Music Perception in Individuals with Hearing Loss

Öz

Hearing loss is the inability of hearing. Musical perception is the perception of music. The relationship between hearing loss and musical perception has been a frequently encountered subject of research in recent years. In the studies, different aspects of the musical perception of individuals with hearing loss, hearing aid and/or cochlear implant users have been discussed. The aim of this review is to review the knowledge and current studies on the perception of music in individuals with hearing loss, hearing aid and/or cochlear implant users, and to gain perspective on the subject.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Musical perception
• hearing loss
• cochlear implant
• hearing aid

İşitme Kayıplı Bireylerde Müzik Algısı

Öz

İşitme kaybı, işitme duyusunda meydana gelen yetersizlik durumudur. Müzikal algı ise müziğin algılanmasıdır. İşitme kaybı ve müzikal algı ilişkisi son yıllarda sıklıkla karşılaşılan bir araştırma konusudur. Çalışmalarda işitme kayıplı, işitme cihazı ve/veya koklear implant kullanıcısı bireylerin sahip olduğu müzikal algı farklı yönleriyle ele alınmıştır. Bu derlemenin amacı; işitme kayıplı, işitme cihazı ve/veya koklear implant kullanıcısı bireylerde müzik algısına ilişkin bilgileri ve güncel çalışmaları gözden geçirmek ve konuya ilişkin bakış açısı kazandırmaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Müzikal algı
• işitme kaybı
• koklear implant
• işitme cihazı

Kaynakça

1. McDermott HJ. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif. 2004;8(2):49-82. doi:10.1177/108471380400800203.
2. Türk Dil Kurumu. Güncel Türkçe Sözlük. https://sozluk.gov.tr. Erişim tarihi 19 Nisan 2021.
3. Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, et al. Does music perception have an impact on quality of life following cochlear implantation?. Acta Otolaryngol. 2007;127(7):682-686. doi:10.1080/00016480601002112.
4. Yüksel M. Koklear implant kullanıcılarında spektral ve temporal işitsel işlemleme ile müzik algısı arasındaki ilişki [doktora tezi]. İstanbul, Türkiye: Odyoloji ve Konuşma Bozuklukları, Marmara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2019.
5. Sonn M, Acoustical Society of America & American National Standards Institute. American national standard psychoacoustical terminology. New York: The Institute;1973.
6. World Health Organization. World report on hearing. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/world-report-on-hearing.Yayınlanma tarihi 3 Mart 2021. Erişim Tarihi 19 Nisan 2021.
7. Dillon H. Hearing Aids. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme Medical Journals; 2012.
8. Madsen SM, Moore BC. Music and hearing aids. Trends Hear. 2014;18:2331216514558271. Published 2014 Oct 31. doi:10.1177/2331216514558271.

9. Chasin M, Russo FA. Hearing AIDS and music. Trends Amplif. 2004;8(2):35-47. doi:10.1177/108471380400800202.
10. Gfeller K, Mallalieu RM, Mansouri A, et al. Practices and Attitudes That Enhance Music Engagement of Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:1368. doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.01368.
11. Clark GM. Personal reflections on the multichannel cochlear implant and a view of the future. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(5):651-693. doi:10.1682/jrrd.2007.05.0064.
12. Bozkır, B. Profesyonel müzisyenlerde müzik algısı farklılıkları; bir FMRI çalışması. [doktora tezi]. İzmir, Türkiye: Müzik Bilimleri, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Enstitüsü; 2009.
13. Düşünmez, İ. Koklear İmplantlı Çocuklarda Müzikal Duygulanımın Değerlendirilmesi. [yüksek lisans tezi]. Ankara, Türkiye: Odyoloji, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2019.
14. Gfeller K. Music-based training for pediatric CI recipients: A systematic analysis of published studies. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016;133 Suppl 1 (Suppl 1):S50-S56. doi:10.1016/j.anorl.2016.01.010.
15. Uys M, van Dijk C. Development of a music perception test for adult hearing-aid users. S Afr J Commun Disord. 2011 Oct;58:19-47. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v58i1.38. Erratum in: S Afr J Commun Disord. 2012 Dec;59:26. PMID: 22216557.
16. Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson J, Witt S, Mehr M. The effects of familiarity and complexity on appraisal of complex songs by cochlear implant recipients and normal hearing adults. J Music Ther. 2003;40(2):78-112. doi:10.1093/jmt/40.2.78.
17. Looi V, Gfeller K, Driscoll V. Music appreciation and training for cochlear implant recipients: a review. Semin Hear. 2012;33(4):307-334. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1329222.
18. Kohlberg GD, Mancuso DM, Chari DA, Lalwani AK. Music Engineering as a Novel Strategy for Enhancing Music Enjoyment in the Cochlear Implant Recipient. Behav Neurol. 2015;2015:829680. doi:10.1155/2015/829680.
19. Gfeller K, Oleson J, Knutson JF, Breheny P, Driscoll V, Olszewski C. Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users. J Am Acad Audiol. 2008;19(2):120-134. doi:10.3766/jaaa.19.2.3.
20. Looi V, McDermott H, McKay C, Hickson L. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users. Ear Hear. 2008;29(3):421-434. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816a0d0b.
21. Nyffeler, M. Study finds that non-linear frequency compression boosts speech intelligibility. Hearing Journal. 2008;61(12):22-26.doi: 10.1097/01.HJ.0000343022.22475.98.
22. Glista D, McDermott H. Phonak Sound Recover: A breakthrough in enhancing intelligibility. Naida Product Information. Stafa, Switzerland: Phonak Hearing Systems; 2008. https://www.audiologyonline.com/releases/soundrecover-breakthrough-in-enhancing-intelligibility-3719. Yayınlanma tarihi 6 Haziran 2008. Erişim tarihi 25 Nisan 2021.
23. Moon IJ, Hong SH. What is temporal fine structure and why is it important? Korean J Audiol. 2014;18(1):1-7. doi:10.7874/kja.2014.18.1.1.
24. Armstrong M, Pegg P, James C, Blamey P. Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid. Am J Otol. 1997;18(6 Suppl):S140-S141. https://europepmc.org/article/med/9391635. Erişim tarihi 20 Nisan 2021.
25. Hochberg I, Boothroyd A, Weiss M, Hellman S. Effects of noise and noise suppression on speech perception by cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 1992;13(4):263-271. doi:10.1097/00003446-199208000-00008.
26. Van Hoesel RJ, Tyler RS. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;113(3):1617-1630. doi:10.1121/1.1539520.
27. Drennan WR, Oleson JJ, Gfeller K, et al. Clinical evaluation of music perception, appraisal and experience in cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol. 2015;54(2):114-123. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.948219.
28. Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson JF, Witt S, Murray KT, Tyler RS. Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11(7):390-406. https://www.audiology.org/sites/default/files/journal/JAAA_11_07_05.pdf. Erişim tarihi 20 Nisan 2021.
29. Migirov L, Kronenberg J, Henkin Y. Self-reported listening habits and enjoyment of music among adult cochlear implant recipients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2009;118(5):350-355. doi:10.1177/000348940911800506.
30. Lenarz T. Cochlear implant - state of the art. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;16:Doc04. Published 2018 Feb 19. doi:10.3205/cto000143.
31. Illg A, Giourgas A, Kral A, Büchner A, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Lenarz T. Speech comprehension in children and adolescents after sequential bilateral cochlear implantation with long interimplant interval. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34(4):682-689. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31828bb75e.
32. Hopyan-Misakyan TM, Gordon KA, Dennis M, Papsin BC. Recognition of affective speech prosody and facial affect in deaf children with unilateral right cochlear implants. Child Neuropsychol. 2009;15(2):136-146. doi:10.1080/09297040802403682.
33. Cooper WB, Tobey E, Loizou PC. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia. Ear Hear. 2008;29(4):618-626. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e318174e787.
34. Kim I, Yang E, Donnelly PJ, Limb CJ. Preservation of rhythmic clocking in cochlear implant users: a study of isochronous versus anisochronous beat detection. Trends Amplif. 2010;14(3):164-169. doi:10.1177/1084713810387937.
35. Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FG. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear. 2004;25(2):173-185. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000120365.97792.2f.
36. Fujita S, Ito J. Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999;108(7 Pt 1):634-640. doi:10.1177/000348949910800702.
37. Gfeller K, Turner C, Mehr M, et al. Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implants Int. 2002;3(1):29-53. doi:10.1179/cim.2002.3.1.29.
38. Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT. Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(5):779-789. doi:10.1682/jrrd.2007.08.0118.
39. Croghan NBH, Duran SI, Smith ZM. Re-examining the relationship between number of cochlear implant channels and maximal speech intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017;142(6):EL537. doi:10.1121/1.5016044.
40. Madsen SMK, Whiteford KL, Oxenham AJ. Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):12624. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-12937-9.
41. Shannon RV, Fu QJ, Galvin J 3rd. The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2004;(552):50-54. doi:10.1080/03655230410017562.
42. Rubinstein JT. How cochlear implants encode speech. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;12(5):444-448. doi:10.1097/01.moo.0000134452.24819.c0.
43. Stakhovskaya O, Sridhar D, Bonham BH, Leake PA. Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007;8(2):220-233. doi:10.1007/s10162-007-0076-9.
44. Fu QJ, Galvin JJ 3rd, Wang X, Wu JL. Benefits of music training in mandarin-speaking pediatric cochlear implant users. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015;58(1):163-169. doi:10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-14-0127.
45. Galvin JJ, Eskridge E, Oba S, Fu QJ. Melodic contour identification training in cochlear implant users with and without a competing instrument. Semin Hear. 2012;33(4), 399-409. doi:10.1055/s-0032- 1329227.
46. Kraus N, Skoe E, Parbery Clark A, Ashley R. Experience-induced malleability in neural encoding of pitch, timbre, and timing. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1169:543-557. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04549.x.
47. Parbery Clark A, Skoe E, Lam C, Kraus N. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise. Ear Hear. 2009;30(6):653-661. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b412e9.
48. Patel AD. Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6(7):674-681. doi:10.1038/nn1082.
49. Tzounopoulos T, Kraus N. Learning to encode timing: mechanisms of plasticity in the auditory brainstem. Neuron. 2009;62(4):463-469. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.05.002.
50. Shukor NFA, Lee J, Seo YJ, Han W. Efficacy of music training in hearing aid and cochlear implant users: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;14(1):15-28. doi:10.21053/ceo.2020.00101.
51. Patel AD. Why would musical training benefit the neural encoding of speech? The OPERA Hypothesis. Front Psychol. 2011;2:142. Published 2011 Jun 29. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00142.
52. Gordon EE. Developmental music aptitude as measured by the primary measures of music audiation. Psychology of Music. 1979;7(1):42-49. doi:10.1177/030573567971005.
53. Gfeller K, Lansing CR. Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;34(4):916-920. doi:10.1044/jshr.3404.916.
54. Gfeller K, Olszewski C, Rychener M, et al. Recognition of "real-world" musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Ear Hear. 2005;26(3):237-250. doi:10.1097/00003446-200506000-00001.
55. Kang R, Nimmons GL, Drennan W, et al. Development and validation of the University of Washington clinical assessment of music perception test. Ear Hear. 2009;30(4):411-418. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a61bc0.
56. D'Onofrio KL, Gifford RH. Bimodal Benefit for Music Perception: Effect of Acoustic Bandwidth. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021;64(4):1341-1353. doi:10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00390.
57. Gfeller K, Jiang D, Oleson JJ, Driscoll V, Knutson JF. Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol. 2010;21(1):28-34. doi:10.3766/jaaa.21.1.4.
58. Fowler SL, Calhoun H, Warner-Czyz AD. Music perception and speech-in-noise skills of typical hearing and cochlear implant listeners. Am J Audiol. 2021;30(1):170-181. doi:10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00116.
59. Ahn J, Ryu G, Cho YS. Long-term Changes in Musical Perception in Korean Cochlear Implant Patients. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(3):312-320. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002098.
60. Sahli AS, Belgin E, Uys M. A musical perception test for people with hearing loss: Turkish adaptation and normalization of the Music Perception Test (MPT). Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(12):1669-1674. doi:10.4103/njcp.njcp_279_19.
61. Dritsakis G, van Besouw RM, O' Meara A. Impact of music on the quality of life of cochlear implant users: a focus group study. Cochlear Implants Int. 2017;18(4):207-215. doi:10.1080/14670100.2017.1303892.
62. Dritsakis G, van Besouw RM, Kitterick P, Verschuur CA. A music-related quality of life measure to guide music rehabilitation for adult cochlear implant users. Am J Audiol. 2017;26(3):268-282. doi:10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0120.
63. Kalathottukaren RT, Purdy SC, Ballard E. Prosody perception and musical pitch discrimination in adults using cochlear implants. Int J Audiol. 2015;54(7):444-452. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.997314.
64. Chatterjee M, Peng SC. Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition. Hear Res. 2008;235(1-2):143-156. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.004.
65. Jung KH, Won JH, Drennan WR, et al. Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol. 2012;17(3):189-197. doi:10.1159/000336407.
66. Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ, Oba S. Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008;124(4):EL189-EL195. doi:10.1121/1.2961171.
67. Spitzer ER, Galvin JJ 3rd, Friedmann DR, Landsberger DM. Melodic interval perception with acoustic and electric hearing in bimodal and single-sided deaf cochlear implant listeners. Hear Res. 2021;400:108136. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2020.108136.
68. Zhou Q, Gu X, Liu B. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users for music perception and tone recognition. Acta Otolaryngol. 2021;141(4):359-366. doi:10.1080/00016489.2020.1782984.