THE MODERATING ROLE OF CYBERLOAFING ACTIVITIES ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INSTITUTIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP AND INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOUR

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 36 Sayı: 1, 63 - 81, 30.03.2018

Neslihan Derin

https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.411127

Cited By: 11

Öz

The present study aims to investigate the effects of organizational psychological ownership on innovative work behavior
and whether cyberloafing activities have
moderating role on relationship between organizational psychological
ownership and cyberloafing activities. Hypotheses of the study are tested with a sample of 355 administrative
and academic staff of Inonu University. As a result
of this study, it is determined that there is positive relationship
between the psychological ownership and innovative business behavior of
university staff. In addition, the result
demonstrated that cyberloafing activities have
moderating role on relationship between corporate psychological
ownership and innovative work behavior. The
relationship between corporate ownership and innovative work behavior is
significant and positive for low cyberloafing activities (B=0,534, p<0.01).The relationship is weaker for high
cyberloafing activities (B=0,193 p<0.01). Based on
the findings, it could be suggested that increasing
corporate ownership and reducing cyberloafing
activities might contribute to corporate success by
innovative work behavior.

KURUMA DUYULAN PSİKOLOJİK SAHİPLENME İLE YENİLİKÇİ İŞ DAVRANIŞI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE SANAL KAYTARMANIN DÜZENLEYİCİ ROLÜ

Öz

Bu
çalışmanın amacı; kuruma yönelik psikolojik sahiplenmenin, yenilikçi iş
davranışına olan etkisini tespit etmek ve kuruma duyulan psikolojik sahiplenme
ile yenilikçi iş davranışı arasındaki ilişkide sanal kaytarmanın düzenleyicilik
rolü olup olmadığını saptamaktır. Araştırmanın hipotezleri, İnönü Üniversitesi
idari ve akademik “355” personelinden oluşan örneklem üzerinden test
edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, üniversite personelinin kuruma yönelik
psikolojik sahiplenme duygularıyla yenilikçi iş davranışı arasında olumlu
ilişkinin olduğu, bu ilişkide sanal kaytarmanın düzenleyicilik rolüne sahip
olduğu görülmüştür. Düşük
sanal kaytarma oranına sahip olanlar için kurumu sahiplenme ve yenilikçi iş
davranışı arasındaki ilişki anlamlı ve pozitif yönlüdür (B=0,417, p<0.01). Yüksek sanal kaytarma yapanlar için ise bu
ilişki daha zayıftır (B=0,151, p<0.01). Çalışmanın bulgularından hareketle,
kuruma yönelik psikolojik sahiplenmenin artırılmasının, sanal kaytarma oranını
düşürülmesinin, yenilikçi iş davranışını artırabileceği, bu durumun kurumsal
başarıya katkı sağlayabileceği söylenebilir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Psikolojik sahiplenme, yenilikçi iş davranışı, sanal kaytarma, düzenleyici

Kaynakça

• Afsar B., Y. Badirb, M.M. Khan (2015), “Person–Job Fit, Person–Organization Fit and Innovative Work Behavior: The Mediating Role of Innovation Trust”, Journal of High TechnologyManagement Research, 26, 105–116.
• Aiken, L.S., S.G. West (1991), Multiple Regression Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Newbury Park, CA Sage.
• Alp M. (2007), Örgütlerde Psikolojik Sahiplenme ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık, Kütahya: Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
• Alpar, C.R. (2003), Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Yöntemlere Giriş 1, 2. Baskı, Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
• Åmo, B.W., L. Kolvereid (2005), Organizational Strategy, Individual Personality and Innovation Behavior, Journal of Enterprising Culture, 13(01), 7-19.
• Anandarajan, M., C.A. Simmers (2005), “Developing Human Capital Through Personal Web Use in the Workplace: Mapping Employee Perceptions”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15, 776-791.
• Askew K., J. Bukner, M. Taing, A. İlie, J. Bauer, M. Coovert (2014), “Explaining Cyberloafing: The Role of Theory Planned Behavior”, Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 510-519.
• Avey, J.B., B.J. Avolio, C.D. Crossley, F. Luthans (2009), “Psychological Ownership: Theoretical Extensions, Measurement and Relation to Work Outcomes”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 173-191.
• Baer M., G. Brown (2012), “Blind in One Eye: How Psychological Ownership of Ideas Affects the Types of Suggestions People Adopt”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 60–71.
• Baturay M.H., S. Toker S. (2015), “An Investigation of the Impact of Demographic on Cyberloafing from an Educational Setting Angle”, Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 358-366.
• Blanchard, A., C.A. Henle (2008), “Correlates of Different Forms of Cyberloafing: The Role of Norms and External Locus of Control”, Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1067-1084.
• Biçkes, D.M. (2016), “Psikolojik Sahiplenme ile Rol Ötesi Davranışlar Arasındaki İlişki: Örgüt Temelli Özsaygının Aracılık Etkisi”, IV. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi, 4-5 Kasım, 521-526.
• Cheng, L., L. Wenli, Q. Zhai, R. Smyth (2014), “Understanding Personal Use of the Internet at Work: An Integrated Model of Neutralization Techniques and General Deterrence Theory”, Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 220-228.
• Çalışkan, A., İ. Akkoç (2012), “The Effects of Entrepreneurship Behavior and Innovative Behavior on Job Performance: Mediating Role of Environmental Uncertainty”, Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 1-29.
• Çınar O, F. Karcıoğlu (2015), Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 207, 444-453.
• Çokluk Ö., G. Şekercioğlu, Ş. Büyüköztürk (2012), Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik, 2. Baskı, Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• De Lara, P.Z.M., D.V. Tacoronte, J.M.T. Ding (2006), “Do Current Anti-Cyberloafing Disciplinary Practices Have a Replica in Research Findings_ A Study of The Effects of Coercive Strategies on Workplace Internet Misuse”, Internet Research, 16(4), 450-467.
• Demirkaya, H., A. Şimşek Kandemir (2014), “21. Yüzyılın Anahtar Rekabet Faktörü Olan Psikolojik Sahiplenme Üzerine Bir İşletme İncelemesi”, Çalışma Dünyası Degisi, 2(3), 7-21.
• Dhar Rajib, L. (2015), “The Affects of High Performance Human Resource Practices on Service Innovative Behaviour”, International Journal of HospitalityManagement, 51, 67–75.
• Dinçer, H., G. Gencer, N. Orhan, K. Şahinbaş (2011), “The Significance of Emotional Intelligence on the Innovative Work Behavior of Managers as Strategic Decision-Makers”, ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 909–919.
• Gürbüz, S., F. Şahin (2016), Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Henle, C.A., G. Kohut, R. Booth (2009), “Designing Electronic Use Policies to Enhance Employee Perceptions of Fairness and to Reduce Cyberloafing: An Empirical Test of Justice Theory”, Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 902-910.
• Henssen, B., W. Voordeckers, F. Lambrechts, M. Koiranen (2014), “The CEO Autonomy–Stewardship Behavior Relationship in Family Firms: The Mediating Role of Psychological Ownership”, Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5, 312–322.
• Hu L. T., P.M. Bentler (1999), “Cut off Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives”, Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
• İspir, D. (2014), “Knowledge as an Object of Psychological Ownership and Knowledge Hıdıng Via Territoriality Among Knowledge Workers”, Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Manisa.
• Janssen, O. (2000), “Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort-Reward Fairness and Innovative Work Behaviour”, Journal of Occupational and OrganizationalPsychology, 73, 287-302.
• Kaplan, M., A.Ş. Çetinkaya (2014), “Meaningful Differences Between Demographic Features and Cyberloafing: Case in Hotel Business”, Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 25(1), 26-34.
• Karadal, H., Akyazı, T.E. (2015), “Psikolojik Sahiplenme ile Etik Olmayan Örgüt Yanlısı Davranışlar Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi Üzerinde Aksaray İlinde Bir Araştırma”, 3. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi, 5-8 Kasım, Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi İİBF İşletme Bölümü, Tokat.
• Kessel M., H. Hannemann-Webera, J. Kratzerb (2012), “Innovative Work Behavior in Healthcare: The Benefit of Operational Guidelines in the Treatment of Rare Diseases”, Health Policy, 105, 146– 153.
• Kim S.J., S. Byrne (2011), “Conceptualizing personal web usage in work contexts: A preliminary framework”, Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2271-2283.
• Köse S., L. Oral, H. Türesin (2012), İş Yaşamında Sosyal Kolaylaştırma Kavramı ve Sanal Kaytarma ile İlişkisi: Araştırma Görevlileri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma, Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 4(1), 287-295.
• Lim, V., T. Teo (2005), “Prevalence, Perceived Seriousness, Justification and Regulation of Cyberloafing in Singapore: An Exploratory Study”, Information & Management, 42, 1081-1093.
• Lim, V.K.G. (2002), “The IT Way of Loafing on the Job: Cyberloafing, Neutralizing and Organizational Justice”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(5), 675-694.
• Maslach, C., M.P. Leiter (1997), The Truth about Burnout How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and what to do about it, San Francisco: CA Jossey-Bass.
• McGuirk, H., Lenihan, H., Hart, M. (2015), “Measuring the impact of innovative human capital on small firms’ Propensity to Innovate”, Research Polic, 44(4), 965–976.
• Öğüt A., Aksay K., Erbil C. (2014). İşletme Yönetiminde Yenilikçilik Paradigmasının Değişimi: Yenilikçilik Kültürü Bileşenlerinin Bibliyografik Taraması ve Derlenmesi, 2. Örgütsel Davranış Kongre Kitabı, 80-89.
• Ötken, A.B. (2015), “Algılanan Örgütsel Destek Ve Psikolojik Sahiplenme Arasındaki İlişki ve Bu İlişkide Örgütsel Adaletin Rolü”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 33( 2), 113-140.
• Özkalp E., U. Aydın, S. Tekeli (2012), “Sapkın Örgütsel Davranışlar ve Çalışma Yaşamında Yeni Bir Olgu: Sanal Kaytarma (Cyberloafing) ve İş İlişkilerine Etkileri”, Çimento İşveren Sendikası Dergisi, 26(2), 18-33.
• Pierce, J.L., T. Kostova, K.T. Dirks (2001), ‘Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations’, Academy of Management Review, 26, 298–310.
• Pierce, J.L., T. Kostova, K. Dirks (2003), ‘The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research’, Review of General Psychology, 7, 84–107.
• Pierce, J.L., O’Driscoll, M.P., Coghlan, A. (2004), ‘Work Environment Structure and Psychological Ownership: The Mediating Effects of Control’, Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 507–34.
• Pierce, J.L., I. Jussila (2010), “Collective Psychological Ownership Within the Work and Organizational Context: Construct Introduction and Elaboration”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 810–834.
• Ramos, H.M., T.W. Yan Man, M.Z. Mustafa (2014), “Psychological Ownership in Small Family Firms: Family and Non-Family Employees’ Work Attitudes and Behaviours”, Journal of Family Business , 5, 300–311.
• Sawitri, H.S.R., (2012), “Role of Internet Experience in Moderating Influence of Work Stressor on Cyberloafing”, Procedia – Social Behavioral Sciences, 57, 320-324.
• Scott, S.G., R.A. Bruce (1994). “Determinants of Innovationbehavior: A Path Model of Individual innovation in the work place”, Academy of Management Journal, 37,580-607.
• Sheikh, A., M.S. Atashgah, M. Adibzadegan (2015), “The Antecedents of Cyberloafing: A Case Study in an Iranian Copper Industry”, Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 172-129.
• Shu S.B., J. Peck (2011), “Psychological Ownership and Affective Reaction: Emotional Attachment Process Variables and the Endowment Effect”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 439–452.
• Sieger, P., T. Zellweger, K. Aquino (2013), “Turning Agents into Psychological Principals: Aligning Interests of Non-Owners Through Psychological Ownership”, Journal of Management Studies, 50(3): 361-387.
• Taştan Bal Ş., S.M. Davoudi (2015), “An Examination of the Relationship between Leader-Member Exchange and Innovative Work Behavior withthe Moderating Role of Trust in Leader: A Study in the Turkish”, Context, 3rd International Conference on Leadership, Technology and Innovation Management, Procedia - Social and BehavioralSciences, 181, 23 – 32.
• Turgut, E., M. Begenirbaş (2013), “Çalışanların Yenilikçi Davranışları Üzerinde Sosyal Sermaye ve Yenilikçi İklimin Rolü: Sağlık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma”, KHO Bilim Dergisi, 23(2), 101-124.
• Turgut, H., (2014), Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin İşletme Performansına Etkisinde İç Girişimciliğin Aracılık Rolü, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(3), 29-62.
• Uslu, T., G. Eser, A. Noyan, D. Çubuk (2015), “Örgütsel Yenilikçiliğin Olumlu Liderlik Aracılığıyla Çalışanlara Etkilerinin İncelenmesi”, 3. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi, 5-8 Kasım, Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi İİBF İşletme Bölümü, Tokat.
• Van Doorn, O.N. (2011), Cyberloafing: A Multi-Dimensional Construct Placed in a Theoretical Framework Master Thesis. Department Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.
• Wagner, S.H., P. Parker, N.D. Christiansen (2003), “Employees that Think and Act Like Owners: Effects of Ownership Beliefs and Behaviors on Organizational Effectiveness”, Personnel Psychology, 56, 847-871.
• Wisse, B., D. Barelds, E.F. Rietzschel (2015), “How Innovative is your Employee? The Role of Employee and Supervisor Dark Triad Personality Traits in Supervisor Perceptions of Employee Innovative Behavior”, Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 158–162.
• Yeşil Ü., A. Bancar, G. Budak (2015), “Psikolojik Sahiplik Kavramına İlişkin Bir Literatür İncelemesi”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(2), 59-82.
• Yılmaz V., E. Çelik (2009), “Lisrel ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi I”, Ankara: PegemAkademi.
• Yoğun, A.E. (2015), “Cyberloafing and Innovative Work Behavior Among Banking Sector Employees”, International Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(10), 61-71.
• Yunus, O.M., H.A. Bustaman, M.R. Wan, F.A. Wan (2014), “Conducive Business Environment: Local Government Innovative Work Behavior”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 214 – 220.