Moral Decision Making and Utility Theory

Öz

Developments in neuroscience make significant contributions to the field of behavioral economics. It offers a versatile perspective, especially in understanding the neural foundations of the utilitarian approach. Utilitarianism in moral philosophy is about increasing pleasure and reducing pain. In this approach, actions that will increase the pleasure of the whole society and living creatures draw the boundaries of utilitarianism. In standard economic theories, it is an assumption that individuals maximize utility. At this point, utilitarianism differs in moral philosophy and economics at two important points. First, classic economic theories only address the benefit maximization of individuals and ignore society and other living things. Secondly, the distinction between individuals' rational or irrational choices is not clearly defined in economic theories. However, this differentiation does not mean that economic science does not adopt utilitarianism in moral philosophy. It is treated as an assumption only to explain theories. Today, information from psychology and neuroscience is needed to explain rational and irrational choices. This study evaluates research on moral choice in brain sciences, from moral philosophy to behavioral economics, within the framework of utility theory. Attention is drawn to the mutual relationship between utilitarian thought and scientific disciplines. discusses the convergence of utilitarianism between philosophical thought and neuroscience at the center of non-moral choice. The aim of the study is to contribute to behavioral economics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Decision Making
• Utilitarianism
• Conscience
• Brain
• Crime

Ahlaki Karar Verme ve Fayda Teorisi

Öz

Nörobilimdeki gelişmeler davranışsal iktisadın çalışma alanına önemli katkılarda bulunmaktadır. Özellikle uzun yıllardır araştırılan faydacılık yaklaşımının sinirsel temellerini kavramada çok yönlü bakış açısı sunmaktadır. Faydacılık, ahlak felsefesinde hazzı arttırma ve acıyı azaltma üzerinedir. Bu yaklaşımda tüm toplumun ve canlıların hazzını arttıracak eylemler faydacılığın sınırlarını çizmektedir. Standart ekonomik teorilerde ise bireylerin faydayı maksimuma çıkarması bir varsayım altında yer almaktadır. Bu noktada faydacılık ahlak felsefesi ile iktisat biliminde iki bağlamda farklılaşmaktadır. İlk olarak klasik iktisat teorileri sadece bireylerin fayda maksimizasyonunu ele alırken toplumu ve diğer canlıları göz ardı etmektedir. İkinci olarak bireylerin rasyonel ya da irrasyonel seçimlerinin ayrımı iktisat teorilerinde kesin çizgilerle belirlenmemektedir. Ancak bu farklılaşma iktisat biliminin ahlak felsefesindeki faydacılığı benimsemediği anlamına gelmemektedir. Günümüzde rasyonel ve irrasyonel seçimleri açıklayabilmek için psikoloji ve nörobilimden gelecek bilgilere ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Bu çalışma, ahlak felsefesinden davranışsal iktisada, beyni konu alan bilimlerin ahlaki seçim üzerine araştırmalarını fayda teorisi çerçevesinde değerlendirmektedir. Faydacı düşünce ile bilimsel disiplinler arasında karşılıklı ilişkiye dikkat çekilerek, faydacılığın felsefi düşünce ile nörobilim arasındaki yakınlaşmasını, ahlaki olmayan seçim merkezinde ele almaktadır. Çalışma ile davranışsal iktisada katkı sunulması amaçlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Karar Verme
• Faydacılık
• Vicdan
• Beyin
• Suç

Kaynakça

1. Akarsu, B. (1970). Ahlak öğretileri I - Mutluluk Ahlakı. İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Yayınları No: 1144.
2. Aristoteles (2022). Nikomakhos’a etik. (Çev. F. Akderin). Ankara: Say Yayınları. (Orijinal yayın tarihi, 1893).
3. Ashar, Y. K., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Dimidjian, S., & Wager, T. D. (2016). Toward a neuroscience of compassion: A brain systems-based model and research agenda. In J. D. Greene, I. Morrison, & M. E. P. Seligman (Eds.), Positive neuroscience (pp. 125–142). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199977925.003.0009
4. Ashraf, N., Camerer, C. F. ve Loewenstein, G. (2005). Adam Smith, Behavioral Economist. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (3), 131-145. DOI: 10.1257/089533005774357897
5. Axinn, S. (2008). Moral judgments and values. In L. Kurtz (Ed.), Encyclopedia of violence, peace, & conflict (2nd ed., pp. 1303–1314). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373985-8.00111-2
6. Bassford, A. D. (2022). Conscientious utilitarianism; or, the utilitarians who walk away from Omelas. Journal of Science Fiction and Philosophy, 5, 1-28. https://philarchive.org/rec/BASCUO
7. Bentham, J. (2021). Yasamanın ilkeleri. (Çev. Asal, B.). İstanbul: On İki Levha Yayıncılık. (Orijinal yayın tarihi, 1780).
8. Bitsori, M. ve Galanakis, E. (2004). Epicurus’ death. World Journal of Urology, 22, 466–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-004-0448-2

9. Blair, R. J. R. (2008). The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex: functional contributions and dysfunction in psychopathy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Science, 12;363(1503), 2557-2565. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0027
10. Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G. ve Drazen, P. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43 (1), 9-64.DOI: 10.1257/0022051053737843
11. Corradi-Dell'Acqua, C., Civai, C., Rumiati, R. I. ve Fink, G. R. (2013). Disentangling self- and fairness-related neural mechanisms involved in the ultimatum game: an fMRI study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(4), 424–431, https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss014
12. Crockett M. J., Clark, L., Hauser, M. D. ve Robbins, T. W. (2010). Serotonin selectively influences moral judgment and behavior through effects on harm aversion. Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences, 107(40), 17433-17438. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009396107
13. Damasio, H., Grabowski, T., Frank, R., Galaburda, A. M. ve Damasio, A.R. (1994). The return of Phineas Gage: Clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient. Science, 264(5162), 1102-1105. DOI: 10.1126/science.8178168
14. Damasio, A. R. (2021). Descartes’in yanılgısı. (Çev. F. E. Çetin ve E. Kumral). Ankara: ODTÜ Yayıncılık.
15. da Cunha-Bang, S. ve Knudsen, G.M. (2021). The modulatory role of serotonin on human impulsive aggression. Biological Psychiatry, 90(7), 447-457, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.05.016.
16. Decety, J. ve Cowell, J.M. (2015). Empathy, justice, and moral behavior. AJOB Neuroscience, 6(3), 3-14. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2015.1047055.
17. Decety, J. ve Yoder K.J. (2017). The emerging social neuroscience of justice motivation. Trends Cognitive Sciences, 21(1), 6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.008
18. De Martino, B., Camerer, C. F. ve Adolphs, R. (2010). Amygdala damage eliminates monetary loss aversion. PNAS, 107(8), 3788-3792 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910230107.
19. Dimmock, M., & Fisher, A. (2017). Utilitarianism. In Ethics for A-Level (1st ed., pp. 9–29). Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0125
20. Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881). Mathematical psychics an essay on the application of mathematics to the moral science. London: C. Kegan Paul & CO. https://historyofeconomicthought.mcmaster.ca/edgeworth/mathpsychics.pdf
21. Fehr, E. ve Camerer, C. F. (2007). Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences,. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(10), 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.002
22. Fehr, E. ve Schmidt, K. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817-868. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151
23. Gage, N. M., & Baars, B. J. (2018). Humans are social beings. In N. M. Gage & B. J. Baars (Eds.), Fundamentals of cognitive neuroscience (pp. 321–356). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803813-0.00010-6
24. Garrett, N., Lazzaro, S. C., Ariely, D. ve Sharot, D. (2016). The brain adapts to dishonesty. Nature Neuroscience, 19, 1727–1732. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4426
25. Giubilini, A. (2022). Conscience. E. N. Zalta (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/conscience/>.Criminal Law and Philosophy journal
26. Glimcher, P. W., Camerer, C. F., Fehr, E. ve Poldrack, R. A. (2009). Introduction: A brief history of neuroeconomics. P. W. Glimcher, C. F. Camerer, E. Fehr & R. A. Poldrack (eds.), in Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain (1–12 ss.). Elsevier Academic Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-01173-001
27. Grieve, A. W. (2010). Phineas Gage - ‘The man with the Iron bar.’ Trauma, 12(3), 171-174. https://doi:10.1177/1460408610375648.
28. Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. R.J. Davidson, K.R. Scherer ve H.H. Goldsmith (eds.), in Handbook of Affective Sciences (852-870. ss.). Oxford. https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~jhaidt/articles/alternate_versions/haidt.2003.the-moral-emotions.pub025-as-html.html
29. Hobbes, T. (2007). Leviathan. (Çev. S. Lim). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları. (Orijinal yayın tarihi, 1651).
30. Hou, X., Allen, T.A., Wei, D., Huang, H., Wang, K., DeYoung, C.G. ve Qiu, J. (2017). Trait compassion is associated with the neural substrate of empathy. Cognitive Affective Behavioral Neuroscience, 17(5), 1018-1027. https://doi: 10.3758/s13415-017-0529-5.
31. Hume, D. (1751). An enquiry into the sources of morals. https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/hume1751_4.pdf
32. Hume, D. (2021). İnsanın anlama yetisi üzerine bir soruşturma. (Çev. F. B. Aydar). İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları. (Orijinal yayın tarihi, 1739).
33. Ishida, N. (2021). Thorstein Veblen on economic man: toward a new method of describing human nature, society, and history. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 18, 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-020-00194-x
34. Izard, C. E. (1977). Guilt, conscience, and morality. In Human emotions: Emotions, personality, and psychotherapy (pp. 421–452). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2209-0_16
35. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Harvard ed., 2 vols.). New York: Holt. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/10538-000
36. Jevons, W. S. (1888). The theory of political economy. London: Macmillan & Co. (Online, Library of Economics and Liberty. http://www.econlib.org/library/YPDBooks/Jevons/jvnPE1.html)
37. Kant, I. (2022). Ethica, etik üzerine dersler. (Çev. O. Özügül). Ankara: Fol Yayınları. (Orijinal yayın tarihi, 1990).
38. Kant, I. (2023). Eğitim üzerine. (Çev. S. E. Bekman). İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık. (Orijinal yayın tarihi, 1904).
39. Laertius, D. (2021). Epikür, mutlu olma sanatı. (Çev. A. Leblebici). İstanbul: Karbon Kitaplar.
40. Laertius, D. (2000). Epicurus. In R. D. Hicks (Trans.), J. Henderson & C. P. Goold (Eds.), Lives of eminent philosophers (Book X, pp. 529–677). Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/diogenes_laertius-lives_eminent_philosophers_book_x_epicurus/1925/pb_LCL185.531.xml?readMode=recto
41. Kroker, T., Wyczesany, M., Rehbein, M. A., Roesmann, K., Wessing, I. ve Junghöfer, M. (2022). Noninvasive stimulation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex modulates rationality of human decision-making. Scientific Reports, 12, 20213. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24526-6
42. Marsh, A. A., Finger, E. C., Fowler, K. A., Jurkowitz, I. T. N., Schechter, J.C., Yu, H.H., Pine, D.S. ve Blair, R.J.R. (2011). Reduced amygdala-orbitofrontal connectivity during moral judgments in youths with disruptive behavior disorders and psychopathic traits. Psychiatry Research, 194(3), 279-286. https://doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.07.008
43. Martin, R., Kusev, P., Teal, J., Baranova, V. ve Rigal, B. (2021). Moral Decision Making: From Bentham to Veil of Ignorance via Perspective Taking Accessibility. Behavioral Sciences (Basel), 11(5), 66. https://doi: 10.3390/bs11050066
44. Mateos-Aparicio, P. and Rodríguez-Moreno, A. (2019). The impact of studying brain plasticity. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 13(66), 1-5. https://doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00066
45. Mill, J. S. (2017). Faydacılık. (Çev. S. Aktuyun). İstanbul: Alfa Basım Yayım Dağıtım. (Orijinal yayın tarihi, 1861).
46. Montaigne (2022). Denemeler. (Çev. S. Eyüboğlu). İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınlar. (Orijinal yayın tarihi, 1580).
47. Moore, C. ve Tenbrunsel, A. (2014). Just think about it? Cognitive complexity and moral choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123 (2), 138-149. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.10.006
48. Moretto, G., Làdavas, E., Mattioli, F. ve di Pellegrino, G. (2010). A psychophysiological investigation of moral judgment after ventromedial prefrontal damage. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1888-1899. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21367. PMID: 19925181.
49. Novak, L., Malinakova, K., Mikoska, P., van Dijk, J.P. ve Tavel, P. (2022). Neural correlates of compassion – An integrative systematic review. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 172, 46-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.12.004.
50. Parisi, F., & Smith, V. (2005). The law and economics of irrational behavior: An introduction. In F. Parisi & V. Smith (Eds.), The law and economics of irrational behavior (George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 04-16). Stanford University Press.
51. Pogarsky, G., Roche, S. ve Pickett, J. (2018). Offender decision-making in criminology: Contributions from behavioral economics. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 379-400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092036.
52. Sanfey, A.G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E. ve Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300(5626), 1755-1758. doi: 10.1126/science.1082976
53. Savaş, V. F. (2007). İktisatın Tarihi. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
54. Scarre, G. (2002). Utilitarianism. Taylor & Francis e-Library. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003070962.
55. Schalkwijk, F., Stams, G. J., Stegge, H., Dekker, J. ve Peen, J. (2014). The Conscience as a Regulatory Function: Empathy, Shame, Pride, Guilt, and Moral Orientation in Delinquent Adolescents. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(6), 675-693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X14561830
56. Schalkwijk, F. (2018). A New Conceptualization of the Conscience. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01863. PMID: 30349496; PMCID: PMC6187870.
57. Seo, D., Patrick, C.J. ve Kennealy, P.J. (2008). Role of serotonin and dopamine system interactions in the neurobiology of impulsive aggression and its comorbidity with other clinical disorders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(5), 383-395. https://doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2008.06.003
58. Serra, D. (2019). Neuroeconomics and modern neuroscience. CEE-M Working Paper, halshs-02160907, HAL. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02160907
59. Shin, L. M. ve Liberzon, I. (2010). The neurocircuitry of fear, stress, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology, 35(1), 169-91. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.83. PMID: 19625997
60. Siegel, J. Z. ve Crockett, M. J. (2013). How serotonin shapes moral judgment and behavior. Annals of the New York Academy Sciences, 1299(1), 42-51. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12229. PMID: 25627116
61. Smith, A. (2018). Ahlaki duygular kuramı. (Çev. D. Kızılay). İstanbul: Pinhan Yayıncılık. (Orijinal yayın tarihi, 1759).
62. Sykes, G. M. ve Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22 (6), 664–670. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2089195?origin=JSTOR-pdf
63. Symons, X. (2023). Why conscience matters: A theory of conscience and its relevance to conscientious objection in medicine. Res Publica, 29, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-022-09555-2
64. Takahashi, T. (2012). Molecular neuroeconomics of crime and punishment: implications for neurolaw. Neuro Endocrinology Letters, 33(7), 667–673. PMID: 23391873.
65. Tarantino, P. (2020). Utility and science. Revue d’études benthamiennes DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/etudes-benthamiennes.7733
66. Tiemersma, J., Noom, M., Stoffelsen, R., Popma, A. ve Schalkwijk, F. S. (2022). Conceptualisation and conscience assessment in adolescence in forensic mental healthcare: experts’ perspectives. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 33(5), 673–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2022.2102531
67. van Dijk, F. ve F. van Winden. (1997). Dynamics of social ties and local public good provision. Journal of Public Economics, 64 (3), 323-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(96)01620-9
68. van Winden, F. ve Ash, E. (2012). On the Behavioral Economics of Crime. Review of Law and Economics, 8(1), 181-213. https://doi.org/10.1515/1555-5879.1591
69. van ’t Wout, M., Kahn, R.S., Sanfey, A.G. ve Aleman, A. (2006). Affective state and decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Experimental Brain Research, 169, 564–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0346-5
70. Veblen, T. (1898). Why is Economics not an Evolutionary Science?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12(4), 373-397. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882952
71. Verkade, M., Karsten, J., Koenraadt, F. ve Schalkwijk, F. (2020). Conscience as a regulatory function: An integrative theory put to the test. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(4), 375-395. doi: 10.1177/0306624X19881918.
72. Verkade, M., Karsten, J., Koenraadt, F. ve Schalkwijk, F. (2023). Conscience and its interrelated constituent aspects: A network and regression analysis in offenders and non-offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 1-30. DOI: 10.1080/24732850.2023.2177576
73. Vithoulkas, G. ve Muresanu, D. F. (2014). Conscience and consciousness: A definition. J Med Life. 15;7(1), 104-108.
74. Walter, H. (2012). Social cognitive neuroscience of empathy: Concepts, circuits, and genes. Emotion Review, 4(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911421379
75. Witt, U. (2016). The transformations of utility theory: a behavioral perspective. Journal of Bioeconomics, 18, 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-016-9235-6
76. White, M. (2004). Can homo economicus follow Kant’s categorical imperative?. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2003.12.002
77. Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience. Published in the United States by Vintage Books. https://www.wtf.tw/ref/wilson.pdf
78. Yoder, K.J. ve Decety, J. (2018). The neuroscience of morality and social decision-making. Psychology Crime Law, 24(3), 279-295. https://doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2017.1414817
79. Young, S. N. (2007). How to increase serotonin in the human brain without drugs. Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience: JPN, 32(6), 394–399. PMID: 18043762
80. Zak, P. J. (2004). Neuroeconomics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359(1451), 1737-1748. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1544
81. Zak, P. J., & Denzau, A. T. (2001). Economics is an evolutionary science. In A. Somit & S. Peterson (Eds.), Evolutionary approaches in the social sciences: Toward a better understanding of human nature (pp. 31–65). JAI Press. https://neuroeconomicstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Econ-Revol-Science.pdf
82. Zavatta, L. ve Cantelmo, R. (2019). At the origin of crime - current developments in neuroscience. Journal of Law and Criminal Justice, 7(2), 68-76. DOI: 10.15640/jlcj.v7n2a7