Culture Theory of Cancellation: A Theoretical Review of Relevant Literature

Öz

This study analyses the phenomenon of Cancel Culture, which was initiated in 2017 with the “#MeToo” movement by large masses and continued in 2022 with their awareness about being a party with a descriptive approach. As a result of the literature review, the definition of the concept, its historical background, definitions of related concepts, and criticisms of the cancellation culture have been outlined. Making a thorough analysis of the phenomenon of cancel culture, this research determined that this tendency has almost never been examined under a single title as a concept before, and thus aims to contribute to the literature in this respect. This research also tries to put forward different aspects of the concepts of cancel culture and lynch culture, which are often confused with each other. The literature review found that the achievements of those who have been “lynched” with “Hashtag” activism throughout their lives are ignored, they are excluded from social media and social life with the effect of social lynching, and their personal rights are discredited to an extent that will affect the business and private lives of the individual as the impact of the posts made in the virtual environment turns into cancel culture. This research also reveals the need to take measures to address this phenomenon, which is dominated by the view of eradicating those who are not one of us, and to compensate for the damages it causes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cancellation Culture
• Lynching Culture
• Social Media
• Hashtag
• Social Lynching

İptal Kültürü Teorisi: İlgili Literatür Üzerine Teorik Bir İnceleme

Öz

Bu araştırmada 2017 yılında “#MeToo” hareketi ile başlatılan ve 2022 yılında geniş kitlelerin taraf olma düşüncesi ile devam ettirdikleri “İptal Kültürü” olgusu betimleyici bir yaklaşımla incelenmiştir. Literatür taraması sonucunda kavramın tanımı, tarihsel arka planı, ilgili kavramların tanımları ve iptal kültürüne yönelik yapılan eleştirilere ilişkin başlıklar oluşturulmuştur. İptal kültürü olgusunun derinlemesine irdelendiği bu araştırmada söz konusu eğilimin daha önce kavram olarak ve tek başlık altında neredeyse hiç incelenmediği tespit edilmiş, bu yönüyle literatüre katkı sağlanması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda birbirleriyle karıştırılan iptal kültürü ve linç kültürü kavramlarının farklılaşan yönleri ifade edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Yapılan literatür araştırmasında, sanal ortamda yapılan paylaşımların yaratmış olduğu etkinin, iptal kültürüne dönüşmesi sonucunda; “Hashtag” aktivizmiyle linç’e uğrayanların yaşamları boyunca elde ettikleri edinimlerin hiçe sayıldığı, toplumsal linçin etkisiyle sosyal medyadan ve sosyal hayattan dışlandığı, bireyin iş hayatını ve özel hayatını etkileyecek oranda kişilik haklarının itibarsızlaştırıldığı tespit edilmiştir. Bu araştırma ayrıca “Bizden olmayanın yok edilmesi” görüşünün hâkim olduğu bu olguya ve sebebiyet verdiği zararların tazminine yönelik önlemlerinin de alınması gerekliliğini ortaya koymuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İptal Kültürü
• Linç Kültürü
• Hashtag Aktivizmi
• Sosyal Medya
• Toplumsal Linç

Kaynakça

1. ALAN, Ü. (2021). “Sosyal medya anlık işlediği için hemen mahkemeyi kurulup, yargılamadan infaz da ediliyor…” Erişim Tarihi: 30 Ekim 2021. http://www.gazete kadikoy.com.tr /yasam/parmak-ucundaki-nefret-h17585.html,
2. AMY, O’DONNELL ve CAROLINE, SWEETMAN. (2018). Introduction: Gender, development and ICTs, Gender & Development, 26:2, 217-229. https://doı: 10.1080/13552074.2018.1489952.
3. ARNABOLDI, M and COGET, J. F. (2016). Social media and business. We've been asking the wrong question, 47-54. http://hdl.handle.net/11311/997014.
4. BAKHER, R. (2021). # CancelCulture: A critical discourse analysis of cancel culture and its effect on representation and voice. Independent thesis Advanced level. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?
5. BAUER, F. (2019). Cancel culture ımpoverishes both the heart and the ıntellect. National review. https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/09/cancel-culture-impoverishes-heart-and-intellect/. [Access Date: 25.09.2019]
6. BÉRUBÉ, M. (2018). The way we review now. PMLA, 133(1),132-138. https://doi.org/10. 1632/pmla.2018.133.1.132.
7. BORA, T. (2018). Türkiye’nin linç rejimi (5. Baskı). İstanbul: İletişim.
8. BORINSTEIN, E. B. (2021). The problematic nature of ad-hominem attacks in the digital age.

9. BOYD, D. (2008). Facebook'un gizlilik tren kazası: Açığa çıkma, istila ve sosyal yakınlaşma. Yakınsama, 14 (1), 13-20.
10. BOUVIER, G. (2020). Racist call-outs and cancel culture on Twitter: The limitations of the platform’s ability to define issues of social justice. Discourse, context & media, 38, 100431. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100431.
11. BROMWICH, J. E. (2020). Why ‘Cancel Culture’ Is a Distraction - The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/14/podcasts/daily-newsletter- cancel-culture-beirut-protest.html. [Access Date: 18.02.2022]
12. BROMWICH, J. E. (2019). Everyone is cancelled. The New York Times. Erişim Tarihi: 31.10.2021 Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/28/style/is-it-canceled. html. BURMAH, L.A. (2021). Strange Cases of Cancel Culture. Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations 1289. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/.
13. CLAIR, R. P., BROWN, N. E., DOUGHERTY, D. S., DELEMEESTER, H. K., GEIST-MART’IN, P., GORDEN, W. I and TURNER, P. K. (2019). # MeToo, sexual harassment: an article, a forum, and a dream for the future. Journal of Applied Communication Research.,47:2, 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1567142.
14. D. CLARK, M. (2020). Drag Them: A brief etymology of so-called “cancel culture”. Communication and the Public, 5(3-4), 88-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/205704732 0961562.
15. DENİZ, B. (2022). Yazılı Basında Linç Saldırılarının Temsili (2009-2019). (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
16. DEUZE, M. (2006). Participation, remediation, bricolage: Considering principal components of a digital culture. The information society, 22(2), 63-75.
17. ENGLISH, M. (2021). Cancel Culture: An Examination of Cancel Culture Acts as a Form of Counterspeech to Regulate Hate Speech Online (Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill).
18. ERDOĞAN, M., & TAŞCIOĞLU, R. (2023). Covid 19 Pandemisinin dijital oyun bağımlılığındaki rolü: üniversite öğrencileri üzerine nitel bir araştırma. Iğdır Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (34), 635-653. https://doi.org/10.54600/igdirsosbilder.1315779.
19. GEORGE, J. J. and LEIDNER, D. E. 2(019). From clicktivism to hacktivism: Understanding digital activism. Information and Organization, 29(3), 100249.
20. GREENSPAN, R. (2020). How ‘cancel culture’ quickly became one of the busiest and most controversial ideas on the internet. Insider. Erişim Tarihi: 17 Şubat 2022. Retrieved from https://www.insider.com/cancel-culture-meaning-history-origin-phrase-used-nega tively2020-7.
21. GOODLİNG, L. (2015). MOAR digital activism please. Kairos: Journal of Rhetoric, Technology and Pedagogy, 19 (3). GÖL, E. (2021). Dıscourse-19: Fear and convıctıon ın the constructıon of the pandemıc process . 18th International Symposium: Communication in the Millennium (pp.727-736). Erzurum, Turkey
22. HAGI, S. (2019). Cancel culture ıs not real – at least not in the way people think. Retrieved from, https://time.com/5735403/cancel-culture-is-not-real/accessed on 31 March 2021. [Access Date: 20.02.2020].
23. HARPER’S MAGAZINE. (2020). A letter and justice on open debate. Retrieved from: https://harpers.org/aletter-on-justice-and-open-debate/. [Access Date: 07.06 2021].
24. HANSSON, K., PARGMAN, T.C., AND BARDZELL, S. (2021). Embodying activism. Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW), 1-10
25. HOLMAN, K. J. (2020). Can you come back from being cancelled? A case study of podcasting, cancel culture, and comedians during #MeToo (Order No. 27955107). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2427301602). Retrieved from, https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/can-you-come-back-being-cancelled-case-study/docview/2427301602/se-2?accountid=191727.
26. HOOKS, A. M. (2020). Cancel culture: posthuman hauntologies in digital rhetoric and the latent values of virtual community networks (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga).
27. LAIDLAW, E. B. (2017). Online shaming and the right to privacy. Laws, 6(1), 3.
28. LE PETIT ROBERT. (2022). Fransız Dili Sözlükleri. https://www.lerobert.com. [Access Date: 11.03.2022].
29. LU, C. (2019). Cancel culture is chaotic good. Jstor Daily. Erişim Tarihi 18.02.2022. Retrieved from: https://daily.jstor.org/cancel-culture-is-chaotic-good/.
30. MUELLER, T. S. (2021). Blame, then shame? Psychological predictors in cancel culture behavior. The Social Science Journal, 1-14, https://doi: 10.1080/03623319.2021.1949552.
31. NG, E. (2020). No grand pronouncements here: Reflections on cancel culture and digital media participation. Television & New Media, 21(6), 621-627. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/ 1527476420918828.
32. NGUYEN, B. (2020). "Cancel Culture on Twitter: The Effects of Information Source and Messaging on Post Shareability and Perceptions of Corporate Greenwashing" Wharton Research Scholars. 197. Retrieved from: https://repository.upenn.edu/wharton_research_ scholars/197.
33. NORRIS, P. (2020). Closed Minds? Is a ‘Cancel Culture’ Stifling Academic Freedom and Intellectual Debate in Political Science? HKS Working Paper No. RWP20-025, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3671026 or http :// dx.doi.org/10.2139 / ssrn .3 6 71026.
34. PAZ, R. D., REIS, A. A. DOS., and MOÇO, C. M. N. (2022). The "culture of cancellation" in social networks: how the phenomenon of "cancellation" interferes in the construction of the personality of the "canceled" person. ibero-american journal of humanities, sciences and education. 8(9), 497–511. https://doi.org/10.51891/Rease.V8i9.6723.
35. PLACIO, E. D. C., VARGAS, D. S and ESTIGOY, M. A. S. (2021). Virtual call-out: the aggressions and advantages of cancel culture.
36. POSNER, E. (2015). A Terrible Shame: Enforcing Moral Norms without Law Is No Way to a Virtuous Society. Slate.
37. POSTA GAZETESİ WEB SİTESİ. (2021).” Mee to hareketi ne anlama geliyor”. Erişim Tarihi: 15 Şubat 2022. https://www.posta.com.tr/me-too-nedir-me-too-turkcesi-ne-anlama-geliyor-me-too-hareketi-buyuyor-2347486.
38. REİJDANUS, H., DE MATOS FERNANDES, CA, TURNER-ZWİNKELS, F., HONARİ, A., ROOS, CA, ROSENBUSCH, H., AND POSTMES, T. (2020). The psychology of online activism and social movements: Relationships between online and offline collective action. Current opinion in psychology, 35, 49–54. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.003.
39. ROMANO, A. (2020). “Why we can’t stop fighting about cancel culture,” Vox (25 August). https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/12/30/20879720/what-is-cancel-culture-explaine d-history-debate. [Access Date: 30.10.2021].
40. RICHARDS, D. (2013). Dead Man's Switch: Disaster Rhetorics in a Posthuman Age. University of South Florida, 98.
41. SAINT-LOUIS, H. (2021). Understanding cancel culture: Normative and unequal sanctioning. First Monday, 26(7). https://doi.org/10. 5210/fm.v26i7.10891. [Access Date: 29.10.2021].
42. TAŞOĞLU, N. P ve ÇAĞLAYAN, S. (2022). Gösterişçi duyarlılık sergileme ya da duyar kasma: Kavramsal bir çerçeve. Selçuk İletişim, 15(2), 833-859.
43. THE NEW YORK TIMES. (2019). Obama on Call-out culture, "That's Not Activism', written by Emily S. Rueb and Derrick Byrson Taylor, published online on October 31, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/31/us/politics/obama-woke-can cel-culture.html. [Access Date: 16.02.2022].
44. VAN DIJK, J. (2018). Ağ toplumu. Epsilon Yayincilik Ltd. Sti. 2. Baskı, 293. VELASCO, J. C. (2020). You are cancelled: Virtual collective consciousness and the emergence of cancel culture as ideological purging. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary studies in humanities, 12(5), 48-68. https://dx.doiorg/10.21659/rup katha. v12n5.r ioc1s21n2. VERMA, A., ISLAM, S., MOGHADDAM, V. AND ANWAR, A. (2023). Promoting Emotion Regulation in Social Media Conversations through Personal Reflection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.00884. YILDIZ, H. N. (2022). Kültür ve reklam ilişkisi. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(1), 293-308. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.886628.