The Impact of Strategy Typologies on Corporate Entrepreneurship Behavior and Financial Performance of Firms: An Empirical Research in Turkish Industry Firms

Yıl 2017, , 1 - 16, 16.04.2017

Metin Ocak , Gökhan Peker Aslan Onur Nacak

https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.285653

Cited By: 2

Öz

This study was conducted in order to determine
the relationship between organizational strategies and corporate
entrepreneurial behaviors and the effects of both on organizational
performance. For this purpose, a hierarchical regression analysis was executed
on the data collected from 121 managers who work in some manufacturing industry
firms operating in Turkey. Results of the hierarchical regression analysis
showed that organizations' strategy types have effects on corporate
entrepreneurship behaviors and financial performance. In addition to this, it
was found that corporate entrepreneurship behaviors had significant effects on
financial performance. In this context, the relations revealed in the light of
theoretical background are generally supported. All these results were
discussed in the light of the findings in the literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Strategy types, Corporate entrepreneurship, Financial performance, Manufacturing industry firms, Hierarchical regression analysis

Strateji Tipolojilerinin Firmaların Kurumsal Girişimcilik Davranışları ile Finansal Performansı Üzerine Etkisi: Türk Sanayi Firmalarında Görgül Bir Araştırma

Öz

Bu
çalışma, örgütlerin stratejileri ve kurumsal girişimcilik davranışları
arasındaki ilişkiyi ve her ikisinin örgüt performansı üzerindeki etkilerinin
ortaya çıkarılması amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Bu maksatla Türkiye’de faaliyet
gösteren bazı imalat sanayi firmalarından çeşitli kademelerde çalışan 121
yöneticiden anket tekniği ile toplanan veriler hiyerarşik regresyon analizine
tabi tutulmuştur. Yapılan hiyerarşik regresyon analizi neticesinde elde edilen
bulgular incelendiğinde, örgütlerin strateji tiplerinin örgütlerin kurumsal
girişimcilik davranışları ile finansal performansı üzerinde etkileri olduğu
görülmüştür. Ayrıca, kurumsal girişimcilik davranışlarının örgütlerin finansal
performans değişkenini yordadığı ortaya konulmuştur. Bu kapsamda kuramsal
gerekçeler ışığında ortaya konulan ilişkiler genel olarak desteklenmiştir.
Araştırmada elde edilen tüm sonuçlar alan yazını bulguları ışığında tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Strateji Tipleri, Kurumsal Girişimcilik, Finansal Performans, Hiyerarşik Regresyon Analizi, İmalat sanayii firmaları

Kaynakça

• Aaboen, L., Lindelöf, P., Koch, C. V. & Löfsten, H. (2006). Corporate governance and performance of small high-tech firms in Sweden. Technovation, 26, 955–968.
• Agarwal, R. & Helfat, C. E. (2009). Strategic renewal of organizations. Organization Science, 20, 2, 281–293.
• Ağca, V. & Kandemir, T. (2008). Aile işletmelerinde iç girişimcilik finansal performans ilişkisi: Afyonkarahisar’da bir araştırma. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10, 3.
• Akbolat, M. (2009). Türk sağlık sektöründe Miles ve Snow’un stratejik tipolojisi: Hastaneler üzerine bir araştırma. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11/3, 127-146.
• Akman, G., Özkan, C. & Eriş, H. (2008). Strateji odaklılık ve firma stratejilerinin firma performansına etkisinin analizi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 7, 13, 93-115.
• Al-Swidi, A. K. & Fadzil, F. H. B. (2014). The measurements of firm performance’s dimensions. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 6, 1, 24-49.
• Altuntaş, G. (2010). Girişimcilik ve stratejik yönetim ilişkisi: Bir stratejik girişimcilik modeli ve İMKB Ulusal-100 endeksinde işlem gören işletmeler üzerinde testi (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). İstanbul Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı, İstanbul.
• Antoncic, B. & Hisrich, R. D. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 495-527.
• Antoncic, B. & Hisrich, R. D. (2003). Privatization, corporate entrepreneurship and performance: Testing a normative model. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 8, 3.
• Antoncic, B. & Hisrich, R. D. (2004). Corporate entrepreneurship contingencies and organizational wealth creation. Journal of Management Development, 23, 6, 518-550.
• Antoncic, B. (2006). Impacts of diversification and corporate entrepreneurship strategy making on growth and profitability: A normative model. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 14, 1, 49-63.
• Antoncic, B. (2007). Intrapreneurship: A comparative structural equation modeling study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107, 3, 309-325.
• Ayyıldız, H. & Cengiz, E. (2006). Pazarlama modellerinin testinde kullanılabilecek yapısal eşitlik modeli üzerine kavramsal bir inceleme. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 11, 1, 63-84.
• Banker, R. D., Potter, G. & Srinivasan, D. (2000). An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes non-financial performance measures. Account Rev., 75 (1), 65-92.
• Bierwerth, M., Schwens, C., Isidor, R. & Kabst, R. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship and performance: A meta-analysis. Small Business Economics, 45(2), 255-278.
• Bloodgood, J. M., Hornsby, J. S., Burkemper, A. C. & Sarooghi, H. (2015). A system dynamics perspective of corporate entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ, 45, 383-402.
• Bouchard, V. (2001). Exploring corporate entrepreneurship: A corporate strategy perspective. European Entrepreneurial Learning, 12, 1-23.
• Bracker, J. (1980). The historical development of the stratejik management concept. Academy of Management Review, 5, 2, 219-224.
• Brinckman J., Grichnik D. & Kapsa, D. (2010). Should entrepreneurs plan or just storm the castle? A meta-analysis on contextual factors impacting the business planning–performance relationship in small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 1, 24–40.
• Bulut, Ç., Fiş, A. M., Aktan, B. & Yılmaz, S. (2008). Kurumsal girişimcilik: Kavramsal yapı üzerine bir tartışma. Journal of Yaşar University, 3, 1389-1416.
• Chakravarhy, B. S. & Doz, Y. (1992). Strategy process research: Focusing on corporate self-renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 5-14.
• Christensen, K. S. (2004). A classification of the corporate entrepreneurship umbrella: Labels and perspectives. International Journal Management Enterprise Development, 1, 4, 301-315.
• Covin, J. G. & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 7-25.
• Crawford C. & Kreiser, P. M. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship strategy: Extending the integrative framework through the lens of complexity science. Small Bus Econ, 45, 403-423.
• Dess G. G., Lumpkin, G. T. & McGee, J. E. (1999). Linking corporate entrepreneurship to strategy, structure and process: Suggested research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 85-102.
• Dinçer, M. A. M., Yıldırım, M. & Dil, E. (2012). Firmanın tercih ettiği stratejinin belirlenmesinde girişimci tipinin etkisi üzerine bir araştırma. Eskişehir Osmangazi İİBF Dergisi, 7, (2), 241-261.
• Doğan, T. (2008). Strateji tipleri ve stratejik yönetim süreçlerinin firma performansına etkileri (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Gebze Teknoloji Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Dollinger, M. J. (2008). Entrepreneurship: Strategies and resources. Marsh Publication. Fourth Edition. Illinois, USA.
• Erkuş, H. (2004). Geleneksel raporlama yöntemlerinin yeni ekonomi karşısındaki durumunun irdelenmesi ve entelektüel sermayenin raporlanması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9, 2, 303-324.
• Fiş, A. M. (2009). Unlocking the relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and performance (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Sabancı Üniversitesi, Istanbul.
• Guth, W.D. & Ginsberg, A. (1990). Guest editors' introduction: Corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 5-15.
• Gürbüz, S. & Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Herrman, P. (2005). Evolution of strategic management: The need for new dominant designs. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7, 2, 111–130.
• Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp S. M. & Sexton, D. L. (2002). Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Oxford, UK.
• Hofer, C. W. & Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. MN: West Publishing Co, St.Paul.
• Hornsby, J. S. & Kuratko, D. F. & Zahra, S. A. (2002). Middle managers' perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: Assessing a measurement scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 3, 253-273.
• Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., Holt, D. T. & Wales, W. J. (2013). Assessing a measurement of organizational preparedness for corporate entrepreneurship. J Prod Innov Manag., 30 (5), 937–955.
• Ireland R. D., Hitt, M. A., Camp, S. M. & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth. The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005). Creating Wealth in Organizations, 15, 1, 49-63.
• Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G. & Kuratko, D. F. (2009). Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19-46.
• Isoherranen, V. & Kess, P. (2011). Analysis of strategy by strategy typology and orientation framework. Modern Economy, 2, 575-583.
• Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F. (1998). Are non-financial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction. J.Acc. Res., 36, 1-35.
• Jauhari, V. (2005). Corporate entrepreneurship–A framework for competitiveness. Institute for International Management & Technology. 3rd International Conference on Globalization & Competitiveness, India.
• Jennings, D. F. & Seaman, S. L. (1990). Aggressiveness of response to new business opportunities following deregulation: An empirical study of established financial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 3, 177-189.
• Jennings D. F. & Hindle, K. (2004). Corporate entrepreneurship and equifinality: An empirical analysis of strategy-structure-performance. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper, 1-8.
• Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
• Karacaoğlu, K., Bayrakdaroğlu, A. & San, F. B. (2013). The impact of corporate entrepreneurship on firms’ financial performance: Evidence from Istanbul stock exchange firms. International Business Research, 6.
• Ketchen, D. J., Thomas, Jr., James B. Jr. & McDaniel, R. R. (1996). Process, content and context: Synergistic effects on organizational performance. Journal of Management, 22, 2, 231-257.
• Khani, A. & Ahmadi, M. (2012). Performance measurement using balanced scorecard measures and strategy based on Miles and Snow’s typology in Iran. African Journal of Business Management, 6 (46), 11391-11400.
• Kraus, S. & Kauranen I. (2009). Strategic management and entrepreneurship: Friends or foes? International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 4, 1.
• Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Hayton, J. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship: The innovative challenge for a new global economic reality. Small Bus Econ, 45, 245-253.
• Kurtuldu, A. (2014). Sağlık işletmelerinde kurumsal girişimcilik ve performansa etkisi (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sağlık Kurumları İşletmeciliği Anabilim Dalı, Ankara.
• Lekmat, L. & Chelliah, J. (2011). Surviving the next economic crisis: Corporate entrepreneurship strategies of Thai Automotive SMEs. Journal of International Management Studies, 6 (3), 18-35.
• Lumpkin, G. T. & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 2, 135-172.
• Luo, X., Zhou, L. & Liu, S. S. (2005). Entrepreneurial firms in the context of China’s transition economy: An integrative framework and empirical examination. Journal of Business Research, 58, 277-284.
• Mainardes, E., Ferreira J. & Raposo, M. (2014). Strategy and strategic management concepts: Are they recognised by management students? E & M Ekonomie and Management, 17 (1), 43-61.
• Martins, T. S. & Kato, H. T. (2010). An analytical framework for Miles and Snow typology and dynamic capabilities. Encontro da Anpad, 1-14.
• Meydan C. H. & Basım, H. N. (2007). Kurumsal Yönetim-Şirket Performansı İlişkisi: Kuramsal Bir Analiz. Kara Harp Okulu Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, 6, 2, 48-67.
• Meyer, G. D. & Heppard, K. A. (2000). Entrepreneurship as strategy: Competing on the entrepreneurial egde. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.
• Miles, R. E. & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy structure and process. Mcgraw Hill, New York.
• Moreno, A. M. & Casillas, J. C. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and growth of SMEs: A causal model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 3, 507-528.
• Miles, R. E. & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy structure and process. Mcgraw Hill, New York.
• Moreno, A. M. & Casillas, J. C. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and growth of SMEs: A causal model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 3, 507-528.
• Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. H. & Jeffrey, G. C. (2011). Corporate entrepreneurship & Innovation. Student Edition.
• Ocak, M. & Basım, H. N. (2015). Kurumsal Girişimciliğin Örgüt Performansı ile Etkileşimi. Turgut Özal Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Siyaset Kongresi-III (11-13 Haziran), Malatya, 8-23.
• Ogot, M. M. (2012). A generic competitive business strategies typology for micro-enterprises. European Journal of Business and Management, 4, 20, 98-110.
• Özdemirci, A. (2011). Corporate entrepreneurship and strategy process: A performance based research on Istanbul Market. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 611–626.
• Peltola, S. (2012). Can an old firm learn new tricks? A corporate entrepreneurship approach to organizational renewal. Business Horizons, 55, 43-51.
• Raman, A. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship: A strategic and structural perspective. International Journal of Business and Administration Research Review, 2, 9, 131-133.
• Rodrigues, S. C. S. F. (2002). Business strategy and organizational performance: An analysis of the Portuguese Mould Industry (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). University of Wolverhampton.
• Rutherfold, M. W. & Holt, D. T. (2004). Corporate entrepreneurship: An empirical look at the innovatiness dimension and its antecedents. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20, 3, 429-446.
• Sânchez, A. M., Criado, M. O. U & Martinez, A. M. R. (2009). The decision to use alliances as corporate entrepreneurship: The role of resources and skills. Group Decis Negot, 18, 431-448.
• Sarvan, F., Arıcı, E. D., Özen, J., Özdemir, B. & İçigen, E. T. (2003). On stratejik yönetim okulu: Biçimleşme okulunun bütünleştirici çerçevesi. Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, (6), 73-122.
• Sebora, T. C., Theerapatvong, T. & Lee, S. M. (2010). Corporate entrepreneurship in the face of changing competition. A case analysis of six Thai manufacturing firms. Journal of Organizational Change, Management, 23,4, 453-470.
• Sihvonen, A. (2010). Success strategies in declining industries-A case survey (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). AALTO University School of Economics Department of Marketing and Management.
• Steiner, G. & Miner, J. (1977). Management policy and strategy: Text, readings and cases. Macmillan, New York.
• Sueyoshi, T., Goto, M. & Omi, Y. (2010). Corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from Japanese manufacturing industries after the lost decade. European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 724–736.
• Summer, C. E. (1980). Strategic behavior in business and government. Little, Brown, Boston.
• Şanal, M. (2011). Aile işletmelerinde kurumsallaşma ve kurumsal girişimcilik üzerine bir araştırma (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Çukurova Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana.
• Taşgit, Y. E. (2013). İş çevresi, kurum kültürü ve işletme stratejileri arasındaki ilişkiler: Otel işletmeleri üzerinde bir araştırma (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Theresa, L., Chan, K. F., Susan, H. C., Tai, H. C. & David, K. C. (2010). Corporate entrepreneurship of IJVs in China. Management Research Review, 33, 1, 6-22.
• Ülgen, H. & Mirze, K. (2004). İşletmelerde stratejik yönetim. Literatür Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
• Üstün, F. (2015). Örgütlerde sıkılık-esneklik boyutunun örgütsel güven, kurumsal girişimcilik ve firma performansına etkisi: Türkiye’nin öncü sanayi işletmeleri üzerine bir araştırma (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Çukurova Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Anabilim Dalı, Adana.
• Wang, C. L.(2008). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32 (4), 635-656.
• Zahra, S. A. (1996). Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunies. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 6, 1713-1735.
• Zahra, S. A. & Garvis, D. M. (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Businness Venturing, 15, 469-492.
• Zahra, S. A., Neubaum, D. O. & Morten, H. (2000). Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: Exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems. Journal of Management, 26, 5, 947-976.
• Zahra, S. A., Randersonk, K. & Fayolle, A. (2013). Corporate entrepreneurship: Where are we? Where can we go from here? M@n@gement, 16, 4, 357-432.
• Zehir, C. & Eren, M. Ş. (2007). Örgütsel faktörlerin kurumsal girişimcilik ve iş performansı üzerine etkileri: Türk otomotiv sektörü üzerine bir alan araştırması. Journal of American Academy of Business, 10, 2.
• Meydan, C.H. & Şeşen, H. (2011) Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Ronda-Pupo, G.A., & Guerras-Martín, L.Á. (2010). Dynamics of the scientific community network within the strategic management field through the Strategic Management Journal 1980–2009: the role of cooperation. Scientometrics, 85(3), 821-848.
• Yazıcıoğlu, Y. & Erdoğan, S. (2004). Spss uygulamalı bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Zahra, S.A. (1993). Environment, corporate entrepreneurship and financial performance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 319-340.