Aftershock: Earthquake In New York Filmi Üzerine Bir Afet Sosyolojisi İncelemesi

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 298 - 311, 31.05.2022

Ruhi Can Alkın

https://doi.org/10.33709/ictimaiyat.1038021

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışmada, bir Hollywood yapımı olan Aftershock: Earthquake in New York adlı filmdeki sahne, kurgu ve diyaloglar, afet sosyolojisi alt disiplininin bazı teorik yönelimleri göz önünde bulundurularak analiz edilmiştir. Afet ve toplum konusunun kapsamına girebilecek “afet öncesi toplumsal düzene yeniden dönme”, “afet müdahalesi ve iyileştirme aşamaları”, “afet, toplumsal dayanışma ve kolektif bilinç” ve benzeri temalar, filmin bir metin olarak ele alındığı incelemede betimsel analiz ve yapısökümcü yaklaşım ışığında tartışmaya sunulmuştur. Makale, iletişimbilim ve medya çalışmaları kapsamındaki teorik ve metodolojik çıktılardan ziyade, afet sosyolojisinin teorik çıktılarına ağırlık vermiştir. Çalışma, Türkçe literatürde bir sinema filmi üzerine yapılmış ilk afet sosyolojisi incelemesi olma iddiasını taşımaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Afet, Toplumsal yaşam, Afet sosyolojisi, Sinema filmi, Afet, Toplumsal yaşam, Afet sosyolojisi, Sinema filmi

Teşekkür

Çalışmanın metodoloji bölümünde desteğini esirgemeyen Selçuk Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi öğretim elemanı Deniz Kurtyılmaz hocama minnetle.

An Inquiry of Sociology of Disaster on Aftershock: Earthquake in New York Movie

Öz

In this study, scenes, fiction and dialogues in Aftershock: Earthquake in New York movie, a Hollywood production, have been analyzed by considering some theoretical trends of the sub-discipline of sociology of disaster. In the analysis, where the movie is dealt as a text, themes such as “turning back to pre-disaster social order”, “disaster response and recovery phases”, “disaster, social solidarity and collective consciousness” have been bringing into question in the light of descriptive analysis and deconstructionist approach. The article is based heavily on the theoretical outputs of the sociology of disaster rather than theoretical and methodological outputs of communication science and media studies. Study claims to be the first inquiry of sociology of disaster on a cinema movie written in Turkish literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Disaster, Social life, Sociology of disaster, Cinema movie, Disaster, Social life, Sociology of disaster, Cinema movie

Kaynakça

• Abraham, M. vd. (Yapımcılar), & Cuaron, A. (Yönetmen). (2006). Children of Men [Sinema Filmi]. İngiltere, ABD ve Japonya: Universal Pictures.
• Adeola, F. O., & Picou, J. S. (2012). Race, Social Capital, and the Health Impacts of Katrina: Evidence from the Louisiana and Mississippi Gulf Coast. Human Ecology Review, 19(1), 10-24.
• Akkuş, Z., & Efe, T. (2016). Doğal Çevre Felaketlerinin Suça Etkisi. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 1-24.
• Aldrich, D. P. (2010). Separate and Unequal: Post-Tsunami Aid Distribution in Southern India. Social Science Quarterly, 91(5), 1369-1389.
• Alkın, R. C. (2021). Bütünleşik Afet Yönetimine Sosyolojik Bakış: Toplumsal Yapı, İşlev ve Temel Kavramlar Işığında Bir Okuma Denemesi. Medeniyet ve Toplum Dergisi, 5(1), 18-34.
• Bourque, L. B., Siegel, J. M., Kano, M., & Wood, M. M. (2007). Morbidity and Mortality Associated with Disasters. Handbook of Disaster Research, H. Rodriguez, E. L. Quarantelli & R. Dynes (Eds.), p. 97-111. New York: Springer.
• Can, İ. (2020) (Edt). Afet Sosyolojisi. Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi.
• Col, J. M. (2007). Managing Disasters: The Role of Local Government. Public Administration Review, 67, 114-124.
• Daines, G. E. (1991). Planning, Training, and Exercising. Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government, T. E. Drabek & G. J. Hoetmer (Eds.), p. 161-200. Washington DC: International City Management Association.
• Derrida, J. (1971). The Deconstruction of Actuality: An Interview with Jacques Derrida. Deconstruction: Critical Concepts in Literary and Cultural Studies Vol. 4, J. Culler (Edt.), p. 245-272. New York: Routledge.
• Drabek, T. E., & McEntire, D. A. (2003). Emergent Phenomena and the Sociology of Disaster: Lessons, Trends and Opportunities from the Research Literature. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 12(2), 97-112.
• Durkheim, E. (1994). Sosyolojik Metodun Kuralları. (çev: Enver Aytekin). Ankara: Sosyal Yayınları.
• Emmerich, R. vd. (Yapımcılar), & Emmerich, R. (Yönetmen). (2009). 2012 [Sinema Filmi]. ABD: Columbia Pictures.
• Emmerich, R., & Gordon, M. (Yapımcılar), & Emmerich, R. (Yönetmen). (2004). The Day After Tomorrow [Sinema Filmi]. ABD: Centropolis Entertainment Lions Gate Films The Mark Gordon Company.
• Fischer, H . W. (1998). Response to Disaster: Fact Versus Fiction & Its Perpetuation: The Sociology of Disaster (2nd Edition). New York: University Press of America.
• Flynn, B. vd. (Yapımcı), & Peyton, B. (Yönetmen). (2015). San Andreas [Sinema Filmi]. ABD: New Line Cinema.
• Giddens, A. (1991). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Hobson, C. (2014). Human Security After the Shock: Vulnerability and the Empowerment. Human Security and Natural Disasters, C. Hobson, P. Bacon & R. Cameron (Eds.), p. 22-35. New York: Routledge.
• Kılıç, Y. (2015). Hobbes, Locke ve Rousseau’da “Doğa Durumu” Düşüncesi. Temaşa Felsefe Dergisi, 2, 97-117.
• Kennedy, K. & Wilson, C. (Yapımcılar), & Spielberg, S. (Yönetmen). (2006). War of the Worlds [Sinema Filmi]. ABD: Amblin Entertainment Cruise/Wagner Productions.
• Krishna, R., Ronan, K., Spencer, C., & Alisic, E. (2021). The Lived Experience of Disadvantaged Communities Affected by the 2015 South Indian floods: Implications for Disaster Risk Reduction Dialogue. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 54, 102-146.
• Latt, D. M. (Yapımcı), & Latt, D. M. (2009). Megafault [Sinema Filmi]. ABD: The Asylum.
• Lee, T. &, Mokhtarian, T. L. (2008). Correlations Between Industrial Demands (Direct and Total) for Communications and Transportation in the U.S. Economy 1947–1997. Transportation, 35, 1-22.
• Leiserowitz, A. A. (2004). Day After Tomorrow: Study of Climate Change Risk Perception. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 46(9), 22-39.
• Lewis, W. M. (1936). The Significance of Transportation to Civilization. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 187(1), 1-6.
• Lindell, M. K. (2019) (edt.). The Routledge Handbook of Urban Disaster Resilience: Integrating Mitigation, Preparedness, and Recovery Planning. London: Routledge.
• Lucini, B. (2014). Disaster Resilience from a Sociological Perspective: Exploring Three Italian Earthquakes as Models for Disaster Resilience Planning. Dordrecht: Springer.
• Methmann C., & Rothe, D. (2012). Politics for the Day After Tomorrow: The Logic of Apocalypse in Global Climate Politics. Security Dialogue, 43(4), 323-344.
• Middleton, J. (2010). Sense and the City: Exploring the Embodied Geographies of Urban Walking. Social & Cultural Geography, 11(6), 575-596.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Milliyet Gazetesi (1999). Gölcük’te Ekmek ve Su Karaborsada, 18.08.1999, http://gazetearsivi.milliyet.com.tr/Ara.aspx?&ilkTar=18.08.1999&sonTar=19.08.1999&ekYayin=&drpSayfaNo=&araKelime=ya%c4%9fma&gelismisKelimeAynen=&gelismisKelimeHerhangi=&gelismisKelimeYakin=&gelismisKelimeHaric=&Siralama=RANK%20DESC&SayfaAdet=20&isAdv=true (Son erişim tarihi: 02.09.2021)
• Moran, B. (1994). Edebiyat Kuramları ve Eleştiri, 9. Baskı. İstanbul: iletişim Yayıncılık.
• Paton, D., Smith, L., & Violanti, J. (2000). Disaster Response: Risk, Vulnerability and Resilience. Disaster Prevention and Management, 9(3), 173-179.
• Perry, R. W., Lindell, M. K., & Tierney, K. J. (2001). Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States. Washington D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.
• Pinkowski, J. (2008). Disaster Management Handbook. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
• Richmond, R. (Yapımcı), & Laifa, J. (Yönetmen). (2006). 10.5: Apocalypse [Sinema Filmi]. ABD: Hallmark Entertainment, Muse Entertainment.
• Rose, L., Dezecache, G., Powell, T., Chokron, S., & Kovarski, K. (2021). The Emergency of Prosociality: a Developmental Perspective on Altruism and Human Prosocial Behavior in the Face of Disaster. PsyArXiv, Available at. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6b5z4 (Son erişim tarihi: 10.11.2021).
• Satır, M. E., & Çetin, C. (2019). Toplumsal Gerçekliğin İdeolojik İnşasında Bir Kitle İletişim Aracı Olarak Sinemanın Rolü: Potemkin Zırhlısı Filmi Örneği. Anadolu Üniversitesi İletişim Bilimleri Fakültesi Uluslararası Hakemli Dergisi, 27(2), 129-146.
• Stallings, R. A. (1988). Conflict in Natural Disasters: A Codification of Consensus and Conflict Theories. Social Science Quarterly, 69, 569-586.
• Ullberg, S. B. (2018). Learning from Loss? The Politics of Memory and Morality in the Post-Disaster. RCC Perspectives, 3, 79-84.
• Waring, S. C. & Brown, B. J. (2005). The Threat of Communicable Diseases Following Natural Disasters: A Public Health Response. Disaster Management & Response, 3(2), 41-47.
• Waugh, W. L. (2000). Living with Hazards, Dealing with Hazards: An Introduction to Emergency Management. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
• Wilson, G. A. (2015). Community Resilience and Social Memory. Environmental Values, 24(2), 227-257.
• Wunderlich, F. M. (2008). Walking and Rhythmicity: Sensing Urban Space. Journal of Urban Design, 13(1), 125-139.
• Zack, N. (2006). Philosophy and Disaster. Homeland Security Affairs, 11(1), Published Online, available at https://www.hsaj.org/articles/176 (Son erişim tarihi: 07.11.2021).