Çin Tipi Küreselleşme: OBOR ve CPEC Örneği (2013-2020)

Öz

Bu çalışmada Çin'in küreselleşme çağındaki yükselişi ve özellikle Tek Kuşak Bir Yol'un “Çin tipi” ile ayırt edici bir küreselleşme biçimini temsil edip etmediği analiz edilmektedir. Neoklasik realist teoriden hareketle Çin'in OBOR politikası gibi küresel yapıların ve yerel faktörlerin dış politika davranışını nasıl etkilediği ve şekillendirdiği de makalede incelenen konular arasında yer almaktadır. Ayrıca, stratejik açıdan en önemli OBOR girişimi olan Çin-Pakistan Ekonomik Koridoru'nun kökenlerini ve gelişimini, Pakistan'ın kalkınma modelini nasıl şekillendirdiğine özel olarak odaklanarak incelemektedir. Bu makale, geniş spektrumda OBOR politikasını ve kesin olarak CPEC'yi teşvik etmek için destekleyici olan küreselleşme faktöründen yararlanmaktadır. Ayrıca dış politikaların küreselleşen ekonomik dünyanın ışığında şekillendiği ve karşılıklı çıkara dayalı kazan-kazan işbirliği kapsamında ortak olma tercihlerinin göz ardı edilemeyeceği bir vakte ihtiyaç olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak makale, CPEC planının ve OBOR girişiminin "Çin'in Küreselleşme yolunu" ne kadar temsil ettiğini değerlendirmektedir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çin-Pakistan Ekonomik Koridoru(CPEC),
• iç politika,
• dış politika,
• küreselleşme,
• Bir Kuşak Bir yol (OBOR)

Globalization with Chinese Characteristics: A Case Study of OBOR and CPEC (2013-2020)

Öz

In this study, China's rise in the age of globalization and especially whether One Belt One Road represents a distinctive form of globalization with "Chinese characteristics" is analyzed. Based on the neoclassical realist theory, how global structures and local factors affect and shape foreign policy behavior, such as China's OBOR policy, is among the topics explored in the article. It also examines the origins and development of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, the most strategically important OBOR initiative, with a special focus on how Pakistan has shaped its development model. This paper draws upon the globalization factor, which is being supportive to promote OBOR policy in broad-spectrum and CPEC in precise. It also shows the need of hour where foreign policies are shaped in the light of globalized economic world and choices of becoming partners under the win-win cooperation due to mutual interest cannot be overlooked. Ultimately, the article evaluates how much the CPEC plan and the OBOR initiative represent "China's way of Globalization".

Anahtar Kelimeler

• China-Pakistan Economic Corridor(CPEC),
• domestic politics,
• foreign policy, Globalization, One Belt One Road(OBOR).

Kaynakça

1. Baloch, K. (2015), Chinese operations in Balochistan again targeted by militants,The Diplomat, https://thediplomat.com, 18 February 2021.
2. Bilal,S.H.(2017), India has nothing to fear from China’s Belt and Road. The Diplomat, https://thediplomat.com, 8 February 2021.
3. Birdsall,N.(1999), Globalization and the Developing Countries: The Inequality Risk, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, https://carnegieendowment.org/1999/03/18/globalization-and-developing-countries-inequality-risk-pub-38, 9 February 2021.
4. Brungs, M. (2013), China and its Regional Role, Short Term Policy Brief 77, Europe China Research and Advice Network (ECRAN), Vol.4.pp256-524.
5. China Daily, (2017), Xi’s Statements of the Belt and Road Initiative, http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2017 04/15/content_28940829_5.htm, 4 February 2021.
6. Clarke, M. (2020), "Beijing’s Pivot West: The Convergence of Innenpolitik and Aussenpolitik on China’s ‘Belt and Road’?" Journal of Contemporary China, Vol.29, pp.336-353.
7. Firoozabadi, J. D. & Ashkezari, M. Z. (2016), "Neo-classical realism in international relations", Asian Social Science, Vol.12, pp.95-99.
8. Fish, I. S. (2016), Crouching Tiger, Sleeping Giant, Foreign Policy.

9. Friedman, T. L. (2006), "The world is flat: The globalized world in the twenty-first century", Penguin London.
10. Garver, J. W. (2012), "The diplomacy of a rising China in South Asia". Orbis, Vol.56, pp. 391-411.
11. Gilpin, R. (1981), "War and Change in World Politics", pp.94–95.
12. Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q. & Arshad, H. (2015), "One Belt and One Road: Does China-Pakistan Economic Corridor benefit for Pakistan's Economy?" Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, Vol.6,pp. 200-207.
13. Jamal, U. (2018), Why Did China Pull Support for Pakistan at the Financial Action Task Force? The Diplomat , https://thediplomat.com, 8 February 2021.
14. Jung, S. C. & Lee, K. (2017), "The Offensive Realists Are Not Wrong: China's Growth and Aggression, 1976–2001", Pacific Focus, Vol.32, pp. 86-108.
15. Khetran, M. S. (2017), "Indian Interference in Balochistan". Strategic Studies, Vol. 37, pp.112-125.
16. Listerud,A.(2017), A Tale of Two Rail Lines: China and Japan’s Soft Power Competition in Indonesia, The Diplomat, https://thediplomat.com, 9 February 2021.
17. Li, X. (2017), "The Rise of Emerging Powers & China and the Enlargement of Room for Maneuver and Upward Mobility".
18. Mardell, J. (2020), The BRI in Pakistan: China’s flagship economic corridor, https://merics.org/en/analysis/bri-pakistan-chinas-flagship-economic-corridor, 9 February 2021.
19. Markey, D. S. & West, J. (2016), "Behind China’s gambit in Pakistan", Council on Foreign Relations, Vol.5, p. 31.
20. Mcgrew, A. (1990), A Global Society in: Stuart Hall, David Held and Anthony McGrew, Modernity and Its Futures. Polity Press, Cambridge.
21. Noshab, F. (2006), "Globalization, WTO and Pakistan", The Muslim World, Vol.96, pp. 341–362.
22. Rana, K. S. (2017), "China’s Belt and road Initiative (BRI): implications, prospects & consequences: impact on India & its China diplomacy." ICS Occasional Paper, No.16.
23. Reich, S. (1998), "What is globalization?: Four possible answers", Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies.
24. R", G. (1998), Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy",World Politics, Vol.51, pp. 144-172.
25. Rosenau, J. N. (1969), "Toward the study of national-international linkages", Linkage Politics, pp. 44-63.
26. Schweller, R.L. (2004), "Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing", International Security, Vol. 29 No.2, pp.159-201,The MIT Press.
27. Schweller, R.L. (2018), "Opposite but Compatible Nationalisms: A Neoclassical Realist Approach to the Future of US–China Relations." The Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol.11, No.1, pp. 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poy003
28. Shah, A. R. (2018), "How Does China–Pakistan Economic Corridor Show the Limitations of China's ‘One Belt One Road’Model", Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, Vol.5, pp. 378-385.
29. Shah, S. & Page, J.( 2015), "China readies $46 billion for Pakistan trade route", Wall Street Journal, No.16.
30. Sinha, A. (2016), "Globalizing India", Cambridge University Press.
31. Smith, N. R. (2018), "Can neoclassical realism become a genuine theory of International Relations?" The Journal of Politics, Vol. 80, pp. 742-749.
32. Stake, R. E. (2005), "Qualitative case studies", The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.),pp.443-466.
33. Stanzel, A.(2019), "China’s BRI and Europe response". The American Institute for Contemporary German Studies , https://www.aicgs.org/publication/chinas-bri-and-europes-response/ 3 February 2021.
34. Sutter, R. G. (2012), "Chinese foreign relations: Power and policy since the Cold War", Rowman & Littlefield, Vol.86, p. 16.
35. Waltz, K. N. (1979), "Theory of International Politics", pp. 127–28.
36. Wenshan,J.(2017), Now globalization with Chinese characteristics, https://yaleglobal.yale.edu, 11February 2021.
37. Wolf JR, C., Dalal, S., Davanzo, J., Larson, E. V., Akhmedjonov, A., Dogo, H., Huang, M. & Montoya, S. (2011), "China and India, 2025: A comparative assessment,. Rand National Defense Research Inst Santa Monica Ca.