Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Evaluating the effectiveness of the sponge city approach: a comparative analysis of Chinese and Dutch applications

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 50, 44 - 67, 31.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.1633234

Öz

The increasing effects of climate change are deepening water-related problems in cities, such as floods, water scarcity, and droughts. The Sponge City approach, developed in response to these problems, centers nature-based solutions in urban water management. The main objective of this study is to comparatively examine the Sponge City applications in China and the Netherlands, which are pioneers in climate change adaptation policies and have different planning regimes, in order to evaluate the multidimensional effectiveness and long-term sustainability of the Sponge City approach. In this study, performance indicators were determined using a systematic content analysis as the method, and leading projects from China (Zhongguancun Life Science Park, East Lake Greenway) and the Netherlands (Benthemplein Water Square, Park 21 Master Plan) were examined. The findings indicate that Chinese practices exhibit high technical performance and high benefit-cost ratios, but this comes with high sustainability risks due to central financing and high maintenance intensity. In contrast, Dutch practices stand out for their low technical risk and high social acceptance (governance). It is emphasized that the effectiveness of sponge city applications is largely dependent on the geographical and local context, and that supportive policies, community participation, and interdisciplinary collaboration are crucial for successful implementations.

Kaynakça

  • Anguelovski, I., & Carmin, J. (2011). Something borrowed, everything new: Innovation and institutionalization in urban climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3, 169–175.
  • Aşıcı, A. A., & Şahin, Ü. (Eds.). (2017). Yeşil ekonomi. Tohum Yayıncılık Turizm Reklam ve Sağlık Hizmetleri.
  • Bekkers, K. (2017). Park21. Retrieved January 10, 2025, from https://www.ruimteenwonen.nl/artikelen/samen-maken-we-park21
  • Calthorpe, P. (2010). Urbanism in the age of climate change. Island Press.
  • Carmona, M. (2021). Public places urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Routledge.
  • Chan, F. K. S., Chen, W. Y., Gu, X., Peng, Y., & Sang, Y. (2022). Transformation towards resilient sponge cities in China. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3(2), 99–101.
  • China State Construction Engineering Corporation. (2024). CSCEC promotes regional green and low-carbon development through multiple projects. Retrieved November 14, 2025, from https://www.cscec.com
  • Dai, L., van Rijswick, H. F., Driessen, P. P., & Keessen, A. M. (2020). Governance of the Sponge City Programme in China with Wuhan as a case study. In Urban resilience to droughts and floods (pp. 106–124). Routledge.
  • Davoudi, S., Crawford, J., & Mehmood, A. (Eds.). (2009). Planning for climate change: Strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners. Earthscan.
  • De Urbanisten. (2017). Watersquare Benthemplein. Retrieved January 15, 2025, from https://www.urbanisten.nl/work/benthemplein
  • Fletcher, T. D., Shuster, W., Hunt, W. F., Ashley, R., Butler, D., Arthur, S., & Viklander, M. (2015). SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more—The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water Journal, 12(7), 525–542.
  • Gagnon-Lebrun, F., & Agrawala, S. (2007). Implementing adaptation in developed countries: An analysis of progress and trends. Climate Policy, 7(5), 392–408.
  • Han, J., Wang, C., Deng, S., & Lichtfouse, E. (2023). China’s sponge cities alleviate urban flooding and water shortage: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 1–18.
  • Hope, K. R. (2009). Climate change and urban development in Africa. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 66(5), 643–658.
  • Jiménez Ariza, S. L., Martínez, J. A., Muñoz, A. F., Quijano, J. P., Rodríguez, J. P., Camacho, L. A., & Díaz-Granados, M. (2019). A multicriteria planning framework to locate and select sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS) in consolidated urban areas. Sustainability, 11(8), 2312.
  • Kazancı, G., Gülümser, A. A., & Costa, J. P. (2025). Sponge city concepts in contemporary literature: Trends, thematic clusters and challenges for sustainable urban water management. Urban Water Journal, 1–20.
  • Kumar, N., Liu, X., Narayanasamydamodaran, S., & Pandey, K. K. (2021). A systematic review comparing urban flood management practices in India to China’s sponge city program. Sustainability, 13(11), 6346.
  • Li, H., Ding, L., Ren, M., Li, C., & Wang, H. (2017). Sponge city construction in China: A survey of the challenges and opportunities. Water, 9(9), 594.
  • Li, Y., Li, H. X., Huang, J., & Liu, C. (2020). An approximation method for evaluating flash flooding mitigation of sponge city strategies: A case study of Central Geelong. Journal of Cleaner Production, 257, 120525.
  • Liu, H., Jia, Y., & Niu, C. (2017). Sponge city concept helps solve China’s urban water problems. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76, 1–5.
  • Liu, J., & Fan, B. (2023). What contributes to local-level institutional adaptation under climate change? A configurational approach based on evidence from China’s Sponge City Program. Journal of Environmental Management, 342, 118292.
  • Ma, Q., Shang, C., & Zhou, T. (2021). Study on the construction of sponge city: Based on international horizontal comparison. Urban Architecture, 18(4), 20–24.
  • Nezami, N., Tizghadam Ghazani, M., Zarghami, M., & Abbasi, M. (2023). Development of a system dynamics model for improving sustainable urban water management (Case study: Isfahan City). Journal of Water and Wastewater (Ab va Fazilab), 34(1), 1–24.
  • Nguyen, T. T., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W., Wang, X. C., Ren, N., Li, G., & Liang, H. (2019). Implementation of a specific urban water management—Sponge City. Science of the Total Environment, 652, 147–162.
  • Takeuchi, H., & Tanaka, H. (2020). Water reuse and recycling in Japan: History, current situation, and future perspectives. Water Cycle, 1, 1–12.
  • Turenscape. (2009). Sponge city projects. Retrieved October 25, 2025, from https://www.turenscape.com/en/about/management.html
  • Wang, H., Mei, C., Liu, J., & Shao, W. (2018). A new strategy for integrated urban water management in China: Sponge city. Science China Technological Sciences, 61, 317–329.
  • Wang, C., Hou, J., Miller, D., Brown, I., & Jiang, Y. (2019). Flood risk management in sponge cities: The role of integrated simulation and 3D visualization. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 39, 101139.
  • Xie, Y. (2016). Sponge city construction in China: Overall ideas and policy suggestions. Frontiers, 21, 29–37.
  • Yu, K., Li, D., & Li, N. (2006). The evolution of greenways in China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 76(1–4), 223–239.
  • Zeng, C., Aboagye, E. M., Li, H., & Che, S. (2023). Comments and recommendations on Sponge City—China’s solutions to prevent flooding risks. Heliyon, 9.

Sünger şehir yaklaşımının etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi: Çin ve Hollanda uygulamalarının karşılaştırmalı analizi

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 50, 44 - 67, 31.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.1633234

Öz

İklim değişikliğinin artan etkileri, kentlerde sel, su kıtlığı ve kuraklık gibi suyla ilgili problemleri derinleştirmektedir. Bu sorunlara yanıt olarak geliştirilen Sünger Şehir (Sponge City) yaklaşımı, kentsel su yönetiminde doğa tabanlı çözümleri merkeze almaktadır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, iklim değişikliğine uyum politikalarında öncü olan ve farklı planlama rejimlerine sahip olan Çin ve Hollanda sünger şehir uygulamalarını karşılaştırmalı olarak inceleyerek Sünger Şehir yaklaşımının çok boyutlu etkinliğini ve uzun vadeli sürdürülebilirliğini değerlendirmektir. Çalışmada yöntem olarak, sistematik bir içerik analizi ile performans göstergeleri belirlenmiş, Çin’den (Zhongguancun Life Science Park, East Lake Greenway) ve Hollanda’dan (Benthemplein Su Meydanı, Park 21 Master Planı) öncü projeler incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, Çin uygulamalarının yüksek teknik performans ve yüksek fayda-maliyet oranları sergilediğini, ancak bunun merkezi finansmana ve bakım yoğunluğuna bağlı olarak yüksek sürdürülebilirlik riskleri taşıdığını göstermektedir. Buna karşın, Hollanda uygulamaları düşük teknik risk ve yüksek toplumsal kabul (yönetişim) ile öne çıkmaktadır. Sonuçta, sünger şehir uygulamalarının etkinliğinin büyük ölçüde coğrafi ve yerel bağlama bağlı olduğu, başarılı uygulamalar için destekleyici politikaların, topluluk katılımının ve disiplinler arası iş birliğinin önemli olduğu vurgulanmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Anguelovski, I., & Carmin, J. (2011). Something borrowed, everything new: Innovation and institutionalization in urban climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3, 169–175.
  • Aşıcı, A. A., & Şahin, Ü. (Eds.). (2017). Yeşil ekonomi. Tohum Yayıncılık Turizm Reklam ve Sağlık Hizmetleri.
  • Bekkers, K. (2017). Park21. Retrieved January 10, 2025, from https://www.ruimteenwonen.nl/artikelen/samen-maken-we-park21
  • Calthorpe, P. (2010). Urbanism in the age of climate change. Island Press.
  • Carmona, M. (2021). Public places urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Routledge.
  • Chan, F. K. S., Chen, W. Y., Gu, X., Peng, Y., & Sang, Y. (2022). Transformation towards resilient sponge cities in China. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3(2), 99–101.
  • China State Construction Engineering Corporation. (2024). CSCEC promotes regional green and low-carbon development through multiple projects. Retrieved November 14, 2025, from https://www.cscec.com
  • Dai, L., van Rijswick, H. F., Driessen, P. P., & Keessen, A. M. (2020). Governance of the Sponge City Programme in China with Wuhan as a case study. In Urban resilience to droughts and floods (pp. 106–124). Routledge.
  • Davoudi, S., Crawford, J., & Mehmood, A. (Eds.). (2009). Planning for climate change: Strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners. Earthscan.
  • De Urbanisten. (2017). Watersquare Benthemplein. Retrieved January 15, 2025, from https://www.urbanisten.nl/work/benthemplein
  • Fletcher, T. D., Shuster, W., Hunt, W. F., Ashley, R., Butler, D., Arthur, S., & Viklander, M. (2015). SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more—The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water Journal, 12(7), 525–542.
  • Gagnon-Lebrun, F., & Agrawala, S. (2007). Implementing adaptation in developed countries: An analysis of progress and trends. Climate Policy, 7(5), 392–408.
  • Han, J., Wang, C., Deng, S., & Lichtfouse, E. (2023). China’s sponge cities alleviate urban flooding and water shortage: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 1–18.
  • Hope, K. R. (2009). Climate change and urban development in Africa. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 66(5), 643–658.
  • Jiménez Ariza, S. L., Martínez, J. A., Muñoz, A. F., Quijano, J. P., Rodríguez, J. P., Camacho, L. A., & Díaz-Granados, M. (2019). A multicriteria planning framework to locate and select sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS) in consolidated urban areas. Sustainability, 11(8), 2312.
  • Kazancı, G., Gülümser, A. A., & Costa, J. P. (2025). Sponge city concepts in contemporary literature: Trends, thematic clusters and challenges for sustainable urban water management. Urban Water Journal, 1–20.
  • Kumar, N., Liu, X., Narayanasamydamodaran, S., & Pandey, K. K. (2021). A systematic review comparing urban flood management practices in India to China’s sponge city program. Sustainability, 13(11), 6346.
  • Li, H., Ding, L., Ren, M., Li, C., & Wang, H. (2017). Sponge city construction in China: A survey of the challenges and opportunities. Water, 9(9), 594.
  • Li, Y., Li, H. X., Huang, J., & Liu, C. (2020). An approximation method for evaluating flash flooding mitigation of sponge city strategies: A case study of Central Geelong. Journal of Cleaner Production, 257, 120525.
  • Liu, H., Jia, Y., & Niu, C. (2017). Sponge city concept helps solve China’s urban water problems. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76, 1–5.
  • Liu, J., & Fan, B. (2023). What contributes to local-level institutional adaptation under climate change? A configurational approach based on evidence from China’s Sponge City Program. Journal of Environmental Management, 342, 118292.
  • Ma, Q., Shang, C., & Zhou, T. (2021). Study on the construction of sponge city: Based on international horizontal comparison. Urban Architecture, 18(4), 20–24.
  • Nezami, N., Tizghadam Ghazani, M., Zarghami, M., & Abbasi, M. (2023). Development of a system dynamics model for improving sustainable urban water management (Case study: Isfahan City). Journal of Water and Wastewater (Ab va Fazilab), 34(1), 1–24.
  • Nguyen, T. T., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W., Wang, X. C., Ren, N., Li, G., & Liang, H. (2019). Implementation of a specific urban water management—Sponge City. Science of the Total Environment, 652, 147–162.
  • Takeuchi, H., & Tanaka, H. (2020). Water reuse and recycling in Japan: History, current situation, and future perspectives. Water Cycle, 1, 1–12.
  • Turenscape. (2009). Sponge city projects. Retrieved October 25, 2025, from https://www.turenscape.com/en/about/management.html
  • Wang, H., Mei, C., Liu, J., & Shao, W. (2018). A new strategy for integrated urban water management in China: Sponge city. Science China Technological Sciences, 61, 317–329.
  • Wang, C., Hou, J., Miller, D., Brown, I., & Jiang, Y. (2019). Flood risk management in sponge cities: The role of integrated simulation and 3D visualization. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 39, 101139.
  • Xie, Y. (2016). Sponge city construction in China: Overall ideas and policy suggestions. Frontiers, 21, 29–37.
  • Yu, K., Li, D., & Li, N. (2006). The evolution of greenways in China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 76(1–4), 223–239.
  • Zeng, C., Aboagye, E. M., Li, H., & Che, S. (2023). Comments and recommendations on Sponge City—China’s solutions to prevent flooding risks. Heliyon, 9.
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Arazi Kullanımı ve Çevre Planlaması, Kentsel Alan Yönetimi, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Gamze Kazancı 0000-0002-6344-523X

Aliye Ahu Gülümser 0000-0001-9722-5131

Gönderilme Tarihi 4 Şubat 2025
Kabul Tarihi 17 Kasım 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Sayı: 50

Kaynak Göster

APA Kazancı, G., & Gülümser, A. A. (2025). Sünger şehir yaklaşımının etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi: Çin ve Hollanda uygulamalarının karşılaştırmalı analizi. İDEALKENT(50), 44-67. https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.1633234