İş Arkadaşları Tarafından Kıskanılmak Amirin Yenilikçi İş Davranışına Verdiği Desteği Zayıflatıyor Mu?

Öz

Hızla gelişen dünyada rekabet koşullarının zorlaşmasıyla, sürece uyum sağlamak isteyen örgütler için yeniliklere açık olmak önemli bir yaklaşım olarak değerlendirilebilir. İşyerindeki sosyal desteğin en önemli parçalarından iki tanesi amirler ve iş arkadaşlarıdır. Bu çalışmada amir tarafından verilen desteğin bireylerin yenilikçi davranışlarının artmasındaki etkisine ve bu öngörülen etki üzerinde bireylerin iş arkadaşları tarafından kıskanıldığına dair algısının düzenleyici bir rolü olup olmadığına odaklanılmaktadır. Bu amaçla, çevrimiçi anket aracılığıyla ve kolayda örnekleme yoluyla çeşitli sektörlerden ulaşılan örneklem incelenmiştir. Elde edilen veriler PROCESS macro ve Pearson çarpım moment korelasyonu ile analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, amir desteğinin ve iş arkadaşları tarafından kıskanılma hissinin bu süreci etkilediğine işaret etmektedir. Örgütler çalışanlarının yenilikçi davranışlarını arttırmak için bu sosyal destek sürecini geliştirme yönünde planlamalar yapabilirler.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kıskanılmak,Kıskançlık,Amir Desteği,Yenilikçi İş Davranışı,Yenilik

Does Being Envied by Coworkers Weaken Supervisor Support for Innovative Work Behavior?

Öz

It can be considered as an important approach to be open to innovations for organizations that want to adapt to the process with difficult competition conditions in the rapidly developing world. Two of the most important factors of social support in the workplace are supervisors and coworkers. This study focuses on whether the support given by the supervisor has the effect of increasing the innovative behaviors of the individual and whether the individual’s perception of being envied by his coworkers on this predicted effect has a moderation role. For this purpose, a sample from various sectors was examined through an online questionnaire and by convenience sampling. The obtained data were analyzed by PROCESS macro and Pearson product-moment correlation. The results indicate that the perception of envy by coworkers beside supervisor support affected this process. Organizations can make plans to improve this social support process in order to increase their workers’ innovative behavior.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Being Envied,Envy,Supervisor Support,Innovative Work Behavior,Innovation

Kaynakça

1. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Hachette UK.
2. Åmo, B. W. (2006). Employee innovation behaviour in health care: the influence from management and colleagues. International Nursing Review, 53(3), 231-237. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2006.00455.x
3. Bhanthumnavin, D. (2003). Perceived social support from supervisor and group members' psychological and situational characteristics as predictors of subordinate performance in Thai work units. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(1), 79-97. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1051
4. Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and Power in social life. Routledge.doi: 10.4324/9780203792643
5. Bliese, P. D. & Castro, C. A. (2000). Role clarity, work overload and organizational support: Multilevel evidence of the importance of support. Work & Stress, 14(1), 65-73. doi: 10.1080/026783700417230
6. Boselie, P., Paauwe, J. & Jansen, P. (2001). Human resource management and performance: lessons from the Netherlands. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(7), 1107-1125. doi: 10.1080/09585190110068331
7. Brough, P. & Pears, J. (2004). Evaluating the influence of the type of social support on job satisfaction and work related psychological well-being. International Journal of Organizational Behavior, 8(2), 472-485.
8. Cable, D. M. & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875-884. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.5.875

9. Casper, W. J., Harris, C., Taylor-Bianco, A. & Wayne, J. H. (2011). Work–family conflict, perceived supervisor support and organizational commitment among Brazilian professionals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(3), 640-652. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.04.011
10. Černe, M., Jaklič, M. & Škerlavaj, M. (2013). Authentic leadership, creativity, and innovation: A multilevel perspective. Leadership, 9(1), 63-85. doi: 10.1177/1742715012455130
11. Cohen, P., West, S. G. & Aiken, L. S. (2014). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Psychology Press. doi: 10.4324/9781410606266
12. Cohen-Charash, Y. & Mueller, J. S. (2007). Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to envy? Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 666-680. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.666
13. Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462. doi: 10.1177/014920630002600304
14. Devloo, T., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A. & Salanova, M. (2015). Keep the fire burning: Reciprocal gains of basic need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation and innovative work behavior. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(4), 491-504. doi: 10.1080/1359432x.2014.931326
15. Dirks, K. T. & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.611
16. Duke, A. B., Goodman, J. M., Treadway, D. C. & Breland, J. W. (2009). Perceived organizational support as a moderator of emotional labor/outcomes relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(5), 1013-1034. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00470.x
17. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S. & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.71.3.500
18. Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L. & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565-573. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.565
19. Ellen III, B. P., Ferris, G. R. & Buckley, M. R. (2013). Leader political support: Reconsidering leader political behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 842-857. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.007
20. Exline, J. J. & Lobel, M. (1999). The perils of outperformance: Sensitivity about being the target of a threatening upward comparison. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 307-337. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.125.3.307
21. Farr, J. L. & Ford, C. M. (1990). Individual innovation. In, M. A. West & J. L. Farr (eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (pp. 63-80). Chichester, England: Wiley.
22. Grandey, A. A. (1999). The Effects of Emotional Labor: Employee Attitudes, Stress and Performance. (Published Doctoral Dissertation). Colorado State University, Colorado.
23. Halbesleben, J. R. (2006). Sources of social support and burnout: a meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1134-1145. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1134
24. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Retrieved from http:// www.personal.psu.edu/jxb14/M554/articles/process2012.pdf
25. Henagan, S. C. & Bedeian, A. G. (2009). The Perils of Success in the Workplace: Comparison Target Responses to Coworkers' Upward Comparison Threat 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(10), 2438-2468. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00533.x
26. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8. doi: 10.9707/2307-0919.1014
27. House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323-352. doi: 10.1016/s1048-9843(96)90024-7
28. Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N. & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128-1145. doi: 10.1037/a0015978
29. Ito, J. K. & Brotheridge, C. M. (2005). Does supporting employees' career adaptability lead to commitment, turnover, or both? Human Resource Management, 44(1), 5-19. doi: 10.1002/hrm.20037
30. James, J. B., McKechnie, S. & Swanberg, J. (2011). Predicting employee engagement in an age‐diverse retail workforce. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 173-196. doi: 10.1002/job.681
31. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302. doi: 10.1348/096317900167038
32. Janssen, O. (2005). The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 573-579. doi: 10.1348/096317905x25823
33. Kalliath, T. J. & Beck, A. (2001). Is the path to burnout and turnover paved by a lack of supervisory support? A structural equations test. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 30(2), 72-78.
34. Kanter, R. M. (1988). Three tiers for innovation research. Communication Research, 15(5), 509-523. doi: 10.1177/009365088015005001
35. Lambert, L. S., Tepper, B. J., Carr, J. C., Holt, D. T. & Barelka, A. J. (2012). Forgotten but not gone: An examination of fit between leader consideration and initiating structure needed and received. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 913-930. doi: 10.1037/a0028970
36. LePine, J. A., Erez, A. & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: a critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 52-65. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.52
37. Masterson, S. S. (2001). A trickle-down model of organizational justice: relating employees' and customers' perceptions of and reactions to fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 594-604. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.86.4.594
38. Menon, T. & Thompson, L. (2010). Envy at work. Harvard business review, 88(4), 74-79.
39. Miron-Spektor, E., Gino, F. & Argote, L. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 229-240. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.006
40. Önhon, Ö. (2016). The relationship between organizational climate for innovation and employees’ innovative work behavior; the moderating effect of leadership behavior; ICT sector in Turkey. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Istanbul: Marmara University, Social Sciences Institute.
41. Penney, L. M. & Spector, P. E. (2005). Job stress, incivility, and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): The moderating role of negative affectivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26(7), 777-796. doi: 10.1002/job.336
42. Rank, J., Nelson, N. E., Allen, T. D. & Xu, X. (2009). Leadership predictors of innovation and task performance: Subordinates' self‐esteem and self‐presentation as moderators. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(3), 465-489. doi: 10.1348/096317908x371547
43. Rodriguez Mosquera, P. M., Parrott, W. G. & Hurtado de Mendoza, A. (2010). I fear your envy, I rejoice in your coveting: On the ambivalent experience of being envied by others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 842-854. doi: 10.1037/a0020965
44. Schaubroeck, J. & Lam, S. S. (2004). Comparing lots before and after: Promotion rejectees' invidious reactions to promotes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94(1), 33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.01.001
45. Schreurs, B. H., Hetty van Emmerik, I. J., Günter, H. & Germeys, F. (2012). A weekly diary study on the buffering role of social support in the relationship between job insecurity and employee performance. Human Resource Management, 51(2), 259-279. doi: 10.1002/hrm.21465
46. Shanock, L. R. & Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates' perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 689-695. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.689
47. Skinner, B. F. (2014). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. (Vol. 3). BF Skinner Foundation.
48. Soper, D. S. (2018). A-priori Sample Size Calculator for Hierarchical Multiple Regression [Software]. Available from http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc
49. Stein, M. (2000). After Eden: Envy and the defences against anxiety paradigm. Human Relations, 53(2), 193-211. doi: 10.1177/a010558
50. Stinglhamber, F. & Vandenberghe, C. (2003). Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of commitment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24(3), 251-270. doi: 10.1002/job.192
51. Swanberg, J. E., McKechnie, S. P., Ojha, M. U. & James, J. B. (2011). Schedule control, supervisor support and work engagement: A winning combination for workers in hourly jobs? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(3), 613-624. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.04.012
52. Ünler Öz, E. (2007). Effect of Emotional Labor on Employees’ Work Outcomes. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Istanbul: Marmara University, Social Sciences Institute.
53. Vecchio, R. (2005). Explorations in employee envy: Feeling envious and feeling envied. Cognition & Emotion, 19(1), 69-81. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000148
54. Vecchio, R. P. (2000). Negative emotion in the workplace: Employee jealousy and envy. International Journal of Stress Management, 7(3), 161-179. doi: 10.1023/a:1009592430712
55. West, M. A. & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 680-693. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.81.6.680
56. Guest, D. E., Paauwe, J. & Wright, P. (Eds.). (2012). HRM and performance: Achievements and challenges. John Wiley & Sons.
57. Yuan, F. & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.49388995