal of Psychiatry & Psychology, 7(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.35365/ctjpp.25.1.02
29. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
30. Shin, D. (2021). The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 146, 102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551
31. Southworth, J., Migliaccio, K., Glover, J., Glover, J. N., Reed, D., McCarty, C., ... & Thomas, A. (2023). Developing a model for AI across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in ai literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127
32. Super, D. E. (1980). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16(3), 282-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(80)90056-1
33. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson.
34. Toker-Gökçe, A., Deveci Topal, A., Kolburan Geçer, A., & Dilek Eren, C. (2025). Investigating the level of artificial intelligence literacy of university students using decision trees. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 6765–6784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13081-4
35. Wang, B., Rau, P. L. P., & Yuan, T. (2023). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(9), 1324-1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2072768
36. Wang, Y. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2022). Development and validation of an artificial intelligence anxiety scale: An initial application in predicting motivated learning behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 619-634. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674887
37. Yaşar, O., & Sunay, H. (2020). Career decidedness of college students. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 15(23), 1614-1624. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.671754
38. Yazıcı, A. M. (2023). The moderator role of career decidedness in the effect of artificial intelligence anxiety on employment hope. BMİJ, 11(4), 1260-1274. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v11i4.2284