USING 3-DIMENSIONAL MODELS AS TEACHING TOOLS IN SCIENCE EDUCATION FOR PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 237 - 254, 30.08.2024

Ayşegül Aslan , Sinem Gül Avcı , Melike Şeyma Gökçü

https://doi.org/10.46519/ij3dptdi.1473140

Öz

This research aims to identify the concepts that elementary school students struggle to understand in their science classes and to overcome these difficulties by utilizing a design thinking model. Specifically, the impact of instructional methods based on the use of 3D models on students' academic achievements has been examined. The study adopted a mixed method approach. The sample of the research consists of 3rd grade (N=31) and 4th grade (N=29) students attending an elementary school in Trabzon. This study used a mixed-method research design. Before using the final 3D models in the lessons, a "Concept Achievement Test" consisting of 10 questions each was administered as a pre-test to the students. One week after the pre-tests were administered, lessons were given using the final 3D models developed by the researchers. These models were used interactively with the students in the classroom environment for two class hours. Three days after this interactive lesson process using the models, post-tests were administered to evaluate the learning levels of the students. Comparison of the pre-test and post-test results revealed a statistically significant improvement in favor of the post-test for both 3rd grade (t(sd)=-5.005; p<.05) and 4th grade (t(sd)=-2.813; p<.05) students. In analyzing the data, a dependent samples t-test was used on the students' test results. In addition, in the qualitative dimension of the study, semi-structured interviews with students and teachers and classroom observations were also conducted. The results of the research demonstrate that the design thinking approach and three-dimensional models enhance understanding and comprehension levels in elementary school science classes. These findings can serve as an important resource for educators and policymakers in developing teaching methods that support active learning processes and encourage conceptual understanding.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Science education, 3d model, teaching material, primary school students

Kaynakça

• 1. Denessen, E., Vos, N., Hasselman, F., & Louws, M. “The relationship between primary school teacher and student attitudes towards science and technology”, Education Research International, Vol. 1, Pages 1-7, 2015.
• 2. Fleer, M. “Supporting scientific conceptual consciousness or learning in ‘a roundabout way’ in play‐based contexts”, International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 3, Issue 8, Pages 1069-1089, 2009.
• 3. Ndjangala, M., Abah, J., & Mashebe, P. “Teachers’ views on challenges affecting learners’ performance in natural science”, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), Vol. 10, Issue 1, Pages 48-56, 2021.
• 4. Jarvis, T. and Pell, A. “Primary teachers’ changing attitudes and cognition during a two‐year science in‐service programme and their effect on pupils”, International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 26, Issue 14, Pages 1787-1811, 2004.
• 5. Doğru, M. S., & Demirbaş, İ. “The relationship between perceptions of multicultural competence and democratic values: Examining science teachers working with international students”, Journal of International Students, Vol. 11, Issue 1, Pages 24-40, 2021.
• 6. Kazeni, M. “Early primary school teachers’ perceptions about science and science process skills: A case study in South Africa”, Education and New Developments, Pages 18-22, 2021.
• 7. Yildiz, Z. “Science teaching self-efficacy beliefs of pre-service teachers: context of technological pedagogical content knowledge and visual metaphors”, Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol. 21, Issue 6, Pages 989-1003, 2022.
• 8. Sulaiman, T., Subramaniam, P., & Kamarudin, N. “The influence of higher order thinking and metacognitive skills towards hands-on teaching among primary school science teachers”, International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, Vol. 8, Issue 4, Pages 245-258, 2019.
• 9. Arthur, J., Beni, S., & Stears, M. “Teaching science in the foundation phase: where are the gaps and how are they accounted for?”, South African Journal of Childhood Education, Vol. 9, Issue 1, Pages 1-9, 2019.
• 10. Vasylenko, S. “Experience using multimedia boards for visualization, conducting pedagogical discussions, developing interactive exercises for primary school”, Open Educational E-Environment of Modern University, Vol. 3, Pages 173-185, 2017.
• 11. 馬漢煊, H. “Teaching about science teaching and learning through an experimental inquiry approach”, Australian Journal of Education, Vol. 48, Issue 2, Pages 182-198, 2004.
• 12. Mtsi, N. and Maphosa, C. “Challenges encountered in the teaching and learning of the natural sciences in rural schools in South Africa”, Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 47, Issue 1, Pages 58-67, 2016.
• 13. Deehan, J., MacDonald, A. “Examining the Metropolitan and Non-metropolitan Educational Divide: Science Teaching Efficacy Beliefs and Teaching Practices of Australian Primary Science Educators”, Res Sci Educ Vol. 53, Pages 889-917, 2023.
• 14. Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. J. “A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: own it, learn it, and share it”, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 64, Issue 4, Pages 707-734, 2016.
• 15. Morel, G. “Student-centered learning: context needed”, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 69, Issue 1, Pages 91-92, 2021.
• 16. Beligatamulla, G., Rieger, J., Franz, J., & Strickfaden, M. “Making pedagogic sense of design thinking in the higher education context”, Open Education Studies, Vol. 1, Issue 1, Pages 91-105, 2019.
• 17. Sawant, S. and Rizvi, S. “Study of passive didactic teacher centered approach and an active student centered approach in teaching anatomy”, International Journal of Anatomy and Research, Vol. 3, Issue 3, Pages 1192-1197, 2015.
• 18. Scalfani, V. and Vaid, T. “3d printed molecules and extended solid models for teaching symmetry and point groups”, Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 91, Issue 8, Pages 1174-1180, 2014.
• 19. Pinger, C., Geiger, M., & Spence, D. “Applications of 3d-printing for improving chemistry education”, Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 97, Issue 1, Pages 112-117, 2019.
• 20. Smith, D., Lampley, S., Dolan, B., Williams, G., Schleppenbach, D., & Blair, M. “Effect of 3d manipulatives on students with visual impairments who are learning chemistry constructs: a pilot study”, Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, Vol. 114, Issue 5, Pages 370-381, 2020.
• 21. Canabrava, S., Diniz-Filho, A., Schor, P., Fagundes, D., Lopes, A., & Batista, W. “Production of an intraocular device using 3d printing: an innovative technology for ophthalmology”, Arquivos Brasileiros De Oftalmologia, Vol. 78, Issue 6, Pages 393-394, 2015.
• 22. Groenendyk, M. “Cataloging the 3d web: the availability of educational 3d models on the internet”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 34, Issue 2, Pages 239-258, 2016.
• 23. Chatzikyrkou, M., Manavis, A., Minaoglou, P., & Efkolidis, N. “A pedagogical methodology for introducing cad modeling tools and 3d printing technologies to adult trainees”. Matec Web of Conferences, 318, 01032, 2020.
• 24. Teplá, M., Teplý, P. & Šmejkal, P. “Influence of 3D models and animations on students in natural subjects”, IJ STEM Ed, Vol. 9, Issue 65, Pages 1-20, 2022.
• 25. Anđić, B., Lavicza, Z., Ulbrich, E., Cvjetićanin, S., Petrović, F. & Maričić, M. “Contribution of 3D modelling and printing to learning in primary schools: a case study with visually impaired students from an inclusive Biology classroom”, Journal of Biological Education, Pages 1-17, 2022.
• 26. Doğru, M. S., & Özsevgeç, L. C. “Comparison of effects of computer-based instructional support on academic achievement of university students regarding meiosis”, The American Biology Teacher, Vol. 85, Issue 5, Pages 259-264, 2023.
• 27. Baki, A., & Gökçek, T. “Karma yöntem araştırmalarına genel bir bakış”, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Vol. 11, Issue 42, Pages 1-21, 2012.
• 28. Wan, A., & Ivy, J. “Providing access by integrating computer aided design in mathematics teacher education courses”, Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, Vol. 37, Pages 234- 246, 2021.
• 29. Chen, J., & Cheng, L. “The influence of 3D printing on the education of primary and secondary school students”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1976, 2021.
• 30. Dove, G. “The Challenges of Abstract Concepts”. In: Robinson, M.D., Thomas, L.E. (eds) Handbook of Embodied Psychology. Springer, Cham., 2021
• 31. McLeod, S. “Piaget’s theory and stages of cognitive development”, Developmental Psychology, Simply Psychology, 2018.
• 32. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). “How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school.” This seminal work explores the interplay between prior knowledge, cognitive processes, and educational experiences in shaping students' understanding and learning of complex concepts, Pages 1-374, 2000.
• 33. Vosniadou, S. “Human learning and the understanding of knowledge.” In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change, Pages 39-63, Routledge, New York, 2013.
• 34. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. “Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning”, Educational Psychologist, Vol. 42, Issue 2, Pages 99-107, 2007.
• 35. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. “Education for the knowledge age: Design-centered models of teaching and instruction.” In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, Pages 695-704, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006.
• 36. Doğru, M. S., & Kurnaz, M. A. “Students’ contextualizing knowledge on the mirage incident, reflection and refraction: a case study”, Physics Education, Vol. 58, Issue 6, Pages 1-14, 2023. 37. Marshall, J. A., & Young, E. S. “Preservice teachers’ theory development in physical and simulated environments”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 43, Issue 9, Pages 907-937, 2006.
• 38. Kern, E. & Carpenter, J. “Enhancement of student values, interests, and attitudes in earth science through a field-oriented approach”, Journal of Geological Education, Vol. 32, Pages 299-305, 1984.
• 39. Rennie, L. J., & Johnston, D. J. “The nature of learning and its implications for research on learning from museums”, Science Education, Vol. 88, Issue 1, Pages 4-16, 2004.
• 40. Schneider, I., & Ohadi, M. M. “Unraveling students' misconceptions about the Earth's shape and gravity”, Science Education, Vol. 82, Issue 2, Pages 265-284, 1998.
• 41. Griffith, K., Cataldo, R., & Fogarty, K. “Do-it-yourself: 3d models of hydrogenic orbitals through 3d printing”, Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 93, Issue 9, Pages 1586-1590, 2016.
• 42. Resnick, M., Silverman, B. “Some reflections on designing construction kits for kids”, In Proceedings of the Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Pages 117-122, 2005.
• 43. Ishutov, S., Hodder, K., Chalaturnyk, R., & Zambrano-Narvaez, G. “A 3d printing short course: a case study for applications in the geoscience teaching and communication for specialists and non-experts” Frontiers in Earth Science, 9, Pages 1-12, 2021.
• 44. Trust, T., Maloy, R. W. “Why 3D print? The 21st-century skills students develop while engaging in 3D printing projects”, Computers in the Schools, Vol. 34, Issue 4, Pages 253-266, 2017.
• 45. Davis, E., Jones, M., Thiel, D., & Pauls, S. “Using open-source, 3d printable optical hardware to enhance student learning in the instrumental analysis laboratory”, Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 95, Issue 4, Pages 672-677, 2018.
• 46. Vangunten, M., Walker, U., Han, G., & Knust, K. “3d-printed microfluidics for hands-on undergraduate laboratory experiments”, Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 97, Issue 1, Pages 178-183, 2019.
• 47. Lemu, H. and Mikkelsen, O. “Experience in use of 3d printing in engineering education at university of stavanger”, Nordic Journal of Stem Education, Vol. 5, Issue 1, Pages 1-5, 2021.
• 48. Pernaa, J. and Wiedmer, S. “A systematic review of 3d printing in chemistry education – analysis of earlier research and educational use through technological pedagogical content knowledge framework”, Chemistry Teacher International, Vol. 2, Issue 2, Pages 1-16, 2019.
• 49. Higman, C., Situ, H., Blacklin, P., & Hein, J. “Hands-on data analysis: using 3d printing to visualize reaction progress surfaces”, Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 94, Issue 9, Pages 1367-1371, 2017.
• 50. Zhang, T., Cummings, M., & Dulay, M. “An outreach/learning activity for steam education via the design and 3d printing of an accessible periodic table”, Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 99, Issue 10, Pages 3355-3359, 2022.
• 51. Harmon, D., Klein, B., Im, C., & Romero, D. “Development and implementation of a three‐dimensional (3d) printing elective course for health science students”, Anatomical Sciences Education, Vol. 15, Issue 3, Pages 620-627, 2022.