State Politics and Islam in the Netherlands and Germany: The Case of Milli Görüş

Öz

This article examines how European state authorities are taking part in the shaping of Islam in Europe by comparing the impact of German and Dutch state policies on Islamic organisations such as Milli Görüş¸ a Turkish-origin political Islamic organisation. Milli Görüş ¸ in the Netherlands has cooperated with Dutch authorities and developed liberal Islamic interpretations, while German authorities list Milli Görüş¸ among the top threats to the constitution. The difference between German and Dutch Milli Görüş¸ has been created through the partially-exclusivist policies of Germany and the multicultural policies of the Netherlands. I suggest that, on the one hand, the Dutch socio-political system and multicultural policies actively promote public recognition of the Muslim community, provide for a transparent relationship between the state and Islamic organisations and make cooperation a more rewarding strategy for Islamic organisations to attain their goals. On the other hand, the German socio-political system and partially exclusivist policies provide limited venues for participation and recognition, promote distrust between political authority and Islamic organisations, and make court cases a more rewarding strategy for public recognition. This comparison may provide insights for European states on how to develop policies conducive to Muslim incorporation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Islam; Europe; Milli Görüş; Integration; State Policy; Turkish Muslims

Hollanda ve Almanya’da Devlet Politikaları ve İslam: Milli Görüş Örneği

Öz

Bu makale Avrupa devleti yetkililerinin Avrupa’da İslam’ın şekillenmesinde nasıl rol aldıklarını Alman ve Hollandalı devlet politikalarının Milli Görüş gibi bir Türk kökenli siyasal İslamcı örgüt üzerindeki etkilerini karşılaştırarak inceliyor. Hollanda'daki Milli Görüş Hollanda devletiyle işbirliği içerisine girdi ve liberal İslam yorumları geliştirdi ancak Alman yetkililer Milli Görüş’ü anayasayı en çok tehdit eden örgütler arasında listeliyor. Alman ve Hollanda Milli Görüş arasındaki fark Almanya’nın kısmen dışlayıcı ve Hollanda’nın çok kültürlülük politikalarının birer sonucu. Hollanda’nın sosyo-politik sistemi ve çok kültürlü politikaları Müslümanların tanınmasını aktif olarak teşvik ediyor; devlet ve İslami kuruluşlar arasında şeffaf bir ilişki sağlıyor ve işbirliğini İslami kuruluşların hedeflerine ulaşmaları için daha ödüllendirici bir strateji haline getiriyor. Öte yandan, Alman sosyo-politik sistem ve kısmen dışlayıcı politikaları katılım ve tanınma için kısıtlı bir alan sağlarken, siyasi otorite ve İslami kuruluşlar arasında karşılıklı güvensizliği teşvik ediyor ve mahkemelerde dava açmayı kamusal tanınma için daha ödüllendirici bir strateji haline getiriyor. Bu karşılaştırma Avrupa devletlerinin Müslümanları topluma entegre etmelerine yönelik politikaları nasıl geliştirebileceklerine ilişkin yollar gösteriyor.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İslam,Avrupa,Milli Görüş,entegrasyon,devlet politikaları,Türkiyeli Müslümanlar

Kaynakça

1. Abadan-Unat, N. ve Neşe Kemiksiz. (1986). Türk Dış Göçü (1960-1984). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları.
2. Andeweg B. Rudy ve Galen A. Irwin. (2002). Governance and Politics of the Netherlands. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Bowen, R. John. (2006). Why the French Don’t Like Headscarves: Islam, the State, and Public Space. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4. Cohen, Roger. (2001). “How Open to Immigrants Should Germany Be?” New York Times, Mayıs 13, p.11.
5. Dowes, D., de Koning, M. and Boender, W. (2005). Nederlandse Moslims: Van Migrant tot Burger. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
6. Dros, L. (2007). ‘AIVD wist van coup Milli Görüş,’ Trouw, 6 June, online at www.trouw.nl. Eickelman, D. (1976) Moroccan Islam. Austin: University of Texas Press.
7. Ewing, K.P. (2003). ‘Living Islam in the diaspora: between Turkey and Germany’, South Atlantic Quarterly, 102(2-3): 405-31.
8. Fetzer, S.J. and Soper, J.C. (2005). Muslims and the State in Britain, France, and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

9. Geertz, C. (1968). Islam Observed: Religious Development in Morocco and Indonesia. New Haven: Yale University Press.
10. German Federal Ministry of the Interior. (2004). “Annual Report of the Office for Protection of the Constitution 2003.” s. 190. Www.bmi.bund.de sitesinden 6 Haziran 2005’te alındı.
11. Giordano, R. (2007). ‘Nein und dreimal nein!’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 1 June, online at http://www.faz.net.
12. Hoffman, L. (1991). Das ‘‘Volk’’Zur ideologischen Struktur eines unvermeidbaren Begriffs’, Zeitschrift fu¨r Soziologie, 20(3): 191-208.
13. Islamiche Föderation in Berlin. (2005). “Schuljahr 2004-05”. http://www. islamiche-foederation.de/IRU/schuljahr200405.htm sitesinden 2 Şubat 2005’te alındı.
14. Jacobs, Dirk. (1998). “Discourse, politics and policy: the Dutch parliamentary debate about voting right for foreign residents.” The International Migration Review, 32, no. 2: 350-73.
15. Johnson, I. (2004). ‘Litigation suits groups of Muslims who seek legitimacy in Germany’, Wall Street Journal, 30 March, A1, A6.
16. Jonker, G. (2002). Eine Wellenlange zu Gott: der ‘‘Verband der Islamischen Kulturzentren’’ in Europa. Bielefeld: Transcript.
17. Kaya, Ayhan ve Ferhat Kentel. (2005). Euro-Turks a Bridge or a Breach between Turkey and the European Union?. Istanbul: Bilgi Yayınevi.
18. Klopp, B. (2002) ‘The political incorporation of EU foreigners before and after Maastricht: the new local politics in Germany’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(2): 239-57.
19. Knubbertz, A. (2000) ‘‘‘Das Berliner Modell’’ oder: die andere Art, Religionsunterricht zu organisieren’, in Fetzer, S.J. and Soper, J.C. (eds) Islamisher Religionsunterricht an staatlichen Schulen in Deutschland: Praxis-Konzepte-Perspektiven; Dokumnetation eines Fachgespraches. Berlin and Bonn: Beauftragte der Bundesregierung fur Auslanderfrage, 18-24.
20. Landman, N. (2001). ‘Dutch responses to Muslim religious practices’. Presentation for the Fachtagung der Katholische Akademie/Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 9-10 February.
21. Landman, N. (1997). “The Islamic Broadcasting Foundation in the Netherlands: Platform or Arena?” Islam in Europe: The Politics of Religion and Community yazısından, Steven Vertovec ve Ceri Peach tarafından düzenlenmiştir, 224-43. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Lijphart, A. (1968). Verzuiling, pacificatie en kentering in de Nederlandse politiek. Amsterdam: DeBussy.
22. Lindo, F. (1999). Heilige wijsheid in Amsterdam: Ayasofia, stadsdeel De Baarsjes en de strijd om het Riva-terrein. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
23. Pfaff, Steven ve Anthony J. Gill. (2006). “Will a Million Muslims March? Muslim Interest Organizations and Political Integration in Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 39, no. 7: 803-28.
24. Phalet, K. and Ter Wal. J. (eds) (2004). Moslim in Nederland. The Hague: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
25. Rath, P., Groenendijk, K. and Meyer, A. (eds) (2001). Western Europe and its Islam. Leiden: Brill. Schiffauer, W. (2000) Die Gottesmanner: Turkische Islamisten in Deutschland. Frankfurt-am-Main:Suhrkamp Taschenbuch.
26. Schiffauer, W. (2006). ‘Verfassungsschutz und islamische Gemeinden’, in Kemmesies, U.E. (ed.) Terrorismus und Extremismus: der Zukunft auf der Spur. Munich: Luchterhand, 237-54.
27. Schiffauer, W. (2000). Die Gottesmanner: Turkische Islamisten in Deutschland. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch.
28. Spuler-Stegemann, U. (2002). Muslime in Deutschland: Nebeneinander oder Miteinander? Freiburg: Herder.
29. Sunier, Thijl ve A. Meyer. (1995). “Chapter IV: Religion” in Immigrant Policy for a Multicultural Society: A Comparative Study of Integration, Language, and Religious Policy in Five Western European Countries, Hans Vermeulen tarafından düzenlenmiştir. Brussels: Migration Policy Group.
30. Tas, R. (2004). ‘Bijna een miljoen islamieten in Nederland’, Web Magazine, 20 September. Online at http://www.cbs.nl.
31. Ter Wal, J. (2005). Active Civil Participation of Immigrants in the Netherlands. Oldenburg: European Research Project POLITIS, online at www.uni-oldenburg.de/politis-europe.
32. Van Bommel, A. (1992). “The History of Muslim Umbrella Organizations.” In Islam in Dutch Society: Current Developments and Future Prospects, W.A.R. Shadid ve P.S. Koningsveld tarafından düzenlenmiştir, 124-43. Kampen, Netherlands: Kok Pharos.
33. Van Herten, M. (2007). “More than 850 thousand Muslims in the Netherlands,” Central Bureau voor de Statistiek, http://www.cbs.nl sitesinden 16 Nisan 2010’da alındı.
34. Van Mierlo, J.G.A. (1986). ‘Depillarisation and the decline of consociationalism in the Netherlands:1970-1985’, West European Politics, 9(1): 97-119.
35. Van Heelsum, A. (2002). ‘The relationship between political participation and civic community of migrants’, Journal of International Migration and Integration, 3(2): 179-200.
36. Van Westerloo, G. (2004). ‘Zwartekousen Moslims’, M Magazine. NRC Handelsblad, February.
37. Vasta, E. (2007). ‘From ethnic minorities to ethnic majority policy: multiculturalism and the shift to assimilationism in the Netherlands’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(5): 713-40.
38. Weber, B. (1995). ‘Immigration and politics in Germany’, The Journal of the International Institute, 2(3); online at http://www.umich.edu/,..iinet/journal/vol2no3/ozdemir.html. Wolschner, K. (2003) ‘Was ist die Alternative zum Dialog?’, Tageszeitung Bremen, 12 June.
39. Wolschner, Klaus. (2003). “Was ist die Alternative zum Dialog?” Tageszeitung Bremen. Haziran 12.