THE INNOVATION DIMENSION OF INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP: A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON BORN GLOBAL FIRMS

Öz

Since the 1990s, with the increase of the international entrepreneurship activities, some firms have become internationalized in a way earlier and faster rather than the traditional ways of internationalization. Small and medium sized enterprises that internationalize from their inception or very shortly thereafter are called “Born Global” in the literature. The role of the international entrepreneurship orientation that born globals have in facilitating faster international activities compared to the traditional ways of internationalization is great. International entrepreneurship orientation is analyzed by its three dimensions, namely, proactivity, risk taking and innovation. The innovation dimension of international entrepreneurship in the study is examined at the point of born global. In the study, born global firms in different sectors in Ankara, Çorum and Konya have been analyzed using qualitative research methods. QSR NVivo 11 program is utilized in data analysis. In conclusion, four factors that influence the dimension of innovation in the entrepreneurial orientation of born global firms are revealed and explained based on the data obtained. These factors are information creation and sharing, entrepreneurship, information and communication technologies, and human resources.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Internationalization process,born global

ULUSLARARASI GİRİŞİMCİLİK YÖNELİMİNİN YENİLİKÇİLİK BOYUTU: KÜRESEL DOĞAN İŞLETMELER ÜZERİNE NİTEL BİR ÇALIŞMA

Öz

1990'lı yıllardan itibaren uluslararasılaşma süreci modeli ile faaliyetlerini diğer ülke pazarlarına götürmekte olan işletmelerden farklı, daha erken ve hızlı bir şekilde uluslararasılaşan işletmelerin varlığı belirlenmeye başlanmıştır.  Kuruldukları andan itibaren veya kuruluşlarını takiben kısa bir süre içerisinde uluslararası faaliyetlerde bulunan küçük ve orta ölçekli işletmeler “Küresel Doğan İşletmeler” olarak isimlendirilmektedir. Küresel doğan işletmelerin uluslararasılaşma süreci modeli ile uluslararasılaşan işletmelere nazaran daha hızlı uluslararası faaliyetlerde bulunabilmelerinde sahip oldukları uluslararası girişimcilik yöneliminin rolü büyüktür. Uluslararası girişimcilik yönelimi, proaktiflik, risk alma ve yenilikçilik şeklindeki üç boyutuyla ele alınmaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında, uluslararası girişimciliğin yenilikçilik boyutu incelenmektedir. Çalışmada, Ankara, Çorum ve Konya’da farklı sektörlerde faaliyet gösteren on küresel doğan işletmeye ulaşılmıştır. Verilerin incelenmesi nitel araştırma yöntemi kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Verilerin analizi için QSR NVivo 11 programı kullanılmıştır. Çalışma içeriğinde elde edilen veriler sayesinde küresel doğan işletmelerin yenilikçiliklerini etkileyen dört faktör ortaya konmuş ve incelenmiştir. Adı geçen faktörler; bilgi oluşturma ve paylaşma, girişimcilik, bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri ve insan kaynaklarıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• uluslararasılaşma süreci,küresel doğan işletmeler,girişimcilik yönelimi,yenilikçilik

Kaynakça

1. Aktepe, C., M.M. Üner, A. Koçak (2011), “Küresel Doğan İşletmelerin Öncülleri: Türkiye’deki Bilgi Teknolojisi Yoğun İşletmeler Üzerinde Nitel Bir Araştırma”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, 26(301), 59-90.
2. Andersen, O. (1993), “On the Internationalization Process of Firms: A Critical Analysis”, Journal of International Business Studies, 24, 209-231.
3. Andersson, S. (2000), “The Internationalization of the Firm From an Entrepreneurial Perspective”, International Studies of Management & Organization, 30(1), 63-92.
4. Andersson, S., I. Wictor (2003), “Innovative Internationalisation in New Firms: Born Globals-The Swedish Case”, Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 249-276.
5. Arvanitis, S., E. Loukis, V. Diamantopoulou (2011), “The Impact of Different Types of Ict on Innovation Performance of Greek Firms”, European Mediterranean&Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems, 1-19.
6. Atlı, H., B. Kartal (2014), “Küresel Doğan İşletmelerde Girişimcinin Bireysel Özelliklerinin Erken Uluslararasılaşmadaki Rolü”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 39, 145-157.
7. Atlı, H. (2017), Küresel Doğan İşletmelerin Uluslararasılaşma Sürecinde Örgütsel Kabiliyetleri ve Bunların İhracat Performansına Etkileri Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma, Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi.
8. Autio, E., H.J. Sapienza, J.G. Almeida (2000), “Effects of Age At Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth”, The Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909-924.

9. Baldwin, J., J. Johnson (1995), “Human Capital Development and Innovation: The Case of Training in Small and Medium-Sized Firms”, Statistics Canada Working Paper, 74.
10. Barbosa, E. (2014), “Organizational Culture Oriented For Innovation: Influencing Variables”, The Małopolska School of Economics in Tarnów Research Papers Collection, 25(29), 37-45.
11. Beğendik, B. (2013), Küresel Doğan İşletmelerin Uluslararasılaşma Sürecine Etki Eden Girişimcilik Yönelimi Boyutları ve Girişimci Özellikleri. Gazi Üniversitesi - Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi.
12. Bilkey, W.J., G. Tesar (1977), “The Export Behavior of Smaller-Sized Wisconsin Manufacturing Firms”, Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 93-98.
13. Chetty, S., C. Campbell-Hunt (2004), “A Strategic Approach to Internationalization: A Traditional Versus a ‘Born-Global’ Approach”, Journal of International Marketing, 12(1), 57–81.
14. Creswell, J.W. (2016), Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
15. Covin, J.G., D.P. Slevin (1989), “Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments”, Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75-87.
16. Covin, J., W. Wales (2012), “The Measurement of Entrepreneurial Orientation”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 677-702.
17. Çavuşgil, S.T. (1980), “On the internationalization process of finns”, European Research, 8, 273-81.
18. Çavuşgil, S.T. (1994), “Born Globals: A Quiet Revolution Among Australian Exporters”, Journal of International Marketing, 2(3), 4-6.
19. Çavuşgil, S.T., G.A. Knight (2009), Born Global Firms: A New International Enterprise, New York: Business Expert Press.
20. Çavuşgil, S.T., G.A. Knight, M.M. Üner (2011), Türkiye’de Küresel Doğan İşletmeler, Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
21. Çiçek, R., Ö. Demirer (2009), “Geleneksel Uluslararasılaşma Teorisine Karşı Çıkan Yeni Bir Uluslararasılaşma Modeli: Global Doğan İşletmeler”, Akademik Bakış Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler E-Dergisi, 16.
22. Dahlstrand, A.L., L. Stevenson (2010), “Innovative Entrepreneurship Policy: Linking Innovation and Entrepreneurship in an European Context”, Annals of Innovation & Entrepreneurship, 1(1).
23. Dai, L., V. Maksimov, B.A. Gilbert, S.A. Fernhaber (2014), “Entrepreneurial Orientation and İnternational Scope: The Differential Roles of Innovativeness, Proactiveness and Risk-Taking”, Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 511–524.
24. Deshpande, R., J. Farley, F. Webster (1993), “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis”, Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 23-37.
25. Faiz, E. (2013), Uluslararası Girişimcilik Yöneliminin Proaktiflik Boyutu: Küresel Doğan İşletmeler Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Gazi Üniversitesi - Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi.
26. Freeman, S., S.T. Çavuşgil (2007), “Toward A Typology of Commitment States Among Managers of Born-Global Firms: A Study of Accelerated Internationalization”, Journal of International Marketing, 15(4), 1-40.
27. Gabr, H., A. Hoffman (2006), A General Policy Framework for Entrepreneurship. FORA, Division for Research and Analysis, Copenhagen: Ministry of Business and Economic Affairs.
28. Gabrielsson, M., V.H.M. Kirpalani (2004), “Born Globals: How To Reach New Business Space Rapidly”, International Business Review, 13, 555-571.
29. Gabrielsson, M., V.H.M. Kirpalani, P. Dimitratos, C.A. Solbergf, A. Zucchella (2008), “Born Globals: Propositions to Help Advance the Theory”, International Business Review, 17, 385–401.
30. Gupta, A.K. (2009), A Study of Metrics and Measures To Measure Innovation At Firm Level & At National Level A Working Paper For IMRI, Cahier de Recherche de l’IMRI.
31. Gupta, A.K., A. Singhal (1993), “Managing Human Resources For Innovation and Creativity”, Journal Research-Technology Management, 36(3), 41-48.
32. Haghighi, E. (2017), Uluslararasılaşma Sürecinde Küresel Doğan İşletmelerin Analizi: Un ve Unlu Ürünler Sanayi Örneği. Ankara Üniversitesi - Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi.
33. Harveston, P.D. (2000), Synoptic Versus Incremental Internationalization: An Examination of Born Global and Gradual Globalizing Firms. Memphis Üniversitesi, Doktora Tezi.
34. Hoffman, A. (2005), “Innovation Monitor 2005: Denmark’s Innovation Capacity From Benchmarking To Policy Priorities”, Copenhagen: FORA, Division for Research and Analysis, Ministry of Business and Economic Affairs.
35. Ilgaz Sümer, S., M.M. Üner (2012), “Uluslararası Pazarlamada Psikolojik Mesafe ile Ürün Stratejileri Arasındaki İlişki”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 1-28.
36. Jimenez-Jimenez, D., R. Sanz‐Valle (2012), “Studying the Effect of HRM Practices on the Knowledge Management Process”, Personnel Review, 42(1), 28-49.
37. Johanson, J., J.E. Vahlne (1977), “The Internationalization Process of the Firm-a Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments”, Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32.
38. Jong, J., O. Marsili (2006), “The Fruit Flies of Innovations: A Taxonomy of Innovative Small Firms”, Research Policy, 35(2), 213-229.
39. Kaplan, B. (2015), Uluslararası Girişimci KOBİ'lerde E-Pazarlama Odaklılık ve Web Sitesi Kullanımı: Küresel Doğan İşletmeler Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Marmara Üniversitesi- Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi.
40. Karlsson, J. (2013), The Role of Hrm in Innovation Processes: Nurturing or Constraining Creativity. University of Gothenburg Faculty of Social Sciences, Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
41. Karra, N., N. Phillips (2004), “Born Global: International Entrepreneurship in The Turkish Fasion Industry”, Academy of International Business Annual Meeting, 1-27.
42. Kirpalani, M., M. Gabrielsson (2012), Born Globals: Research Areas That Still Need To Be Covered More Fully. Gabrielsson, M. ve Kirpalani, V.H.M.(Editörler) Handbook of Research on Born Globals. Boston. Massachusetts, Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., s. 71-98.
43. Knight, G.A., S.T. Çavuşgil (1996), “The Born Global Firm: A Challenge to Traditional Internationalization Theory”, Advance in International Marketing, 8, 11-26.
44. Knight, G.A., S.T. Çavuşgil (2004), “Innovation, Organizational Capabilities and the Born Global Firm”, Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 124-141.
45. Knight, G.A., T.K. Madsen, P. Servais (2004), “An Inquiry Into Born-Global Firms in Europe and The USA”, International Marketing Review, 645-665.
46. Konaklıoğlu, E. (2011), Küresel Doğan İşletmelerin Erken Uluslararasılaşmasını Tetikleyen Kurucu Ve/Veya Yönetici Özellikleri. Gazi Üniversitesi - Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi.
47. Laursen, K., N.J. Foss (2003), “New Human Resource Management Practices, Complementarities and the Impact on Innovation Performance”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 243–263.
48. Lee, S.M., S.J. Peterson (2000), “Culture, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Global Competitiveness”, Journal of World Business, 35(4), 401-416.
49. Lumpkin, G.T., G.G. Dess (1996), “Clarifying The Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance”, Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
50. Lumpkin, G.T., G.G. Dess (2001), “Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle”, Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429-451.
51. Madsen, T.K., E. Rasmussen, P.Servais (2000), “Differences and Similarities Between Born Globals and Other Types of Exportes”, Advances in International Marketing, 10, 247-265.
52. Madsen, T.K., T. Knudsen (2003), “International New Ventures: A New Organizational Form?”, 6th McGill Conference on International Entrepreneurship: Crossing Boundaries and Researching New Futures.
53. Martins, E.C., F. Terblanche (2003), “Building Organisational Culture That Stimulates Creativity and Innovation”, European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64-74.
54. McDougall, P.P., B.M. Oviatt (2000), “International Entrepreneurship: The Intersection of Two Research Paths”, The Academy of Management Journal, 43, 902-906.
55. Miller, D. (1983), “The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms”, Management Science, 29, 770–791.
56. Moen, O., P. Servais (2002), “Born Global or Gradual Global? Examining The Export Behavior of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises”, Journal of International Marketing, 10(3), 49-72.
57. Mohammed, U.D., A.B.O. Umar, G.C.O. Nzelibe (2016), “Entrepreneurial Orientation, Access To Debt Finance and The Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in Nigeria”, Prague: MAC Prague Consulting Ltd, Czech Technical University, Proceedings of the 6th. İnternational Conference.
58. Nasution, H.N., F.T. Mavondo, M.J. Matanda, N.O. Ndubisi (2011), “Entrepreneurship: Its Relationship with Market Orientation and Learning Orientation and as Antecedents to Innovation and Customer Value”, Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 336-345.
59. Rasmussan, E.S., T.K. Madsen, F. Evangelista (2001), “The Founding of the Born Global Company in Denmark and Australia: Sensemaking and Networking”, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 13(3), 75-107.
60. Rauch, A., J. Wiklund, M. Frese, G.T. Lumpkin (2009), “Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of Past Research and Suggestions for the Future”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761-787.
61. Reid, S. D. (1981), “The decision-maker and export entry and expansion”, Journal of Internationial Business Studies, 12, 101-12.
62. Rennie, M. (1993), Born Global. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 5-52.
63. Rialp, A., I. Galvan- Sanchez, M. Garcia (2012), “An Inquiry into Born Global Firms’ Learning Process: A Case Study of Information Technology-Based SMEs”, Handbook of Research on Born Globals, ed. Mika Gabrielsson and Vishnu H. Kirpalani, 71-98, Boston. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.
64. Rosli, M.M., S. Sidek (2013), “The Impact of Innovation on the Performance of Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises: Evidence from Malaysia”, Journal of Innovation Management in Small & Medium Enterprise, 2013, 1-16.
65. Roux, I.L., K.M.K. Bengesi (2014), “Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small and Medium Enterprise Performance in Emerging Economies”, Journal of Development Southern Africa, 31(4), 606-624.
66. Shrader, R.C., B.M. Oviatt, P.P. Mcdougall (2000), “How New Ventures Exploit Trade-Offs Among International Risk Factors: Lessons for the Accelerated Internationization of The 21st Century”, The Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1227-1247.
67. Tang, Z., P.M. Kreiser, L. Marino (2009), “A Hierarchical Perspective of the Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation”, International Entrepreneurial Management Journal, 5, 181-201.
68. Tidd, J., J. Bessant (2014), Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
69. Ulijn, J., T.E. Brown (2004), “A Matter of Interaction Between Technology, Progress and Economic Growth? An Interaction”, Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Culture, ed.T. Brown &J. M. Ulijn, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1-38.
70. Wales, W.J., V.K. Gupta, F. Mousa (2011), “Empirical Research on Entrepreneurial Orientation: An Assessment and Suggestions For Future Research”, International Small Business Journal, 31(4), 357–383.
71. Yıldırım, M.H., A.T. Erdem (2016), “Küreselleşme Ve Küresel Doğan İşletmeler: Konya Karatay Organize Sanayi Bölgesinde Nitel Bir Araştırma”, İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(1), 12-28.
72. Yin, R.K. (2003), Case Study Research Design and Methods, United States of America: Sage Publications.
73. Zahra, S. A., H.J.Sapienza, P. Davidsson (2006),” Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda”, Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917-955.
74. Zhao, F. (2005), “Exploring The Synergy Between Entrepreneurship and Innovation”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 11(1), 25 – 41.
75. Zijdemans, E., S. Tanev, (2014), “Conceptualizing Innovation in Born Global Firms”, Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(9), 5-10.