Siyasi İstikrar ve Küreselleşmenin Petrol Üreten ve Üretmeyen Afrika Ülkelerinde Çevre Kalitesi Üzerindeki Etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışmada, 2002-2022 yılları arasında petrol üreten ve petrol üretmeyen Afrika ülkelerinde politik istikrar ve küreselleşmenin çevresel kalite üzerindeki etkisini araştırılmıştır. Panel nedensellik testinin kullanıldığı çalışma sonuçları, hem petrol üreten hem de petrol üretmeyen ülkelerde kısa vadede yalnızca küreselleşme ile çevresel kalite arasında nedensellik olduğunu, ancak uzun vadede politik istikrar, küreselleşme ve genel olarak çevresel kalite arasında nedensellik bulunduğunu göstermektedir. Buna ek olarak çalışmanın bir diğer sonucu emtia üretmeyen ülkelerde kısa vadeli dengesizliklerin daha kısa sürede ortadan kalktığını göstermektedir. Panel tahmincilerine göre ise küreselleşmenin her iki ülke grubunda da çevresel kalite üzerindeki etkisi politik istikrardan daha büyük olduğu ortaya konmuştur. Bu sonuçlar ışığında çevresel kalite kapsamında düşünüldüğünde, petrol üreten ülkelerin emtia gelirlerinden beklenen faydaları elde edemediği yorumu yapılabilir. Sonuç olarak, çevresel kalitenin arttırılması amacıyla ulus devletler karmaşık sosyo-ekonomik sorunları çözmede yetersiz kaldığı için, kamu egemenliğinin paylaşılması mevcut çevresel sorunların çözülmesine yardımcı olacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Siyasi istikrar
• Küreselleşme
• Çevresel Kalite
• Afrika Ülkeleri

Impact of Political Stability and Globalization on Environmental Quality in Oil-Producing and Non-Oil Producing African Countries

Öz

In this study, we use the panel cointegration and causality tests to investigate the impact of political stability (PS) and globalization on environmental quality (EQ) in oil-producing and non-oil-producing African countries from 2002 to 2022. The panel causality test results indicate that, in both oil-producing and non-oil-producing countries, there is short-term causality only between globalization and EQ but long-term causality between PS and globalization and EQ overall. Interestingly, in non-commodity-producing countries, short-run imbalances are eliminated in a much shorter period of time. According to the panel estimators, globalization has a greater impact on EQ than PS in both country groups. Oil-producing countries fail to reap the expected benefits from commodity revenues. In conclusion, since nation-states are insufficient in solving complex socio-economic problems, sharing public sovereignty will help to solve existing problems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Political stability
• Globalization
• Environmental quality
• African countries

Kaynakça

1. Abid, M. (2016). Impact of economic, financial, and institutional factors on CO2 emissions: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa economies. Utilities Policy, 41, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.06.009
2. Adebayo, T. S., & Odugbesan, J. A. (2021). Modeling CO 2 emissions in South Africa: empirical evidence from ARDL based bounds and wavelet coherence techniques. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 9377–9389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11442-3
3. Andlib, Z., & Salcedo-Castro, J. (2021). The Impacts of Tourism and Governance on CO 2 Emissions in Selected South Asian Countries. Etikonomi, 20(2), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v20i2.17449
4. Andlib, Z., Scicchitano, S., & Padda, I. U. H. (2024). The role of natural resources, fintech, political stability, and social globalization in environmental sustainability: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Resources Policy, 91, 104922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104922
5. Ashraf, J. (2024). Spatial-temporal nexus of economic complexity interaction with human capital and political stability on environmental quality and their possible causes of change for BRI countries. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 67(4), 870–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16330-y
6. Ashraf, J., Luo, L., & Khalid Anser, M. (2022). Do BRI policy and institutional quality influence economic growth and environmental quality? An empirical analysis from South Asian countries affiliated with the Belt and Road Initiative. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43, 3647–3664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16330-y/Published
7. Atkinson, G., & Hamilton, K. (2003). Savings, Growth and the Resource Curse Hypothesis. World Development, 31(11), 1793–1807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.05.001
8. Bakhsh, K., Rose, S., Ali, M. F., Ahmad, N., & Shahbaz, M. (2017). Economic growth, CO2 emissions, renewable waste and FDI relation in Pakistan: New evidences from 3SLS. Journal of Environmental Management, 196, 627–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.029

9. Beck, U., & Camiller, P. (2000). What Is Globalization. Polity Press.
10. Bilgili, F., Alsanusi, M., Kabir, M. M., & Awan, A. (2024). Quantile dynamics of control of corruption, political stability, and renewable energy on environmental quality in the MENA region. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04504-w
11. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253. https://about.jstor.org/terms
12. Bu, M., Lin, C. Te, & Zhang, B. (2016). Globalization and climate change: new empirical panel data evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(3), 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12162
13. Danish, Baloch, M. A., & Wang, B. (2019). Analyzing the role of governance in CO2 emissions mitigation: The BRICS experience. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 51, 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.08.007
14. Destek, M. A. (2020). Investigation on the role of economic, social, and political globalization on environment: evidence from CEECs. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(27), 33601–33614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04698-x
15. Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500392078
16. Eberhardt, M., & Bond, S. (2009). Cross-section dependence in nonstationary panel models: a novel estimator Cross-section dependence in nonstationary panel models: a novel estimator.
17. Esty, D. C., & Porter, M. E. (2005). National environmental performance: an empirical analysis of policy results and determinants. Environment and Development Economics, 10(4), 391–434. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X05002275
18. Gallagher, K. P. (2009). Economic Globalization and the Environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34(1), 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.021407.092325
19. Gani, A. (2012). The relationship between good governance and carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from developing economies. Journal of Economic Development, 77(1).
20. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic Growth and the Environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377.
21. Haseeb, A., Xia, E., Danish, Baloch, M. A., & Abbas, K. (2018). Financial development, globalization, and CO2 emission in the presence of EKC: evidence from BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(31), 31283–31296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3034-7
22. Hill, C., & Hult, G. (2019). International Business: Competing on a global marketplace. In Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility, 21.
23. Huh, H.-S., & Park, C.-Y. (2019). A New Index of Globalization: Measuring Impacts of Integration on Economic Growth and Income Inequality. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3590186
24. İnal, V., Addi, H. M., Çakmak, E. E., Torusdağ, M., & Çalışkan, M. (2022). The nexus between renewable energy, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: Empirical evidence from African oil-producing countries. Energy Reports, 8, 1634–1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.12.051
25. IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report Summary Chapter for Policymakers.
26. Jahanger, A., Usman, M., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2022). Autocracy, democracy, globalization, and environmental pollution in developing world: Fresh evidence from STIRPAT model. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2753
27. Jahanger, A., Usman, M., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2022). The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: The moderating role of technological innovations. Resources Policy, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102569
28. Karaduman, C. (2022). The effects of economic globalization and productivity on environmental quality: evidence from newly industrialized countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 639–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15717-1
29. Kartal, M. T., Kirikkaleli, D., & Kılıç Depren, S. (2024). Investigating political stability effect on the environment in the Netherlands by Fourier-based approaches. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 31(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2256716
30. Kartal, M. T., Kılıç Depren, S., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2023). Asymmetric effect of political stability on production-based CO2 emissions in the UK: long-run evidence from nonlinear ARDL and frequency domain causality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(12), 33886–33897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24550-z
31. Kaya, V., & Yalçınkaya, Ö. (2017). Politik istikrarın/istikrarsızlığın ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkileri: Dünyanın en büyük ilk yirmi ekonomisi üzerinde bir uygulama (1996-2015). International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 13(2), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.2017228684
32. Kiogora, D. M. (2016). Toward a Sustainable Future: Assessing the Impact of Extractive Industries on Sustainable Development in Africa. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3054734
33. Kirikkaleli, D., Awosusi, A. A., Adebayo, T. S., & Otrakçı, C. (2023). Enhancing environmental quality in Portugal: can CO2 intensity of GDP and renewable energy consumption be the solution? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(18), 53796–53806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26191-2
34. Kirikkaleli, D., & Osmanlı, A. (2023). The Impact of Political Stability on Environmental Quality in the Long Run: The Case of Turkey. Sustainability, 15(11), 9056. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15119056
35. Kılıç Depren, S., Kartal, M. T., Kirikkaleli, D., & Depren, Ö. (2023). Effect of political stability on environmental quality: long-run and asymmetric evidence from Iceland by non-linear approaches. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 16(7), 1407–1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-023-01351-y
36. Koengkan, M., Fuinhas, J. A., & Santiago, R. (2020). Asymmetric impacts of globalisation on CO2 emissions of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Environment Systems and Decisions, 40(1), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-019-09752-0
37. Leitão, A. (2016). Corruption and the Environment. Journal of Socialomics, 5(3).
38. Liu, M., Ren, X., Cheng, C., & Wang, Z. (2020). The role of globalization in CO2 emissions: A semi-parametric panel data analysis for G7. Science of the Total Environment, 718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137379
39. Lv, Z., & Xu, T. (2018). Is economic globalization good or bad for the environmental quality? New evidence from dynamic heterogeneous panel models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137, 340–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.004
40. Majeed, A., Wang, L., Zhang, X., Muniba, & Kirikkaleli, D. (2021). Modeling the dynamic links among natural resources, economic globalization, disaggregated energy consumption, and environmental quality: Fresh evidence from GCC economies. Resources Policy, 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102204
41. Martens, P., & Raza, M. (2010). Is Globalisation Sustainable? Sustainability, 2(1), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2010280
42. Mrabet, Z., Alsamara, M., Mimouni, K., & Mnasri, A. (2021). Can human development and political stability improve environmental quality? New evidence from the MENA region. Economic Modelling, 94, 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.09.021
43. Muhammad, S., Khan, S., Ali, A., & Bhattacharya, M. (2017). The Impact of Globalization on CO2 Emissions in China. Singap Econ Rev, 62(4), 929–957.
44. Ozcan, B., Tzeremes, P. G., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2020). Energy consumption, economic growth and environmental degradation in OECD countries. Economic Modelling, 84, 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.04.010
45. Paramati, S. R., Shahbaz, U., & Doğan, B. (2022). The role of environmental technology for energy demand and energy efficiency: Evidence from OECD countries . Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , 153, 1–9.
46. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels (Discussion Paper No. 1240).
47. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
48. Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x
49. Pettinger, T. (2022). Factors Affecting Economic Development. International Journal of Development Strategies in Humanities, Management and Social Sciences, 12(2), 117–120. https://doi.org/10.48028/iiprds/ijdshmss.v12.i2.08
50. Purcel, A.-A. (2019). Does political stability hinder pollution? Evidence from developing states. The Economic Research Guardian, 9(2), 75–98. www.ecrg.ro
51. Sabir, S., & Gorus, M. S. (2019). The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(32), 33387–33398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06458-3
52. Saud, S., Chen, S., Haseeb, A., & Sumayya. (2020). The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: Accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119518
53. Shahbaz, M., Mallick, H., Mahalik, M. K., & Loganathan, N. (2015). Does globalization impede environmental quality in India? Ecological Indicators, 52, 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.025
54. Shahbaz, M., Shahzad, S. J. H., Mahalik, M. K., & Hammoudeh, S. (2018). Does Globalisation Worsen Environmental Quality in Developed Economies? Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 23(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-017-9574-2
55. Smith, L. V., Leybourne, S., Kim, T., & Newbold, P. (2004). More powerful panel data unit root tests with an application to mean reversion in real exchange rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19(2), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.723
56. Su, Z. W., Umar, M., Kirikkaleli, D., & Adebayo, T. S. (2021). Role of political risk to achieve carbon neutrality: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Environmental Management, 298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113463
57. Sui, B., Chang, C.-P., & Chu, Y. (2021). Political Stability: an Impetus for Spatial Environmental Spillovers. Environmental and Resource Economics, 79(2), 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00568-8
58. Tamazian, A., & Bhaskara Rao, B. (2010). Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Economics, 32(1), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.04.004
59. Tang, S., Wang, Z., Yang, G., & Tang, W. (2020). What Are the Implications of Globalization on Sustainability?—A Comprehensive Study. Sustainability, 12(8), 3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083411
60. Tomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and Culture. University of Chicago Press.
61. Usman, M., Makhdum, M. S. A., & Kousar, R. (2021). Does financial inclusion, renewable and non-renewable energy utilization accelerate ecological footprints and economic growth? Fresh evidence from 15 highest emitting countries. Sustainable Cities and Society, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102590
62. Venâncio de Vasconcelos, M. (2020). Political Stability and Bank Flows: New Evidence. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(3), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13030056
63. Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.967
64. Westerlund, J., & Edgerton, D. L. (2008). A simple test for cointegration in dependent panels with structural breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70(5), 665–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00513.x
65. Yameogo, C. E. W., Omojolaibi, J. A., & Dauda, R. O. S. (2021). Economic globalisation, institutions and environmental quality in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Research in Globalization,3. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2020.100035
66. Yang, B., Jahanger, A., Usman, M., & Khan, M. A. (2021). The dynamic linkage between globalization, financial development, energy utilization, and environmental sustainability in GCC countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 16568–16588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11576-4/Published
67. Yuping, L., Ramzan, M., Xincheng, L., Murshed, M., Awosusi, A. A., BAH, S. I., & Adebayo, T. S. (2021). Determinants of carbon emissions in Argentina: The roles of renewable energy consumption and globalization. Energy Reports, 7, 4747–4760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.065
68. Zaidi, S. A. H., Zafar, M. W., Shahbaz, M., & Hou, F. (2019). Dynamic linkages between globalization, financial development and carbon emissions: Evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.210
69. Zhang, L., Xu, M., Chen, H., Li, Y., & Chen, S. (2022). Globalization, Green Economy and Environmental Challenges: State of the Art Review for Practical Implications. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.870271