Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Exploring Teachers’ Assessment Practices and Skills

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 1 - 18, 12.12.2016
https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.254581

Öz

The need for increased use of test results to improve educational outcomes is urgent; yet, there is little understanding in the research literature of practitioners’ knowledge and skills in interpreting and using educational data (test results) to enhance classroom instruction and student learning. This study aims to survey 40 high school teachers who work in El Jadida region, distributed between males and females, of different years of experience, with the purpose of learning about their assessment practices, and identifying the barriers that prevent thoughtful applications of formative assessment in classrooms. A questionnaire and an interview were used as a data collection technique. The findings point to use of a varied number of assessment strategies ranging from homework assignments to in-class written tests but mainly for summative purposes. In light of the results, the study ends with implications for teachers and policy makers.

Kaynakça

  • Babaii, E. & Damankesh, M. (2015). On students’ test-taking and test-preparation strategies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 45, 62-69.
  • Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan 80 (2): 139–48.
  • Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (2005).Changing teaching through formative assessment: Research and practice. London: King’s College.
  • Bouzid, H. (2009). Teacher commentary and its impact on student revision. In H. Bennoudi and Y. Tamer, (Eds). The Educational Reform. Paper presented at Agadir conference, Agadir (pp. 67-82).
  • Brookhart, S. (2011).Educational assessment knowledge and skill for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, (30)1, 3-12.
  • Brown, H. D. (2003). Language assessment: principles and classroom practices. Longman: Longman.com.
  • Bruner J S (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A, Jarvella R & Levelt W J M (eds.) The child’s conception of language. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 1-14.
  • Crooks, T. J. (1998). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438-481.
  • Fleming, M., & Chambers, B. (1983). Teacher-made tests: Windows to the classroom. InW. E. Hathaway (Ed.), Testing in the schools (pp. 29-47). San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
  • Gotch, C. & French, B. (2011).Development of and validity evidence for the teacher educational measurement literacy scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national council on measurement in education conference. New Orleans, LA.
  • Hattie, J. (1999). Influences on student learning, Inaugural professorial lecture. New Zealand: University of Auckland.
  • Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89 (2), 140–145.
  • Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies inHigher Education, 27(1), 53-64.
  • Khtou, H. (2011). Assessment in higher education: Students and teachers’ perceptions. Published doctoral dissertation, Saarbrucken: Lambert academic publishing.
  • Lynch, B. (2001). The ethical potential of alternative language assessment. In C. Elder (Ed). Experimenting with uncertainty: Essays in honour of Alan Davies (pp. 228-239). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Melouk, M. (2001, March 25-29). The state of EFL evaluation in Morocco: The testers and teachers' opinions. In A. Zaki & M. Naji, (Eds). The Teaching and Assessment of English for Global Purposes. Paper presented at MATE proceedings, Essaouira (pp. 41-51). Rabat: MATE.
  • Mertler, C. (2004). Secondary teachers’ assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference? American Secondary Education 33(1), 49-64.
  • Nunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Plake, B. (1993). Teacher assessment literacy: Teachers’ competencies in the educational assessment of students. Midwestern Educational Researcher 6(1), 21-27.
  • Popham, W. J. (2004). Curriculum, instruction, and assessment: Amiable allies or phony friends? Teachers College Record 106(3), 417– 428.
  • Popham, J. (2011). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Boston: Pearson.
  • Rea-Dickins, P. & Gardner, S. (2000). Snares and silver bullets: Disentangling the construct of formative assessment. Language Testing, 17, 215-243.
  • Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 18, 119–44.
  • Schunk, D. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal-setting, and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 159-172.
  • Stiggins, R. (2009). Essential formative assessment competencies for teachers and school leaders. In. H.L. Andrade & G. J Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment. New York: Routledge.
  • Stiggins, R. (2001). Student Involved Classroom Assessment. Columbus: Merrill Publishing.
  • Torrance, H. & Pryor, J. (2002). Investigating formative assessment: Teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom. England: Open University Press.
  • Vaden-Goad, R. E. (2009). Leveraging summative assessment for formative purpose. College Teaching, 57(3), 153-155.
  • Wise, Steven L. (1993). Teachers’ testing knowledge, skills, and practices. In N. M. Ronald & L. P. Fred (Eds.), Teacher Training in Measurement and Assessment Skills (129-185). Lincoln, NE: Buros-Nebraska Symposium on Measurement & Testing.
  • Yamtima, V. & Wongwanichb, S. (2014). A study of classroom assessment literacy of primary school teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2998-3004.

Exploring Teachers’ Assessment Practices and Skills

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 1 - 18, 12.12.2016
https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.254581

Öz

The need for increased use of test results to
improve educational outcomes is urgent; yet, there is little understanding in
the research literature of practitioners’ knowledge and skills in interpreting
and using educational data (test results) to enhance classroom instruction and
student learning. This study aims to survey 40 high school teachers who work in
El Jadida region, distributed between males and females, of different years of
experience, with the purpose of learning about their assessment practices, and
identifying the barriers that prevent thoughtful applications of formative
assessment in classrooms. A questionnaire and an interview were used as a data
collection technique. The findings point to use of a varied number of
assessment strategies ranging from homework assignments to in-class written
tests but mainly for summative purposes. In light of the results, the study
ends with implications for teachers and policy makers.

Kaynakça

  • Babaii, E. & Damankesh, M. (2015). On students’ test-taking and test-preparation strategies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 45, 62-69.
  • Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan 80 (2): 139–48.
  • Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (2005).Changing teaching through formative assessment: Research and practice. London: King’s College.
  • Bouzid, H. (2009). Teacher commentary and its impact on student revision. In H. Bennoudi and Y. Tamer, (Eds). The Educational Reform. Paper presented at Agadir conference, Agadir (pp. 67-82).
  • Brookhart, S. (2011).Educational assessment knowledge and skill for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, (30)1, 3-12.
  • Brown, H. D. (2003). Language assessment: principles and classroom practices. Longman: Longman.com.
  • Bruner J S (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A, Jarvella R & Levelt W J M (eds.) The child’s conception of language. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 1-14.
  • Crooks, T. J. (1998). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438-481.
  • Fleming, M., & Chambers, B. (1983). Teacher-made tests: Windows to the classroom. InW. E. Hathaway (Ed.), Testing in the schools (pp. 29-47). San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
  • Gotch, C. & French, B. (2011).Development of and validity evidence for the teacher educational measurement literacy scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national council on measurement in education conference. New Orleans, LA.
  • Hattie, J. (1999). Influences on student learning, Inaugural professorial lecture. New Zealand: University of Auckland.
  • Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89 (2), 140–145.
  • Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies inHigher Education, 27(1), 53-64.
  • Khtou, H. (2011). Assessment in higher education: Students and teachers’ perceptions. Published doctoral dissertation, Saarbrucken: Lambert academic publishing.
  • Lynch, B. (2001). The ethical potential of alternative language assessment. In C. Elder (Ed). Experimenting with uncertainty: Essays in honour of Alan Davies (pp. 228-239). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Melouk, M. (2001, March 25-29). The state of EFL evaluation in Morocco: The testers and teachers' opinions. In A. Zaki & M. Naji, (Eds). The Teaching and Assessment of English for Global Purposes. Paper presented at MATE proceedings, Essaouira (pp. 41-51). Rabat: MATE.
  • Mertler, C. (2004). Secondary teachers’ assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference? American Secondary Education 33(1), 49-64.
  • Nunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Plake, B. (1993). Teacher assessment literacy: Teachers’ competencies in the educational assessment of students. Midwestern Educational Researcher 6(1), 21-27.
  • Popham, W. J. (2004). Curriculum, instruction, and assessment: Amiable allies or phony friends? Teachers College Record 106(3), 417– 428.
  • Popham, J. (2011). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Boston: Pearson.
  • Rea-Dickins, P. & Gardner, S. (2000). Snares and silver bullets: Disentangling the construct of formative assessment. Language Testing, 17, 215-243.
  • Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 18, 119–44.
  • Schunk, D. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal-setting, and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 159-172.
  • Stiggins, R. (2009). Essential formative assessment competencies for teachers and school leaders. In. H.L. Andrade & G. J Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment. New York: Routledge.
  • Stiggins, R. (2001). Student Involved Classroom Assessment. Columbus: Merrill Publishing.
  • Torrance, H. & Pryor, J. (2002). Investigating formative assessment: Teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom. England: Open University Press.
  • Vaden-Goad, R. E. (2009). Leveraging summative assessment for formative purpose. College Teaching, 57(3), 153-155.
  • Wise, Steven L. (1993). Teachers’ testing knowledge, skills, and practices. In N. M. Ronald & L. P. Fred (Eds.), Teacher Training in Measurement and Assessment Skills (129-185). Lincoln, NE: Buros-Nebraska Symposium on Measurement & Testing.
  • Yamtima, V. & Wongwanichb, S. (2014). A study of classroom assessment literacy of primary school teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2998-3004.
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Benzehaf Bouchaib Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 12 Aralık 2016
Gönderilme Tarihi 14 Temmuz 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Bouchaib, B. (2016). Exploring Teachers’ Assessment Practices and Skills. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 4(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.254581

23823             23825             23824