Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

CULTURAL DIFFUSION THEORY AND TOURISM IMPLICATIONS

Yıl 2021, , 358 - 364, 26.01.2021
https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.811722

Öz

Cultural diffusion is defined as the spread of cultural elements due to the interaction among people from different cultures. Migration was one major reason for cultural diffusion for thousands of years. Through migration, cultural elements such as art, knowledge, language, poetry and religion were exchanged during the diffusion process. Diffusion usually occurs in a cumulative way starting from developed western countries towards developing Eastern countries. The characteristics of people starting diffusion process and the proximity of the cultures are the main factors influencing cultural diffusion. The change in the nature of the cultural element through diffusion process is inevitable. With the increase in the scope of tourism activities worldwide in the last century, the speed of diffusion has increased. The development of tourism activity in a region led an increase in the pace of cultural diffusion via interactions between hosts and guests. The impacts of cultural diffusion on a region can be both positive and negative. While the globalization can be a threat for the local culture, the increased tourism activity gave rise to the preservation efforts of local culture. The purpose of this paper is to review literature in cultural diffusion theory and discuss the tourism implications.

Kaynakça

  • Caton K. & Santos C. A. (2009). Images of the other: Selling study abroad in a postcolonial world. Journal of Travel Research, 48(2), 191- 204.
  • Chang, T. C. (2000). Renaissance revisited: Singapore as a global city for the arts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(4), 818-831.
  • Chick, G. (2000). Editorial: Opportunities for cross-cultural comparative research on leisure. Leisure Sciences, 22(2), 79-91.
  • Coss, P. R. (1985). Aspects of cultural diffusion in medieval England: The early romances, local society and Robin Hood. Past and Present, 108(1), 35-79.
  • Dyer, P., Aberdeen, L. & Schuler, S. (2003). Tourism impacts on an Australian indigenous community: A Djabugay case study. Tourism Management, 24(1), 83-95.
  • Echtner, C. M. & Prasad, P. (2003). The context of third world tourism marketing. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(3), 660-682.
  • Faist, T. (2000). Transnationalization in international migration: implications for the study of citizenship and culture. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23(2), 189-222.
  • Ferrante, J. (2012). Sociology: A Global Perspective. (9th ed.). Stanford, CT: Nelson Education.
  • Golden, P.B. (2006). Some thoughts on the origins of the Turks and shaping of Turkic Peoples. In Mair, V.H (Ed.), Contact and exchange in the ancient World (pp. 30-59). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Grünewald, R. A. (2002). Tourism and cultural revival. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(4), 1004-1021.
  • Henrich, J. (2001). Cultural transmission and the diffusion of innovations: adoption dynamics indicate that biased cultural transmission is the predominate force in behavioral change. American Anthropological Association. 103(4), 992-1013.
  • Jordan Bychkov T. G., Domosh M. & Neumann R. P. (2005). Human Mosaic. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan.
  • Kariel, H. G. & Kariel, P. E. (1982). Socio-cultural impacts of tourism: an example from the Austrian Alps. Geografiska Annaler.Series B.Human Geography, 64(1), 1-16.
  • Kaufman, J. & Patterson, O. (2005). Cross-national cultural diffusion: the global spread of cricket. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 82- 110.
  • Kelley, D.B. (1997). Cultural diffusion. [Web Log Post]. Retrieved September 14, 2018, from http://mysite.verizon.net/dbkelley1/id2.html
  • Kroeber, A. L. (1922). Elements of culture in native California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology,13, 259-328.
  • Kroeber, A. L. (1940). Stimulus diffusion. American Anthropologist, 42(1), 1-20.
  • Lewitt P. (1998). Social remittances: migration driven local-level forms of cultural diffusion. International Migration Review, 32(4), 926-948.
  • Li, Y. (2003). Heritage tourism: The contradictions between conservation and change. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 4(3), 247-261.
  • Morley, D. & Robins, K. (1995). Spaces of Identity: Global Media, Electronic Landscapes and Cultural Boundaries. London: Routledge
  • Pemberton, H.E. (1936). The curve of culture diffusion rate. American Sociological Review,1(4), 547-556.
  • Reisinger, Y. (2009). Cultural practices and tourism ımpacts on culture. In Y. Reisinger & Dimanche, F (Eds.), Advanced ınternational tourism: cultures and behavior (pp. 67-81). UK:Butterworth-Heineman.
  • Riesman, D. & Denney, R. (1951). Football in America: a study in culture diffusion. American Quarterly, 3(4), 309-325.
  • Robinson, M. (1999). Collaboration and cultural consent: Refocusing sustainable tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 7(3), 379-397.
  • Sundqvist, S., Frank, L. & Puumalainen, K. (2005). The effects of country characteristics, cultural similarity and adoption timing on the diffusion of wireless communications. Journal of Business Research, 58(1), 107- 110.
  • Wall, G. & Mathieson A. (2006). Tourism: Change, Impacts, and Opportunities. Harlow, England; New York, NY: Pearson Prentice Hall.

CULTURAL DIFFUSION THEORY AND TOURISM IMPLICATIONS

Yıl 2021, , 358 - 364, 26.01.2021
https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.811722

Öz

Cultural diffusion is defined as the spread of cultural elements due to the interaction among people from different cultures. Migration was one major reason for cultural diffusion for thousands of years. Through migration, cultural elements such as art, knowledge, language, poetry and religion were exchanged during the diffusion process. Diffusion usually occurs in a cumulative way starting from developed western countries towards developing Eastern countries. The characteristics of people starting diffusion process and the proximity of the cultures are the main factors influencing cultural diffusion. The change in the nature of the cultural element through diffusion process is inevitable. With the increase in the scope of tourism activities worldwide in the last century, the speed of diffusion has increased. The development of tourism activity in a region led an increase in the pace of cultural diffusion via interactions between hosts and guests. The impacts of cultural diffusion on a region can be both positive and negative. While the globalization can be a threat for the local culture, the increased tourism activity gave rise to the preservation efforts of local culture. The purpose of this paper is to review literature in cultural diffusion theory and discuss the tourism implications. 

Kaynakça

  • Caton K. & Santos C. A. (2009). Images of the other: Selling study abroad in a postcolonial world. Journal of Travel Research, 48(2), 191- 204.
  • Chang, T. C. (2000). Renaissance revisited: Singapore as a global city for the arts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(4), 818-831.
  • Chick, G. (2000). Editorial: Opportunities for cross-cultural comparative research on leisure. Leisure Sciences, 22(2), 79-91.
  • Coss, P. R. (1985). Aspects of cultural diffusion in medieval England: The early romances, local society and Robin Hood. Past and Present, 108(1), 35-79.
  • Dyer, P., Aberdeen, L. & Schuler, S. (2003). Tourism impacts on an Australian indigenous community: A Djabugay case study. Tourism Management, 24(1), 83-95.
  • Echtner, C. M. & Prasad, P. (2003). The context of third world tourism marketing. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(3), 660-682.
  • Faist, T. (2000). Transnationalization in international migration: implications for the study of citizenship and culture. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23(2), 189-222.
  • Ferrante, J. (2012). Sociology: A Global Perspective. (9th ed.). Stanford, CT: Nelson Education.
  • Golden, P.B. (2006). Some thoughts on the origins of the Turks and shaping of Turkic Peoples. In Mair, V.H (Ed.), Contact and exchange in the ancient World (pp. 30-59). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Grünewald, R. A. (2002). Tourism and cultural revival. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(4), 1004-1021.
  • Henrich, J. (2001). Cultural transmission and the diffusion of innovations: adoption dynamics indicate that biased cultural transmission is the predominate force in behavioral change. American Anthropological Association. 103(4), 992-1013.
  • Jordan Bychkov T. G., Domosh M. & Neumann R. P. (2005). Human Mosaic. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan.
  • Kariel, H. G. & Kariel, P. E. (1982). Socio-cultural impacts of tourism: an example from the Austrian Alps. Geografiska Annaler.Series B.Human Geography, 64(1), 1-16.
  • Kaufman, J. & Patterson, O. (2005). Cross-national cultural diffusion: the global spread of cricket. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 82- 110.
  • Kelley, D.B. (1997). Cultural diffusion. [Web Log Post]. Retrieved September 14, 2018, from http://mysite.verizon.net/dbkelley1/id2.html
  • Kroeber, A. L. (1922). Elements of culture in native California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology,13, 259-328.
  • Kroeber, A. L. (1940). Stimulus diffusion. American Anthropologist, 42(1), 1-20.
  • Lewitt P. (1998). Social remittances: migration driven local-level forms of cultural diffusion. International Migration Review, 32(4), 926-948.
  • Li, Y. (2003). Heritage tourism: The contradictions between conservation and change. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 4(3), 247-261.
  • Morley, D. & Robins, K. (1995). Spaces of Identity: Global Media, Electronic Landscapes and Cultural Boundaries. London: Routledge
  • Pemberton, H.E. (1936). The curve of culture diffusion rate. American Sociological Review,1(4), 547-556.
  • Reisinger, Y. (2009). Cultural practices and tourism ımpacts on culture. In Y. Reisinger & Dimanche, F (Eds.), Advanced ınternational tourism: cultures and behavior (pp. 67-81). UK:Butterworth-Heineman.
  • Riesman, D. & Denney, R. (1951). Football in America: a study in culture diffusion. American Quarterly, 3(4), 309-325.
  • Robinson, M. (1999). Collaboration and cultural consent: Refocusing sustainable tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 7(3), 379-397.
  • Sundqvist, S., Frank, L. & Puumalainen, K. (2005). The effects of country characteristics, cultural similarity and adoption timing on the diffusion of wireless communications. Journal of Business Research, 58(1), 107- 110.
  • Wall, G. & Mathieson A. (2006). Tourism: Change, Impacts, and Opportunities. Harlow, England; New York, NY: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Toplam 26 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Beşeri Coğrafya
Bölüm DERLEME
Yazarlar

Güliz Coşkun 0000-0002-5200-6370

Yayımlanma Tarihi 26 Ocak 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021

Kaynak Göster

APA Coşkun, G. (2021). CULTURAL DIFFUSION THEORY AND TOURISM IMPLICATIONS. Lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education(43), 358-364. https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.811722
AMA Coşkun G. CULTURAL DIFFUSION THEORY AND TOURISM IMPLICATIONS. IGGE. Ocak 2021;(43):358-364. doi:10.32003/igge.811722
Chicago Coşkun, Güliz. “CULTURAL DIFFUSION THEORY AND TOURISM IMPLICATIONS”. Lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education, sy. 43 (Ocak 2021): 358-64. https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.811722.
EndNote Coşkun G (01 Ocak 2021) CULTURAL DIFFUSION THEORY AND TOURISM IMPLICATIONS. lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education 43 358–364.
IEEE G. Coşkun, “CULTURAL DIFFUSION THEORY AND TOURISM IMPLICATIONS”, IGGE, sy. 43, ss. 358–364, Ocak 2021, doi: 10.32003/igge.811722.
ISNAD Coşkun, Güliz. “CULTURAL DIFFUSION THEORY AND TOURISM IMPLICATIONS”. lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education 43 (Ocak 2021), 358-364. https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.811722.
JAMA Coşkun G. CULTURAL DIFFUSION THEORY AND TOURISM IMPLICATIONS. IGGE. 2021;:358–364.
MLA Coşkun, Güliz. “CULTURAL DIFFUSION THEORY AND TOURISM IMPLICATIONS”. Lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education, sy. 43, 2021, ss. 358-64, doi:10.32003/igge.811722.
Vancouver Coşkun G. CULTURAL DIFFUSION THEORY AND TOURISM IMPLICATIONS. IGGE. 2021(43):358-64.