Yarı Kurak Koşullarda Korunga Genotiplerinin (Onobrychis sativa Scop.) Morfolojik ve Agronomik Özellikleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Öz

Baklagiller familyasına ait bitki türleri, yarı kurak bölgelerdeki meraların kalitesi ve miktarı için çok önemlidir. Yanlış yönetim nedeniyle hızla bozulan meralarımız için bu familyada yer alan lezzetli, uzun ömürlü ve kaliteli bitki türlerinden yeni çeşitler geliştirilmelidir. Bu doğrultuda yeni çeşitlerin geliştirilmesi amacıyla korunga ıslah çalışması başlatılmıştır. Bu amacı gerçekleştirmek için korunga ıslah çalışması yeni çeşitlerin geliştirilmesi amacıyla başlatılmıştır. İlk aşamada, Orta ve Doğu Anadolu Bölgelerinin mera alanlarından toplanan yedi korunga populasyonu, 2015 yılında Ankara'nın Gölbaşı ilçesinde bulunan araştırma istasyonunda tesis edilen bir gözlem bahçesinde kontrol çeşitleri olan Özerbey-03 ve Lütfibey ile birlikte ekilmiştir. Projenin ikinci ve üçüncü yılarında (2016 ve 2017), morfolojik (bitki boyu, sap kalınlığı ve sap sayısı) ve agronomik özellikler (yeşil ot ve kuru ot verimleri) tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, L-1787 tüm populasyonlar arasında bitki boyu, yeşil ot ve kuru ot verimi bakımından en yüksek değerlere sahip olmuştur. Ayrıca, tüm popülasyonlar arasında L-1747 en düşük yeşil ot ve kuru ot verimine sahip olmuştur. L-1781 en yüksek sap sayısına sahipken, Lütfibey en düşük sap sayısına sahiptir. Özerbey-03 ve L-1781 en kalın sapa sahip olmuştur. L-1781, L-1787 ve L-1788 populasyonları, kontrol çeşitleriyle karşılaştırıldığında, daha fazla sap sayısı ve daha geniş sap çapı nedeniyle daha yüksek yeşil ve kuru ot verimi sergilemiştir. Bu populasyonlar, yeni çeşitlerin geliştirilmesi için gelecekte yapılacak ıslah çalışmalarında da kullanılabilir. Ayrıca benzer özelliklerin ve benzerlik düzeylerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla Kümeleme Analizi ve Temel Bileşenler Analizi yöntemleri kullanılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Korunga populasyonları
• morfolojik özellikler
• agronomik özellikler
• kümeleme analizi
• temel bileşenler analizi

A Study on Morphological and Agronomic Traits of Sainfoin Populations (Onobrychis sativa Scop.) in Semi-Arid Conditions

Abstract

Plant species belonging to the leguminous family are very important for the quality and quantity of rangelands in semiarid regions. New varieties should be developed from the delicious, long-lasting, and high-quality plant species in this family for our rangelands that have rapidly deteriorated due to mismanagement. For this reason, sainfoin breeding study was initiated to develop new cultivars. In the first period, the seven collected sainfoin populations from the rangeland areas of the Central and Eastern Anatolia Regions were planted with control cultivars, Özerbey-03 and Lütfibey, in a nursery plot at the research station located in the Gölbaşı district of Ankara in 2015. At the initiating period of this breeding study (in 2016 and 2017), morphological (plant height, stem diameter, and stem number) and agronomic traits (fresh forage and dry forage yields) were determined. According to the obtained results, The L-1787 had the highest values in plant height, fresh forage, and dry forage yields of all populations. Moreover, among all populations, L-1747 had the lowest fresh forage and dry forage yield. The L-1781 had the highest stem number, while Lütfibey had the lowest. The Özerbey-03 and L-1781 had the thickest stems. L-1781, L-1787 anwd L-1788 populations exhibited higher fresh and dry feed yield due to higher stem number and larger stem diameter compared to control varieties. These populations can also be utilized for future breeding studies to develop new cultivars. Additionally, the methods of Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis were used to identify similar traits and their similarity levels.

Keywords

• Sainfoin populations
• morphological traits
• agronomic traits
• cluster analysis
• principal component analysis

Kaynakça

1. Acharya, S., Sottie, E., Coulman, B., Iwaasa, A., McAllister, T., Wang, Y., & Liu, J. (2013). New sainfoin populations for bloat‐free alfalfa pasture mixtures in western Canada. Crop Science, 53, 2283-2293.
2. Açıkgöz, E. (2021). Forages. Uludağ University, Agriculture Faculty, Publication no: 7-025- 0210, Bursa.
3. Albayrak, S. & Ekiz, H. (2004). Determination of the characters related to hay yield in some perennial forage crops by correlation and path analysis. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10(3), 250-257.
4. Alibegoviç, S., & Gatariç, D. (1989, October 4-11). Yield and Yield Components of Some Domestic Populations and Improved Sainfoin Varieties, [Paper presentation] XVI. International Grassland Congress, Nice, France.
5. Anonymous (2015). Soil analysis results of trails in Gölbaşı. Central Soil, Fertilizer and Water Resources Research Institute, Ankara. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Announcement/201/Soil-Fertilizer-And-Water-Resources-Central-Research-Institute-Is-On-The-Way-To-International-Excellence, [Accessed date: 27.09.2023].
6. Anonymous (2017). The climatic data of Gölbaşı. The General Director of State Meteorological, Annual Climatic Observation Table Report. https://mgm.gov.tr/eng/forecast-cities.aspx, [Accessed date: 01.03.2018].
7. Anonymous (2019). Technical instruction for leguminous forage crops agricultural values measurement trials. Seed Registration and Certification Center Directorate. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Villages, Ankara. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/BUGEM/TTSM/Belgeler/Duyuru%20Belgeleri/2019/%C3%A7ay%C4%B1r%20mera/baklagil%20yem%20bitkileri.pdf, [Accessed date: 27.09.2023].
8. Anonymous (2023a). Plant Production Statistics. Turkish Statistical Institute. Government Agency. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=92&locale=tr, [Accessed date: 13.02.2023].

9. Anonymous (2023b). National Variety List (Field Crop Varieties) Seed Registration and Certification Central Directorate, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/BUGEM/TTSM/Sayfalar/Detay.aspx?SayfaId=85, [Accessed date: 01.08.2023].
10. Arzani, H., Nikkhah, A., Arzani, Z., Kaboli, S. H., & Fazel Dehkordi, L. (2007). Study of range forage quality in three province of Semnan, Markazi and Lorestan for calculation of animal unit requirement. Journal of Pajouhesh & Sazandegi, 76: 60-68.
11. Aygün, C., Kara, E., & Çakal, Ş. (2007, June 25-27). Cultivation Possibilities of Forage Plant Species. [Paper presentation] Türkiye VII. Field Crops Congress, Erzurum.
12. Bakoğlu, A., Koç, A., Erkovan, H. İ., & Özaslan, H. (1999, November 15-18). Some Characteristics of Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) in Pasture Vegetations of Erzurum Region”, [Paper presentation] Turkey 3rd Field Crops Congress, Meadow Pasture Forage Crops and Edible Grain Legumes, Adana.
13. Balabanlı, C., Yüksel, O., & Karadoğan, T. (2007, June, 25-27). Determination of Development Course of Sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa Lam.), Türkiye VII. Field Crops Congress Erzurum [Poster Presentation].
14. Bato, E., Nizam, İ. & Tuna, M. (2021). Determination of forage yield and some morphological characteristics of prairie grass (Bromus catharticus Vahl.) lines. Tekirdağ Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 18(1), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.828741
15. Bhattarai, S., Coulman, B., & Biligetu, B. (2016). Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.): renewed interest as a forage legume for western Canada. Can. Journal Plant Science, 96, 748–756. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2015-0378.
16. Butkutė, B., Padarauskas, A., Cesevičienė, J., Taujenis, L., & Norkevičienė, E. (2018). Phytochemical composition of temperate perennial legumes. Crop Pasture Science, 69, 1020. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP18206.
17. Cebeci, H. (2011). Determination of agricultural characteristics of different origin Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop. and Onobrychis altissima Grossh) populations”, [Master Thesis, Ankara University Institute of Science, Department of Field Crops.]. Ankara. https://dspace.ankara.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12575/30524
18. Çaçan, E., Kökten, K., & Koç, A. (2023). Determination of high yield and quality sainfoin genotypes (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) for the Bingöl province of Turkey. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Agriculture and Nature Journal, 26(3), 619-628. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1084441
19. Çeçen, S., Öten, M., & Erdurmuş, C. (2015). Collection and determination of morphological traits of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa L.) populations from Antalya natural flora. Derim, 32(1), 63-70.
20. Davis, P. H. (1970). Flora of Turkey and The East Agean Islands. Vol III. Edinburgh Univ. Pres.
21. Delgado, I., Salvia, J., & Andrés, C. (2008). The agronomic variability of a collection of sainfoin accessions. In: Spaish Journal Agriculture Research, 6(3), 401-407.
22. Demir İ., Turgut, İ. (1999). Plant Breeding. Ege University, Agriculture Faculty publications, no: 496, pp. 451. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1177406
23. Elçi, Ş., Ekiz, H., & Sancak, C. (1996, July 17-19). Problems of Sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa) Production in Turkey, [Paper presentation] Turkey 3rd Grassland and Forage Crops Congress, Erzurum.
24. Erkovan, H. I., & Tan, M. (2009). The determination of seed and hay yield and some characteristics of sainfoin under dry and irrigation condition. Erzincan University Journal of Science and Techonology, 2(1), 61-70.
25. Ertuş, M. M., Sabancı, C. O., & Celebi, Z. S. (2012). Determination of some characteristics of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa) landraces grown in Van province. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 22(3), 165-172.
26. Frame, J., Charlton, J. F. L., & Laidlaw, A. S. (1998). Temperate forage legumes (Wallingford, Oxon, UK; New York, NY, USA: CAB International).
27. Gea, A., Stringano, E., Brown, R. H., & Mueller-Harvey, I. (2011). In situ analysis and structural elucidation of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) tannins for high-throughput germplasm screening. Journal Agriculture Food Chemistry, 59, 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf103609p.
28. Gülcan, H., & Anlarsal, A. E. (1993). Çukurova University Faculty of Agriculture Textbook (Legumes Forage Crops), Publication no: 5 Adana.
29. İlgin, H. (2017). Investigation of the effects of different seed amounts and row spacing on forage yield in sainfoin (Onorbrychis sativa L.) in Şanlıurfa ecological conditions. [Master Thesis, T.R. Harran University Institute of Science and Technology. Field Plants Department Şanlıurfa p. 40. i]. http://hdl.handle.net/11513/1391
30. Karabulut, E., Erkoc¸ K., Acı, M., Aydın, M., Barriball, S., Braley, J., Cassetta, E., Craine, E. B., Diaz-Garcia, L., Hershberger, J., Meyering, B., Miller, A. J., Rubin, M. J., Tesdell, O., Schlautman. B., & Şakioğlu, M. (2023) Sainfoin (Onobrychis spp.) crop ontology: supporting germplasm characterization and international research collaborations. Frontier Plant Science, 14, 1177406.
31. Karagöz, A., Pilanalı, N., Horan, A., Karakurt, E., Alişan. T., Sağlam, G., & Fırıncıoğlu, H. K. (2001). Characterization, evaluation, and conservation study of some important pasture crops collected from Central Anatolian rangelands, Unpublished final report, Field Crops Central Research Institute Ankara.
32. Koç, A., & Akdeniz, H. (2017). Preliminary investigations on the yield and some agricultural properties of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa L.) species of breed in Gozlu and Altınova agricultural establishments. Kahramanmaraş Sütcü İmam University Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 20(1), 6-12.
33. Lu, Y., Sun, Y., Foo, Y., & McNabb, W. C. (2000). Phenolic glycosides of forage legume Onobrychis viciifolia. Phytochemistry 55, 67-75.
34. Miller, D. A., & Hanna, W. W. (1995). Forage Breeding. Eds: Barnes, R. F., D. A. Miller, and C. J. Nelson. Forages, An introduction to grassland agriculture, pp. 117-125.
35. Mohajer, S., Jafari, A. A., Taha, R. M., Yaacob, J. S., & Saleh, A. (2013). Genetic diversity analysis of agro-morphological and quality traits in populations of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa). Austr. Journal Crop Science, 7, 1024–1031.
36. Özkan, S., & Bilgen, B. B. (2019). Genetic characterization of some sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) varieties and populations using microsatellite markers. Tekirdağ Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 16(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.516991
37. Parlak Özaslan, A., Gökkuş, A., Samikıran, E., & Şenol, M. Y. (2014). Investigation of morphological and agronomic characteristics of some wild sainfoin species. COMU Journal of Agriculture Faculty, 2(2), 111-117.
38. Robins, J. G., & Jensen, K. B. (2020). Breeding of the crested wheatgrass complex (Agropyron spp.) for North American temperate rangeland agriculture and conservation. Agronomy, 10, 1134. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081134.
39. Sabancı C. O. &Tosun M. (2009). Forage crops breeding and biotechnology, Forage crops, v. 1, section 7, p. 214-240. Turkish Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Affairs. General Directorate of Agricultural Production and Development.
40. Schlautman, B., Barriball, S., Ciotir, C., Herron, S., & Miller, A. J. (2018). Perennial grain legume domestication phase I: criteria for candidate species selection. Sustainability, 10, 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030730.
41. Tan M. & Serin Y. (2009). Problems and applied policies in forage crops production in Turkey. Forage Crops, 1(2):45-50. Turkish Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Affairs. General Directorate of Agricultural Production and Development.
42. Tan, M., & Sancak, C. (2009). Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.). In: Legume Forage Crops Volume II, ed. Avcıoğlu R., Hatipoğlu R, Karadağ Y, General Directorate of Agricultural Production and Development, Izmir (In Turkish).
43. Tekkanat, A., & Soylu, S. (2005). Determınatıon of important quality characters and grain yield in popcorn cultivars Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture of Selçuk University, 19(37), 51-60.
44. Tucak M., Popović, S., Čupić, T., Krizmanić, G., Španić, V., Šimić, B., & Meglič, V. (2014). Agro-Morphological and forage quality traits of selected alfalfa populations and their application in breeding. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 19(1), 79-83.
45. Ünal, S., & Eraç, A. (2000). The researches on effects of mixture sowing rates of cicer milkvetcth (Astragalus cicer L.) - wheatgrass (Agropyrou Gaertn.) for forage yield, and botanical composition. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute, 9(1-2), 32-54.
46. Ünal S., & Fırıncıoğlu, H. K. (2002). An observation of the morphological and the phenological features of on some sainfoin. Journal Field Crops Central Research Institue for Field Ccrops, 11(1-2), 42-55.
47. Ünal, S., & Fırıncıoğlu, H. K. (2007). Investigation of the phenological, morphological and agronomic traits of some sainfoin populations and line. Journal of Central Research Institute for Field Crops, 16(1- 2), 31-38.