EVALUATING IN-SERVICE GIS TRAINING FOR GEOGRAPHY TEACHERS BASED ON G-TPACK MODEL

Öz

Many different barriers have been identified which limit integration of spatial technologies into secondary school education. Because of these challenges teachers tend to concentrate traditional teaching methods instead of removing obstacles on using spatial technologies. However, we may remove physical (lack of hardware, software) and technical (lack of computer) barriers in terms of requirements of geography teachers. Geography teachers who can combine their technological skills with pedagogical and field knowledge are the ones who meets today's educational needs. It is necessary to organize in-service training (IST) activities that can meet today's needs in geography education, prepared in line with the needs of teachers and helpful in developing their technological competencies, to which they can participate voluntarily. The aim of this study was to develop, implement and evaluate in-service training GIS course among geography teachers using an open source software, free data and geographical technological pedagogical content knowledge (G-TPACK) model. The research employed both qualitative and quantitative research methods and techniques. Our study proved that in-service GIS training which was admired to attend by teachers according to the needs analysis, have improved their skills and knowledge.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Geography Teaching
• In-Service Training
• G-TPACK Model

Kaynakça

1. Artvinli, E. (2010). Coğrafya’da Öğretmen Eğitimi: Hizmet Öncesi-Hizmet içi Eğitim ihtiyaç Analizi. Ankara: Pegem Publication.
2. Babacan, Ş. & Özey, R. (2016). In-service training needs of geography teachers. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 33(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.14781/mcd.17180
3. Balcı, A. (2012). A qualitative study on teaching geographical features of Turkey with descriptive activities. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 26, 215-258.
4. Bednarz, S. W. (2004). Geographic information systems: A tool to support geography and environmental education? GeoJournal, 60(2), 191–199.
5. Chunling, G. (2015). Need analysis and curriculum design in business English. Studies in English Language Teaching, 3(2), 146-152.
6. Çınar, S. (2011). Sınıf öğretmenleri için Fen-Teknoloji-Toplum (FTT) yaklaşımına yönelik bir HİE kurs programı geliştirilmesi ve etkililiğinin araştırılması. (Doctoral thesis, Institute of Natural Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon).
7. Dick, W. & Carey, L. (1978). The Systematic Design of Instruction. New York: HarperCollins.
8. Doering, A. & Veletsianos, G. (2007). Multi-scaffolding environment: an analysis of scaffolding and its impact on cognitive load and problem-solving ability. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(2), 107-129. https://doi.org/10.2190/Q58T-4388-8015-8141

9. Doering, A. & Veletsianos, G. (2008). An investigation of the use of real-time, authentic geospatial data in the K–12 classroom. Journal of Geography, 106(6), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340701845219
10. Doering, A., Koseoglu, S., Scharberg, C., Henrickson, J. & Lanegran, D. (2014). Technology integration in K-12 geography education using TPACK as a conceptual model. Journal of Geography, 113(6), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2014.896393.
11. Doğru, E. & Aydın, F. (2017). Examining the skills of geography teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(2), 485-506. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i2.686
12. Favier, T. T. & van der Schee, J. A. (2014). The effects of geography lessons with geospatial technologies on the development of high school students' relational thinking. Computers & Education, 76, 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.004
13. Fleischmann, E. M. L. & Van der Westhuizen, C. P. (2017). The interactive-GIS-Tutor (IGIST): an option for GIS teaching in resource-poor South African schools. South African Geographical Journal, 99(1), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2016.1208576
14. Fleischmann, E. M. L. (2016). A framework for Interactive-GIS-Tutor Integration within FET phase geography. (Doctoral thesis, Potchefstroom Campus of the North West University, South Africa).
15. Gültekin, M. & Çubukçu, Z. (2008). Perceptions of primary school teachers about in-service training. Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(3), 185-201.
16. Güven, D. (2010). Profesyonel bir meslek olarak Türkiye’de öğretmenlik. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 27(2), 13-21.
17. Heafner, T. (2004). Using technology to students to learn social studies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(1), 42-53.
18. Hong, J. E. (2015). Teaching GIS and other geospatial technologies to in-service teachers. In M. Solari, A. Demirci & J. V. D. Schee (Eds.), Geospatial technologies and geography education in a changing world (pp. 117-126). New York: Springer.
19. Hong, J. U. & Stonier, F. (2015). GIS in-service teacher training based on TPACK. Journal of Geography, 114(3), 108-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2014.947381
20. Jekel, T. (2008). What you all want is GIS 2. 0. In A. Car, G. Griesebner & J. Strobl (Eds.), Collaborative GI based learning environments: Spatial planning and education. Wichmann: Heidelberg
21. Johannson, T. (2006). GISAS Project: Geographical Information Systems Applications for Schools. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
22. Kabakçı Yurdakul, I. (2011). Examining technopedagogical knowledge competencies of preservice teachers based on ICT usage. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40, 397-408.
23. Kaleli Yılmaz, G. (2015). Analysis of technological pedagogical content knowledge studies in Turkey: a meta-synthesis study. Education and Science, 40(178), 103-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.4087
24. Kerski, J. J. (2008). The role of GIS in digital earth education. International Journal of Digital Earth, 1(4), 326–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538940802420879
25. Lee, J. & Bednarz, R. (2009). Effect of GIS learning on spatial thinking. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 183- 198. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260802276714
26. MEB, (2021, October 07). Teacher training and development general directorate. Retrieved October 07, 2021, from http://oygm.meb.gov.tr/www/tanitim/icerik/7
27. Metin, M. (2010). Fen ve teknoloji öğretmenleri için hazırlanan performans değerlendirmeye yönelik hizmet içi eğitim kursunun etkililiği. (Doctoral thesis, Institute of Natural Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon).
28. Metoyer, S. (2014). Geospatial technology to enhance spatial thinking and facilitate processes of reasoning. (Doctoral thesis, Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas, A&M University).
29. Metoyer, S. K., Bednarz, S. W. & Bednarz, R. S. (2015). Spatial thinking in education: Concepts, development, and assessment. In M. Solari, A. Demirci & J. V. D. Schee (Eds.), Geospatial technologies and geography education in a changing world (pp. 21.33). New York: Springer.
30. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis A Sourcebook of New Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
31. Milson, A. J. & Roberts, J. A. (2008). The status of geospatial technologies in US high school geography standards. In A. J. Milson & M. Alibrandi (Eds.), Digital geography: Geospatial technologies in the social studies classroom (pp. 39.59). Information Age Publishing.
32. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
33. Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
34. Nielsen, C. P., Oberle, A. & Sugumaran, R. (2011). Implementing a high school level geospatial technologies and spatial thinking course. Journal of Geography, 110(2), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2011.534171
35. Özgen, N. & Çakıcıoğlu, R. O. (2009). Coğrafi bilgi sistemlerinin (CBS) Coğrafya eğitiminde kullanımı ve dersin hedeflerine ulaşma düzeyine etkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 10(1), 81-90.
36. Öztürk, M. & Eroğlu, E. (2013). Coğrafya öğretmen yeterlikleri ve uygulamaların değerlendirilmesi. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 27(1), 630-659.
37. Patterson, M. W., Reeve, K. & Page, D. (2003). Integrating geographic information systems into the secondary curricula. Journal of Geography, 102(6), 275-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340308978559
38. Rossetto, R., De Filippis, G., Borsi, L., Foglia, L., Cannata, M., Criollo., R. & Vázquez-Suñé, E. (2018). Integrating free and open source tools and distributed modelling codes in GIS environment for data-based groundwater management. Environmental Modelling & Software, 107, 210-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.06.007
39. Şenel, T. (2008). Fen ve teknoloji öğretmenleri için alternatif ölçme ve değerlendirme tekniklerine yönelik bir hizmet içi eğitim programının etkililiğinin araştırılması. (Master thesis, Institute of Natural Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon).
40. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
41. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
42. Tsou, M. H. & Smith, J. (2011). Free and Open Source software for GIS education. San Diego.
43. Uçar, R. & İpek, C. (2006). İlköğretim okullarında görev yapan yönetici ve öğretmenlerin MEB hizmet içi eğitim uygulamalarına ilişkin görüşleri. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 34-53.
44. Uşak, M. (2009). Preservice science and technology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge on cell topics. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 9(4), 2033-2046.
45. Yazıcı, Ö. & Gündüz, Y. (2011). Gelişmiş bazı ülkeler ile Türkiye’deki öğretmenlerin hizmet içi eğitimlerinin karşılaştırılması. Kuramsal Eğitim Bilim Dergisi, 4(2), 1-15.
46. Ye, H., Brown, M. & Harding, J. (2014). GIS for all exploring the barriers and opportunities for underexploited GIS applications. OSGeo Journal, 13(1), 19-28.
47. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Publication.