Comparison of Knowledge Levels and Misconceptions of Science and Social Studies Prospective Teachers About Atmospheric Environmental Problems

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 216 - 236, 28.05.2020

Mustafa Ürey Kerem Çolak Hafife Bozdemir Selahattin Kaymakcı

Öz

The aim of this study is to determine and compare the knowledge and misconceptions of science and social studies prospective teachers about atmospheric environmental problems. In this study, field scanning method from the methods of descriptive research was used and it was conducted with prospective science and social studies teachers. The sample of the study was designed by 441 prospective teachers studying in faculties of education in 2017-2018 academic years. It was taken in consideration to have taken environmental courses at the undergraduate level in determination of participants in the sample selection by using easily accessible and the criterion sampling. In the study, Atmospheric Based Environmental Problems Diagnosis Test (ABEPDT) was used as data collection tool. ABEPDT is a three-stage test consisting of 13 questions. In the first stage, multiple choice questions, in the second stage, the rationale of the answers given in the first stage and in the third stage, the question of whether or not to be sure of the answers were questioned. The data obtained from the prospective teachers were evaluated considering the rubric developed by the researchers. It was utilized of SPSS.20 package program in data analysis. At the end of the study, it was found that science and social science prospective teachers had similar misconceptions, while misconceptions were more intense in social science prospective teachers. When the knowledge levels of science and social studies prospective teachers about atmospheric environmental problems were compared, it was determined that Science prospective teachers were more successful.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Science, social studies, atmospheric environment problems

Kaynakça

• Arslan, H. Ö., Çiğdemoğlu, C. & Moseley, C. (2012). A three-tier diagnostic test to assess pre-service teachers’ misconceptions about global warming, greenhouse effect, ozone layerdepletion, and acid rain. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1667-1686.
• Bahar, M. & Aydın, F. (2002). Sınıf öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin sera gazları ve global ısınma ile ilgili anlama düzeyleri ve hatalı kavramları. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi’nde sunulan bildiri. Eylül 2002, ODTÜ, Ankara.
• Bakırcı, H. & Yıldırım, İ. (2017). Ortak bilgi yapılandırma modelinin sera etkisi konusunda öğrencilerin kavramsal anlamalarına ve bilginin kalıcılığına etkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18, 45-63.
• Bayraç, H. N. (2014). Enerji kullanımının küresel ısınmaya etkisi ve önleyici politikalar. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(2), 229-259.
• Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., & Read, D. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 959-970.
• Boyes, E., Chambers, W. & Stanisstreet, M. (1995). Trainee primary teachers’ ideas about the ozone layer. Environmental Education Research, 1(2), 133 –145.
• Bozdoğan, A. E. (2009). An investigation on Turkish prospective primary school teachers’ perceptions about Global Warming. World Applied Sciences Journal, 7(1), 43-48.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
• Caleon, I. & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Development and application of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess secondary students’ understanding of waves. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 939–961.
• Campbell, J., Waliczek, T. M. & Zajicek, J. M. (1999). Relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitude of high school students, Journal of Environmental Education, 30(3), 17-21.
• Chiu, M. (2007). A national survey of students’ conceptions of chemistry in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 421–452.
• Çepni, S. (2012). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş. Trabzon: Celepler Matbaacılık.
• Çiğdemoğlu, C. & Arslan, H. Ö. (2017). Atmosfer ile ilgili çevre problemleri konularında kavram yanılgılarını tespit eden üç aşamalı tanı testinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. YYÜ Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 671-679.
• Çimer, S. O., Çimer, A. & Ursavas, N. (2011). Student teachers' conceptions about global warming and changes in their conceptions during pre-service education: A cross-sectional study, Educational Research and Reviews, 6(8), 592-597.
• Daskolia, M., Flogaitis, E. & Papageorgiou, E. (2006). Kindergarten teachers’ conceptual framework on the ozone layer depletion. Exploring the associative meanings of a global environmental issue. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(2), 168-178.
• Dawson, V. & Carson, K. (2013). Australian secondary school students‟ understanding of climate change. Teaching Science, 59(3), 9–14.
• Dove, J. (1996). Student teacher understanding of the greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion and acid rain. Environmental Education Research, 2(1), 89-100.
• Goueli, S. (2003). Environmental education in an Egyptian university: The role of teacher educators. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Alberta.
• Groves, F. & Pugh, A. (1999). Elementary pre-service teacher perceptions of the greenhouse effect. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 75–81.
• Hobson, A. (1993). Ozone and interdisciplinary science teaching-learning to address the things that count most. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(1), 33-37.
• Kara, F. (2015). Knowledge level of prospective science teachers regarding formation and effects of acid rains on the environment and organisms. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 5(4), 128-131.
• Karpudewan, M., Roth, W. M. & Chandrakesan, K. (2015). Remediating misconception on climate change among secondary school students in Malaysia. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 631-648.
• Khalid, T. (2003). Pre-service high school teachers’ perceptions of three environmental phenomena. Environmental Education Research, 9, 35-50.
• Kurnaz, M. A. & Aktaş, E. (2018). A thematic review of students’ alternative ideas studies on greenhouse effect, Online Science Education Journal, 3(1), 33-40. Küçüközer, H. & Demirci, N. (2008). Pre-service and in-service physics teachers’ ideas about simple electric circuits. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(3), 303-311.
• MEB. (2018a). Sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 4, 5, 6 ve 7. Sınıflar). Ankara: MEB Yayınevi.
• MEB. (2018b). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar). Ankara: MEB Yayınevi.
• Öztürk, T. & Zayimoğlu Öztürk, F. (2016). Sosyal bilgiler öğretim programının çevre eğitimi açısından analizi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 24(3), 1533-1550.
• Pabuçcu, A. (2016). Öğretmen adaylarının asit yağmurlarıyla ilgili bilgilerinin kimya okur-yazarlığı açısından incelenmesi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(3), 961-976.
• Papadimitriou, V. (2004). Prospective primary teachers' understanding of climate change, greenhouse effect, and ozone layer depletion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 299-307.
• Pekel, F. O. (2005). High school students' and trainee science teachers' perceptions of ozone layer depletion. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 1(7), 12-21.
• Pesman, H. &Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103, 208–222.
• Selvi, M. (2007). Biyoloji öğretmeni adaylarının çevre kavramları ile ilgilialgılamalarının değerlendirilmesi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Shepardson, D. P., Niyogi, D., Roychoudhury, A. & Hirsch, A. (2012). Conceptualizing climate change in the context of a climate system: Implications for climate and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 18(3), 323-352.
• Şenel, H. & Güngör, B. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin küresel ısınma hakkındaki bilgilerinin ve kavram yanılgılarının tespiti. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 4(4), 1207-1225.
• Topsakal, U. Ü. & Kara, S. (2009). İlköğretim öğretmen adaylarının ozon tabakası ile ilgili algılamaları. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(3), 13-37.
• Topsakal, Ü. U. & Altınöz, N. (2010). İlköğretim öğretmen adaylarının sera etkisi ile ilgili kavramları algılama düzeyleri. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), 147-163.
• Treagust, D. F. (1998). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 159–170.
• Ural, E., Ercan, O. & Bilen, K. (2017). Pre-service science teachers’ misconceptions of carboncycle and global warming. Scientific Educational Studies, 1(1), 1-17.
• Ürey, M. (2018). Çevre eğitimi. A. Tekbıyık & G. Çakmakçı (Eds.), Fen bilimleri öğretimi ve stem etkinlikleri (güncel öğretim programlarıyla uyumlu pısa-tımss soru örnekleriyle desteklenmiş uygulamalar) (ss.323-352). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Ürey, M. & Alev, N. (2010). “A” ilköğretim okulunun çevre eğitimindeki başarısının nedenlerini incelemeye yönelik bir nitel araştırma örneği. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 186, 183-208.
• Ürey, M. & Aydın, M. (2014). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji programında yer alan çevre konularına yönelik bir program analizi. e-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 37-50.
• Ürey, M., Şahin, B. &Şahin, N.F. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının temel ekoloji kavramları ve çevre sorunları konusundaki yanılgıları. Ege Eğitim Dergisi,12(1), 22-51