BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Portfolyo Değerlendirme

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 32, 133 - 144, 01.06.2007

Öz

Günümüzde geçerliğini koruyan ya da kabul gören ölçme ve değerlendirmeye ilişkin yaklaşımlar ve bunların teorik temelleri daha çok davranışcı yaklaşımın etkisi altında, onu temel alarak şekillenmiştir. 1990’lı yıllarda, öğrenmeyi ve öğrenme ürünlerini, düşünme tarzlarını, öğrenme stillerini içine alan yeni ve alternetif ölçme ve değerlendirme sistemleri oluşturma gerekliliği ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu çabaların ürünlerinden biriside portfolyolar (öğrenci gelişim dosyaları) ve değerlendirilmesidir. Bu çalışmada, öğrencilerin performanslarını değerlendirmede çok önemli bir role sahip olan öğrenci portfolyolarının ne olduğu, kapsamı, portfolyo çeşitleri, özellikleri, uygulanışı, portfolyo değerlendirmenin avantajları ve dez avantajları, değerlendirilmesi üzerinde durulmuştur. Sonuç olarak, eğitim ve öğretim sürecinde portfolyoların kullanılmasının ülkemiz ve süreç açısından önemi vurgulanmıştır

Kaynakça

  • Barret, H. C. (2000). The Electronic Portfolio Development Process, 10.05.2003 tarihinde http://www.electronicportfolios.com/portfolios/EPDevProcess.html#portdev adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Chang, C. C. (2001). A study on the evaluation and effectiveness analysis of web-based learning portfolio (WBLP). British Journal Of Educational Technology, 32(4).
  • Chapman, J. M., Pettway C. ve White, M. (2001). The portfolio: An instruction program assessment tool. Reference Services Review, 29(4), 294-300.
  • Columba, L. ve Dolgos, K. A. (1995). Portfolio assessment in mathematics. Reading Improvement, 32(3), 174-176.
  • Dubrovich, M. (2002). A diversify your assesment portfolio. Principal, 82(2), 7-56.
  • Farr, R. (1990). Setting direction for language arts portfolios. Educational Leadership, 48(3), 103.
  • Fazal, M. ve Goldsby, D. (2001). Now that your student have created web-based digital portfolios, how do evaluate them? Journal of Technologhy and Teacher Education, 9(4), 607-616.
  • Fenwick, T. J. ve Parsons, J. (1999). A note on using portfolios to assess learning. Canadian Social Studies. 33(3), 90-92.
  • Gearhart, M., Herman, J. L., Baker, E. L. ve Whittaker, A. K. (1993). A question for the validity of large-scale portfolio assessment (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 363). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standarts, and Student Testing.
  • Gilman, D. A., Andrew, R. ve Rafferty, C. D. (1995). Making assessment a meaningful part ofinstruction. NASSP Bulletin, 79(573), 20-24
  • Kan, A. (2003). Değerlendirmede yeni yaklaşımlar. İleti Dergisi, 84, 7-9.
  • Kemp, J. ve Toperoff, D. (1998). Guidelines for portfolio assessment in teaching English. 20.04.2003 tarihinde http://www.etni.org.il/ministry/portfolio adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Koretz, D. (1994). The evolution of a portfolio program: The impact and quality of the vermont portfolio program. ERIC Document Reproduction Service. ED 379301.
  • Krest, M. (1990). Adapting the portfolio to meet student needs. English Journal, 79(2), 29-34
  • Lankes, A. M. D. (1995). Electronic portfolios: A new idea in assessment. ERIC Clearing House on Information and Technologhy. Service. ED 390377.
  • Midkiff, R. B. ve Thomasson, R. D. (1993) A practical approach to using learning styles in math instruction. Springfield, IL: Thomas Books.
  • Moya, S., S.ve O’ Malley, M. (1994). A portfolio assessment model for ESL. The Journal of Issues of Language Minority Students. 13(13), 13-36.
  • Novack, J. R., Herman, J. L. ve Gearhart, M. (1996). Issues in portfolio assessment: The score-ability of narrative collections. (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 410). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standarts, and Student Testing.
  • Owings, C. A. ve Follo, E. (1992). Effect of portfolio assessment on students attitudes and goal setting abilities in mathematics. Michigan.
  • Paulsaon, F.L., Paulson, P.R. ve Meyer, C.A. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60- 63.
  • Valencia, S. (1990). A portfolio approach to clasroom assessment: The whys, whats and hows. The Reading Teacher, 43(4), 338-40
  • Wolfe, E. W. (1996). Student Reflection in Portfolio Assessment. ERIC Document Repreduction Service. ED 396004.
Yıl 2007, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 32, 133 - 144, 01.06.2007

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Barret, H. C. (2000). The Electronic Portfolio Development Process, 10.05.2003 tarihinde http://www.electronicportfolios.com/portfolios/EPDevProcess.html#portdev adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Chang, C. C. (2001). A study on the evaluation and effectiveness analysis of web-based learning portfolio (WBLP). British Journal Of Educational Technology, 32(4).
  • Chapman, J. M., Pettway C. ve White, M. (2001). The portfolio: An instruction program assessment tool. Reference Services Review, 29(4), 294-300.
  • Columba, L. ve Dolgos, K. A. (1995). Portfolio assessment in mathematics. Reading Improvement, 32(3), 174-176.
  • Dubrovich, M. (2002). A diversify your assesment portfolio. Principal, 82(2), 7-56.
  • Farr, R. (1990). Setting direction for language arts portfolios. Educational Leadership, 48(3), 103.
  • Fazal, M. ve Goldsby, D. (2001). Now that your student have created web-based digital portfolios, how do evaluate them? Journal of Technologhy and Teacher Education, 9(4), 607-616.
  • Fenwick, T. J. ve Parsons, J. (1999). A note on using portfolios to assess learning. Canadian Social Studies. 33(3), 90-92.
  • Gearhart, M., Herman, J. L., Baker, E. L. ve Whittaker, A. K. (1993). A question for the validity of large-scale portfolio assessment (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 363). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standarts, and Student Testing.
  • Gilman, D. A., Andrew, R. ve Rafferty, C. D. (1995). Making assessment a meaningful part ofinstruction. NASSP Bulletin, 79(573), 20-24
  • Kan, A. (2003). Değerlendirmede yeni yaklaşımlar. İleti Dergisi, 84, 7-9.
  • Kemp, J. ve Toperoff, D. (1998). Guidelines for portfolio assessment in teaching English. 20.04.2003 tarihinde http://www.etni.org.il/ministry/portfolio adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Koretz, D. (1994). The evolution of a portfolio program: The impact and quality of the vermont portfolio program. ERIC Document Reproduction Service. ED 379301.
  • Krest, M. (1990). Adapting the portfolio to meet student needs. English Journal, 79(2), 29-34
  • Lankes, A. M. D. (1995). Electronic portfolios: A new idea in assessment. ERIC Clearing House on Information and Technologhy. Service. ED 390377.
  • Midkiff, R. B. ve Thomasson, R. D. (1993) A practical approach to using learning styles in math instruction. Springfield, IL: Thomas Books.
  • Moya, S., S.ve O’ Malley, M. (1994). A portfolio assessment model for ESL. The Journal of Issues of Language Minority Students. 13(13), 13-36.
  • Novack, J. R., Herman, J. L. ve Gearhart, M. (1996). Issues in portfolio assessment: The score-ability of narrative collections. (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 410). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standarts, and Student Testing.
  • Owings, C. A. ve Follo, E. (1992). Effect of portfolio assessment on students attitudes and goal setting abilities in mathematics. Michigan.
  • Paulsaon, F.L., Paulson, P.R. ve Meyer, C.A. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60- 63.
  • Valencia, S. (1990). A portfolio approach to clasroom assessment: The whys, whats and hows. The Reading Teacher, 43(4), 338-40
  • Wolfe, E. W. (1996). Student Reflection in Portfolio Assessment. ERIC Document Repreduction Service. ED 396004.
Toplam 22 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Adnan Kan Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2007
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2007 Cilt: 32 Sayı: 32

Kaynak Göster

APA Kan, A. (2007). Portfolyo Değerlendirme. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(32), 133-144.