The Effect of Different Sowing Dates to Leaf Area Index in Some Common Vetch Varieties

Öz

The aim of this article was to research the effect of different sowing dates on the leaf area index (LAI) of common vetch varieties growing in arid conditions. The experiment was conducted during 2014 - 2015 growing season in Igdir with arid climate. In study, Bakır-2001, Dicle, Emir, Gülhan-2005 and Nilüfer varieties were sown six different dates (E1:1 October 2014, E2: 16 October 2014, E3: 31 October 2014, E4: 15 March 2015, E5: 1 April 2015 and E6: 16 April 2015), and their LAI were measured by the tool of CI-202 at the stage of full seed filling of lower pods on plant. Results showed that the LAI differed significantly in terms of variety, sowing date and variety x sowing date interaction. Among varieties, the highest LAI was determined in Dicle and Nilüfer, but the lowest values in Emir and Bakır-2001. In reasearch, while maximum LAI was obtained from E1 time (6.22), minimum vales were measured at E6 (0.87). In respect of variety x sowing date interaction, the highest LAI was determined in Nilüfer and Dicle grown in early fall season (E1), but the lowest value in all varieties growing in summer sowing (E6). According to these results, significant decreases were seen in LAI by delay of sowing dates depending on environmental conditions, and Dicle and Nilüfer were determined as least affected varieties by low rainfall and high temperature in terms of LAI.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Common vetch,sowing date,drought,LAI

Bazı Adi Fiğ Çeşitlerinde Farklı Ekim Tarihlerinin Yaprak Alan İndeksine Etkisi

Öz

Bu makalenin amacı kurak şartlarda yetiştirilen adi fiğ çeşitlerinin yaprak alan indeksi (YAI) üzerine farklı ekim tarihlerinin etkisini incelemektir. Deneme 2014 - 2015 yetiştirme döneminde kurak iklim özelliği gösteren Iğdır ilinde yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada Bakır-2001, Dicle, Emir, Gülhan-2005 ve Nilüfer çeşitleri, 6 farklı ekim döneminde (E1:1 Ekim 2014, E2: 16 Ekim 2014, E3: 31 Ekim 2014, E4: 15 Mart 2015, E5: 1 Nisan 2015 ve E6: 16 Nisan 2015) ekilmiş ve ot için hasat dönemi olan bitkilerdeki alt baklaların tamamen dolduğu devrede yaprak alan ölçer cihazı ile (CI-202) YAI’leri belirlenmiştir. Sonuçlar YAI üzerine çeşit, ekim tarihi ve çeşit x ekim tarihi interaksiyonun önemli etkisi olduğunu göstermiştir. Çeşitler arasında en yüksek YAI Dicle ve Nilüfer çeşidinde, en düşük değerler Emir ve Bakır-2001 çeşidinde belirlenmiştir. Ekim zamanları arasında maksimum YAI, E1 döneminde (6.22), minimum değerler E6 (0.87) döneminde ölçülmüştür. Çeşit x ekim tarihi interaksiyonu açısından ise en yüksek YAI, erken güz döneminde ekilen (E1) Nilüfer ve Dicle çeşitlerinde tespit edilmiştir. Oysa en düşük YAI değerleri tüm çeşitlerde E6 dönemi olan yazlık ekimlerde gerçekleşmiştir. Bu sonuçlara göre, çevresel koşullara bağlı olarak ekim tarihlerinin gecikmesi ile (özellikle yazlık ekimlerde) YAI’lerinde önemli düşüşler görülmüş, Dicle ve Nilüfer YAI açısından düşük yağış ve yüksek sıcaklıktan en az etkilenen çeşitler olmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Adi fiğ,ekim dönemi,kuraklık,YAI

Kaynakça

1. Alam MP., Kumar S., Ali N., Manjhi RP., Kumari N., Lakva RK and Izhar T., 2013. Performance of wheat varieties under different sowing dates in Jharkland. Journal of Wheat Research, 5: 61-64.
2. Al-Doori SA., 2011. A Study of the importance of sowing dates and plant density affecting some rapeseed cultivars (Brassica napus L.). College of Basic Education Researchers Journal, 11: 615-632.
3. Asseng S., Jamieson PD., Kimball B., Pinter P., Sayra K., Bowden JW and Howden SM., 2004. Simulated wheat growth affected by rising temperature, in creased water deficit and elevated atmospheric coz. Field Crops Research, 85: 85-102.
4. Aydınoğlu B ve Çakmakçı S., 2001. Antalya ili sahil kuşağında farklı kışlık ve yazlık ekim zamanlarının adi fiğ (Vicia sativa L.)'in tohum verimi ve kalitesine etkileri. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 14: 39-45.
5. Ayisi KK and Poswall MAL., 1997. Effect of plant population on leaf area index, cob characteristics and grain yield of early maturing maize cultivars. European Journal of Agronomy, 16: 151-159.
6. Blonquist JJM., Jones SB and Robinson DA., 2006. Precise irrigation scheduling for turfgrass using a subsurface electromagnetic soil moisture sensor. Agricultural Water Management, 84: 153-165.
7. Budakli Carpici E and Celik N., 2014. Forage Yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with triticale and annual ryegrass. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 19: 66-69.
8. Chaudhary BJ., 1987. Relationships between vegetation indices, radiation absorption, and net photosynthesis evaluated by a sensitivity analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment, 22: 209-233.

9. Çamoğlu G., Genç L ve Aşık Ş., 2011. Tatlı mısırda (Zea mays saccharata Sturt) su stresinin fizyolojik ve morfolojik parametreler üzerine etkisi. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 48: 141-149.
10. Dalirie MS., Sharifi RS and Farzaneh S., 2010. Evaluation of yield, dry matter accumulation and leaf area index in wheat genotypes as affected by terminal drought stress. Notulae Botanicae Hort Agrobotanici Cluj, 38: 182-186.
11. Dennis RE., 1996. Maize for Grain in Arizona. University of Arizona Cooperative Extension Tucson.
12. Dijak M., Modarres AM., Hamilton RI., Dwyer LM., Stewart DW., Mather DE and Smith DL., 1999. Leafy reduced-stature maize hybrids for short-season environments. Crop Science, 39: 1106-1110.
13. Drunasky N and Struve DK., 2005. Quercus macrocarpa and Q. prinus physiological and morphological responses to drought stress on Coriandrum sativum L. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 4: 13-22.
14. Edalat M., Dadkhodaiel A and Naderi Kharraji R., 2015. The interrelationships of chickpea (Cicera rietinum L.) kernel yield and its components under rainfed conditions. Iran Agricultural Research, 34: 56-62.
15. El-Khoby WM., 2004. Study The Effect of Some Cultural Practices on Rice Crop. Ph. D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture Kafr El-Sheikh, Tanta University, Egypt.
16. Erkovan HI., Güllap MK., Dasci M and Koc A., 2009. Changes in leaf area index, forage quality and above-ground biomass in grazed and ungrazed rangelands of Eastern Anatolia region. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 15: 217-223.
17. Hajibabaee M., Azizi F and Zargari K., 2012. Effect of drought stress on some morphological, physiological and agronomic traits in various foliage corn hybrids. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science, 12: 890-896.
18. Hakyemez BH., 2006. Adi Fiğ (Vicia sativa L.)’de ekim zamanlarının ot ve tane verimi üzerine etkileri. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 20: 47-55.
19. Jaleel CA., Manivannan P., Wahid A., Farooq M., Al-Juburi HJ., Somasundaram R and Panneerselvam R., 2009. Drought stress in plants: A Review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 11: 100-105.
20. Jamali MM., 2013. Investigate the effect of drought stress and different amount of chemical fertilizers on some physiological characteristics of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.). International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences. 2: 872-879.
21. Jonckheere I., Fleck S., Nackerts K., Muys B., Coppin P and Baref M., 2004. Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination: theories, sensors and hemispherical photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 121: 19-35.
22. Kacar B., 1986. Gübreler Gübreleme Tekniği. T.C. Ziraat Bankası Kültür Yayınları No:20, Ankara.
23. Kamali N., Khajeh Pour MR and Soleymani A., 2014. Studying growth indices and grain yield of barley cultivars at planting dates in Isfahan Region. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences, 3: 35-44.
24. Kaplan M ve Kara R., 2014. Silaj sorgum’da bazı fizyolojik özelliklerin verim üzerine etkileri. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 31: 20-31.
25. Karam F., Masaad R., Sfeir T., Mounzer O and Rouphael Y., 2007. Evaptranspiration and seed yield of field grown soybean under deficit irrigation conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 75: 226-244.
26. Karayel R ve Bozoğlu H., 2012. Yemlik yetiştiriciliğe uygun yerel bezelye (Pisum sativum L.) genotipleri. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi, 1: 83-90.
27. Khayat M., Rahnama A., Lorzadeh S and Lack S., 2015. Growth analysis rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) genotypes in different sowing date under warm and semiarid climate condition in South West of Iran. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Science, 6: 387-394.
28. Khokhar MA., Ahmed CMS and Mahmood F., 1999. Growth analysis of different cultivars of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.). Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 15: 417-422.
29. Koca YO ve Turgut İ., 2012. Mısırda (Zea mays L.) farklı ekim zamanlarının tane verimine, kuru madde birikimine, yaprak alanı indeksine ve bazı büyüme parametrelerine etkisi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 9: 1-10.
30. Maurya KR., 1989. Growth, yield and quality component in coriander genotypes. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 46: 107-110.
31. McDonald GK., Sutton BG and Ellison FW., 1983. The effect of time of sowing on the grain yield of irrigated wheat in the Namoi Valley, New South Wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, 34: 229-240.
32. McMaster GS and Smika DE., 1988. Estimation and evaluation of winter wheat phenology in the Central Great Plains. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 43: 1-18.
33. MGM 2015. Başbakanlık DMİ Genel Müdürlüğü Meteroloji Bültenleri. Ankara.
34. Modarrres AM., Hamilton RI., Dwyer LM., Dijak M and Smith DL., 1998. Leafy reduced-staure maize for short-season environments: population density and planting pattern effect on hybrid perfomance. Maydica, 43: 227-234.
35. Moemeni F., Ghobadi M., Jalali-honarmand S and Shekaari P., 2013. Effect of supplementary irrigation on growth analysis of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 5: 1595-1600.
36. Mohammadian R., Moghaddam M., Rahimian H and Sadeghian SY., 2005. Effect of early season drought stress on growth characteristics of sugar beet genotypes. Turk Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 29: 357-368.
37. Mollah MRA., Ali MA., Ahmad M., Hassan MK and Alam MJ., 2015. Effect of planting dates on the yield and quality of true seeds of onion. International Journal of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 3: 67-72.
38. Moosavi SG., Seghatoleslami MJ and Moazeni A., 2012. Effect of planting date and plant density on morphological traits, LAI and forage corn (Sc. 370) yield in second cultivation. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 3: 57-63.
39. Muchow RC., Sinclair TR and Bennett JM., 1990. Temperature and solar radiation effects on potential maize yield across locations. Agronomy Journal, 82:338-343.
40. Muldoon JF., Daynard TB., Duinen BV and Tollenaar M., 1984. Comparisons among rates of appearance of leaf tips, collars and leaf area in maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica. 29: 109-120.
41. Naceur MB., Daily M and Selmi M., 1999. Effect of water deficiency during different growth stages of wheat on soil different growth stages of wheat on soil humidity, plant physiology and yield components. Medit, 10 : 63-60.
42. Nelson DW and Sommers LE., 1995. Morphology and systematics. Forages (Eds. RF. Barnes, DA. Miller and CJ. Nelson), Iowa State University Press, pp: 15-30.
43. Noferesti M., 2006. Effect planting date on yield and yield components of forage corn as second cultivation in Birjand, Iran region. M.Sc. Thesis on Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Birjand Branch, Iran.
44. Nouri Azhar J and Ehsanzadeh P., 2007. Study of relationship of some growth indices and yield of five corn hybrids at two irrigation regime in Isfahan region. Journal of Science and Technology, 41: 261-272.
45. Pamuk G., 2003. II. Ürün Mısır bitkisinin su-verim ilişkileri ve ceres-maize bitki büyüme modelinin bölge koşullarına uygunluğunun irdelenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Doktora Tezi (Basılmamış), Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
46. Rui L., Wei S., Mu-xiang C., Cheng-jun J., Min W and Bo-ping Y., 2009. Leaf anatomical changes of Burguiera gymnorrhiza seedlings under salt stress. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 17: 169-175.
47. Running SW., 1990. A bottom-up evolution of terrestrial ecosystem modeling theory, and ideas toward global vegetation modeling. In Modeling the Earth Systemi (Ed. D. Ojima), UCAR/Office for Interdisciplinary Earth Studies, pp. 263-280.
48. Saberali SF., Sadat Noori SA., Hejazi A and Zand E., 2007. Influence of plant density and planting pattern of corn on its growth and yield under competition with common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Journal of Stored Products Research, 74: 143-152.
49. Saeed IAM and El-Nadi AH., 1998. Forage sorghum yield and water use efficiency under variable irrigation. Irrigation Science, 18: 67-71.
50. Safari F., Galeshi S., Torbati Nejad NM and Mosavat SA., 2008. The effect of sowing date and plant density on forage yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 15: 22-36.
51. Serin Y ve Tan M., 2011. Yembitkileri Kültürüne Giriş. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Yay. No: 206, Erzurum, 219 s.
52. Serin Y., Şeker H ve Tan M., 1996. Farklı sıra aralığı ve tohum miktarının fiğ (Vicia sativa L.)’in ot verimi ve kalitesi üzerine etkileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 27: 375-386.
53. Suleiman AA., Nganya JF and Ashraf MA,. 2014. Effect of cultivar and sowing date on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) In Khartoum, Sudan. Journal of Forest Products and Industries, 3: 198-203.
54. Sun YF., Liang JM., Ye J and Zhu WY., 1999. Cultivation of super-high yielding rice plants. China Rice, 5: 38-39.
55. Taiz L and Zeiger E., 2008. Bitki Fizyolojisi. Palme Yayıncılık, Ankara (Çeviri Editörü: Prof. Dr. İsmail TÜRKAN).
56. Tan M ve Serin Y., 1995. Erzurum sulu şartlarında Rhizobium aşılaması ve değişik dozlarda azotla gübrelemenin Adi Fiğ (Vicia sativa L.)’de ot, tohum, sap ve ham protein verimi ile otun ham protein oranına ve nodül sayısına etkileri üzerinde bir araştırma. Türk Tarım ve Orman Dergisi, 19: 137-144.
57. Taner S., 2011. Ekmeklik buğdayda kurağa toleranslı ve hassas genotiplerde bazı fizyolojik ve morfolojik parametreler kullanılarak kalıtım değerlerinin incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi (Basılmamış), Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya.
58. Temel S., Keskin B., Şimşek U and Yılmaz IH., 2015. Performance of some forage grass species in halomorphic soil. Turk Journal of Field Crops, 20: 131-141.
59. Temel S ve Tan M., 2002. Erzurum şartlarında adi Fiğ (Vicia sativa L.)’in ekim ve hasat zamanlarının belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 33: 363-368.
60. Terbea M., Vranceanu AV., Petcu E., Craiciu DS and Micut G., 1995. Physiological response of sunflower plants to drought. Romanian Agricultural Research, 3: 61-67.
61. Wolf J., Van Oijen M and Kempenear C., 2002. Analysis of the experimental variability in wheat response to elevated coz and temperature. Agri-Environmental Economics and Policy, 93: 227-247.
62. Yano T., Aydin M and Haragu chi T., 2007. Impact of climate change on irrigation demand and crop growth in a Mediterranean environment of Turkey. Sensors, 7: 2297-2315.
63. Yilmaz H and Kina A., 2008. The influence of NaCl salinity on some vegetative and chemical changes of strawberries (Fragaria x ananassa L.). African Journal of Biotechnology, 7: 3299-3305.
64. Yunusa IAM and Sedgley RH., 1992. Reduced tillering spring wheats for heavy textured soils in a semiarid Mediterranean environment. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 168: 159-168.